search
Back to results

Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Administered With Topical Corticosteroids (TCS) in Participants ≥6 to <12 Years With Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

Primary Purpose

Dermatitis, Atopic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dupilumab
Matching Placebo
Background Treatment: Topical Corticosteroids
Background Treatment: Moisturizers
Sponsored by
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dermatitis, Atopic focused on measuring Eczema

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 11 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of AD according to the American Academy of Dermatology consensus criteria (Eichenfield 2003) at screening visit
  2. Chronic AD diagnosed at least 1 year prior to the screening visit
  3. IGA = 4 at screening and baseline visits
  4. EASI ≥21 at the screening and baseline visits
  5. BSA ≥15% at screening and baseline visits
  6. Documented recent history (within 6 months before the baseline visit) of inadequate response to topical AD medication(s)
  7. At least 11 (of a total of 14) applications of a stable dose of topical emollient (moisturizer) twice daily during the 7 consecutive days immediately before the baseline visit

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in a prior dupilumab clinical study
  2. Treatment with a systemic investigational drug before the baseline visit
  3. Treatment with a topical investigational drug within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit
  4. Treatment with crisabarole within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit
  5. History of important side effects of medium potency topical corticosteroids (e.g, intolerance to treatment, hypersensitivity reactions, significant skin atrophy, systemic effects), as assessed by the investigator or patient's treating physician
  6. Treatment with a topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit
  7. Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment:

    1. Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g, systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, interferon gamma, Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.)
    2. Phototherapy for AD
  8. Treatment with biologics, as follows:

    1. Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab:

      within 6 months before the baseline visit, or until lymphocyte and CD 19+ lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer

    2. Other biologics: within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks before the baseline visit, whichever is longer
  9. Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks before the baseline visit
  10. Body weight <15 kg at baseline

Note: Other Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria apply

Sites / Locations

  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site
  • Regeneron Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Arm Description

Participants will receive dupilumab, dosing regimen 1

Participants will receive dupilumab, dosing regimen 2

Participants will receive matching placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1 at Week 16
The IGA was an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD globally, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at Week 16 were considered as a non-responder.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index -75 (EASI-75) (≥ 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
The EASI assesses severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD). Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16
The EASI assesses severity and extent of AD. Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score at Week 16
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score ≥3 Points at Week 16
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score ≥4 Points at Week 16
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index - 50 (EASI-50) (≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
The EASI assessed severity and extent of AD. Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index - 90 (EASI - 90) (≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
The EASI assessed the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD). Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Time to Achieve ≥ 4 Point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score From Baseline During the 16-week Treatment Period
The worst itch scale: simple assessment tool that participants used to report intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) where 0 (no itching) and 10 (worst itching) possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, & follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as worse of scores for 2 questions. FAS was used. Time to event is calculated in weeks as (date of first event - date of first dose)/7. The event of NRS reduction ≥ 4 was based on observed data without setting data to be non-responder after rescue treatment use. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint & "NA" represents "Not computable" as only 12.3% of participants achieved NRS reduction during 16-week treatment period & hence median time to achieve ≥ 4-point reduction of NRS for placebo +TCS treated participants could not be reported.
Time to Achieve ≥ 3 Point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score From Baseline During the 16-week Treatment Period
The worst itch scale: a simple assessment tool that participants used to report intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) where 0 (no itching) & 10 (worst itching) possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, & follow-up period). Daily worst itch score was calculated as worse of scores for 2 questions. FAS was used. Time to event is calculated in weeks as (date of first event - date of first dose)/7. The event of NRS reduction ≥ 3 was based on observed data without setting data to be non-responder after rescue treatment use. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint & "NA" represents "Not computable" as only 21.1% of participants achieved NRS reduction during 16-week treatment period & hence median time to achieve ≥ 3-point reduction of NRS for placebo +TCS treated participants could not be reported.
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Week 16
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body using the rule of nines (the possible highest score for each region is: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and were reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The proportion assigned to different body regions were different in younger children as compared to older children (head and neck area is assigned a higher proportion in younger children as compared to older children). The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16
SCORAD was used to assess the extent and severity of AD. Extent and severity of eczema as well as subjective symptoms (insomnia, etc) were assessed and scored. SCORAD total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at Week 16
CDLQI was a validated 10 question tool to measure the impact of skin disease on the quality of life (QOL) in children by assessing how much the skin problem has affected the participant over the past week. Nine questions were scored as follows: Very much = 3, Quite a lot = 2, Only a little = 1, Not at all or unanswered = 0. Question 7 has an added possible response, which was scored as 3. CDLQI equals the sum of the score of each question (maximum = 30, minimum = 0). Higher the score, the greater the impact on QOL. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Data presented reflects the mean & standard deviation of the CDLQI total scores.
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16
POEM was a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults. The format was a response to 7 items (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping) based on frequency of these disease symptoms during the past week (ie, 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days) with a scoring system of 0 to 28; the total score reflected the disease-related morbidity. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score at Week 16
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Index (DFI) at Week 16
DFI was a 10-item questionnaire with items inquiring about housework, food preparation, sleep, family leisure activity, shopping, expenditure, tiredness, emotional distress, relationships and the impact of helping with treatment on the primary caregiver's life. The DFI questions were scored on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3, so that the total DFI score ranges from 0 to 30. Timeframe of reference was the past week. A higher DFI score indicated greater impairment in family Quality of life (QOL) as affected by atopic dermatitis. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements Information Systems (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety Short Form Scale Total Score at Week 16
PROMIS Anxiety instrument measures self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), & somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart, dizziness). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Almost never, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Almost Always). Total raw score calculated using sum of response values: for 8-item form, lowest possible is 8 & highest possible is 40; For 6-item form: lowest possible is 6; highest possible is 30. Higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements Information Systems (PROMIS) Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form Scale Score at Week 16
PROMIS Depression instrument assesses self-reported negative mood (sadness/guilt), views of self (self-criticism/worthlessness) & social cognition (loneliness/interpersonal alienation), & decreased positive affect & engagement (loss of interest/meaning/purpose). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Almost never, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Almost Always). Total raw score is the sum of response values. For 8-item form, lowest possible is 8, highest is 40; for 6-item form, lowest possible is 6, highest is 30. Higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms.
Percentage of Participants Having at Least One Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Through Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-subjects hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Percentage of participants having at least one skin infection TEAE (Excluding Herpetic Infections) through Week 16 were reported. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Percentage of Participants Having at Least One Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participants hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Proportion of Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Medication-free Days From Baseline to Week 16
Proportion of TCS medication-free days is calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither TCS/TCI nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days of each period. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Mean Weekly Dose of Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) in Grams for Low or Medium Potency TCS From Baseline to Week 16
Mean weekly dose of TCS in grams for low or medium potency TCS from baseline to Week 16 were reported. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.

Full Information

First Posted
November 14, 2017
Last Updated
July 30, 2020
Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Sanofi
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03345914
Brief Title
Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Administered With Topical Corticosteroids (TCS) in Participants ≥6 to <12 Years With Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Administered Concomitantly With Topical Corticosteroids in Patients, ≥6 Years to <12 Years of Age, With Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 17, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 10, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Sanofi

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main objective of the trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab administered concomitantly with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants ≥6 years to <12 years of age with severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The secondary objective is to assess the safety of dupilumab administered concomitantly with TCS in patients ≥6 years to <12 years of age with severe AD.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dermatitis, Atopic
Keywords
Eczema

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
367 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive dupilumab, dosing regimen 1
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive dupilumab, dosing regimen 2
Arm Title
Group 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive matching placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dupilumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
DUPIXENT®, REGN668, SAR231893
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: Subcutaneous (SC)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Matching Placebo
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Subcutaneous (SC)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Background Treatment: Topical Corticosteroids
Intervention Description
All participants are required to initiate treatment with a medium potency TCS using a standardized regimen. It is recommended that participants use triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream, fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% cream, or clobetasone butyrate 0.05%.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Background Treatment: Moisturizers
Intervention Description
All participants should apply moisturizers throughout the study. All types of moisturizers are permitted, but participants may not initiate treatment with prescription moisturizers. Participants may continue using stable doses of such moisturizers if initiated before the screening visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1 at Week 16
Description
The IGA was an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD globally, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at Week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Time Frame
Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index -75 (EASI-75) (≥ 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Description
The EASI assesses severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD). Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16
Description
The EASI assesses severity and extent of AD. Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score at Week 16
Description
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score ≥3 Points at Week 16
Description
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score ≥4 Points at Week 16
Description
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index - 50 (EASI-50) (≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Description
The EASI assessed severity and extent of AD. Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index - 90 (EASI - 90) (≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Description
The EASI assessed the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD). Scores range from 0-72. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness, scratching, and lichenification) were assessed for severity on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). Area of involvement assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Values after first rescue treatment used were set to missing. Participants with missing score at week 16 were considered as a non-responder.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Time to Achieve ≥ 4 Point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score From Baseline During the 16-week Treatment Period
Description
The worst itch scale: simple assessment tool that participants used to report intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) where 0 (no itching) and 10 (worst itching) possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, & follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as worse of scores for 2 questions. FAS was used. Time to event is calculated in weeks as (date of first event - date of first dose)/7. The event of NRS reduction ≥ 4 was based on observed data without setting data to be non-responder after rescue treatment use. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint & "NA" represents "Not computable" as only 12.3% of participants achieved NRS reduction during 16-week treatment period & hence median time to achieve ≥ 4-point reduction of NRS for placebo +TCS treated participants could not be reported.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 16
Title
Time to Achieve ≥ 3 Point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score From Baseline During the 16-week Treatment Period
Description
The worst itch scale: a simple assessment tool that participants used to report intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) where 0 (no itching) & 10 (worst itching) possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, & follow-up period). Daily worst itch score was calculated as worse of scores for 2 questions. FAS was used. Time to event is calculated in weeks as (date of first event - date of first dose)/7. The event of NRS reduction ≥ 3 was based on observed data without setting data to be non-responder after rescue treatment use. Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint & "NA" represents "Not computable" as only 21.1% of participants achieved NRS reduction during 16-week treatment period & hence median time to achieve ≥ 3-point reduction of NRS for placebo +TCS treated participants could not be reported.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Week 16
Description
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body using the rule of nines (the possible highest score for each region is: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and were reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The proportion assigned to different body regions were different in younger children as compared to older children (head and neck area is assigned a higher proportion in younger children as compared to older children). The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16
Description
SCORAD was used to assess the extent and severity of AD. Extent and severity of eczema as well as subjective symptoms (insomnia, etc) were assessed and scored. SCORAD total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at Week 16
Description
CDLQI was a validated 10 question tool to measure the impact of skin disease on the quality of life (QOL) in children by assessing how much the skin problem has affected the participant over the past week. Nine questions were scored as follows: Very much = 3, Quite a lot = 2, Only a little = 1, Not at all or unanswered = 0. Question 7 has an added possible response, which was scored as 3. CDLQI equals the sum of the score of each question (maximum = 30, minimum = 0). Higher the score, the greater the impact on QOL. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Data presented reflects the mean & standard deviation of the CDLQI total scores.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16
Description
POEM was a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults. The format was a response to 7 items (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping) based on frequency of these disease symptoms during the past week (ie, 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days) with a scoring system of 0 to 28; the total score reflected the disease-related morbidity. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Itch Score at Week 16
Description
The worst itch scale was a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch). This was an 11-point scale (0 to 10) in which 0 indicated no itching while 10 indicated worst itching possible. Participants were asked to answer 2 questions daily throughout the entire study (screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period). The daily worst itch score was calculated as the worse of the scores for the 2 questions. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Index (DFI) at Week 16
Description
DFI was a 10-item questionnaire with items inquiring about housework, food preparation, sleep, family leisure activity, shopping, expenditure, tiredness, emotional distress, relationships and the impact of helping with treatment on the primary caregiver's life. The DFI questions were scored on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3, so that the total DFI score ranges from 0 to 30. Timeframe of reference was the past week. A higher DFI score indicated greater impairment in family Quality of life (QOL) as affected by atopic dermatitis. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) , Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements Information Systems (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety Short Form Scale Total Score at Week 16
Description
PROMIS Anxiety instrument measures self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), & somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart, dizziness). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Almost never, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Almost Always). Total raw score calculated using sum of response values: for 8-item form, lowest possible is 8 & highest possible is 40; For 6-item form: lowest possible is 6; highest possible is 30. Higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements Information Systems (PROMIS) Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form Scale Score at Week 16
Description
PROMIS Depression instrument assesses self-reported negative mood (sadness/guilt), views of self (self-criticism/worthlessness) & social cognition (loneliness/interpersonal alienation), & decreased positive affect & engagement (loss of interest/meaning/purpose). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Almost never, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Almost Always). Total raw score is the sum of response values. For 8-item form, lowest possible is 8, highest is 40; for 6-item form, lowest possible is 6, highest is 30. Higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Having at Least One Skin Infection Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Excluding Herpetic Infections) Through Week 16
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-subjects hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Percentage of participants having at least one skin infection TEAE (Excluding Herpetic Infections) through Week 16 were reported. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline through Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Having at Least One Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through Week 16
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participants hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) through Week 16
Title
Proportion of Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Medication-free Days From Baseline to Week 16
Description
Proportion of TCS medication-free days is calculated as the number of days that a participant used neither TCS/TCI nor system rescue therapy divided by the study days of each period. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Title
Mean Weekly Dose of Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) in Grams for Low or Medium Potency TCS From Baseline to Week 16
Description
Mean weekly dose of TCS in grams for low or medium potency TCS from baseline to Week 16 were reported. The FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized). Here "Number of participants analyzed" = number of participants who were evaluated for this specific endpoint.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
11 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of AD according to the American Academy of Dermatology consensus criteria (Eichenfield 2003) at screening visit Chronic AD diagnosed at least 1 year prior to the screening visit IGA = 4 at screening and baseline visits EASI ≥21 at the screening and baseline visits BSA ≥15% at screening and baseline visits Documented recent history (within 6 months before the baseline visit) of inadequate response to topical AD medication(s) At least 11 (of a total of 14) applications of a stable dose of topical emollient (moisturizer) twice daily during the 7 consecutive days immediately before the baseline visit Key Exclusion Criteria: Participation in a prior dupilumab clinical study Treatment with a systemic investigational drug before the baseline visit Treatment with a topical investigational drug within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit Treatment with crisabarole within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit History of important side effects of medium potency topical corticosteroids (e.g, intolerance to treatment, hypersensitivity reactions, significant skin atrophy, systemic effects), as assessed by the investigator or patient's treating physician Treatment with a topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment: Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g, systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, interferon gamma, Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.) Phototherapy for AD Treatment with biologics, as follows: Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 6 months before the baseline visit, or until lymphocyte and CD 19+ lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer Other biologics: within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks before the baseline visit, whichever is longer Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks before the baseline visit Body weight <15 kg at baseline Note: Other Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria apply
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trial Management
Organizational Affiliation
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85234
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Bakersfield
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90808
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Mission Viejo
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92691
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Rolling Hills Estates
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90274
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Coral Gables
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33146
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33624
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Sandy Springs
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30328
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Normal
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61761
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Rockville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20850
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Ypsilanti
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48197
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55402
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Forest Hills
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11375
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14620
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Gahanna
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
North Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29420
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Bellaire
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78218
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2G 1B1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Markham
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L3P 1X2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Peterborough
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K9J 5K2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1C5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Kutná Hora
ZIP/Postal Code
284 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Ústí Nad Labem
ZIP/Postal Code
40113
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bavaria
ZIP/Postal Code
80337
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Osnabruck
State/Province
Lower Saxony
ZIP/Postal Code
49074
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Munster
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Gera
State/Province
Thuringen
ZIP/Postal Code
07548
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Bad Bentheim
ZIP/Postal Code
48455
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Wroclaw
State/Province
Dolnoslaskie
ZIP/Postal Code
50381
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Krakow
State/Province
Malopolska
ZIP/Postal Code
30363
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Białystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-453
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-065
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Gdańsk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-152
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-611
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-648
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40123
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-142
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-817
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-758
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Łódź
ZIP/Postal Code
90-265
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Świętokrzyskie
ZIP/Postal Code
27-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 7EH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Newcastle Upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Regeneron Research Site
City
Sheffield
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2TH
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36269504
Citation
Paller AS, Yosipovitch G, Weidinger S, DiBenedetti D, Whalley D, Gadkari A, Guillemin I, Zhang H, Eckert L, Chao J, Bansal A, Chuang CC, Delevry D. Development, Psychometric Validation and Responder Definition of Worst Itch Scale in Children with Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;12(12):2839-2850. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00804-z. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34462864
Citation
Paller AS, Wollenberg A, Siegfried E, Thaci D, Cork MJ, Arkwright PD, Gooderham M, Sun X, O'Malley JT, Khokhar FA, Vakil J, Bansal A, Rosner K, Shumel B, Levit NA. Laboratory Safety of Dupilumab in Patients Aged 6-11 Years with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Phase III Clinical Trial. Paediatr Drugs. 2021 Sep;23(5):515-527. doi: 10.1007/s40272-021-00459-x. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34427891
Citation
Simpson EL, Paller AS, Siegfried EC, Thaci D, Wollenberg A, Cork MJ, Marcoux D, Huang R, Chen Z, Rossi AB, Shumel B, Sierka D, Bansal A. Dupilumab Demonstrates Rapid and Consistent Improvement in Extent and Signs of Atopic Dermatitis Across All Anatomical Regions in Pediatric Patients 6 Years of Age and Older. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1643-1656. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00568-y. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34270797
Citation
Kamal MA, Kovalenko P, Kosloski MP, Srinivasan K, Zhang Y, Rajadhyaksha M, Lai CH, Kanamaluru V, Xu C, Sun X, Simpson EL, Paller AS, Siegfried EC, Shumel B, Bansal A, Al-Huniti N, Davis JD. The Posology of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Atopic Dermatitis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;110(5):1318-1328. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2366. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34046851
Citation
Simpson EL, de Bruin-Weller M, Bansal A, Chen Z, Nelson L, Whalley D, Prescilla R, Guillemin I, Delevry D. Definition of Clinically Meaningful Within-Patient Changes in POEM and CDLQI in Children 6 to 11 Years of Age with Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1415-1422. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00543-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Administered With Topical Corticosteroids (TCS) in Participants ≥6 to <12 Years With Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs