search
Back to results

Motor Learning in People With Cerebral Palsy by Using Virtual Reality.

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Right hemiparesis, right upper limb.
Right hemiparesis, left upper limb
Left hemiparesis, left upper limb
Left hemiparesis, right upper limb
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Cerebral Palsy

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 19 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • classification of gross motor function with levels I and II according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS),
  • MACS (Manual Ability Classification System) classification between levels I and II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • over 20 years;
  • comorbidities that prevent the accomplishment of the activity;
  • people with significant visual and cognitive impairment;
  • those who have undergone chemical blockade or upper limb surgery for less than six months

Sites / Locations

  • Escola de Artes,Ciencias e Humanidades da Universidade d Sao Paulo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Right hemiparesis, right upper limb

Right hemiparesis, left upper limb

Left hemiparesis, left upper limb

Left hemiparesis, right upper limb

Arm Description

Individuals with right hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the affected upper limb.

Individuals with right hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the non-affected upper limb.

Individuals with left hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the affected upper limb.

Individuals with left hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the non-affected upper limb.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference in performance of the Coincident Timing task between participants with right hemiparesis and participants with left hemiparesis
There will be differences between right and left hemiparesis regarding coincident timing (e.g. patients with left hemiparesis will have a worse time in milliseconds that patients with right hemiparesis).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 21, 2017
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03348943
Brief Title
Motor Learning in People With Cerebral Palsy by Using Virtual Reality.
Official Title
Comparative Analysis of Motor Performance in People With Cerebral Palsy (Spastic Hemiparesis) by Virtual Task.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 15, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent disorders that affect movement and posture due to a non-progressive lesion in the immature brain occurring in fetal brain development or in infancy. These disorders are often associated with changes in sensation, learning, body perception, communication and behavior. People with CP present variable difficulties in muscle action. With increasing access to computer-aided accessibility, rehabilitation programs have increasingly used virtual reality (VR) environments to provide functional tasks. Virtual reality research in individuals with cerebral palsy has demonstrated improvements in gross motor functions and functional disabilities in mobility, and is a good device for rehabilitation. The present research is a cross-sectional study. For this study 40 individuals aged over six years (with task comprehension) of both gender who have a clinical diagnosis of spastic hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy will be evaluated. Thus, the present study aims to compare the motor function of the committed and uncommitted body side by performing tasks in virtual reality.
Detailed Description
METHOD The present research is a cross-sectional study. The study will be carried out at the School of Special Education Don Bosco, Rio Branco, Acre. PARTICIPANTS (CASE) For this study 40 individuals aged over six years (with task comprehension) of both gender who have a clinical diagnosis of spastic hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy will be evaluated. STUDY DESIGN The individuals selected will be divided according to the affected body side, forming a first group categorized by RH (Right Hemiparetic) and a second LH (Left Hemiparetic), and for the accomplishment of the activity in the RH group half will start the task with the affected side and than with the unaffected side and the same will be reproduced in the LH group. Before performing the matching Timing task, individuals will perform a simple reaction time (RT) task, with 14 repetitions in each task. Next, they will perform 20 attempts of the Timing task in the acquisition phase (0.5 second speed between the firings of each sphere - level 4), after 10 minutes without contact with the task the subjects will carry out 5 attempts for the Retention phase at the same speed as the acquisition phase. Then the subjects will perform 5 more attempts for the transfer phase with change in the speed of the task (0.25 seconds between the firings of each sphere - level 5). After the task is finished, the TR will be applied again. INSTRUMENTS Timing Software Coincident For the data collection will be used a software of games created in partnership with the group of Information Systems of the School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH-USP. The game proposes a Coincident Timing task, which displays on the computer screen 10 spheres that light up (red light) in sequence until reaching the last ball that is considered the target (Green light). The participant can have immediate feedback of correctness or error of the task through different sounds (Auditory Interaction) and through visual images (Visual Interaction) that change color previously demonstrated to them. Software TRT_S (Simple Reaction Time) Other software used was TRT_S2012. Which was constructed and validated by Crocetta et al. The software proposes a simple TRT test consisting of the appearance of a yellow square (parameterizable) in the center of the monitor at predefined time intervals (ranging from 1.5 to 6.5 ms - these intervals were identical in both Software) and, when the stimulus is applied, the participant should react as quickly as possible by pressing the spacebar on the computer keyboard. Procedure and design Participants will perform the task individually in a quiet room, with only the experimenter, who will provide the instructions. The computer monitor will be positioned on a desk. Participants will remain seated in the chair with height adjusted according to the needs of each. In addition, a footrest will be available if needed. The functional assessment scales will be performed at the beginning of the research, the experimenter will explain the task verbally and perform a demonstration of the game's functioning and interfaces (Kinect for Windows®, touch the computer key or touchscreen).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Palsy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Right hemiparesis, right upper limb
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Individuals with right hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the affected upper limb.
Arm Title
Right hemiparesis, left upper limb
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Individuals with right hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the non-affected upper limb.
Arm Title
Left hemiparesis, left upper limb
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Individuals with left hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the affected upper limb.
Arm Title
Left hemiparesis, right upper limb
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Individuals with left hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the non-affected upper limb.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Right hemiparesis, right upper limb.
Intervention Description
Individuals with right hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the affected upper limb.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Right hemiparesis, left upper limb
Intervention Description
Individuals with right hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the non-affected upper limb.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Left hemiparesis, left upper limb
Intervention Description
Individuals with left hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the affected upper limb.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Left hemiparesis, right upper limb
Intervention Description
Individuals with left hemiparesis Cerebral Palsy that will perform the tasks with the non-affected upper limb.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in performance of the Coincident Timing task between participants with right hemiparesis and participants with left hemiparesis
Description
There will be differences between right and left hemiparesis regarding coincident timing (e.g. patients with left hemiparesis will have a worse time in milliseconds that patients with right hemiparesis).
Time Frame
6 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: classification of gross motor function with levels I and II according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), MACS (Manual Ability Classification System) classification between levels I and II. Exclusion Criteria: over 20 years; comorbidities that prevent the accomplishment of the activity; people with significant visual and cognitive impairment; those who have undergone chemical blockade or upper limb surgery for less than six months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos BM Monteiro, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Sao Paulo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Escola de Artes,Ciencias e Humanidades da Universidade d Sao Paulo
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
03828-000
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Motor Learning in People With Cerebral Palsy by Using Virtual Reality.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs