Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC (NICSA)
Primary Purpose
Bladder Cancer
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mitomycin c
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Bladder Cancer focused on measuring Mitomycin C, Neoadjuvant
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Known history of urothelial non-invasive Ta-tumour low-grade or high-grade.
- ≥18 years old
- Mentally healthy individual
- The ability to understand Danish orally and in writing
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known history of invasive tumour of the bladder (T1+)
- Known history of CIS of the bladder
- Previous BCG-treatment within the last 24 months
- Previous Mitomycin C-treatment (except single-shot postoperative instillation)
- Known allergy or intolerance to Mitomycin C
- Solid tumour with suspicions of invasion
- Single tumour of more than 2 cm in diameter
- Suspicion of CIS (positive cytology with high-grade neoplastic cells combined with suspicious cystoscopy for flat lesions).
- Small bladder volume (less than 100 ml) or incontinence
- Acute cystitis
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Not willing to use secure contraception with regard to men with partners and premenopausal women
Sites / Locations
- Aarhus University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Intervention
Control
Arm Description
Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C
Adjuvant Mitomycin C
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
2-year recurrence rate
The primary outcome is the number of patients in need for a TURB or tumour fulguration in the first 2 years following randomization.
TURBs included as primary endpoint are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Tumour response rate
Number of patients with complete, partial and incomplete tumour response on neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C.
5-year recurrence rate
The number of patients in need of a TURB or tumour fulguration in the outpatient clinic in the first 5 years following randomization.
TURBs included are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.
Adverse events
Proportion of patients with adverse events related to neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection
Biomarkers
Composition of 650 cancer-associated genes expressed on the last resected tumour
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03348969
First Posted
November 13, 2017
Last Updated
May 30, 2023
Sponsor
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03348969
Brief Title
Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC
Acronym
NICSA
Official Title
Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 11, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled trial aiming to investigate neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Detailed Description
Background:
Bladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the world and one of the most costly cancers on a per patient basis, due to the cost of operative procedures, follow-up cystoscopies and instillation therapy. Furthermore there is a risk of progression to invasive and hence deadly cancer why efficient and immediate treatment is crucial. Treatment today consists of surgical removal of tumours (TURB) and adjuvant intravesical treatment. There is a chance; neoadjuvant intravesical treatment with chemotherapy can supersede surgical removal in chemo-sensitive tumours while however some tumours will not respond to intravesical chemotherapy. Currently it is not possible to predict which tumours are chemo-sensitive and which are not.
Objectives:
To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
To investigate the ability to predict chemo-response in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Methods:
A randomised clinical controlled trial will include 120 patients with recurrent NMIBC.
The control group of 60 patients will receive standard care with TURB and adjuvant intravesical treatment. The intervention group of 60 patients will be submitted to neoadjuvant short-term intensive chemoresection with three instillations with Mitomycin C per week for two weeks. Remnant tumour tissue will be evaluated by flexible cystoscopy after four weeks.
To investigate the ability to predict chemo-response in patients with recurrent NMIBC, a connection between biomarkers of the initial tumour tissue and tumour response will be assessed.
Samples of the latest resected tumour prior to inclusion will be collected from all participants treated with neoadjuvant chemoresection and assessed against the tumour response seen in the trial.
Perspectives:
Validation of biomarkers to predict chemo-response will be an important step to integrate biomarkers in daily clinical practice and to individualize the treatment of NMIBC.
In some cases surgery could be avoided while ineffective chemotherapy could be avoided in others.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bladder Cancer
Keywords
Mitomycin C, Neoadjuvant
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized Clinical Trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Adjuvant Mitomycin C
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mitomycin c
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mitomycin "Medac"
Intervention Description
Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
2-year recurrence rate
Description
The primary outcome is the number of patients in need for a TURB or tumour fulguration in the first 2 years following randomization.
TURBs included as primary endpoint are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.
Time Frame
within 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tumour response rate
Description
Number of patients with complete, partial and incomplete tumour response on neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C.
Time Frame
6 months after complete enrollment
Title
5-year recurrence rate
Description
The number of patients in need of a TURB or tumour fulguration in the outpatient clinic in the first 5 years following randomization.
TURBs included are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.
Time Frame
within 5 years
Title
Adverse events
Description
Proportion of patients with adverse events related to neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection
Time Frame
6 months after complete enrollment
Title
Biomarkers
Description
Composition of 650 cancer-associated genes expressed on the last resected tumour
Time Frame
within 2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Known history of urothelial non-invasive Ta-tumour low-grade or high-grade.
≥18 years old
Mentally healthy individual
The ability to understand Danish orally and in writing
Exclusion Criteria:
Known history of invasive tumour of the bladder (T1+)
Known history of CIS of the bladder
Previous BCG-treatment within the last 24 months
Previous Mitomycin C-treatment (except single-shot postoperative instillation)
Known allergy or intolerance to Mitomycin C
Solid tumour with suspicions of invasion
Single tumour of more than 2 cm in diameter
Suspicion of CIS (positive cytology with high-grade neoplastic cells combined with suspicious cystoscopy for flat lesions).
Small bladder volume (less than 100 ml) or incontinence
Acute cystitis
Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Not willing to use secure contraception with regard to men with partners and premenopausal women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Aarhus University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Aarhus University Hospital
City
Aarhus
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27979427
Citation
Herr H. Re: Marko Babjuk, Andreas Bohle, Maximilian Burger, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-61. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):e171-e172. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Dec 12. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16707208
Citation
Maffezzini M. Re: Richard J. Sylvester, Adrian P.M. van der Meijden, Willem Oosterlinck, J. Alfred Witjes, Christian Bouffioux, Louis Denis and Donald W.W. Newling. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006;49:466-77. Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):623-4; author reply 624-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 May 4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27603424
Citation
Kaasinen E, Wijkstrom H, Rintala E, Mestad O, Jahnson S, Malmstrom PU. Seventeen-year follow-up of the prospective randomized Nordic CIS study: BCG monotherapy versus alternating therapy with mitomycin C and BCG in patients with carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):360-8. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1210672. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10575266
Citation
Lamm DL. Preventing progression and improving survival with BCG maintenance. Eur Urol. 2000;37 Suppl 1:9-15. doi: 10.1159/000052376.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15008714
Citation
Shelley MD, Wilt TJ, Court J, Coles B, Kynaston H, Mason MD. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin is superior to mitomycin C in reducing tumour recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BJU Int. 2004 Mar;93(4):485-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04655.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5465489
Citation
Shida K, Shimasaki J, Takahashi H, Kurihara H, Sato J. [Therapy and prognosis of bladder tumors--result of injection of mitomycin C into the bladder]. Gan No Rinsho. 1970 Jul;16(7):737-44. No abstract available. Japanese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22633362
Citation
Colombo R, Rocchini L, Suardi N, Benigni F, Colciago G, Bettiga A, Pellucchi F, Maccagnano C, Briganti A, Salonia A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Neoadjuvant short-term intensive intravesical mitomycin C regimen compared with weekly schedule for low-grade recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: preliminary results of a randomised phase 2 study. Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 May 18. Erratum In: Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):e81.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24697672
Citation
Sousa A, Inman BA, Pineiro I, Monserrat V, Perez A, Aparici V, Gomez I, Neira P, Uribarri C. A clinical trial of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) for treating intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014 May;30(3):166-70. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.900194. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26681820
Citation
Miyata Y, Sakai H. Predictive Markers for the Recurrence of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Intravesical Therapy. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:857416. doi: 10.1155/2015/857416. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20579709
Citation
Seo HK, Cho KS, Chung J, Joung JY, Park WS, Chung MK, Lee KH. Prognostic value of p53 and Ki-67 expression in intermediate-risk patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving adjuvant intravesical mitomycin C therapy. Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):512.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.040. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22901199
Citation
Chen JX, Deng N, Chen X, Chen LW, Qiu SP, Li XF, Li JP. A novel molecular grading model: combination of Ki67 and VEGF in predicting tumor recurrence and progression in non-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2229-34. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.5.2229.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17905101
Citation
Karam JA, Lotan Y, Ashfaq R, Sagalowsky AI, Shariat SF. Survivin expression in patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23787994
Citation
Bracci L, Schiavoni G, Sistigu A, Belardelli F. Immune-based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2014 Jan;21(1):15-25. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.67. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28129544
Citation
Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, Berent-Maoz B, Pang J, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, Seja E, Lomeli S, Kong X, Kelley MC, Sosman JA, Johnson DB, Ribas A, Lo RS. Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Cell. 2017 Jan 26;168(3):542. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.010. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
36223555
Citation
Lindgren MS, Hansen E, Azawi N, Nielsen AM, Dyrskjot L, Jensen JB. DaBlaCa-13 Study: Oncological Outcome of Short-Term, Intensive Chemoresection With Mitomycin in Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Primary Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):206-211. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00470. Epub 2022 Oct 12. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 25;:JCO2202889.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs