search
Back to results

A Placebo-Controlled Effectiveness in INPH Shunting (PENS) Trial (PENS)

Primary Purpose

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
programmable CSF shunt valve
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years; and
  • Diagnosis of INPH based on the Investigator's clinical judgement based on criteria and testing as described in the INPH Guidelines; and
  • Evans Ratio ≥ 0.30; and
  • One positive supplementary test to include large volume Lumbar Puncture or extended CSF drainage per institutional standards; and
  • History or evidence of gait impairment (such as decreased step height or length,decreased speed, retropulsion as described in the INPH Guidelines) duration ≥ 6 months; and
  • Participant has the sensory motor skills, communication skills and understanding to comply with the testing and reporting required in the PENS trial; and
  • Participant is able to give written informed consent, after being properly informed of the nature and risks of the study and prior to engaging in any study-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to walk 10 meters with or without an assistive device; or
  • Baseline fastest gait velocity>1 m/sec and fastest gait velocity improvement is ≤ 30% with or without an assistive device; or
  • Unable to return to the study center for follow up evaluation and shunt programming; or
  • Participant is not medically cleared for shunt surgery per local standards; or
  • Secondary NPH. (Prior encephalitis, meningitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (including concussion) within two years or with brain injury or skull fracture on baseline imaging, brain abscess, brain tumor, obstructive hydrocephalus (including acquired aqueductal stenosis and carcinomatous meningitis)); or
  • Prior or existing shunts, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or any previous surgical intervention for hydrocephalus; or
  • Previous intracranial neurosurgical procedure; or
  • Current treatment with anticoagulation medications or expected to be on anticoagulation medications in future based on clinician evaluation; or
  • Symptomatic cerebral or cerebellar infarction within 6 months from screening(asymptomatic lacunar infarctions are permitted); or
  • Diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation; or
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia or any psychiatric diagnosis (including depression) that in the investigator's judgment will complicate the outcome evaluation (such as neuroleptic treatment for schizophrenia); or
  • Diagnosis of dementia disorder where the investigator considers cognition deficit limits participation in the study; or
  • Conditions impairing gait that are considered to be unrelated to hydrocephalus, such as hemiparesis, spasticity, cerebellar ataxia or musculoskeletal and joint disease.

Sites / Locations

  • Johns Hopkins Medicine
  • University of New Mexico
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • University of Washington Medical Center
  • University of Calgary
  • Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Colombia
  • Umeå University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Open Shunt Group

Closed Shunt Group

Arm Description

FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation

FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation followed by setting to active (setting 4) (110 mm H2O) four months after the procedure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Gait Velocity
Evaluation of CSF shunting in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH) patients through a group comparison of improvement from baseline at four months between active and placebo-controlled groups, using the primary endpoint of gait velocity in meters per second (m/s).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Cognition as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30 where lower scores signify greater cognitive impairment.
Change in Bladder Control as Assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, Short Form
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. The OAB-q SF is scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating worse QOL due to bladder control.

Full Information

First Posted
November 14, 2017
Last Updated
July 29, 2022
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
University of Utah, Integra LifeSciences Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03350750
Brief Title
A Placebo-Controlled Effectiveness in INPH Shunting (PENS) Trial
Acronym
PENS
Official Title
A Placebo-Controlled Effectiveness in INPH Shunting (PENS) Trial: Proof of Concept
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 18, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
University of Utah, Integra LifeSciences Corporation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Placebo-Controlled Effectiveness in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) Shunting (PENS) trial is a multi-center blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled design investigation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery to study the shunt effectiveness in iNPH patients.
Detailed Description
The primary intervention will be setting the FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) or placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O)in a 1:1 ratio. By the time of the primary objective evaluation at four months, the closed shunt group will have zero months of active treatment, and the open shunt group will have four months of active treatment. At four months, shunts for subjects in the closed shunt group will be adjusted to setting 4. To maintain blinding, all patients will be adjusted/ mock adjusted to the active setting in a similar fashion. Patients from both groups will not be adjusted before four months of active treatment, unless judged medically necessary by the treating team. Following four months of active treatment, all subjects in each group will have shunt adjustments according to clinical standards at each center.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The primary intervention will be the initiation of the randomized initial shunt valve opening pressure setting to create a delayed treatment group in half of the study patients. Randomization will be to active or placebo (closed) shunt settings. At the time of the standard four-month evaluation, all subjects will be similarly non-invasively adjusted to bring all subjects in both groups to the active setting while maintaining blinding of the subjects. All settings will be verified by the adjusting neurosurgeon.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
18 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Open Shunt Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation
Arm Title
Closed Shunt Group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation followed by setting to active (setting 4) (110 mm H2O) four months after the procedure.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
programmable CSF shunt valve
Other Intervention Name(s)
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard
Intervention Description
Brain shunt surgery using a programmable CSF shunt valve
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Gait Velocity
Description
Evaluation of CSF shunting in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH) patients through a group comparison of improvement from baseline at four months between active and placebo-controlled groups, using the primary endpoint of gait velocity in meters per second (m/s).
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Cognition as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30 where lower scores signify greater cognitive impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 Months
Title
Change in Bladder Control as Assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, Short Form
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. The OAB-q SF is scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating worse QOL due to bladder control.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in Function as Assessed by the Lawton Activities of Daily Living/Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL/IADL) Test Score
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups on change from baseline to four months using ADL/IADL test to assess function. Scores on the Lawton ADL/IADL scale range from 0 to 32 where a lower score indicates less independence in physical and instrumental daily living skills.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 months
Title
Change in Function as Assessed by the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS)
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using MRS to assess function. Scores on the MRS range from 0 to 6 where higher scores signify increased disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 months
Title
Change in Cognition as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using SDMT to assess cognition. Scores on the SDMT range from 0 to 110 where lower scores are associated with reduced psychomotor speed.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 months
Title
Change in Gait Velocity From Shunt Activation to 8 Months After Active Shunting
Description
Evaluate the clinical improvement of all study participants at eight months of active shunting, using the primary outcome of gait velocity. For patients assigned to Open shunt, active shunting is from Baseline to Month 8 of the study. For patients assigned to Closed Shunt, active shunting is from Month 4 of the study (immediately prior to opening of initially Closed shunt) to Month 12 (i.e., after 8 months of the patient having an open shunt).
Time Frame
Up to 8 months after active shunting
Title
Change in Cognition Using MoCA From Baseline to 8 Months After Active Shunting
Description
Evaluate the clinical improvement of all study participants at eight months of active shunting using MoCA to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30 where lower scores signify greater cognitive impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 months after active shunting
Title
Change in Bladder Control From Baseline to 8 Months After Active Shunting
Description
Evaluate the clinical improvement of all study participants at eight months of active shunting using OAB-q test to assess bladder control. The OAB-q SF is scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating worse QOL due to bladder control.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 months after active shunting
Title
Change in Function Using ADL/IADL From Baseline to 8 Months After Active Shunting
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups on change from baseline to four months using ADL/IADL test to assess function. Scores on the Lawton ADL/IADL scale range from 0 to 32 where a lower score indicates less independence in physical and instrumental daily living skills.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 months after active shunting
Title
Change in Function Using MRS From Baseline to 8 Months After Active Shunting
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months using MRS to assess function. Scores on the MRS range from 0 to 6 where higher scores signify increased disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 months after active shunting
Title
Change in Cognition Using SDMT From Baseline to 8 Months After Active Shunting
Description
Evaluate the clinical improvement of all study participants at eight months of active shunting using SDMT to assess cognition. Scores on the SDMT range from 0 to 110 where lower scores are associated with reduced psychomotor speed.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 months after active shunting
Title
Number of Patients With Falls
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at four months by assessing the number of patients with falls.
Time Frame
4 months
Title
Frequency of Adverse Effects
Description
Evaluate the clinical improvement of all study participants at eight months of active shunting by assessing the frequency of falls, surgical and non-surgical complications, related and unrelated.
Time Frame
8 months
Title
Adverse Events
Description
Compare adverse events (AEs) in the active versus placebo-controlled group at four months and at eight months of active shunting.
Time Frame
4 and 8 months of active shunting

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 60 years; and Diagnosis of INPH based on the Investigator's clinical judgement based on criteria and testing as described in the INPH Guidelines; and Evans Ratio ≥ 0.30; and One positive supplementary test to include large volume Lumbar Puncture or extended CSF drainage per institutional standards; and History or evidence of gait impairment (such as decreased step height or length,decreased speed, retropulsion as described in the INPH Guidelines) duration ≥ 6 months; and Participant has the sensory motor skills, communication skills and understanding to comply with the testing and reporting required in the PENS trial; and Participant is able to give written informed consent, after being properly informed of the nature and risks of the study and prior to engaging in any study-related procedures. Exclusion Criteria: Unable to walk 10 meters with or without an assistive device; or Baseline fastest gait velocity>1 m/sec and fastest gait velocity improvement is ≤ 30% with or without an assistive device; or Unable to return to the study center for follow up evaluation and shunt programming; or Participant is not medically cleared for shunt surgery per local standards; or Secondary NPH. (Prior encephalitis, meningitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (including concussion) within two years or with brain injury or skull fracture on baseline imaging, brain abscess, brain tumor, obstructive hydrocephalus (including acquired aqueductal stenosis and carcinomatous meningitis)); or Prior or existing shunts, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or any previous surgical intervention for hydrocephalus; or Previous intracranial neurosurgical procedure; or Current treatment with anticoagulation medications or expected to be on anticoagulation medications in future based on clinician evaluation; or Symptomatic cerebral or cerebellar infarction within 6 months from screening(asymptomatic lacunar infarctions are permitted); or Diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation; or Diagnosis of schizophrenia or any psychiatric diagnosis (including depression) that in the investigator's judgment will complicate the outcome evaluation (such as neuroleptic treatment for schizophrenia); or Diagnosis of dementia disorder where the investigator considers cognition deficit limits participation in the study; or Conditions impairing gait that are considered to be unrelated to hydrocephalus, such as hemiparesis, spasticity, cerebellar ataxia or musculoskeletal and joint disease.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Luciano, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Medicine
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of New Mexico
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98196
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Calgary
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 2T9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Colombia
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Colombia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Umeå University
City
Umeå
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After subject enrollment and follow up have been completed, the Data Coordinating Center (DCC) of the study will prepare a final study database for analysis. A releasable database will be produced and completely de-identified in accordance with the definitions provided in the Health insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Namely, all identifiers specified in HIPAA will be re-coded in a manner that will make it impossible to deduce or impute the specific identity of any patient. The database will not contain any institutional identifiers. The DCC will also prepare a data dictionary that provides a concise definition of every data element included in the database. If specific data elements have idiosyncrasies that might affect interpretation or analysis, this will be discussed in the dictionary document. In accordance with policies determined by the investigators and funding sponsors, the releasable database will be provided to users in electronic form.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
One year after publication of the results of the primary analysis.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
individual participant data (IPD) will be made available to researchers submitting a request for data that includes an analytic plan approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at their institution

Learn more about this trial

A Placebo-Controlled Effectiveness in INPH Shunting (PENS) Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs