search
Back to results

Acupuncture Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis (ATKOA Ⅱ)

Primary Purpose

Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
acupuncture
Sponsored by
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Knee Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Knee osteoarthritis, acupuncture, electroacupuncture, sham acupuncture

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 45-75 years old, male or female
  2. Single / bilateral knee pain, duration of more than 6 months
  3. KL (Kellgren-Lawrence) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ
  4. NRS ≥ 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Surgery history of knee or waiting for surgery (knee replacement or knee arthroscopy)
  2. Knee pain caused by other diseases (such as joint bodies, severe effusion of joint cavity, infection, malignant tumors, autoimmune diseases, trauma, fracture, gout, lumbosacral vertebrae disease, etc.)
  3. History of arthroscopy within 1 year or intra-articular injection within 4 months
  4. History of receiving acupuncture or massage treatment within 3 months
  5. Severe acute/chronic organic or mental diseases
  6. Coagulation disorders (such as hemophilia, etc.)
  7. Cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or needle phobia
  8. Pregnant women, pregnant and lactating women
  9. Participation in another clinical study in the past 3 months

Sites / Locations

  • Beijing Hostipal of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital medical University
  • Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
  • Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
  • Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  • Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  • Hospital of acupuncture-Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
  • Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Electro-acupuncture

manual acupuncture

sham acupuncture

Arm Description

5 compulsory acupoints (ST35、EX-LE5、LR8、GB33 and Ashi) and 3 optional matching acupoints (stomach meridian syndrome:ST34、ST36、ST32、ST40、EX-LE2;gallbladder meridian syndrome:GB31、GB36、GB34、GB39、GB41;bladder meridian syndrome:BL39、BL40、BL57、BL60;San Yin meridian syndrome:LR7、SP9、SP10、KI10、SP4、SP6、LR3、KI3) will be chosen. Needles will be stimulated manually to achieve "De Qi" sensation and an electrical apparatus (Nanjing Jisheng Medical Co., Ltd., wave of 2/100Hz) will be then connected to the needles with alligator clips in pairs LR8-GB33 and two other matching acupoints. The stimulus intensity will be increased until the patient reports a strong but comfortable intensity. Patients will receive 30-minute, 24 sessions intervention over eight weeks.

Participants in the manual acupuncture group have the same schedule as the Electro-acupuncture group except that the electrical apparatus has working power indicator and sound without actual current output.

Those in the sham acupuncture group receive shallow acupuncture at non-acupoints without manipulation,Deqi or actual current output.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Response rate
the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 8 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Response rate
the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 16 and 26 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Knee-joint pain
using numerical rating scale (NRS). NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.
Knee-joint pain
using WOMAC pain subscale. The WOMAC pain subscale referred to the patient's pain. It was comprised of 5 items, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst pain condition. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Knee-joint function
using WOMAC function subscale. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Knee-joint stiffness
using WOMAC stiffness subscale. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
Quality of life
using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 100(maximum), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Credibility score
using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Expectancy score
using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Blinding assessment
Blinding assessment will be performed in all 9 centers
Global effect
Overall Treatment Effect (extremely improved, slightly improved, not changed, slightly aggravated, extremely aggravated)
Adverse events
Adverse Event Form

Full Information

First Posted
November 20, 2017
Last Updated
December 3, 2017
Sponsor
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Collaborators
Beijing science and technology commission
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03366363
Brief Title
Acupuncture Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis
Acronym
ATKOA Ⅱ
Official Title
Efficacy of Acupuncture Therapy Versus Sham Acupuncture on Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 15, 2017 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Collaborators
Beijing science and technology commission

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), also called degenerative knee disease, is one of the most common bone and joint diseases in clinic. It was estimated to affect more than 9 million individuals in the United States in 2005 and is a leading cause of disability and medical costs. Most elderly people over the age of 65 have radiographic and/or clinical evidence of osteoarthritis. KOA is a lifelong disease which can lead to obvious pain, joint stiffness, limitation of activity and even joint failure or disability. Acupuncture is a popular treatment taken from ancient Chinese medicine, in which fine needles are placed into the body at specific points. Studies have shown that acupuncture can stimulate nerves under the skin, causing the body to produce natural pain-relieving substances (endorphins). However the evidences of acupuncture for KOA are contradictory. According to the review, intensive acupuncture with three sessions a week is more effective for KOA than sparse acupuncture with one session a week. Moreover, the papers published in the past years suggest that manual acupuncture and electro-acupuncture are most commonly used acupuncture therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive electro-acupuncture or manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in reducing pain and improving function in patients with KOA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knee Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Knee osteoarthritis, acupuncture, electroacupuncture, sham acupuncture

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Acupuncturist (Electro-acupuncture group and Manual acupuncture group), Participant, Outcome Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
480 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Electro-acupuncture
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
5 compulsory acupoints (ST35、EX-LE5、LR8、GB33 and Ashi) and 3 optional matching acupoints (stomach meridian syndrome:ST34、ST36、ST32、ST40、EX-LE2;gallbladder meridian syndrome:GB31、GB36、GB34、GB39、GB41;bladder meridian syndrome:BL39、BL40、BL57、BL60;San Yin meridian syndrome:LR7、SP9、SP10、KI10、SP4、SP6、LR3、KI3) will be chosen. Needles will be stimulated manually to achieve "De Qi" sensation and an electrical apparatus (Nanjing Jisheng Medical Co., Ltd., wave of 2/100Hz) will be then connected to the needles with alligator clips in pairs LR8-GB33 and two other matching acupoints. The stimulus intensity will be increased until the patient reports a strong but comfortable intensity. Patients will receive 30-minute, 24 sessions intervention over eight weeks.
Arm Title
manual acupuncture
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the manual acupuncture group have the same schedule as the Electro-acupuncture group except that the electrical apparatus has working power indicator and sound without actual current output.
Arm Title
sham acupuncture
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Those in the sham acupuncture group receive shallow acupuncture at non-acupoints without manipulation,Deqi or actual current output.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
acupuncture
Intervention Description
acupuncture is a therapy of traditional Chinese medicine,in which acupuncturist puncture the patient's skin at specific acupoints with needle.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Response rate
Description
the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 8 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Response rate
Description
the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 16 and 26 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Time Frame
16 weeks, 26 weeks
Title
Knee-joint pain
Description
using numerical rating scale (NRS). NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.
Time Frame
baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks
Title
Knee-joint pain
Description
using WOMAC pain subscale. The WOMAC pain subscale referred to the patient's pain. It was comprised of 5 items, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst pain condition. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Time Frame
baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks
Title
Knee-joint function
Description
using WOMAC function subscale. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Time Frame
baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks
Title
Knee-joint stiffness
Description
using WOMAC stiffness subscale. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
Time Frame
baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks
Title
Quality of life
Description
using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 100(maximum), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time Frame
baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks
Title
Credibility score
Description
using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Time Frame
1 week(after the first treatment)
Title
Expectancy score
Description
using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Time Frame
1 week(after the first treatment)
Title
Blinding assessment
Description
Blinding assessment will be performed in all 9 centers
Time Frame
4 weeks and 8 weeks
Title
Global effect
Description
Overall Treatment Effect (extremely improved, slightly improved, not changed, slightly aggravated, extremely aggravated)
Time Frame
8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks
Title
Adverse events
Description
Adverse Event Form
Time Frame
first treatment up to 8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 45-75 years old, male or female Single / bilateral knee pain, duration of more than 6 months KL (Kellgren-Lawrence) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ NRS ≥ 4 Exclusion Criteria: Surgery history of knee or waiting for surgery (knee replacement or knee arthroscopy) Knee pain caused by other diseases (such as joint bodies, severe effusion of joint cavity, infection, malignant tumors, autoimmune diseases, trauma, fracture, gout, lumbosacral vertebrae disease, etc.) History of arthroscopy within 1 year or intra-articular injection within 4 months History of receiving acupuncture or massage treatment within 3 months Severe acute/chronic organic or mental diseases Coagulation disorders (such as hemophilia, etc.) Cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or needle phobia Pregnant women, pregnant and lactating women Participation in another clinical study in the past 3 months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Cun-Zhi Liu
Phone
0086-10-52176043
Email
lcz623780@126.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jian-Feng Tu
Email
tujianfeng1@126.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cun-Zhi Liu
Organizational Affiliation
lcz623780@126.com
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beijing Hostipal of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital medical University
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100000
Country
China
Facility Name
Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100053
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhi-Shun Liu
Email
liuzhishun@aliyun.com
Facility Name
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100078
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiao-Gang Yu
Email
yuxiaogang6451@163.com
Facility Name
Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100078
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hui Hu
Email
dfzhenjiu@126.com
Facility Name
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100700
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jun Wang
Email
wangjunee@yeah.net
Facility Name
Hospital of acupuncture-Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100700
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hong Zhao
Email
hongzhao2005@aliyun.com
Facility Name
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
City
Beijin
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100050
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jing-Jie Zhao
Email
13466376389@139.com
Facility Name
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine
City
Hebei
State/Province
Hebei
ZIP/Postal Code
050011
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chun-Sheng Jia
Email
jia7158@163.com
Facility Name
First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
City
Tianjin
State/Province
Tianjin
ZIP/Postal Code
300193
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yu-Zheng Du
Email
drduyuzheng@163.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33174383
Citation
Tu JF, Yang JW, Shi GX, Yu ZS, Li JL, Lin LL, Du YZ, Yu XG, Hu H, Liu ZS, Jia CS, Wang LQ, Zhao JJ, Wang J, Wang T, Wang Y, Wang TQ, Zhang N, Zou X, Wang Y, Shao JK, Liu CZ. Efficacy of Intensive Acupuncture Versus Sham Acupuncture in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;73(3):448-458. doi: 10.1002/art.41584. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32802114
Citation
Wang Q, Lv H, Sun ZT, Tu JF, Feng YW, Wang TQ, Liu CZ. Effect of Electroacupuncture versus Sham Electroacupuncture in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Jul 30;2020:1686952. doi: 10.1155/2020/1686952. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31272488
Citation
Tu JF, Yang JW, Wang LQ, Wang Y, Li JL, Zhang N, Lin LL, Yu ZS, Liu CZ. Efficacy of electro-acupuncture and manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3513-2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30683147
Citation
Tu JF, Yang JW, Lin LL, Wang TQ, Du YZ, Liu ZS, Hu H, Zhao JJ, Yu XG, Jia CS, Wang J, Wang T, Hou YQ, Zou X, Wang Y, Shao JK, Wang LQ, Yu ZS, Liu CZ. Efficacy of electro-acupuncture and manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3138-x. Erratum In: Trials. 2019 Apr 10;20(1):204.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Acupuncture Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs