search
Back to results

REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients ( REMOTE-CAT) (REMOTE-CAT)

Primary Purpose

Ischemic Stroke

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Remote ischemic perconditioning
Sham remote perconditioning
Sponsored by
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Ischemic Stroke

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above 18 years old
  • Suspected clinical stroke with 8 hours since onset of neurological symptoms
  • Stroke code (SC) activation
  • Independent in daily life before the onset of acute symptoms. (mrs</=2)
  • Rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale score>0 and RACE motor item>0
  • Written informed consent (patient or representative)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unknown onset of symptoms
  • Coma (GCS< 8)
  • Malignancy or significant co-morbidity thought to limit life expectancy to <6 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Taking part in another interventional study

Sites / Locations

  • Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRBLleida) Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de LleidaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Usual care plus RIPerC

Usual care plus Sham RIPerC

Arm Description

Usual care for stroke code patients, with or without revascularization therapies, with Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) using an electronic tourniquet.

Usual care for stroke code patients, with or without revascularization therapies, with Sham remote ischemic conditioning (RIPerC)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Dependency
Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) <3. The mRS is an ordinal, graded interval scale that assigns patients among 7 global disability levels: 0 (no symptom) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Early neurological improvement rate
NIHSS decrease >=4 with respect to baseline
Treatment Related Serious Adverse Event Rates
Number of participants with a serious adverse event related to treatment
Size of the infarct volume
The infarct volume will be defined as the hyperintense area on the initial isotropic DWI acquired with a b value of 1000 sec/mm2
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) defined by the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke Monitoring Study protocol
Omic's response
Metabolomic and lipidomic analyses to define a panel of serum biomarkers accurately related to Remote ischemic conditioning phenomenon.
Early dependency
Modified Rankin Scale <3. The mRS is an ordinal, graded interval scale that assigns patients among 7 global disability levels: 0 (no symptom) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).

Full Information

First Posted
December 4, 2017
Last Updated
March 28, 2022
Sponsor
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03375762
Brief Title
REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients ( REMOTE-CAT)
Acronym
REMOTE-CAT
Official Title
REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in CATalonia: REMOTE-CAT PROJECT
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 7, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and the main cause of incapacity. Currently, the only therapies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients are the administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and/or endovascular treatment. Unfortunately, many patients cannot benefit from these therapies due to contraindications or evolution time. Neuroprotective therapies could not only increase the benefits of available reperfusion therapies but also provide an option for patients who are not candidates for these treatments. Remote ischemic conditioning, consisting on brief episodes of transient limb ischemia, represents a new paradigm in neuroprotection. It can be categorized in pre-, per- or postconditioning, depending on the moment of application. According to studies in coronary ischemia, remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) during the ischemic event is safe, cost-effective, feasible and associated with a reduction in myocardial injury. The investigators aim to conduct a multicentre study (5 university hospitals) of pre-hospital RIPerC in AIS patients (within 8 hours of stroke onset), which would include 572 stroke code activated patients (286 would undergo RIPerC and 286 would be sham). Our hypothesis is that RIPerC would be safe and would induce endogenous neuroprotective phenomena associated with good outcomes in AIS patients whether treated with revascularization therapies or not. Moreover, the development of systemic ischemic tolerance should provide metabolomic and lipidomic signatures that would present an opportunity to find specific molecular markers (biomarkers). The main objectives will be to assess: 1) RIPerC clinical benefits in AIS, 2) whether RIPerC is safe not only in AIS but also in all cases of stroke code activation, 3) whether RIPerC is associated with a reduction in cerebral infarct size and 4) metabolomic and lipidomic signatures of the RIPerC effect.
Detailed Description
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and the main cause of incapacity. Currently, the only therapies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients are the administration of rt-PA and/or endovascular treatment. Unfortunately, many patients cannot benefit from these therapies due to contraindications or evolution time. Neuroprotective therapies could not only increase the benefits of available reperfusion therapies but also provide an option for patients who are not candidates for these treatments. However, most neuroprotection trials have so far failed to demonstrate their efficacy in acute phase stroke patients, despite good results in animal studies. Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) represents a new paradigm in neuroprotection. It upregulates endogenous defense systems to achieve ischemic tolerance in brain ischemia. It consists of brief episodes of transient limb ischemia. According to studies in coronary ischemia, RIPerC during the ischemic event is safe, feasible and related to reduction in myocardial injury. However, there is only limited data about the clinical utility of RIC in AIS patients. Only one small single-centre, randomized, open label clinical trial has been conducted to test RIPerC in AIS patients as an adjunctive therapy intravenous alteplase in the prehospital setting. The investigators want to conduct a multicenter study (involving 5 university hospitals) of prehospital RIPerC in AIS patients (within 8 hours of stroke onset) in which 572 stroke code activated patients will be included (286 subjects will undergo RIPerC and 286 subjects will be sham). RIPerC will consist of five cycles of electronic tourniquet inflation during five minutes and deflation during five minutes. The main endpoint will be a good clinical outcome measured by the modified Rankin score. The investigators will also establish a secondary neuroimaging endpoint defined by the infarct size observed in a Magnetic resonance imaging performed at three days. In addition, the investigators will conduct a substudy of biomarkers in 100 patients. Our hypothesis is that RIPerC will be safe and will induce endogenous neuroprotective phenomenon responsible for good outcome in AIS patients whether treated with revascularization therapies or not. Moreover, the development of systemic ischemic tolerance will provide a metabolomic and lipidomic signature that will offer the opportunity to find specific molecular markers (biomarkers). Project Objectives: To assess RIPerC clinical benefit in AIS measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score <3. To evaluate whether RIPerC is safe not only in AIS but also in all cases of stroke code activation. To assess whether RIPerC is associated with a reduction of cerebral infarct size. To identify the metabolomic and lipidomic signatures of the RIPerC effect.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ischemic Stroke

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
572 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Usual care plus RIPerC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Usual care for stroke code patients, with or without revascularization therapies, with Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) using an electronic tourniquet.
Arm Title
Usual care plus Sham RIPerC
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Usual care for stroke code patients, with or without revascularization therapies, with Sham remote ischemic conditioning (RIPerC)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Remote ischemic perconditioning
Intervention Description
Five 5-minute inflations/deflations of an automatic device placed on the upper non-paretic arm initiated in the ambulance on the way to hospital in the case of stroke code activation and RACE score >0 and RACE motor item>0
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sham remote perconditioning
Intervention Description
Sham five 5-minute inflations/deflations of an automatic device placed on the upper non-paretic arm initiated in the ambulance on the way to hospital in the case of stroke code activation and RACE score >0 and RACE motor item>0
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Dependency
Description
Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) <3. The mRS is an ordinal, graded interval scale that assigns patients among 7 global disability levels: 0 (no symptom) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).
Time Frame
Day 90±7
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Early neurological improvement rate
Description
NIHSS decrease >=4 with respect to baseline
Time Frame
Day 1, day 5±1
Title
Treatment Related Serious Adverse Event Rates
Description
Number of participants with a serious adverse event related to treatment
Time Frame
Day 1, day 5±1, day 90±7
Title
Size of the infarct volume
Description
The infarct volume will be defined as the hyperintense area on the initial isotropic DWI acquired with a b value of 1000 sec/mm2
Time Frame
Day 5±1
Title
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Description
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) defined by the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke Monitoring Study protocol
Time Frame
24-36 hours
Title
Omic's response
Description
Metabolomic and lipidomic analyses to define a panel of serum biomarkers accurately related to Remote ischemic conditioning phenomenon.
Time Frame
Day 1, day 3, day 5±1
Title
Early dependency
Description
Modified Rankin Scale <3. The mRS is an ordinal, graded interval scale that assigns patients among 7 global disability levels: 0 (no symptom) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).
Time Frame
Day 5±1,

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age above 18 years old Suspected clinical stroke with 8 hours since onset of neurological symptoms Stroke code (SC) activation Independent in daily life before the onset of acute symptoms. (mrs</=2) Rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale score>0 and RACE motor item>0 Written informed consent (patient or representative) Exclusion Criteria: Unknown onset of symptoms Coma (GCS< 8) Malignancy or significant co-morbidity thought to limit life expectancy to <6 months Pregnancy Taking part in another interventional study
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRBLleida) Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida
City
Lleida
ZIP/Postal Code
25198
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Francisco Purroy, PhD
Phone
34973705236
Email
fpurroy.lleida.ics@gencat.cat
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ikram Benabdelhak, NR
Phone
34973248100
Ext
2386
Email
ibenabdelhak@irblleida.cat

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24203849
Citation
Hougaard KD, Hjort N, Zeidler D, Sorensen L, Norgaard A, Hansen TM, von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Simonsen CZ, Damgaard D, Gottrup H, Svendsen K, Rasmussen PV, Ribe LR, Mikkelsen IK, Nagenthiraja K, Cho TH, Redington AN, Botker HE, Ostergaard L, Mouridsen K, Andersen G. Remote ischemic perconditioning as an adjunct therapy to thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a randomized trial. Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):159-67. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001346. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28265014
Citation
England TJ, Hedstrom A, O'Sullivan S, Donnelly R, Barrett DA, Sarmad S, Sprigg N, Bath PM. RECAST (Remote Ischemic Conditioning After Stroke Trial): A Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Phase II Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):1412-1415. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016429. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25593060
Citation
Heusch G, Botker HE, Przyklenk K, Redington A, Yellon D. Remote ischemic conditioning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;65(2):177-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.031.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26585977
Citation
Hess DC, Blauenfeldt RA, Andersen G, Hougaard KD, Hoda MN, Ding Y, Ji X. Remote ischaemic conditioning-a new paradigm of self-protection in the brain. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Dec;11(12):698-710. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.223. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26812782
Citation
Pan J, Li X, Peng Y. Remote ischemic conditioning for acute ischemic stroke: dawn in the darkness. Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul 1;27(5):501-10. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2015-0043.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33101178
Citation
Purroy F, Arque G, Mauri G, Garcia-Vazquez C, Vicente-Pascual M, Pereira C, Vazquez-Justes D, Torres-Querol C, Vena A, Abilleira S, Cardona P, Forne C, Jimenez-Fabrega X, Pagola J, Portero-Otin M, Rodriguez-Campello A, Rovira A, Marti-Fabregas J. REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Catalonia: REMOTE-CAT PROJECT. Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 25;11:569696. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.569696. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients ( REMOTE-CAT)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs