search
Back to results

Comparing Smartphone Technology and a Memory Strategy on Improving Prospective Memory in Alzheimer's Disease

Primary Purpose

Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment, Mild, Dementia, Mild

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Smartphone Personal Assistant
Implementation Intention
Sponsored by
Baylor University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Alzheimer Disease

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of MCI or dementia at a neurology and/or neuropsychology office visit in the BSWH Temple region, or neuropsychology office visit in the RR BSWH region within 12 months of the study contact (Specific ICD Codes outlined below).
  • Interest in participating in research
  • Able and willing to bring a legally authorized representative (spouse or medical power of attorney) to initial training session.
  • Able to independently consent according to the results of a structured capacity to consent interview OR is interested after going through the consent process but does not pass capacity to consent inventory AND has a legally authorized representative available to provide proxy consent.
  • Presence of no more than mild dementia on the basis of telephone administered cognitive screening instrument (TICS-M) & Collateral/Informant ADL Measure

    o Using the TICS-M and published normative data, all subjects must have scores that are around -1 to -2 standard deviations for demographically corrected norms (National Institute of Aging-Alzheimer's Association recommended criteria for the very mild to mild stages of Alzheimer's disease; Albert et al., 2011; McKhann et al., 2011).

  • Etiology of the dementia or MCI can be varied or unknown at the time of the screening criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe cognitive impairment defined by a TICS-M score <-2 standard deviations from the mean.
  • Semi-structured telephone clinical interview and/or chart review suggest:

    • Serious mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar, or depression with suicidal ideation in the last 30 days) are present and significantly contributing to the current presentation
    • Uncorrected hearing loss, visual loss, or motoric dysfunction would preclude using the smartphone.
  • English language proficiency (whether due to English as a second language or the presence of aphasia) significantly interferes with completion of telephone screening procedures or would be clinically suspected to interfere with completion of the study process.

Sites / Locations

  • Baylor Scott & White Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Smartphone Personal Assistant

Implementation Intention

Arm Description

Participants will use the personal assistant feature of the smartphone ("Cortana") to provide reminders to perform prospective memory tasks at the appropriate time and location. In the current study, participants will press a button and verbally state "Cortana, I need to remember to..." for time--based tasks ("...take my medicine at 7pm") and event--based tasks ("pick-up milk at the grocery store).

The implementation intention is a memory strategy, in which individuals verbally state when/where they will perform a prospective memory intention. In the current study, participants will verbally specify an external cue in a "When…then" format and record doing so using the smartphone's voice recorder app. They will use the implementation intention strategy for time--based tasks ("When it is 7pm, then I will remember to take my medicine"), and event--based tasks ("When I am at the grocery store, then I will remember to pick--up milk).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Objective Prospective Memory Performance
Performance on the experimenter-assigned time-based and event-based prospective memory tasks (number of tasks completed).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of Life - Positive Affect and Well-Being
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Positive Affect and Well-Being." This subscale has 9 items that are rated from Never to Always. The subscale total scores range from 9 (minimum) to 45 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes
Quality of Life - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities." This subscale has 8 items that are rated from Never to Always. The subscale total scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Quality of Life - Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities." This subscale has 8 items that are rated from Not at All to Very Much. The subscale total scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Quality of Life - Cognitive Function
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Cognitive Function." This subscale has 8 items. The first four items are rated from Never to Very Often, and the last four items are rated from No Difficulty to Cannot Do. The subscale total scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Subjective Memory Performance Questionnaire
The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire uses a 5-point scale to assess the frequency of retrospective and prospective memory failures such as forgetting to take a pill.
Perceived Memory Structured Interview
The experimenter will conduct a structured interview session at baseline to determine participants' most important, common, and challenging prospective memory tasks. At follow-up, participants will rate whether each memory issue described at baseline was much worse (1), worse (2), normal (3), better (4), or much better (5) than usual over the last month.
Use of Technology/Strategy
The number of times the personal assistant feature and voice-recorder system were used.
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Scale on participants' ability to complete instrumental activities of daily living, such as housekeeping, financing, and medication activities.
Smartphone Acceptability/Usability Scale
Scale to assess the acceptability and usability of the smartphone (Ben Zeev et al., 2014). The scale includes 26 items to which participants respond agree, neutral, or disagree, with agree indicating the favorable outcome on 21 items, and disagree indicating the favorable outcome on 5 items.
Training Duration
Number of minutes to complete smartphone training

Full Information

First Posted
December 18, 2017
Last Updated
July 7, 2020
Sponsor
Baylor University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03384043
Brief Title
Comparing Smartphone Technology and a Memory Strategy on Improving Prospective Memory in Alzheimer's Disease
Official Title
Using Smartphone Personal Assistant Technology to Improve Prospective Memory in Alzheimer's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 8, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Baylor University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Alzheimer's disease is a debilitating condition for patients and their caregivers marked by hallmark cognitive symptoms (e.g., memory loss) as well as an impact on quality of life. Researchers and clinicians are learning that a specific type of memory, called prospective memory, may be particularly affected in mild Alzheimer's disease. Prospective memory is memory for future intentions, goals, and chores, and the loss of the neurocognitive processes supporting prospective memory may reduce independent functioning (e.g., medication adherence). The current study investigates a technology-based intervention to assist participants with their daily prospective memory tasks. Participants with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease will be trained to use a smartphone for four weeks. Smartphone acceptability, usability, and overall user experience will be measured. Furthermore, participants will be tested on completion of daily prospective memory tasks. In one group, participants will train to use the smartphone personal assistant reminder system, which reminds participants of their goals, tasks, and chores at the appropriate time or location. In a comparison group, participants will also carry a smartphone but will train to use a memory strategy in which they verbalize external cues to remind them to perform their goals, tasks, and chores. The goal of this research is to inform whether smartphone technology or a memory strategy can be used to reduce memory burden and improve daily, independent functioning in participants with mild Alzheimer's disease.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment, Mild, Dementia, Mild

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
52 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Smartphone Personal Assistant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will use the personal assistant feature of the smartphone ("Cortana") to provide reminders to perform prospective memory tasks at the appropriate time and location. In the current study, participants will press a button and verbally state "Cortana, I need to remember to..." for time--based tasks ("...take my medicine at 7pm") and event--based tasks ("pick-up milk at the grocery store).
Arm Title
Implementation Intention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The implementation intention is a memory strategy, in which individuals verbally state when/where they will perform a prospective memory intention. In the current study, participants will verbally specify an external cue in a "When…then" format and record doing so using the smartphone's voice recorder app. They will use the implementation intention strategy for time--based tasks ("When it is 7pm, then I will remember to take my medicine"), and event--based tasks ("When I am at the grocery store, then I will remember to pick--up milk).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Smartphone Personal Assistant
Intervention Description
Electronic memory aids (e.g., pagers) are known to support memory for goals and intentions (prospective memory) in individuals with cognitive impairment. Smartphone technology has the potential to enhance the benefits of previous electronic memory aids because they can provide reminders not only at the correct time, but also at the correct location.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Implementation Intention
Intervention Description
Verbally specifying when and where one intends to complete a goal or action (prospective memory) is known to improve the likelihood of later completing that prospective memory. The implementation intention is the best known memory strategy for prospective memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective Prospective Memory Performance
Description
Performance on the experimenter-assigned time-based and event-based prospective memory tasks (number of tasks completed).
Time Frame
Measured for 4 weeks.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of Life - Positive Affect and Well-Being
Description
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Positive Affect and Well-Being." This subscale has 9 items that are rated from Never to Always. The subscale total scores range from 9 (minimum) to 45 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Quality of Life - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
Description
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities." This subscale has 8 items that are rated from Never to Always. The subscale total scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Quality of Life - Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
Description
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities." This subscale has 8 items that are rated from Not at All to Very Much. The subscale total scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Quality of Life - Cognitive Function
Description
Participants will complete the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) subscale titled "Cognitive Function." This subscale has 8 items. The first four items are rated from Never to Very Often, and the last four items are rated from No Difficulty to Cannot Do. The subscale total scores range from 8 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Subjective Memory Performance Questionnaire
Description
The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire uses a 5-point scale to assess the frequency of retrospective and prospective memory failures such as forgetting to take a pill.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Perceived Memory Structured Interview
Description
The experimenter will conduct a structured interview session at baseline to determine participants' most important, common, and challenging prospective memory tasks. At follow-up, participants will rate whether each memory issue described at baseline was much worse (1), worse (2), normal (3), better (4), or much better (5) than usual over the last month.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Use of Technology/Strategy
Description
The number of times the personal assistant feature and voice-recorder system were used.
Time Frame
Measured for 4 weeks
Title
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Description
Scale on participants' ability to complete instrumental activities of daily living, such as housekeeping, financing, and medication activities.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Smartphone Acceptability/Usability Scale
Description
Scale to assess the acceptability and usability of the smartphone (Ben Zeev et al., 2014). The scale includes 26 items to which participants respond agree, neutral, or disagree, with agree indicating the favorable outcome on 21 items, and disagree indicating the favorable outcome on 5 items.
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention (4 weeks)
Title
Training Duration
Description
Number of minutes to complete smartphone training
Time Frame
Pre-Intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of MCI or dementia at a neurology and/or neuropsychology office visit in the BSWH Temple region, or neuropsychology office visit in the RR BSWH region within 12 months of the study contact (Specific ICD Codes outlined below). Interest in participating in research Able and willing to bring a legally authorized representative (spouse or medical power of attorney) to initial training session. Able to independently consent according to the results of a structured capacity to consent interview OR is interested after going through the consent process but does not pass capacity to consent inventory AND has a legally authorized representative available to provide proxy consent. Presence of no more than mild dementia on the basis of telephone administered cognitive screening instrument (TICS-M) & Collateral/Informant ADL Measure o Using the TICS-M and published normative data, all subjects must have scores that are around -1 to -2 standard deviations for demographically corrected norms (National Institute of Aging-Alzheimer's Association recommended criteria for the very mild to mild stages of Alzheimer's disease; Albert et al., 2011; McKhann et al., 2011). Etiology of the dementia or MCI can be varied or unknown at the time of the screening criteria. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of severe cognitive impairment defined by a TICS-M score <-2 standard deviations from the mean. Semi-structured telephone clinical interview and/or chart review suggest: Serious mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar, or depression with suicidal ideation in the last 30 days) are present and significantly contributing to the current presentation Uncorrected hearing loss, visual loss, or motoric dysfunction would preclude using the smartphone. English language proficiency (whether due to English as a second language or the presence of aphasia) significantly interferes with completion of telephone screening procedures or would be clinically suspected to interfere with completion of the study process.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Scullin, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Baylor University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center
City
Temple
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76508
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified data will be shared with any interested researcher who adheres to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24609454
Citation
Ben-Zeev D, Brenner CJ, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr DC, Mueser KT. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1244-53. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu033. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Comparing Smartphone Technology and a Memory Strategy on Improving Prospective Memory in Alzheimer's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs