Effect of Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis HN019 on Oral Lichen Planus
Primary Purpose
Oral Lichen Planus
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019
Clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Oral Lichen Planus focused on measuring Oral lichen planus, Probiotics, Immunomodulation.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical inclusion
- Adults ≥ 18 years old, both genres, who consent to participate of the study;
- Presence of symptomatic reticular lesion and/or white-gray papules. In afro-descendent individuals, reticular lesions may be associated with hyperpigmented lesions;
- Additional clinical features such as ulcerative, erythematous, plaque and bullous lesions will be accepted in the presence of bilateral and symmetrical reticular lesions.
Histopathological inclusion criteria
- Presence of subepithelial infiltrate predominantly lymphocytic, in band and confined to the subepithelial area.
- Liquefaction degeneration of the basal cells layer.
Exclusion Criteria:
Clinical exclusion criteria
- Exclusion of contact lichenoid lesions: the pattern of reticular lesion and / or papules should not be present only in areas of physical contact with restorative materials;
- Exclusion of lichenoid reaction to the drug: difficult to differentiate from OLP, however it is necessary to report all drugs in use by the patient; the comparison between patients on medication, and those who do not use medication is important to establish subgroups of OLP;
- Exclusion of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD): differentiation between OLP and GVHD is established in most cases by medical history;
- Exclusion of immunocompromised patients or patients with systemic diseases of high complexity.
- Exclusion of patients who have previously used probiotic bacteria in the last 4 weeks prior to the study.
- Histopathological criteria for exclusion • Presence of epithelial dysplasia, absence of the lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate band and liquefaction degeneration.
Sites / Locations
- School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
Clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Arm Description
Intervention: Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019
Intervention: Clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in symptoms intensity measure
Self reported symptoms at baseline, 15 and 30 days after therapy through an visual analogue scale (VAS). It consists of a subjective scale scoring the symptoms from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms and 10 = as bad as can be).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Histopathological analysis
Biopsies will be collected at the baseline stage or at the time of the diagnosis of OLP (optional), consisting of a 5mm x 5mm fragment or a 4mm punch of reticular lesions. The second biopsy will be optional, with patient consent, close to the area of the first biopsy for comparative purposes. The histological findings will be determined quantitatively and qualitatively regarding the presence of epithelial hyperplasia, degeneration by liquefaction of the basal cells layer, lymphocytic infiltrate in the subepithelial connective tissue, and apoptotic cells. Photographs will be used at 400x and quantification using the Image J. program.
Immunohistochemical analysis
The population of inflammatory cells will be characterized by analysis of oral mucosa samples, with emphasis on the T cell line (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD103, perforin, granzyme B and Foxp3), B cells (CD20 / CD20), dendritic cells (CD123 and CD303), submucosal dendritic cells (CD209 and factor XIIIa), Langerhans cells (CD1a and CD207), endothelial activity (e-selectin and CD31), mast cells ), macrophages (CD68 and CD163), myeloid dendritic cells (S100 and CD11c), cell proliferation markers (Ki-67, MCM-2, MCM-5, cyclin D1) and extracellular matrix (laminin-5). For immunohistochemical reactions, histological sections of 3μm thickness will be performed, which will be placed on slides coated with organosilane (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).
Venous blood collection
10 ml of venous blood to evaluate the probiotic systemic effect, by means of the research of pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03386643
First Posted
December 2, 2017
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03386643
Brief Title
Effect of Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis HN019 on Oral Lichen Planus
Official Title
Effect of the Probiotic Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis HN019 on Clinical, Histopathological and Immunophenotypic Features of Oral Lichen Planus
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 5, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 6, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disease, which often results in oral manifestations, receiving the name of oral lichen planus (OLP). Its frequency varies from 0,1 to 4% of the general population, with a higher incidence in women, around the 4th and 5th decades of life. Although the pathogenesis of OLP is related to a immune-cellular response, mainly mediated by T lymphocytes, its cause remains unknown. Considering its chronic nature, control of OLP aims to reduce symptoms and improve function, and agents with anti-inflammatory action, especially topical corticosteroids result in some degree of success in most patients, depending on the clinical presentation. However, some cases are resistant to the use of corticosteroids, thus justifying the search for new therapeutic options. The immunomodulation proved to be one of the main functions of probiotic bacteria, and recent studies have shown effect of probiotics on decreasing the expression of inflammatory markers, which enables the study of this therapy as an alternative to the control of OLP. Thus, this project aims to evaluate the effects of therapy with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 comparing with clobetasol propionate 0.05% in symptomatic patients with OLP referred for diagnosis and treatment of School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo (USP). The impact of the topical therapy (probiotic or corticosteroid) on the clinical, histopathological and immunopathological features will be evaluated. This project was previously submitted and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto/USP, and all patients must give informed consent to participate in this study.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized double-blind clinical trial with symptomatic patients presenting OLP, which will be randomly assigned to either topical Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis HN019 or clobetasol propionate 0.05%. The selected patients will receive capsules to be diluted in 15 ml of water containing 6 x 109 CFUs of Bifidobacterium subsp. lactis HN019 (experimental group) or 0.05% clobetasol propionate (control group) for mouth washing, twice a day for 4 weeks. Patients will be instructed to maintain normal brushing and not to use or consume another corticosteroid and /or probiotic during the study. Outcomes measures will be symptoms (VAS and Likert-like scale), quality of life (SF-36 form), and clinical changes (erythema, reticulation, erosion/ulcer based on clinical photographs), which will be performed at baseline, 15 days (only VAS, Likert-like scale and photographs) and and at one month of treatment. All patients will undergo biopsies for the diagnosis of OLP, and those who consent will be submitted to an optional biopsy at the end of the topical treatment for histopathological and immunopathological characterization.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Oral Lichen Planus
Keywords
Oral lichen planus, Probiotics, Immunomodulation.
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Symptomatic patients presenting OLP will be randomly assigned to either topical Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis HN019 or clobetasol propionate 0.05%, and they will receive capsules to be diluted in 15 ml of water containing 6 x 109 CFUs of Bifidobacterium subsp. lactis HN019 (experimental group) or 0.05% clobetasol propionate (control group) for mouth washing, twice a day for 4 weeks.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
Both patients and investigators who will assess the outcomes have no knowledge of the interventions assigned to individual participants.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
22 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention:
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019
Arm Title
Clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention:
Clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019
Other Intervention Name(s)
Probiotic
Intervention Description
The selected patients will receive capsules to be diluted in 15 ml of water containing 6 x 109 CFUs of Bifidobacterium subsp. lactis HN019 for mouthwash twice a day for 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Clobetasol propionate 0.05%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Topical corticosteroid
Intervention Description
The selected patients will receive capsules to be diluted in 15ml of water containing clobetasol propionate 0.05% for mouthwash twice a day for 4 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in symptoms intensity measure
Description
Self reported symptoms at baseline, 15 and 30 days after therapy through an visual analogue scale (VAS). It consists of a subjective scale scoring the symptoms from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms and 10 = as bad as can be).
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Histopathological analysis
Description
Biopsies will be collected at the baseline stage or at the time of the diagnosis of OLP (optional), consisting of a 5mm x 5mm fragment or a 4mm punch of reticular lesions. The second biopsy will be optional, with patient consent, close to the area of the first biopsy for comparative purposes. The histological findings will be determined quantitatively and qualitatively regarding the presence of epithelial hyperplasia, degeneration by liquefaction of the basal cells layer, lymphocytic infiltrate in the subepithelial connective tissue, and apoptotic cells. Photographs will be used at 400x and quantification using the Image J. program.
Time Frame
Before (baseline) and one month after intensive topical therapy
Title
Immunohistochemical analysis
Description
The population of inflammatory cells will be characterized by analysis of oral mucosa samples, with emphasis on the T cell line (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD103, perforin, granzyme B and Foxp3), B cells (CD20 / CD20), dendritic cells (CD123 and CD303), submucosal dendritic cells (CD209 and factor XIIIa), Langerhans cells (CD1a and CD207), endothelial activity (e-selectin and CD31), mast cells ), macrophages (CD68 and CD163), myeloid dendritic cells (S100 and CD11c), cell proliferation markers (Ki-67, MCM-2, MCM-5, cyclin D1) and extracellular matrix (laminin-5). For immunohistochemical reactions, histological sections of 3μm thickness will be performed, which will be placed on slides coated with organosilane (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).
Time Frame
After 4 weeks of intensive therapy.
Title
Venous blood collection
Description
10 ml of venous blood to evaluate the probiotic systemic effect, by means of the research of pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines.
Time Frame
Before (baseline) and after 4 weeks of topical therapy
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical inclusion
Adults ≥ 18 years old, both genres, who consent to participate of the study;
Presence of symptomatic reticular lesion and/or white-gray papules. In afro-descendent individuals, reticular lesions may be associated with hyperpigmented lesions;
Additional clinical features such as ulcerative, erythematous, plaque and bullous lesions will be accepted in the presence of bilateral and symmetrical reticular lesions.
Histopathological inclusion criteria
Presence of subepithelial infiltrate predominantly lymphocytic, in band and confined to the subepithelial area.
Liquefaction degeneration of the basal cells layer.
Exclusion Criteria:
Clinical exclusion criteria
Exclusion of contact lichenoid lesions: the pattern of reticular lesion and / or papules should not be present only in areas of physical contact with restorative materials;
Exclusion of lichenoid reaction to the drug: difficult to differentiate from OLP, however it is necessary to report all drugs in use by the patient; the comparison between patients on medication, and those who do not use medication is important to establish subgroups of OLP;
Exclusion of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD): differentiation between OLP and GVHD is established in most cases by medical history;
Exclusion of immunocompromised patients or patients with systemic diseases of high complexity.
Exclusion of patients who have previously used probiotic bacteria in the last 4 weeks prior to the study.
Histopathological criteria for exclusion • Presence of epithelial dysplasia, absence of the lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate band and liquefaction degeneration.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michel Reis Messora, DDS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sergio L. Souza Salvador, DDS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Átila V. Vitor Nobre, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cristhiam de J. Hernández Martínez, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kleber Tanaka Suzuki, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marina C. Gabriel Del Arco
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lara Maria A Innocentini, DDS,PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gilberto A Silva, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ellen E Monteiro, Student
Organizational Affiliation
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo
City
Ribeirão Preto
State/Province
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
14040-904
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28499235
Citation
Han X, Zhang J, Tan Y, Zhou G. Probiotics: A non-conventional therapy for oral lichen planus. Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Sep;81:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28756997
Citation
Garcia-Pola MJ, Gonzalez-Alvarez L, Garcia-Martin JM. Treatment of oral lichen planus. Systematic review and therapeutic guide. Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Oct 23;149(8):351-362. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 28. English, Spanish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27829754
Citation
Sivaraman S, Santham K, Nelson A, Laliytha B, Azhalvel P, Deepak JH. A randomized triple-blind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of topical triamcinolone acetonate (0.1%), clobetasol propionate (0.05%), and tacrolimus orabase (0.03%) in the management of oral lichen planus. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016 Oct;8(Suppl 1):S86-S89. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.191976.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28662142
Citation
Ricoldi MST, Furlaneto FAC, Oliveira LFF, Teixeira GC, Pischiotini JP, Moreira ALG, Ervolino E, de Oliveira MN, Bogsan CSB, Salvador SL, Messora MR. Effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis on the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis. A histomorphometric, microtomographic and immunohistochemical study in rats. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179946. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28678976
Citation
Gerhard D, Sousa FJDSS, Andraus RAC, Pardo PE, Nai GA, Neto HB, Messora MR, Maia LP. Probiotic therapy reduces inflammation and improves intestinal morphology in rats with induced oral mucositis. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul 3;31:e71. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0071.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis HN019 on Oral Lichen Planus
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs