Intrathecal Morphine Microdose Method Sensory Changes
Primary Purpose
Analgesic Drug Dependence, Sensory Disorders, Chronic Pain
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Quantitative Sensory Tests
surveys
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Analgesic Drug Dependence
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 75
- Selected for microdose Intrathecal pump therapy by their pain physician
- Chronic pain for at least 3 months
- Willing to cooperate with all study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of cancer
- Age less than 18 years old or greater than 75
- Current intrathecal therapy and/or with multiple intrathecal drugs (such as other opioids, local anesthetics, muscle relaxants)
- Medical conditions (myocardial infarction within the last year, uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune disease
- Recent history of alcohol or substance abuse in the last 5 years
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Intrathecal Pump Therapy Participants
Arm Description
Patients eligible for intrathecal pump therapy will undergo quantitative sensory tests and surveys during various stages of the treatment process.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Heat threshold measurements
Heat threshold measurements (degrees Celsius) will be obtained using a pen-shaped temperature probe. Tests will be performed on a designated painful and non-painful body surface. Testing will completed when patient reports numeric pain rating of 5 or greater, or at a temperature >49 degrees Celsius.
Cold threshold measurements
Cold threshold measurements (degrees Celsius) will be obtained using a pen-shaped temperature probe. Tests will be performed on a designated painful and non-painful body surface. Testing will be completed when patient reports discomfort with cold stimulus, or if probe temperature reaches 0 degrees Celsius.
Pressure threshold measurements
Pressure threshold measurements (Newtons) will be obtained using a hand-held algometer. Tests will be performed on a designated painful and non-painful body surface. Testing will be completed when patient reports discomfort with pressure stimulus, or if pressure exceeds 60 Newtons.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Demographic Evaluation - Pain History
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the pain history.
Demographic Evaluation - Medical History
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the medical history.
Demographic Evaluation - Body Mass Index
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will collect data on body mass index.
Demographic Evaluation - Gender
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will collect data on gender.
Demographic Evaluation - Surgical History
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the surgical history.
Demographic Evaluation - Age
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will collect data on patient age.
Demographic Evaluation - Social History
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the social history.
Demographic Evaluation - Urine Drug Tests
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the urine drug tests
Demographic Evaluation - Numeric Pain Scale Scores
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine numeric pain scale scores.
surveys - Anxiety
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on anxiety will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
surveys - Depression
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on depression will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
surveys - Pain Behavior
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on pain behavior will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
surveys - Fatigue
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on fatigue will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
surveys - Pain Interference
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on pain interference will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
surveys - Physical Function
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on physical function will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
surveys - Sleep Disturbance
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on sleep disturbance will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03395275
First Posted
December 5, 2017
Last Updated
March 3, 2023
Sponsor
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03395275
Brief Title
Intrathecal Morphine Microdose Method Sensory Changes
Official Title
Intrathecal Morphine Microdose Method Sensory Changes: A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
lack of recruitment and funding
Study Start Date
October 8, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 3, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 3, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Following the retrospective study on the effectiveness of the microdose method of intrathecal morphine therapy, the investigators are interested in measuring the sensory changes at 4 time points during the microdose method. The microdose method involves weaning the patient off oral opioids and maintaining an opioid-free period prior to initiating a very low opioid dose in intrathecal therapy. The microdose method is a standard of care. The study involves measuring sensory changes to hot, cold, and pressure. Data collection will be performed at regularly scheduled clinic visits, examining range of doses, pain scores,dose escalations, quantifiable psychosocial factors ( not captured in previous retrospective study), and changes in sensory thresholds.
Detailed Description
The use of intrathecal drug delivery systems for the management of chronic non-cancer pain has been in practice for over 30 years. A recently published study from the University of Texas Medical Branch performed a retrospective review on the morphine microdose method in community-based clinics. The goal of the study was to examine the morphine microdose method in an outpatient setting and assess success of therapy, pain scores and dose escalation. Patients were successfully weaned off their systemic opioids, maintained in an opioid-free period for 4-6 weeks, and then underwent a microdose trial and implantation. The majority of patients were successfully managed on morphine monotherapy, with a significant reduction in pain scores, and dose escalations comparable to prior studies. No prospective studies have examined the microdose method in correlation with changes in pain sensitivity.
Several studies have looked at the use of various pain testing models to investigate the effects of chronic opioid therapy and changes in pain perception. A systematic review of the literature identified clinical studies incorporating measures of hyperalgesia in patients on chronic opioid therapy. This review was aimed at finding the optimal testing modality to evaluate pain threshold and tolerance to external stimuli, including mechanical (pressure, touch, injection), thermal (cold/heat), and electrical. Although the results did not reveal any one method with sufficient power, several prospective studies evaluating hyperalgesia with heat pain ratings have shown some promising results; two studies revealing significant changes in heat responses for opioid treatment groups, and one study demonstrating lower heat pain perception values following an opioid taper. The latter study of research pertaining to pain sensitivity changes following an opioid taper is lacking, and only recently was a study performed investigating changes in pressure threshold following transition from full mu agonist to buprenorphine. Little is known at this juncture how pain thresholds change due to opioid dose changes and/or route of delivery changes such as oral to intrathecal routes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Analgesic Drug Dependence, Sensory Disorders, Chronic Pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The study will be a non-randomized prospective trial. Participants will be selected for microdose intrathecal pump therapy by their pain physicians. Eligible participants will undergo an opioid taper by their physicians, and sensory tests will be carried out in the various stages of the intrathecal microdose treatment process (pre-taper, mid-taper, post-taper and post-implant phase).
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intrathecal Pump Therapy Participants
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients eligible for intrathecal pump therapy will undergo quantitative sensory tests and surveys during various stages of the treatment process.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Quantitative Sensory Tests
Intervention Description
Three testing modalities will be utilized for this study:
Hot threshold test: The hot threshold method we will be utilizing has been described in the literature with good reproducibility and reliability. We will be using a similar system and have reproduced the program using a non-invasive device.
Cold threshold test: the same non-invasive device will be used to test cold detection and pain threshold levels. This method is previously described.
Pressure threshold: Mechanical testing (pressure pain threshold) will be assessed utilizing an algometer. We have used this method in a previous study and published results.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
surveys
Intervention Description
surveys including anxiety, depression, pain behavior, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, self-efficacy, satisfaction roles
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Heat threshold measurements
Description
Heat threshold measurements (degrees Celsius) will be obtained using a pen-shaped temperature probe. Tests will be performed on a designated painful and non-painful body surface. Testing will completed when patient reports numeric pain rating of 5 or greater, or at a temperature >49 degrees Celsius.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cold threshold measurements
Description
Cold threshold measurements (degrees Celsius) will be obtained using a pen-shaped temperature probe. Tests will be performed on a designated painful and non-painful body surface. Testing will be completed when patient reports discomfort with cold stimulus, or if probe temperature reaches 0 degrees Celsius.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Pressure threshold measurements
Description
Pressure threshold measurements (Newtons) will be obtained using a hand-held algometer. Tests will be performed on a designated painful and non-painful body surface. Testing will be completed when patient reports discomfort with pressure stimulus, or if pressure exceeds 60 Newtons.
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Pain History
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the pain history.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Medical History
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the medical history.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Body Mass Index
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will collect data on body mass index.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Gender
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will collect data on gender.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Surgical History
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the surgical history.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Age
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. The investigators will collect data on patient age.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Social History
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the social history.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Urine Drug Tests
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine the urine drug tests
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Demographic Evaluation - Numeric Pain Scale Scores
Description
To describe the patient population and to evaluate patient factors, which predict successful trials. We will do a chart review of one year prior to start of the trial to examine numeric pain scale scores.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Anxiety
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on anxiety will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Depression
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on depression will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Pain Behavior
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on pain behavior will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Fatigue
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on fatigue will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Pain Interference
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on pain interference will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Physical Function
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on physical function will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
surveys - Sleep Disturbance
Description
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System survey on sleep disturbance will be administered at the subject's initial, halfway and end of their evaluations. The results from the surveys will be aggregated and compared to other participants' responses.
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age between 18 and 75
Selected for microdose Intrathecal pump therapy by their pain physician
Chronic pain for at least 3 months
Willing to cooperate with all study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of cancer
Age less than 18 years old or greater than 75
Current intrathecal therapy and/or with multiple intrathecal drugs (such as other opioids, local anesthetics, muscle relaxants)
Medical conditions (myocardial infarction within the last year, uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune disease
Recent history of alcohol or substance abuse in the last 5 years
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Denise M Wilkes, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Professor
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10746527
Citation
Wallace M, Yaksh TL. Long-term spinal analgesic delivery: a review of the preclinical and clinical literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;25(2):117-57. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.0250117. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29016893
Citation
Wilkes DM, Orillosa SJ, Hustak EC, Williams CG, Doulatram GR, Solanki DR, Garcia EA, Huang LM. Efficacy, Safety, and Feasibility of the Morphine Microdose Method in Community-Based Clinics. Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1782-1789. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx132.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22845187
Citation
Hamza M, Doleys D, Wells M, Weisbein J, Hoff J, Martin M, Soteropoulos C, Barreto J, Deschner S, Ketchum J. Prospective study of 3-year follow-up of low-dose intrathecal opioids in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. Pain Med. 2012 Oct;13(10):1304-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01451.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21785477
Citation
Grider JS, Harned ME, Etscheidt MA. Patient selection and outcomes using a low-dose intrathecal opioid trialing method for chronic nonmalignant pain. Pain Physician. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(4):343-51.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16229972
Citation
Pud D, Cohen D, Lawental E, Eisenberg E. Opioids and abnormal pain perception: New evidence from a study of chronic opioid addicts and healthy subjects. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 May 20;82(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22704854
Citation
Chu LF, D'Arcy N, Brady C, Zamora AK, Young CA, Kim JE, Clemenson AM, Angst MS, Clark DJ. Analgesic tolerance without demonstrable opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sustained-release morphine for treatment of chronic nonradicular low-back pain. Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1583-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.028. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22570562
Citation
Krishnan S, Salter A, Sullivan T, Gentgall M, White J, Rolan P. Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia. J Pain Res. 2012;5:99-106. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S27738. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26469365
Citation
Wasserman RA, Hassett AL, Harte SE, Goesling J, Malinoff HL, Berland DW, Zollars J, Moser SE, Brummett CM. Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Suspected Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):687-93. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000315.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25437498
Citation
Katz NP, Paillard FC, Edwards RR. Review of the performance of quantitative sensory testing methods to detect hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients on long-term opioids. Anesthesiology. 2015 Mar;122(3):677-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000530.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23340535
Citation
Suzan E, Eisenberg E, Treister R, Haddad M, Pud D. A negative correlation between hyperalgesia and analgesia in patients with chronic radicular pain: is hydromorphone therapy a double-edged sword? Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):65-76.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21029354
Citation
Hooten WM, Mantilla CB, Sandroni P, Townsend CO. Associations between heat pain perception and opioid dose among patients with chronic pain undergoing opioid tapering. Pain Med. 2010 Nov;11(11):1587-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00962.x. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28361126
Citation
Wasserman RA, Hassett AL, Harte SE, Goesling J, Malinoff HL, Berland DW, Zollars J, Moser SE, Brummett CM. Pressure sensitivity and phenotypic changes in patients with suspected opioid-induced hyperalgesia being withdrawn from full mu agonists. J Nat Sci. 2017 Feb;3(2):e319.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8815179
Citation
Dyck PJ, Zimmerman IR, Johnson DM, Gillen D, Hokanson JL, Karnes JL, Gruener G, O'Brien PC. A standard test of heat-pain responses using CASE IV. J Neurol Sci. 1996 Mar;136(1-2):54-63. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00277-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27898461
Citation
Wright A, Benson HAE, Will R, Moss P. Cold Pain Threshold Identifies a Subgroup of Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis That Present With Multimodality Hyperalgesia and Elevated Pain Levels. Clin J Pain. 2017 Sep;33(9):793-803. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000458.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28402092
Citation
Wilkes D, Martinello C, Medeiros FA, Babazade R, Hurwitz E, Khanjee N, Iyer PS, Leary P, Vadhera RB. Ultrasound-determined landmarks decrease pressure pain at epidural insertion site in immediate post-partum period. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Oct;83(10):1034-1041. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11782-7. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Intrathecal Morphine Microdose Method Sensory Changes
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs