search
Back to results

The Technology-assisted, High Intensive, Task-oriented Exercise Trial (TECHITO)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Orthosis
Sponsored by
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Stroke, Rehabilitation, Task oriented training, Motor recovery, Hand function, Arm function

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke by World Health Organization criteria;
  • able to consent;
  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • upper extremity hemiparesis with Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) ≤ 3 for hand function;
  • able to comply with the requirements of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • traumatic or nonvascular brain injury;
  • subarachnoid or primary intraventricular haemorrhage;
  • orthopedic / malfunctions in the arm and hand not related to stroke;
  • severe co-morbidity;
  • cognitive disorders with a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 20.

Sites / Locations

  • Unicare Fram

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Orthosis

Control

Arm Description

The intervention will be performed individually and will run for 12 weeks both at the community rehabilitation unit (3 times a week for 3 weeks) and at home (9 weeks). The group will receive an orthotic device for use during the study-specific exercises.

The group will receive the same amount of a study-specific training program without the orthotic device.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores
The ARAT is a 19 items arm- and hand-specific measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the higher scores indicating better performance. A minimal clinical change of 10% on total score of ARAT will be considered as clinically relevant.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Fugl- Meyer Assessment- Upper Extremity
Measure to assess reflex activity, movement control and muscle strength in the upper extremity. Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully. Motor score for upper extremity: ranges from 0 to 66 points (normal motor performance).
Motor Assessment Scale items 3, 6, 7, and 8
Measure to assess performance of functional tasks. The items are assessed using a 7-point scale from 0 - 6, with a score of 6 indicates optimal motor behavior.
Nine-peg-hole test
Measure to assess fine manual dexterity
Grip-strength / Dynamometer
Measure to assess isometric strength of the hand.
EQ-5D Instrument
Measure to assess health-related quality of life. The instrument comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Measure to assess resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and spasticity. Scores range from 0-4 with 0- no increase in muscle tone to 4- affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
Borg scale
Measure to gauge individual level of intensity in training. The scale ranges from 6 to 20, where 6 means "no exertion at all" and 20 means "maximal exertion. Moderate training register 11 to 14 on the Borg scale, while vigorous exercises usually rate a 15 or higher.
Subjective evaluation of the exercise program and the use of orthotic device
A semi-structured interview with questions on the satisfaction and subjective perception of the exercise program and orthotic device.
Registration data
Demographic data will be registered. Descriptive data will be recorded in regard of the patients' age, gender, occupation, civil and residential status, stroke incidence, treatment, medication and length of stay in the institution.
functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
In this study, 44 channel near-infrared brain functional imaging system (ETG-4100, Hitachi Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) will be used for measurement. The concentration changes of oxyhemoglobin (Oxy -Hb) and deoxyhemoglobin (Deoxy-Hb) in the cerebral cortex are measured continuously. We focus on several Regions of interest (ROI): bilateral sensorimotor cortex (SMC), premotor cortex (PMC) , supplementary motor area (SMA). We aim a) to confirm significant activation channel in task state, b) to compare the intragroup/intergroup concentration changes of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin before and after the intervention, and c) to analyze hemodynamics corresponding curve of ROI including difference of amplitude and latent period when oxyhemoglobin reaches the peak.

Full Information

First Posted
January 2, 2018
Last Updated
April 14, 2020
Sponsor
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
Unicare Fram, SunHF Aker Polklinikk
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03396939
Brief Title
The Technology-assisted, High Intensive, Task-oriented Exercise Trial
Acronym
TECHITO
Official Title
A Technology-assisted, High Intensive, Task-oriented Exercise Program to Improve Arm and Hand Functions in Persons With Stroke. The TECHITO Feasibility and Pilot Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 10, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
Unicare Fram, SunHF Aker Polklinikk

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The interventional study aims to increase the knowledge on arm and hand rehabilitation after stroke within community-based services. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of the arm and hand training program (focusing on functional goal- and task-oriented daily life exercises) in combination with the use of an orthotic device in terms of patient compliance and improvement of outcomes. The secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of the program with or without the use of an orthotic device in a randomized controlled trial.
Detailed Description
Two third of all persons with stroke have a reduced arm and hand function in the acute stage. Three months after the debut of stroke event, 50% of these patients will still have a remaining disability with chronic problems of hand function (Kwakkel et al., 2003; Lawrence et al., 2001). The consequences are grave for these individuals, considering arm and hand function to be important for independent living and related quality of life. In this context, an intervention, combining functional goal- and task- oriented exercises with a supportive orthotic device in the community-based rehabilitation unit and home environment, is hypothesized to increase perceived goal achievement, repetition, as well as the intensity of exercises. An initial feasibility study followed by a pilot randomized controlled trial could strengthen the evidence for the arm and hand interventions after stroke, and support the generalizability of the results to a larger sample. The exercise program is outlined in accordance with the Frequency, Intensity, Type and Time (FITT) principles of training. The proposed training adopts a task-oriented approach as practised today in the participating facilities. The program is standardized in close collaboration with physio- and occupational therapists on the basis of contemporary motor learning and exercise theories. An orthosis supporting the wrist will be used as supporting device, hypothetically enhancing the performance of the exercise groups. The intervention will be performed individually and will run for 12 weeks both at the community rehabilitation unit (3 times week for 3 weeks) and at home (9 weeks). Time: one session at the community rehabilitation unit is approximately 60 minutes with a focus on trunk, arm and hand training. Exercises at home will be carried out in minimum 2 hours per day. Frequency: 5 days per week at home-exercises with/ without the orthotic device. Intensity: moderate to maximal in view of strength, muscle endurance and concentration, as evaluated individually by use of Borg scale. Type: fine motor coordination exercises such as pinch grip, writing, handling objects and stretching of fingers, hand, and wrist; various combined activities such as turning pages, distributing cards, washing up, folding laundry, sweeping floor; strengthening exercises such as gross motor exercises for trunk, arm, hand and fingers with and without weights.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Cerebral Infarction, Brain Ischemia
Keywords
Stroke, Rehabilitation, Task oriented training, Motor recovery, Hand function, Arm function

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The study is a two-step trial: first with the feasibility trial in a cohort of stroke patients regardless of location and temporal evolution then followed by a pilot randomized controlled study (RCT). The feasibility study will include 30 stroke patients with reduced arm and hand functions to explore and establish a target group for whom the intervention may be best suitable in terms of compliance and improvement of perceived use. The pilot RCT will include 30 first-time stroke patients with reduced arm and hand functions. The experimental group (15 patients) will receive an orthotic device for use during the exercises, while the control group (15 patients) will not. Both groups will receive the same amount of a study-specific training program.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Assessments of the study population are performed at baseline, at the end of week 3, at week 12 upon completion of the intervention. A "blinded" therapist, not involved in the project, will perform all the testing.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Orthosis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention will be performed individually and will run for 12 weeks both at the community rehabilitation unit (3 times a week for 3 weeks) and at home (9 weeks). The group will receive an orthotic device for use during the study-specific exercises.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The group will receive the same amount of a study-specific training program without the orthotic device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Orthosis
Intervention Description
All participants in the experimental group will be given an orthotic device for a 12-week period to use alongside their functional goal- and task-oriented training program.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores
Description
The ARAT is a 19 items arm- and hand-specific measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the higher scores indicating better performance. A minimal clinical change of 10% on total score of ARAT will be considered as clinically relevant.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fugl- Meyer Assessment- Upper Extremity
Description
Measure to assess reflex activity, movement control and muscle strength in the upper extremity. Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully. Motor score for upper extremity: ranges from 0 to 66 points (normal motor performance).
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Title
Motor Assessment Scale items 3, 6, 7, and 8
Description
Measure to assess performance of functional tasks. The items are assessed using a 7-point scale from 0 - 6, with a score of 6 indicates optimal motor behavior.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Title
Nine-peg-hole test
Description
Measure to assess fine manual dexterity
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Title
Grip-strength / Dynamometer
Description
Measure to assess isometric strength of the hand.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Title
EQ-5D Instrument
Description
Measure to assess health-related quality of life. The instrument comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Title
Modified Ashworth Scale
Description
Measure to assess resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and spasticity. Scores range from 0-4 with 0- no increase in muscle tone to 4- affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.
Title
Borg scale
Description
Measure to gauge individual level of intensity in training. The scale ranges from 6 to 20, where 6 means "no exertion at all" and 20 means "maximal exertion. Moderate training register 11 to 14 on the Borg scale, while vigorous exercises usually rate a 15 or higher.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested after each training session at the institution, and upon completion of the intervention.
Title
Subjective evaluation of the exercise program and the use of orthotic device
Description
A semi-structured interview with questions on the satisfaction and subjective perception of the exercise program and orthotic device.
Time Frame
Participants will be interviewed at week 3 and week 12.
Title
Registration data
Description
Demographic data will be registered. Descriptive data will be recorded in regard of the patients' age, gender, occupation, civil and residential status, stroke incidence, treatment, medication and length of stay in the institution.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
Description
In this study, 44 channel near-infrared brain functional imaging system (ETG-4100, Hitachi Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) will be used for measurement. The concentration changes of oxyhemoglobin (Oxy -Hb) and deoxyhemoglobin (Deoxy-Hb) in the cerebral cortex are measured continuously. We focus on several Regions of interest (ROI): bilateral sensorimotor cortex (SMC), premotor cortex (PMC) , supplementary motor area (SMA). We aim a) to confirm significant activation channel in task state, b) to compare the intragroup/intergroup concentration changes of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin before and after the intervention, and c) to analyze hemodynamics corresponding curve of ROI including difference of amplitude and latent period when oxyhemoglobin reaches the peak.
Time Frame
Participants will be tested at baseline, week 3 and week 12.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke by World Health Organization criteria; able to consent; age ≥ 18 years; upper extremity hemiparesis with Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) ≤ 3 for hand function; able to comply with the requirements of the protocol Exclusion Criteria: traumatic or nonvascular brain injury; subarachnoid or primary intraventricular haemorrhage; orthopedic / malfunctions in the arm and hand not related to stroke; severe co-morbidity; cognitive disorders with a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 20.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johan K Stanghelle, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Unicare Fram
City
Rykkin
ZIP/Postal Code
1349
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Technology-assisted, High Intensive, Task-oriented Exercise Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs