search
Back to results

Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Primary Purpose

Rectal Cancer

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transanal total mesorectal excision
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
Sponsored by
Ruijin Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring TaTME, Rectal cancer, Laparoscopic Surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years < age < 80 years
  • Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
  • Tumor located in mid and low rectum ( the lower border of the tumor is located distal to the peritoneal reflection)
  • Pathological rectal carcinoma
  • Clinically diagnosed cT1-3N0-2 M0 lesions according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual with or without neoadjuvant therapeutic history
  • Tumor size of 5 cm or less
  • ECOG score is 0-1
  • ASA score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requiring a Mile's procedure
  • Fecal incontinence
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Pregnant woman or lactating woman
  • Severe mental disease
  • Intolerance of surgery for severe comorbidities
  • Previous abdominal surgery
  • Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by rectal cancer
  • Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease

Sites / Locations

  • Ruijin Hospital North

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

TaTME

LaTME

Arm Description

Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo transanal total mesorectal excision.(assisted by laparoscopy to control the IMA)

Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Circumferential resection margin (CRM)
Positive rate of circumferential resection margin (pathological assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Completeness of mesorectum
Pathological assessment of completeness of the TME specimen(complete, near
Lymph node detection
Lymph nodes harvested(numbers)
Distal safety margin
Length of distal margin (millimeter,mm)
Operative time
Operative time(minutes)
Intraoperative blood loss
Estimated blood loss(milliliters,ml)
Length of stay
Duration of hospital stay(days after surgery)
Postoperative recovery course
Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and soft diet (hours after surgery)
Early morbidity rate
Morbidity rate 30 days after surgery
Pain score
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-10 points)tool on postoperative day 1, 2, 3 and the day of discharge
3-year disease free survival rate
3-year disease free survival rate
5-year overall survival rate
5-year overall survival rate

Full Information

First Posted
January 22, 2018
Last Updated
February 12, 2020
Sponsor
Ruijin Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03413930
Brief Title
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Official Title
Single-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
No funding was raised
Study Start Date
June 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ruijin Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for the resection of mid and low rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(LaTME).
Detailed Description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) including rectal cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors, and its incidence is third in the world. At present,surgical treatments is the main means to cure CRC. Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) was recently developed to overcome technical difficulties associated with LaTME and open TME. Most reports are retrospective studies. More studies, especially large-scale, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the best indications for TaTME for mid and low rectal cancer.This is a single-center, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to TaTME group and LaTME group at a 1:1 ratio. It will provide valuable clinical evidence for the objective assessment of the oncological safety,efficacy and potential benefits of TaTME compared with LaTME for mid and low rectal cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
Keywords
TaTME, Rectal cancer, Laparoscopic Surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TaTME
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo transanal total mesorectal excision.(assisted by laparoscopy to control the IMA)
Arm Title
LaTME
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Transanal total mesorectal excision
Intervention Description
Patients undergo transanal total mesorectal excision.(assisted by laparoscopy to control the IMA)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
Intervention Description
Patients undergo Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Circumferential resection margin (CRM)
Description
Positive rate of circumferential resection margin (pathological assessment)
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Completeness of mesorectum
Description
Pathological assessment of completeness of the TME specimen(complete, near
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Title
Lymph node detection
Description
Lymph nodes harvested(numbers)
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Title
Distal safety margin
Description
Length of distal margin (millimeter,mm)
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Title
Operative time
Description
Operative time(minutes)
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Intraoperative blood loss
Description
Estimated blood loss(milliliters,ml)
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Length of stay
Description
Duration of hospital stay(days after surgery)
Time Frame
1-30 days after surgery
Title
Postoperative recovery course
Description
Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and soft diet (hours after surgery)
Time Frame
1-14 days after surgery
Title
Early morbidity rate
Description
Morbidity rate 30 days after surgery
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Pain score
Description
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-10 points)tool on postoperative day 1, 2, 3 and the day of discharge
Time Frame
1-3 days after surgery
Title
3-year disease free survival rate
Description
3-year disease free survival rate
Time Frame
36 months after surgery
Title
5-year overall survival rate
Description
5-year overall survival rate
Time Frame
60 months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years < age < 80 years Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2 Tumor located in mid and low rectum ( the lower border of the tumor is located distal to the peritoneal reflection) Pathological rectal carcinoma Clinically diagnosed cT1-3N0-2 M0 lesions according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual with or without neoadjuvant therapeutic history Tumor size of 5 cm or less ECOG score is 0-1 ASA score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Requiring a Mile's procedure Fecal incontinence History of inflammatory bowel disease Pregnant woman or lactating woman Severe mental disease Intolerance of surgery for severe comorbidities Previous abdominal surgery Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by rectal cancer Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yimei Jiang, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ruijin Hospitla North
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ruijin Hospital North
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
201821
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26466751
Citation
Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/codi.13151.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25185463
Citation
Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblan D, Diaz del Gobbo G, DeLacy B, Balust J, Lacy AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):221-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000865.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26537907
Citation
Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs