Development of a Tailored Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Support Intervention for Stroke Surrogate Decision Makers
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Decision tool
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Stroke focused on measuring surrogate decision maker
Eligibility Criteria
Surrogates:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-identify as the surrogate decision maker for eligible patient
- Able to read and communicate in English without an interpreter
- Limited to one surrogate per patient
Exclusion Criteria:
- No prior relationship with patient
- Dementia or other cognitive or health condition that would impair their ability to participate
Patients:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ischemic stroke or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
- Impaired decisional capacity (per treating team)
- Enrolled on or before full hospital day 5
Minimum illness severity (either):
- National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 10
- Glasgow coma scale ≤12
Exclusion Criteria:
- No surrogate available for study procedures
- Already on comfort measures only
- Physician refuses to allow approach for consent
- Pregnancy
Sites / Locations
- The University of Michigan
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Experimental
Arm Label
Control Surrogate Arm
Surrogate Decision Tool Arm
Arm Description
Usual care control group will complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires with standard decision making techniques. This group will not be asked to use the decision making tool.
This group will complete a baseline questionnaire, then use the tool and complete follow up questionnaires.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Acceptability of the decision tool intervention
The proportion of cases where the surrogate completes use of the tool with high acceptability using the Acceptability E-Scale. The Acceptability E-Scale is a 6-item scale. A score of 1 indicates a negative evaluation and 5 indicates a positive evaluation. A score of 3 indicates a neutral evaluation. An individual will be considered to have high acceptability if the average response across the 6 items is 4 or higher)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Accuracy of the surrogate's prognostic estimate for functional recovery
Calculated as the absolute value of the difference between the surrogate's estimate of the probability (0-100%) of return to functional independence by 90 days and the model based estimate of modified Rankin of 0-2. Range of this measure will be 0-100.
Decisional Self Efficacy scale
11-item scale (a score of 0 indicates not at all confident and a 4 indicates very confident) with ordered categorical responses, converted to a 0-100 scale based on the average of the responses to each item. A score of 0 means extremely low self-efficacy and a score of 100 means extremely high self-efficacy
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03427645
First Posted
January 29, 2018
Last Updated
February 3, 2020
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03427645
Brief Title
Development of a Tailored Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Support Intervention for Stroke Surrogate Decision Makers
Official Title
Development of a Tailored Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Support Intervention for Stroke Surrogate Decision Makers
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 8, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 22, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 22, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The trial is testing an investigator-developed decision support tool for surrogate decision makers for stroke patients that are unable to make medical decisions for themselves.
A historical usual care control group will be enrolled during tool development. The tool will then be tested in surrogates of hospitalized stroke patients.
Detailed Description
Decision support tools, specifically recommended in the 2010 Affordable Care Act, have been shown to improve the quality of decisions and reduce burden on the decision maker in multiple clinical settings, yet almost none have focused on life-sustaining treatments in acute critical illness such as stroke. This study proposes a comprehensive frame shift in how the health care team and surrogates collaborate on decisions regarding life-sustaining treatments for acute illness, by developing a tailored web-based stroke decision support intervention. This web-based tool will be developed for use by the surrogate decision maker during the acute stroke hospitalization and will be designed to facilitate high quality patient-centered decisions and minimize adverse effects on the surrogate.
The two project phases are: 1) Decision support intervention development; and 2) Pilot testing in surrogates of hospitalized stroke patients. A novel ordinal prognostic model will be developed and incorporated into the tool.
The project expects 25 surrogate-patient pairs in the control group, and 25 surrogate-patient pairs in the intervention group, which equals a total of 100 subjects.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
surrogate decision maker
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
106 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Control Surrogate Arm
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual care control group will complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires with standard decision making techniques. This group will not be asked to use the decision making tool.
Arm Title
Surrogate Decision Tool Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group will complete a baseline questionnaire, then use the tool and complete follow up questionnaires.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Decision tool
Other Intervention Name(s)
tailored decision support intervention
Intervention Description
A tailored web-based stroke decision support intervention. This web-based tool will be developed for use by the surrogate decision maker during the acute stroke hospitalization and will be designed to facilitate high quality patient-centered decisions and minimize adverse effects on the surrogate.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acceptability of the decision tool intervention
Description
The proportion of cases where the surrogate completes use of the tool with high acceptability using the Acceptability E-Scale. The Acceptability E-Scale is a 6-item scale. A score of 1 indicates a negative evaluation and 5 indicates a positive evaluation. A score of 3 indicates a neutral evaluation. An individual will be considered to have high acceptability if the average response across the 6 items is 4 or higher)
Time Frame
Immediately post-intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Accuracy of the surrogate's prognostic estimate for functional recovery
Description
Calculated as the absolute value of the difference between the surrogate's estimate of the probability (0-100%) of return to functional independence by 90 days and the model based estimate of modified Rankin of 0-2. Range of this measure will be 0-100.
Time Frame
Within approximately 5 days of admission
Title
Decisional Self Efficacy scale
Description
11-item scale (a score of 0 indicates not at all confident and a 4 indicates very confident) with ordered categorical responses, converted to a 0-100 scale based on the average of the responses to each item. A score of 0 means extremely low self-efficacy and a score of 100 means extremely high self-efficacy
Time Frame
Within approximately 5 days of admission
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Surrogates:
Inclusion Criteria:
Self-identify as the surrogate decision maker for eligible patient
Able to read and communicate in English without an interpreter
Limited to one surrogate per patient
Exclusion Criteria:
No prior relationship with patient
Dementia or other cognitive or health condition that would impair their ability to participate
Patients:
Inclusion Criteria:
Ischemic stroke or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Impaired decisional capacity (per treating team)
Enrolled on or before full hospital day 5
Minimum illness severity (either):
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 10
Glasgow coma scale ≤12
Exclusion Criteria:
No surrogate available for study procedures
Already on comfort measures only
Physician refuses to allow approach for consent
Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Darin Zahuranec
Organizational Affiliation
University of Michigan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32689982
Citation
Chen EP, Arslanian-Engoren C, Newhouse W, Egleston D, Sahgal S, Yande A, Fagerlin A, Zahuranec DB. Development and usability testing of Understanding Stroke, a tailored life-sustaining treatment decision support tool for stroke surrogate decision makers. BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 20;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00617-x.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Development of a Tailored Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Support Intervention for Stroke Surrogate Decision Makers
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs