search
Back to results

Phase 1 Study of HF-LED-RL in Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to III

Primary Purpose

Skin Diseases, Keloid, Scar

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HF-LED-RL Phototherapy
Mock Therapy
Sponsored by
VA Northern California Health Care System
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Skin Diseases focused on measuring light emitting diode-red light, high fluence, red light, RCT

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects of any sex and age
  • Non-Hispanic, Caucasian race/ethnicity
  • Nondominant proximal anterior forearm is wide enough to ensure reproducible placement of LED-RL phototherapy or mock therapy hand-held unit
  • Available and willing to attend all clinic visits
  • Able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects using any photosensitizers (i.e. lithium, melatonin, phenothiazine antipsychotics, antibiotics)
  • Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM)
  • Subjects with a history of skin cancer.
  • Subjects with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE)
  • Subjects with light-sensitive conditions (All subjects will be tested for photosensitivity per manufacturer user guide instructions)
  • Subjects with open wounds on the nondominant proximal anterior forearm
  • Subjects with fibrotic skin disease or other skin conditions on the nondominant proximal anterior forearm
  • Subjects with tattoos that cover the procedure site on the nondominant proximal anterior forearm
  • Subjects of an ethnic race group other than Non-Hispanic, Caucasian
  • Subjects who have previously participated in the VA Northern California's "Phase 1 Study of LED-RL in Human Skin"

Sites / Locations

  • Sacramento VA Medical CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

HF-LED-RL Phototherapy

Mock Therapy

Arm Description

The protocol for dose escalation requires subjects be enrolled sequentially in groups of five (three subjects randomized to HF-LED-RL phototherapy and two subjects randomized to mock therapy). After either a maximally tolerated dose (MTD) has been established or the study endpoint of 640 J/cm2 has been achieved, an additional 24 or 27 HF-LED-RL phototherapy subjects (for a total of 30) and 16 or 18 mock therapy subjects (for a total of 20) (determined randomly) will be enrolled to satisfy Hanley's Rule of Three, such that it can be concluded with 95% confidence that fewer than 1 person in 10 will experience an adverse event.

The protocol for dose escalation requires subjects be enrolled sequentially in groups of five (three subjects randomized to HF-LED-RL phototherapy and two subjects randomized to mock therapy). After either a maximally tolerated dose (MTD) has been established or the study endpoint of 640 J/cm2 has been achieved, an additional 24 or 27 HF-LED-RL phototherapy subjects (for a total of 30) and 16 or 18 mock therapy subjects (for a total of 20) (determined randomly) will be enrolled to satisfy Hanley's Rule of Three, such that it can be concluded with 95% confidence that fewer than 1 person in 10 will experience an adverse event.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of safety profile by evaluating incidence of procedure-related common procedure outcomes
To evaluate safety of high fluence LED-RL phototherapy by recording any common expected procedure outcomes [warmth, erythema (redness), and edema (swelling) that are mild, self-limited, and are expected to last less than 24 hours] via assessment during and immediately post-procedure and subject diary of adverse events.
Assessment of safety profile by evaluating incidence of adverse events
To evaluate safety of high fluence LED-RL phototherapy by recording adverse events (including: first-degree or higher skin burning or blistering, erythema lasting more than 24 hours, severe swelling, pain, ulceration, change in sensation, and/or muscle weakness], via assessment during and immediately post-procedure and subject diary of adverse events.

Full Information

First Posted
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 7, 2018
Sponsor
VA Northern California Health Care System
Collaborators
East Bay Institute for Research and Education
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03433222
Brief Title
Phase 1 Study of HF-LED-RL in Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to III
Official Title
EBIRE: Phase 1 Study of High Fluence LED-Red Light in Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to III
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 31, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 8, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 8, 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
VA Northern California Health Care System
Collaborators
East Bay Institute for Research and Education

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to establish the safety of high fluence LED-RL at fluence of 480 J/cm2 and 640 J/cm2 in healthy non-Hispanic, Caucasian subjects. The hypothesis is that high fluence LED-RL phototherapy is safe in non-Hispanic, Caucasians.
Detailed Description
The effects of visible light, while common in the environment (visible spectrum accounts for 44% of total solar energy), remain undefined. An important safety feature of visible red light (600 nm to 700 nm) is that it does not generate pro-carcinogenic DNA damage as does ultraviolet (UV) light. Recently published clinical observations indicate that red light in combination with other modalities such as photosensitizers in combined red light photodynamic therapy can treat skin diseases. However, preliminary in vitro data generated by the investigator's research group suggests that red light can function as a stand-alone treatment, eliminating the side-effects of chemical photosensitizers and the potential long-term harm of current UV therapy. Furthermore, commercially available light emitting diode-red light (LED-RL) units exist and are already FDA-cleared for other dermatological uses (such as rhytides and acne), thus clinical translation for use in skin diseases could occur relatively quickly following safety and efficacy demonstration. Developing high fluence LED-RL phototherapy as a treatment for skin conditions may represent an important advance that lacks the serious systemic side effects associated with immunomodulatory agents (such as oral steroids); avoids the need for invasive, painful injections with anti-fibrotic agents (such as intralesional steroids, 5-fluorouracil and bleomycin); and eliminates the UV-induced DNA damage associated with skin cancer and photoaging that are associated with current UVA/UVA1 and UVB/narrowband UVB phototherapy. To the investigator research group's knowledge, no clinical trials have been performed to determine the safety of high fluence LED-RL in different Fitzpatrick skin types. The innovation of this approach is that the investigator research group intend to study the safety of high fluence LED-RL in Fitzpatrick skin types I to III (based on NIH's race/ethnicity category of non-Hispanic, Caucasian). A previous study demonstrated that fluence up to 320 J/cm2 is safe for all skin types (unpublished data, investigator research group). This study will evaluate doses of 480 J/cm2 and 640 J/cm2 in Fitzpatrick skin types I to III. This is based on the classical method for dose escalation as described by Spilker: starting with dose (X) increased by an equal amount (in this instance: X=160 J/cm2 which is the maximum recommended starting dose in clinical studies, 2X=320 J/cm2, 3X=480 J/cm2, 4X=640 J/cm2).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Skin Diseases, Keloid, Scar, Fibrosis, Hypertrophic Skin
Keywords
light emitting diode-red light, high fluence, red light, RCT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Single-blind, dose escalation, randomized controlled Phase 1 study
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HF-LED-RL Phototherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The protocol for dose escalation requires subjects be enrolled sequentially in groups of five (three subjects randomized to HF-LED-RL phototherapy and two subjects randomized to mock therapy). After either a maximally tolerated dose (MTD) has been established or the study endpoint of 640 J/cm2 has been achieved, an additional 24 or 27 HF-LED-RL phototherapy subjects (for a total of 30) and 16 or 18 mock therapy subjects (for a total of 20) (determined randomly) will be enrolled to satisfy Hanley's Rule of Three, such that it can be concluded with 95% confidence that fewer than 1 person in 10 will experience an adverse event.
Arm Title
Mock Therapy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The protocol for dose escalation requires subjects be enrolled sequentially in groups of five (three subjects randomized to HF-LED-RL phototherapy and two subjects randomized to mock therapy). After either a maximally tolerated dose (MTD) has been established or the study endpoint of 640 J/cm2 has been achieved, an additional 24 or 27 HF-LED-RL phototherapy subjects (for a total of 30) and 16 or 18 mock therapy subjects (for a total of 20) (determined randomly) will be enrolled to satisfy Hanley's Rule of Three, such that it can be concluded with 95% confidence that fewer than 1 person in 10 will experience an adverse event.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HF-LED-RL Phototherapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Omnilux New-U (Photo Therapeutics, Carlsbad, CA)
Intervention Description
The starting dose of 480 J/cm2 will be administered to Group 1's HF-LED-RL phototherapy randomized subjects and the HF-LED-RL dose will be escalated in the subsequent group to 640 J/cm2. Common expected procedure side effects are mild and temporary, including warmth, redness (erythema) and swelling (edema). The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level below the dose producing unacceptable but reversible toxicity in 2 or more subjects and is considered the upper limit of subject tolerance. All subjects will receive total of nine LED-RL phototherapy, three times per week for three consecutive weeks.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Mock Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mock therapy unit (Photo Therapeutics, Carlsbad, CA)
Intervention Description
Mock therapy will be administered to mock therapy randomized subjects using the mock therapy unit. The mock therapy unit only generates warmth and does not emit LED-RL. All subjects will receive total of nine mock therapy procedures, three times per week for three consecutive weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Description
The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose.
Time Frame
3 consecutive weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of safety profile by evaluating incidence of procedure-related common procedure outcomes
Description
To evaluate safety of high fluence LED-RL phototherapy by recording any common expected procedure outcomes [warmth, erythema (redness), and edema (swelling) that are mild, self-limited, and are expected to last less than 24 hours] via assessment during and immediately post-procedure and subject diary of adverse events.
Time Frame
3 consecutive weeks
Title
Assessment of safety profile by evaluating incidence of adverse events
Description
To evaluate safety of high fluence LED-RL phototherapy by recording adverse events (including: first-degree or higher skin burning or blistering, erythema lasting more than 24 hours, severe swelling, pain, ulceration, change in sensation, and/or muscle weakness], via assessment during and immediately post-procedure and subject diary of adverse events.
Time Frame
3 consecutive weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy subjects of any sex and age Non-Hispanic, Caucasian race/ethnicity Nondominant proximal anterior forearm is wide enough to ensure reproducible placement of LED-RL phototherapy or mock therapy hand-held unit Available and willing to attend all clinic visits Able and willing to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Subjects using any photosensitizers (i.e. lithium, melatonin, phenothiazine antipsychotics, antibiotics) Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) Subjects with a history of skin cancer. Subjects with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) Subjects with light-sensitive conditions (All subjects will be tested for photosensitivity per manufacturer user guide instructions) Subjects with open wounds on the nondominant proximal anterior forearm Subjects with fibrotic skin disease or other skin conditions on the nondominant proximal anterior forearm Subjects with tattoos that cover the procedure site on the nondominant proximal anterior forearm Subjects of an ethnic race group other than Non-Hispanic, Caucasian Subjects who have previously participated in the VA Northern California's "Phase 1 Study of LED-RL in Human Skin"
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jared Jagdeo, MD, MS
Phone
916-451-7245
Email
Jared.Jagdeo@va.gov
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jared Jagdeo, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Physician, Dermatology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sacramento VA Medical Center
City
Mather
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95655
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jared Jagdeo, MD, MS
Phone
916-451-7245
Email
Jared.Jagdeo@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erica Wang, MD
Email
Erica.Wang2@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jared Jagdeo, MD, MS

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23077622
Citation
Jagdeo JR, Adams LE, Brody NI, Siegel DM. Transcranial red and near infrared light transmission in a cadaveric model. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047460. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25485805
Citation
Mamalis A, Jagdeo J. Light-emitting diode-generated red light inhibits keloid fibroblast proliferation. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):35-9. doi: 10.1097/01.DSS.0000452650.06765.51.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19146602
Citation
Sadick NS. A study to determine the efficacy of a novel handheld light-emitting diode device in the treatment of photoaged skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008 Dec;7(4):263-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00404.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18459515
Citation
Sadick NS. Handheld LED array device in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Apr;7(4):347-50.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23590233
Citation
Lev-Tov H, Mamalis A, Brody N, Siegel D, Jagdeo J. Inhibition of fibroblast proliferation in vitro using red light-emitting diodes. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Aug;39(8):1167-70. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12212. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27484782
Citation
Ho D, Kraeva E, Wun T, Isseroff RR, Jagdeo J. A single-blind, dose escalation, phase I study of high-fluence light-emitting diode-red light (LED-RL) on human skin: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Aug 2;17:385. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1518-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30894210
Citation
Wang EB, Kaur R, Nguyen J, Ho D, Austin E, Maverakis E, Li CS, Hwang ST, Isseroff RR, Jagdeo J. A single-blind, dose-escalation, phase I study of high-fluence light-emitting diode-red light on Caucasian non-Hispanic skin: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Mar 20;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3278-7.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Phase 1 Study of HF-LED-RL in Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to III

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs