search
Back to results

Efficacy of Cryotherapy Combined or Not With Analgesics in Uncontrolled Painful Musculoskeletal Metastasis (CRYO)

Primary Purpose

Musculoskeletal Pain

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cryotherapy + Medical analgesics
Medical Analgesics
Sponsored by
Centre Leon Berard
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Musculoskeletal Pain focused on measuring Randomized controlled trial, Musculoskeletal metastasis, Cancer pain, Percutaneous cryotherapy, Medical supportive care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years at the day of consenting to the study;
  • Patient with at least 1 painful metastasis with a musculoskeletal involvement;
  • Patient referred to a Pain Management Unit to optimize the analgesic strategy;
  • Painful metastatic lesion that fulfils with all the following :

    • Pain must be correlated with an identifiable lesion on imaging (Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography)
    • Level of mean pain within the past 24 hours of at least 4/10 (numeric rating scale)
    • Painful metastasis suitable for a procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy
  • Life-expectancy longer than 6 months;
  • Performance Status of the ECOG ≤2;
  • Neutrophils count > 1 Gi/l within the past 14 days;
  • Adequate coagulation panel (as per the investigator judgement);
  • Ability to understand and willingness for follow-up visits;
  • Covered by a medical insurance;
  • Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all the pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrolment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a primary tumor of leukemia, lymphoma or myeloma;
  • Tumor involving a weight bearing long bone of the lower limbs with the tumor causing more than 50% of cortical bone;
  • Lesion amenable to any curative intervention;
  • Formal indication for local analgesic procedure other than percutaneous cryotherapy;
  • Prior radiotherapy on the targeted lesion within the 3 weeks prior to randomization;
  • Patient with any contraindication for the procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy, including treatment requiring ice ball formation within 0.5 cm of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve, structure, large abdominal vessels such as the aorta or inferior vena cava, bowel or bladder (except if active or passive thermic protection can be performed);
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders;
  • Evidence of pregnancy, breast-feeding, or patient wishing to become pregnant during the study;
  • Active, uncontrolled infection;
  • Any cognitive impairment or any disease that may restrain the use of numeric scales and the administration of quality of life questionnaires;
  • Clinically significant unrelated systemic illness (e.g., serious infection or significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or other organ dysfunction) that would likely interfere with study procedures or results;
  • Concurrent participation in other experimental studies that could interfere with the primary endpoint assessment.

Sites / Locations

  • Institut Bergonié
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes
  • Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier-Val d'Aurelle
  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Centre René Gauducheau
  • Institut Paul Strauss
  • CHRU de Strasbourg
  • Institut Gustave Roussy

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cryotherapy + medical analgesics

Medical analgesics

Arm Description

Percutaneous Cryotherapy and medical analgesics according to the investigator's discretion

Medical analgesics alone according to the investigator's discretion

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to analgesic strategy failure
Failure will be defined as at least, one of the following situations: Reescalation of the mean local pain by 2 points or more from the lowest pain score from baseline; Absence of pain relief ≥ 2 points 3 months after randomization; Indication of any other loco regional analgesic procedure (radiotherapy, interventional radiology or surgery).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of pain relief
Percentage of pain relief from baseline, rated by patients
Depth of local pain relief
Evaluation using the numeric rating scale
Depth of local pain relief
Evaluation using the Brief Pain Inventory
The impact of local pain on the patient's quality of life
Using the FACT-BP questionnaire
The impact of local pain on the patient's quality of life
Using the EuroQOL-5Dimensions-5Levels questionnaire
Description of analgesic consumption
Using a booklet completed by the patients and/or the investigator
Overall Survival
Time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause
Tolerance profile
Tolerance assessed according to the NCI-CTC AE version 4

Full Information

First Posted
January 29, 2018
Last Updated
October 11, 2021
Sponsor
Centre Leon Berard
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03441139
Brief Title
Efficacy of Cryotherapy Combined or Not With Analgesics in Uncontrolled Painful Musculoskeletal Metastasis
Acronym
CRYO
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Multicenter Prospective Open-label Study of the Efficacy of the Percutaneous Cryotherapy Combined or Not With a Medical Analgesia in the Treatment of Patients With Uncontrolled Painful Musculoskeletal Metastasis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Difficulty to recruit patient.
Study Start Date
July 19, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Leon Berard

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy of 2 analgesic strategies, based on percutaneous cryotherapy plus medical supportive care versus medical supportive care alone in the treatment of cancer patients with painful musculoskeletal metastasis.
Detailed Description
There is a substantial body of evidences that support the rationale for percutaneous cryotherapy in the treatment of painful musculoskeletal metastasis. Since the available results are based exclusively on retrospective and single-arm prospective studies, all authors agree that preliminary data deserves further investigation to provide high level evidences. Current knowledge, along with the need for relieving patients' pain, already leads interventional radiologists to introduce analgesic cryotherapy in their routine practice. Our team usually notes a clinically significant pain relief that is immediate, continuous and prolonged in these patients. However, facing the lack of comparative studies, this technique is still proposed to patients with poor life-expectancy. Percutaneous cryotherapy is an innovative strategy in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled painful metastases. It could provide a significant and durable pain relief and a better quality of life, earlier in the patient's care pathway. The study group hypotheses that an early procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy is able to provide painful patients with better and prolonged analgesia and quality of life. A prospective controlled study is proposed with two analgesic strategies (percutaneous cryotherapy plus medical supportive care versus medical supportive care alone) in patients with a painful metastasis not controlled by conventional analgesia strategy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Musculoskeletal Pain
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial, Musculoskeletal metastasis, Cancer pain, Percutaneous cryotherapy, Medical supportive care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
18 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cryotherapy + medical analgesics
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Percutaneous Cryotherapy and medical analgesics according to the investigator's discretion
Arm Title
Medical analgesics
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Medical analgesics alone according to the investigator's discretion
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cryotherapy + Medical analgesics
Other Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous cryotherapy + Medical analgesics
Intervention Description
Percutaneous cryotherapy: A complete cycle of treatment will require 2 freezing 10-minutes periods, separate by a 9-minutes passive and 1-minute active thaw, with the cryoablation system. Dimension of the iceball coverage above the tumor will be monitored by non-contrast CT or MRI during the freezing cycle. Medical supportive care: Best analgesic therapy at investigator's discretion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Medical Analgesics
Other Intervention Name(s)
Best medical medical analgesics
Intervention Description
Best analgesic therapy at investigator's discretion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to analgesic strategy failure
Description
Failure will be defined as at least, one of the following situations: Reescalation of the mean local pain by 2 points or more from the lowest pain score from baseline; Absence of pain relief ≥ 2 points 3 months after randomization; Indication of any other loco regional analgesic procedure (radiotherapy, interventional radiology or surgery).
Time Frame
Time from the date of randomization to the date of analgesic strategy failure assessed up to 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of pain relief
Description
Percentage of pain relief from baseline, rated by patients
Time Frame
Weekly for the first 3 months, then monthly assessed up to 6 months
Title
Depth of local pain relief
Description
Evaluation using the numeric rating scale
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale (scale range from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]): Weekly for the first 3 months, then monthly assessed up to 6 months
Title
Depth of local pain relief
Description
Evaluation using the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame
Brief Pail Inventory : Monthly assessment up to 6 months
Title
The impact of local pain on the patient's quality of life
Description
Using the FACT-BP questionnaire
Time Frame
Monthly assessment up to 6 months
Title
The impact of local pain on the patient's quality of life
Description
Using the EuroQOL-5Dimensions-5Levels questionnaire
Time Frame
Monthly assessment up to 6 months
Title
Description of analgesic consumption
Description
Using a booklet completed by the patients and/or the investigator
Time Frame
Weekly for the first 3 months, then monthly assessed up to 6 months
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause
Time Frame
From date of randomization to date of death from any cause or date of LPLV (estimated date: March 2020)
Title
Tolerance profile
Description
Tolerance assessed according to the NCI-CTC AE version 4
Time Frame
Date of last visit (Month 6 +/- 28 days)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Description
All the resources consumption will be collected during the 6-months timeframe: Hospitalization costs (outpatient, inpatient, and home care), external consultations and wider examinations (eg MRI), transportation costs.
Time Frame
Date of last visit (Month 6 +/- 28 days)
Title
Cost-utility analysis
Description
All the resources consumption will be collected during the 6-months timeframe: Hospitalization costs (outpatient, inpatient, and home care), external consultations and wider examinations (eg MRI), transportation costs.
Time Frame
Date of last visit (Month 6 +/- 28 days)
Title
Budget impact analyses
Description
Quantication of financial consequences of rolling out the innovative strategy throughout the health system (i.e. the replacement of Medical supportive care by Medical supportive care + Percutaneous cryotherapy)
Time Frame
One-year baseline period. Will be performed in case the experimental strategy dominates the standard strategy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years at the day of consenting to the study; Patient with at least 1 painful metastasis with a musculoskeletal involvement; Patient referred to a Pain Management Unit to optimize the analgesic strategy; Painful metastatic lesion that fulfils with all the following : Pain must be correlated with an identifiable lesion on imaging (Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography) Level of mean pain within the past 24 hours of at least 4/10 (numeric rating scale) Painful metastasis suitable for a procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy Life-expectancy longer than 6 months; Performance Status of the ECOG ≤2; Neutrophils count > 1 Gi/l within the past 14 days; Adequate coagulation panel (as per the investigator judgement); Ability to understand and willingness for follow-up visits; Covered by a medical insurance; Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all the pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrolment. Exclusion Criteria: Patient with a primary tumor of leukemia, lymphoma or myeloma; Tumor involving a weight bearing long bone of the lower limbs with the tumor causing more than 50% of cortical bone; Lesion amenable to any curative intervention; Formal indication for local analgesic procedure other than percutaneous cryotherapy; Prior radiotherapy on the targeted lesion within the 3 weeks prior to randomization; Patient with any contraindication for the procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy, including treatment requiring ice ball formation within 0.5 cm of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve, structure, large abdominal vessels such as the aorta or inferior vena cava, bowel or bladder (except if active or passive thermic protection can be performed); Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders; Evidence of pregnancy, breast-feeding, or patient wishing to become pregnant during the study; Active, uncontrolled infection; Any cognitive impairment or any disease that may restrain the use of numeric scales and the administration of quality of life questionnaires; Clinically significant unrelated systemic illness (e.g., serious infection or significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or other organ dysfunction) that would likely interfere with study procedures or results; Concurrent participation in other experimental studies that could interfere with the primary endpoint assessment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charles MASTIER, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Leon Berard
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institut Bergonié
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Léon Bérard
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69008
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Paoli Calmettes
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13273
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier-Val d'Aurelle
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34298
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Centre René Gauducheau
City
Saint-Herblain
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Paul Strauss
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67065
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU de Strasbourg
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67091
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Cryotherapy Combined or Not With Analgesics in Uncontrolled Painful Musculoskeletal Metastasis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs