Scrambler Trial for Pain in NMOSD
Primary Purpose
Neuromyelitis Optica
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Scrambler
Scrambler Sham Control
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuromyelitis Optica
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be 18 years of age or older
- Have the presence of persistent CNP rated at a level of 4 or higher on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS); persistent pain is defined as presence for >3 months
- Patients must be stable in their disease, such that they have had no spinal cord relapses with the last 6 months
- Patients may use any combination of standard of care medications for pain treatment, to include anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, with no adjustments to the regimen within 30 days of enrollment.
- Aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-antibody positive or negative, or untested, but otherwise meeting criteria for diagnosis of NMOSD.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A concomitant diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy
- An ongoing concomitant central neurologic disorder
- Pain that is referable to a spinal cord lesion that starts above the 4th vertebral disc of the cervical spinal cord because FDA device clearance allows for treatment below the neck
- Use of an investigational agent for pain control within 30 days of enrollment
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Those with cognitive or mental incompetency
- Patients with implantable devices
Sites / Locations
- Johns Hopkins University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Scrambler
Sham-Control
Arm Description
This arm will receive the Scrambler intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.
This arm will receive the Sham-Control intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question
Will be determined by how many participants say "yes" to the following question, "Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?"
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits
Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Pain Level
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Change in Pain Level
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Change in Pain Level
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03452176
First Posted
February 22, 2018
Last Updated
April 21, 2020
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03452176
Brief Title
Scrambler Trial for Pain in NMOSD
Official Title
Phase II, Randomized, Single Blind Sham Controlled Trial Investigating Scrambler Therapy for Neuropathic Pain Caused by Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 29, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 29, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A novel technology called Scrambler Therapy is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of C fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. This neuromodulatory therapy has been investigated for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in several conditions including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and post-surgical neuropathic pain with promising results. Patients report sustained relief after undergoing daily treatment sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays. This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 & 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Detailed Description
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that disproportionately affects non-Caucasians and females,1,2 and has a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.52 to 4.4/100,000.3 NMOSD preferentially causes recurrent inflammatory attacks in the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to blindness, paralysis and death. Despite these devastating consequences of the disease, patients have reported that pain is among the most prevalent and debilitating symptom, and impacts mood, mobility and quality of life (QoL). In particular, central neuropathic pain (CNP) is pervasive, severe, intractable to treatment, and affects 62-91% of patients with NMOSD. CNP is described as agonizing burning, stabbing, shooting, tingling or squeezing sensation that is distressing, persistent and incapacitating.13,14 The presence of CNP in NMOSD is a direct consequence of targeted immune-mediated destruction of the spinal cord and may be influenced by lesion span and location: NMOSD lesions are generally transverse, involving both the central gray matter and dorsal horns. The dorsal horns are innervated by primary ascending fibers that convey sensory information to the brain. Damage to the central gray matter in NMOSD leads to astrocytic damage and tissue necrosis, thus disrupting sensory pain tracts going to and from the brain. As a consequence of ongoing spontaneous activity arising in the periphery, surviving neurons develop increased background activity and increased responses to ascending nerve impulses, including normally harmless tactile stimulation. An additional mechanism of CNP involves peripheral sensitization of non-myelinated ascending C fibers interpreted by the brain as persistent pain, a characteristic sign of an inflammatory process in the spinal cord.
Spinal CNP typically presents weeks to months after the cord damage has occurred, long after the acute injury, and may be the result of secondary changes due to reorganization of damaged circuits of the somatosensory system. CNP occurs at and below the spinal cord lesion level, and can persist for years, decades or throughout the patient's life. As with neuropathic pain from other etiologies, the most frequently-used medications for its treatment in NMOSD are anti-epileptics, antidepressants and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Descriptive studies in NMOSD recognized the inadequate effect of these medications, resulting in frequent breakthrough opioid use. Furthermore, side effects from these medications, particularly at higher doses, are independently associated with fatigue.
Scrambler is a type of transcutaneous electrostimulation (TENS) that uses peripheral nerve stimulation to modify ascending sensory responses in the spinal cord. Electrical impulses are transmitted via surface electrodes placed surrounding the pain area. Traditional TENS units take advantage of the Gate Control Theory in which stimulation of surrounding A-delta fibers dampens incoming pain signals. Scrambler therapy provides additional stimulation of ascending sensory C fibers that imitate normal nerve action potentials with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. The theory behind Scrambler treatment is that "scrambled" waveforms - instead of repetitive identical waveforms in traditional TENS - are dynamically assembled into strings of information that are interpreted by the brain to replace pain with "no-pain" information. In contrast to traditional TENS therapy that provides only short term pain relief, studies with Scrambler therapy in peripheral neuropathy suggest that patients can have significantly reduced pain or be pain-free for up to 3 months following a series of treatments, and that follow-up treatments may require fewer sessions for continued relief.
This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 & 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuromyelitis Optica
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
22 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Scrambler
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This arm will receive the Scrambler intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.
Arm Title
Sham-Control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
This arm will receive the Sham-Control intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Scrambler
Other Intervention Name(s)
CALMARE
Intervention Description
Scrambler is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of nociceptive fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways which has been investigated for treatment of peripheral neuropathy.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Scrambler Sham Control
Intervention Description
Sham control should be indistinguishable to the participants from experimental Scrambler therapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question
Description
Will be determined by how many participants say "yes" to the following question, "Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?"
Time Frame
10 days
Title
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits
Description
Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.
Time Frame
10 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Level
Description
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline, 10 days
Title
Change in Pain Level
Description
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline, 30 days
Title
Change in Pain Level
Description
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Be 18 years of age or older
Have the presence of persistent CNP rated at a level of 4 or higher on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS); persistent pain is defined as presence for >3 months
Patients must be stable in their disease, such that they have had no spinal cord relapses with the last 6 months
Patients may use any combination of standard of care medications for pain treatment, to include anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, with no adjustments to the regimen within 30 days of enrollment.
Aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-antibody positive or negative, or untested, but otherwise meeting criteria for diagnosis of NMOSD.
Exclusion Criteria:
A concomitant diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy
An ongoing concomitant central neurologic disorder
Pain that is referable to a spinal cord lesion that starts above the 4th vertebral disc of the cervical spinal cord because FDA device clearance allows for treatment below the neck
Use of an investigational agent for pain control within 30 days of enrollment
Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Those with cognitive or mental incompetency
Patients with implantable devices
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Levy, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maureen A Mealy, RN
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32269109
Citation
Mealy MA, Kozachik SL, Cook LJ, Totonis L, Salazar RA, Allen JK, Nolan MT, Smith TJ, Levy M. Scrambler therapy improves pain in neuromyelitis optica: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2020 May 5;94(18):e1900-e1907. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009370. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Scrambler Trial for Pain in NMOSD
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs