search
Back to results

Injections of Botulinic Toxin in Plantar Lesions of Localized Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex (EBTox)

Primary Purpose

Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botulinic toxin
Placebo
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Toulouse
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex focused on measuring Dermatology, Rare skin diseases, epidermolysis bullosa simplex, botulinic toxin, blisters

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of LEBS based on clinical symptoms and in some cases histological or molecular findings
  • Palmar skin lesions: blisters and/or : erosions, edematous and erythematous lesions, crusts. 3 lesions per foot, as a minimum
  • Similar clinical severity of skin lesions on both feet
  • Patient with social security
  • Written consent of the patient
  • Patient able to understand the study's questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with only one leg and a different number of toes on each foot.
  • Known hypersensitivity to botulinic toxin or its excipients
  • Current treatment with aminosides
  • Myasthenia
  • Swallowing difficulties
  • Respiratory disorders
  • Past medical history of dysphagia or pneumopathy of inhalation
  • Known allergy or contraindications to lidocaine, prilocaine, paracetamol or nitrous oxide
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test (β-HCG) for women of childbearing age, performed within the 2 days prior to the study. Breastfeeding.
  • Contraception during 6 months from inclusion
  • Mental or physical or judicial incapacity to fill the questionnaires
  • Guardianship patients
  • Skin infection on the soles at the time of the inclusion
  • Skin lesions located on the soles, not related to LEBS (ie. post traumatic wound, wart)
  • Patient suffering from dishydrosis
  • Botulinic toxin injections in the previous 6 months
  • Inclusion in another study in the previous 2 months

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital BordeauxRecruiting
  • University Hospital NiceRecruiting
  • Saint-Louis Hospital - APHPRecruiting
  • Hôpital Larrey - CHU ToulouseRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Botulinic toxin

Placebo

Arm Description

Injections of botulinic toxin (Dysport®, Allergan) 200 UI

Injections of physiological serum

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Global clinical improvement on each foot assessed by a blinded centralized independent reviewer using photographs, at M3 vs.baseline: IGA score (Improvement Global Assessment) assessed for each foot
IGA score is a 5-point scale (range from 0 to 4): 0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Global clinical improvement on each foot assessed by a blinded centralized independent reviewer using photographs: IGA score (Improvement Global Assessment) for each foot
IGA score is a 5-point scale (range from 0 to 4): 0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance
Global clinical improvement on each foot assessed by the investigator: IGA score (Improvement Global Assessment) assessed for each foot.
IGA score is a 5-point scale (range from 0 to 4): 0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance
Efficacy assessment concerning the number of plantar lesions clinically observed by the investigator
on each foot (erythematous and edematous areas, blisters, skin erosion, crusts)
Efficacy assessment on each foot of the affected plantar skin surface (blisters, erosions, erythematous and edematous areas, crusts)
calculation of this affected surface by delimiting its contours on a standardized photography using "Image J" software = computerized assessment by a blinded centralized independent reviewer.
Efficacy assessment by the patient himself, for each foot
Global improvement assessed with a 5-point score (0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance)
Plantar pain assessment by the patient himself, for each foot
Plantar pain assessment , using a 0 to 10 pain EVA scale. To perform the assessment, patient is requested to be standing on one foot (assessment of pain felt for this foot using EVA scale) then, standing on the other foot (assessment of pain felt for this other foot using EVA scale).
Immediate tolerance during injection :
Assessment performed by the patient of the pain felt during the act for each foot, using a 0 to 10 pain EVA scale (patient interview). Assessment performed by the investigator of local adverse events (for each foot) or general adverse events, during the injections
Mid-term and long-term tolerance
Assessment performed by the patient of local adverse events (for each foot) or general adverse events reported in the home patient's diary between the protocol visits (collected at month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 9). • Assessment performed by investigator of local adverse events (for each foot) or general adverse events, at D0 (at the end of/after the injections), M3 and M6.

Full Information

First Posted
February 6, 2018
Last Updated
August 22, 2023
Sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03453632
Brief Title
Injections of Botulinic Toxin in Plantar Lesions of Localized Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex
Acronym
EBTox
Official Title
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injections of Botulinic Toxin in Plantar Lesions of Patients Suffering From Localized Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex : Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 14, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that palmar injections of botulinic toxin, via an inhibition of the sudation, would limit the occurrence of blisters in localized epidermolysis bullosa simplex (LEBS).
Detailed Description
Epidermolysis bullosa is a group of rare genetic diseases characterized by the occurrence of blisters and erosions due to skin fragility. There are 4 different subgroups, based on the location of the skin cleavage area. The most frequent subgroup is the simplex form, consisting predominantly of the localized form (localized epidermolysis bullosa simplex: LEBS). The incidence of LEBS was estimated at between 1/318.000 and 1/35.000. The disease starts early in infancy by the occurrence of blisters and erosions located on soles, secondary to frictions during the walk. The phenomenon is worsened by heat and sudation. LEBS is due to mutations in keratin genes. Life expectancy in LEBS is normal but the quality of life is significantly impaired due to permanent skin pain and limitation of everyday activities (walking, sports). There is no effective or curative treatment. Patients must limit the frictions, protect the skin and use plasters in case of skin lesions. Botulinic toxin has an agreement for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis and has been shown to be also effective on palms and soles. The efficacy of botulinic toxin in plantar lesions of LEBS has been reported in the literature (one case report and a short retrospective series of 6 patients) but there is no proper study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex
Keywords
Dermatology, Rare skin diseases, epidermolysis bullosa simplex, botulinic toxin, blisters

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Each subject is his own witness, receiving the 2 treatments : left foot vs. right foot
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
25 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Botulinic toxin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Injections of botulinic toxin (Dysport®, Allergan) 200 UI
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Injections of physiological serum
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Botulinic toxin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dysport® (experimental drug)
Intervention Description
Clinical photographs of the soles Standardized anesthesia protocol (lidocaine, prilocaine on soles, cryo-spray, oral administration of paracetamol and only if necessary oxycodone and hydroxyzine). Cleaning and antiseptic on the soles Injections of botulinic toxin (200 UI) on right or left foot
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
physiological serum
Intervention Description
Clinical photographs of the soles Standardized anesthesia protocol (lidocaine, prilocaine on soles, cryo-spray, oral administration of paracetamol and only if necessary oxycodone and hydroxyzine). Cleaning and antiseptic on the soles Injections of physiological serum (200 UI) on right or left foot
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Global clinical improvement on each foot assessed by a blinded centralized independent reviewer using photographs, at M3 vs.baseline: IGA score (Improvement Global Assessment) assessed for each foot
Description
IGA score is a 5-point scale (range from 0 to 4): 0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance
Time Frame
at baseline vs month 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Global clinical improvement on each foot assessed by a blinded centralized independent reviewer using photographs: IGA score (Improvement Global Assessment) for each foot
Description
IGA score is a 5-point scale (range from 0 to 4): 0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance
Time Frame
at baseline vs month 6
Title
Global clinical improvement on each foot assessed by the investigator: IGA score (Improvement Global Assessment) assessed for each foot.
Description
IGA score is a 5-point scale (range from 0 to 4): 0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance
Time Frame
at month1, month 3 and month 6 respectively vs baseline
Title
Efficacy assessment concerning the number of plantar lesions clinically observed by the investigator
Description
on each foot (erythematous and edematous areas, blisters, skin erosion, crusts)
Time Frame
at baseline, month 1, month 3 and month 6
Title
Efficacy assessment on each foot of the affected plantar skin surface (blisters, erosions, erythematous and edematous areas, crusts)
Description
calculation of this affected surface by delimiting its contours on a standardized photography using "Image J" software = computerized assessment by a blinded centralized independent reviewer.
Time Frame
at baseline, month 1, month 3 and month 6
Title
Efficacy assessment by the patient himself, for each foot
Description
Global improvement assessed with a 5-point score (0=no improvement or worsening / 1=minimal improvement / 2=moderate improvement / 3=significant improvement / 4=total disappearance)
Time Frame
at month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 9
Title
Plantar pain assessment by the patient himself, for each foot
Description
Plantar pain assessment , using a 0 to 10 pain EVA scale. To perform the assessment, patient is requested to be standing on one foot (assessment of pain felt for this foot using EVA scale) then, standing on the other foot (assessment of pain felt for this other foot using EVA scale).
Time Frame
at baseline, month 1, month 3 and month 6
Title
Immediate tolerance during injection :
Description
Assessment performed by the patient of the pain felt during the act for each foot, using a 0 to 10 pain EVA scale (patient interview). Assessment performed by the investigator of local adverse events (for each foot) or general adverse events, during the injections
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Mid-term and long-term tolerance
Description
Assessment performed by the patient of local adverse events (for each foot) or general adverse events reported in the home patient's diary between the protocol visits (collected at month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 9). • Assessment performed by investigator of local adverse events (for each foot) or general adverse events, at D0 (at the end of/after the injections), M3 and M6.
Time Frame
Day 0, month 1, month 3 and month 6 and month 9

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of LEBS based on clinical symptoms and in some cases histological or molecular findings Palmar skin lesions: blisters and/or : erosions, edematous and erythematous lesions, crusts. 3 lesions per foot, as a minimum Similar clinical severity of skin lesions on both feet Patient with social security Written consent of the patient Patient able to understand the study's questionnaires Exclusion Criteria: Patients with only one leg and a different number of toes on each foot. Known hypersensitivity to botulinic toxin or its excipients Current treatment with aminosides Myasthenia Swallowing difficulties Respiratory disorders Past medical history of dysphagia or pneumopathy of inhalation Known allergy or contraindications to lidocaine, prilocaine, paracetamol or nitrous oxide Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test (β-HCG) for women of childbearing age, performed within the 2 days prior to the study. Breastfeeding. Contraception during 6 months from inclusion Mental or physical or judicial incapacity to fill the questionnaires Guardianship patients Skin infection on the soles at the time of the inclusion Skin lesions located on the soles, not related to LEBS (ie. post traumatic wound, wart) Patient suffering from dishydrosis Botulinic toxin injections in the previous 6 months Inclusion in another study in the previous 2 months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier, MD
Phone
5 67 77 81 41
Ext
33
Email
mazereeuw-hautier.j@chu-toulouse.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Isabelle DREYFUS, PharmD
Phone
5 67 77 81 10
Ext
33
Email
dreyfus.i@chu-toulouse.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Toulouse
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Bordeaux
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier COGREL, MD
Facility Name
University Hospital Nice
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine CHIAVERINI, MD
Facility Name
Saint-Louis Hospital - APHP
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emmanuel Bourrat, MD
Facility Name
Hôpital Larrey - CHU Toulouse
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier, Pr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24690439
Citation
Fine JD, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Eady RA, Bauer EA, Bauer JW, Has C, Heagerty A, Hintner H, Hovnanian A, Jonkman MF, Leigh I, Marinkovich MP, Martinez AE, McGrath JA, Mellerio JE, Moss C, Murrell DF, Shimizu H, Uitto J, Woodley D, Zambruno G. Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: updated recommendations on diagnosis and classification. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jun;70(6):1103-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.903. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19945613
Citation
Sprecher E. Epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Dermatol Clin. 2010 Jan;28(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2009.10.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18828848
Citation
Langan SM, Williams HC. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of treatments for inherited forms of epidermolysis bullosa. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009 Jan;34(1):20-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02789.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19153338
Citation
Abitbol RJ, Zhou LH. Treatment of epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Weber-Cockayne type, with botulinum toxin type A. Arch Dermatol. 2009 Jan;145(1):13-5. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2008.546. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24650374
Citation
Schwieger-Briel A, Chakkittakandiyil A, Lara-Corrales I, Aujla N, Lane AT, Lucky AW, Bruckner AL, Pope E. Instrument for scoring clinical outcome of research for epidermolysis bullosa: a consensus-generated clinical research tool. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015 Jan-Feb;32(1):41-52. doi: 10.1111/pde.12317. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Injections of Botulinic Toxin in Plantar Lesions of Localized Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs