search
Back to results

Analgesic Efficacy of Two Adjuvants During Spinal Anaesthesia.

Primary Purpose

Pain, Postoperative

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Tunisia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Saline Solution
Magnesium Sulfate
Midazolam 5 MG/ML Injection
Sponsored by
Centre de Maternité de Monastir
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain, Postoperative focused on measuring Bupivacaine,, Anesthetics, Adjuvants, Analgesics, Peripheral system, Central Nervous, sensory system, Agents, Physiological effects of drugs, opioid, Pain, Postoperative, Signs and Symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a mono fetal pregnancy, term> 35 week, planned caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, six-hour fasting, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication for intrathecal injection, known allergies to midazolam, other benzodiazepines, magnesium sulfate, caesarean section in extreme urgency, preeclamptic parturient, foetal death in utero, premature delivery (<32SA), anomaly of the placentation, any significant cardiovascular or hepatorenal diseases, a history of seizures or convulsive neurological disease, an altered coagulation profile. Exclusion criteria: failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion into general anesthesia, anesthetic or surgical perioperative incident requiring resuscitation, traumatic puncture, occurrence of serious complication of spinal anesthesia, loss of blindness or randomization of patients.

Sites / Locations

  • Chu Tahar Sfar
  • Centre de Maternité de Monastir

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group C

Group Mg

Group MDZ

Arm Description

Control group

Magnesium sulfate group

Midazolam group

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The first requirement for analgesic
Postoperatively, the patients were observed for the duration of analgesia using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), from 0 - 10 (with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain imaginable) at H2, H4, H6, H10, H12, H24 at rest and coughing or mobilization until supplementary analgesia was required. The duration of effective analgesia was defined as the time interval between administration of the IT drug to the time of first analgesic request or a VAS ≥ 4. Rescue analgesics were given in the form of a paracetamol injection (1g IV) as well as nefopam (20 mg IV) injection once the VAS was recorded as 4 or more.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The sensory blocks
. The assessments of the sensory and motor blocks were taken at the end of each minute until the maximum level of block (T4) was achieved and were assessed using a short, beveled 22-gauge needle and tested at the mid_clavicular line on the chest, trunk, and legs on either side. The duration of the sensory block was defined as the time for regression of the sensory block from the maximum block height to the L-1 dermatome as evaluated by a pinprick.
The motor block
The motor block was assessed using the Modified Bromage score (1:Complete block (unable to move feet or knees); 2: Almost complete block (able to move feet only); 3: Partial block (just able to move knees); 4: Detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees); 5: No detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; 6: Able to perform partial knee bend).
Hypotension
Hypotension was defined as a more than 20% decrease in the systolic blood pressure from the baseline. It was treated with IV fluids and an additional bolus of intravenous (IV) ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg) was repeated at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist at incremental doses
Bradycardia
Bradycardia was defined as a decrease in the pulse rate to less than 45 beats per minutes and was treated with an IV injection of 0.5mg atropine sulfate.
Sedation Score
The sedation scores were recorded using the observer's assessment of the Ramsay scale (Ramsay 1: Anxious, agitated, restless; Ramsay 2: Cooperative, oriented, tranquil; Ramsay 3: Responsive to commands only; Ramsay 4: Brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; Ramsay 5: Sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; Ramsay 6: No response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus).
Maternal satisfaction
Maternal satisfaction concerning the anesthetic technique was evaluated by the following score:• Excellent = comfort and satisfactory analgesia• Good = average comfort and acceptable analgesia • Poor = significant and lasting discomfort.

Full Information

First Posted
February 15, 2018
Last Updated
March 1, 2018
Sponsor
Centre de Maternité de Monastir
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03458078
Brief Title
Analgesic Efficacy of Two Adjuvants During Spinal Anaesthesia.
Official Title
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Two Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Centre de Maternité de Monastir

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
: Pain modulation is very important after operation, particularly for women who undergo caesarean section. A pain-free postoperative period is essential following a caesarean section so new mothers may care for and bond with their neonates. The consequences of the improper pain management which raise the healthcare costs and prolong the recovery process. Intrathecal adjuvants are often administered during this procedure to provide significant analgesia, but they may also have bothersome side effects. Intrathecal midazolam and magnesium sulfate produces effective postoperative analgesia with no significant side effects. Objectives: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal midazolam vs. Magnesium sulfate vs plain bupivacaine as an adjunct to bupivacaine in pregnancy patients scheduled for elective caesarean section.
Detailed Description
The patients were randomly allocated using a computer-generated randomization list to one of three groups that contained 50 parturients each via www.randomization.com. Group C (control group): 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (2 ml) + 100γ morphine (1ml) + 2.5 γ sufentanil (0.5ml) + 1 ml physiological saline. Group Mg (magnesium sulfate group): 10 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (2 ml) + 100γ Morphine (1ml) + 2.5 γ sufentanil (0.5ml) + 100 mg MgSO4 (1 ml). Group MDZ (midazolam group): 10 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (2 ml) + 100γ Morphine (1ml) + 2.5 γ Sufentanil (0.5ml) + 2mg Midazolam (0.4 + 0.6cc physiological saline (1 ml)). The parturients as well as the anesthetist who evaluated the protocol did not know the nature of the adjuvant injected in spinal anesthesia. The presented syringe contained one of the two adjuvants or the physiological serum in the same volume and of the same appearance. It was prepared by an anesthesist who was not included in the analysis of the study and was presented anonymously to the anesthetist in charge of the patient. A postoperative monitoring (PO) was performed during the first 24 hours in the intensive care unit by the anesthesist who did not know the nature of the injected adjuvant. All patients were kept nil per os for six hours prior to surgery.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Postoperative
Keywords
Bupivacaine,, Anesthetics, Adjuvants, Analgesics, Peripheral system, Central Nervous, sensory system, Agents, Physiological effects of drugs, opioid, Pain, Postoperative, Signs and Symptoms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group C
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Control group
Arm Title
Group Mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Magnesium sulfate group
Arm Title
Group MDZ
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Midazolam group
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Saline Solution
Other Intervention Name(s)
Saline
Intervention Description
Spinal injection of 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (2 ml) + 100γ morphine (1ml) + 2.5 γ sufentanil (0.5ml) + 1 ml physiological saline.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Magnesium Sulfate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Magnesium
Intervention Description
Spinal injection of 10 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (2 ml) + 100γ Morphine (1ml) + 2.5 γ sufentanil (0.5ml) + 100 mg MgSO4 (1 ml).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Midazolam 5 MG/ML Injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Midazolam
Intervention Description
Spinal injection of 10 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (2 ml) + 100γ Morphine (1ml) + 2.5 γ Sufentanil (0.5ml) + 2mg Midazolam (0.4 + 0.6cc physiological saline (1 ml)).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The first requirement for analgesic
Description
Postoperatively, the patients were observed for the duration of analgesia using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), from 0 - 10 (with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain imaginable) at H2, H4, H6, H10, H12, H24 at rest and coughing or mobilization until supplementary analgesia was required. The duration of effective analgesia was defined as the time interval between administration of the IT drug to the time of first analgesic request or a VAS ≥ 4. Rescue analgesics were given in the form of a paracetamol injection (1g IV) as well as nefopam (20 mg IV) injection once the VAS was recorded as 4 or more.
Time Frame
24 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The sensory blocks
Description
. The assessments of the sensory and motor blocks were taken at the end of each minute until the maximum level of block (T4) was achieved and were assessed using a short, beveled 22-gauge needle and tested at the mid_clavicular line on the chest, trunk, and legs on either side. The duration of the sensory block was defined as the time for regression of the sensory block from the maximum block height to the L-1 dermatome as evaluated by a pinprick.
Time Frame
24 hours postoperative
Title
The motor block
Description
The motor block was assessed using the Modified Bromage score (1:Complete block (unable to move feet or knees); 2: Almost complete block (able to move feet only); 3: Partial block (just able to move knees); 4: Detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees); 5: No detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; 6: Able to perform partial knee bend).
Time Frame
24 hours postoperative
Title
Hypotension
Description
Hypotension was defined as a more than 20% decrease in the systolic blood pressure from the baseline. It was treated with IV fluids and an additional bolus of intravenous (IV) ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg) was repeated at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist at incremental doses
Time Frame
24 hours post operative
Title
Bradycardia
Description
Bradycardia was defined as a decrease in the pulse rate to less than 45 beats per minutes and was treated with an IV injection of 0.5mg atropine sulfate.
Time Frame
24 hours post operative
Title
Sedation Score
Description
The sedation scores were recorded using the observer's assessment of the Ramsay scale (Ramsay 1: Anxious, agitated, restless; Ramsay 2: Cooperative, oriented, tranquil; Ramsay 3: Responsive to commands only; Ramsay 4: Brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; Ramsay 5: Sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; Ramsay 6: No response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus).
Time Frame
24 hours post operative
Title
Maternal satisfaction
Description
Maternal satisfaction concerning the anesthetic technique was evaluated by the following score:• Excellent = comfort and satisfactory analgesia• Good = average comfort and acceptable analgesia • Poor = significant and lasting discomfort.
Time Frame
24 hours post operative

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: a mono fetal pregnancy, term> 35 week, planned caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, six-hour fasting, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. Exclusion Criteria: contraindication for intrathecal injection, known allergies to midazolam, other benzodiazepines, magnesium sulfate, caesarean section in extreme urgency, preeclamptic parturient, foetal death in utero, premature delivery (<32SA), anomaly of the placentation, any significant cardiovascular or hepatorenal diseases, a history of seizures or convulsive neurological disease, an altered coagulation profile. Exclusion criteria: failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion into general anesthesia, anesthetic or surgical perioperative incident requiring resuscitation, traumatic puncture, occurrence of serious complication of spinal anesthesia, loss of blindness or randomization of patients.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rim Cherif, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
CHU TAHAR SFAR MAHDIA
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Chu Tahar Sfar
City
Mahdia
ZIP/Postal Code
5100
Country
Tunisia
Facility Name
Centre de Maternité de Monastir
City
Monastir
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Tunisia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
Citation
Zakeri H, Pouralborz Y, Askari A, Parkhah M, Hosseinipour A. The adjunctive midazolam or magnesium sulfate to intrathecal bupivacaine analgesic effect in caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Biomedical Research. 2017; 28: 3783-3787.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Analgesic Efficacy of Two Adjuvants During Spinal Anaesthesia.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs