search
Back to results

Thermal Micro-cautery for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis (TMC-PKO)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Ireland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery
Sponsored by
The National Children's Hospital, Tallaght
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Pain Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • awaiting knee replacement surgery on an orthopaedic waiting list

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Sites / Locations

  • Tallaght University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention group: PNFS-TMC

Control group: Stepladder analgesics

Arm Description

Procedure- The patients in the intervention group were examined and the most painful points over the knee with the avoidance of the proposed site for skin incision for a future knee replacement operation were marked. The marked points received an intervention in the form of application of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery (PNFS-TMC), an intense heat by metal rod was applied to the painful points for 0.3 to 0.5 seconds. The patients to receive 4 sessions over a period of 8 weeks with 2 weeks rest after every session.

Patients with painful knee osteoarthritis and on the waiting list for a total knee replacement surgery and declined to have PNFS-TMC were included in the control group. The control group received the stepladder analgesic protocol for pain management. The analgesic protocol was managed by the orthopaedic team without any interference by the investigators.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in VAS score reduction after 4 sessions
To measure the change in a visual analogue scale is a numerical ruler of 10 cm in length with each centimetre marked and the patient chooses a number between one and ten to score their pain where zero is no pain and 10 is the worst pain that the subject can imagine.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in activity levels
The change in the activity subjective scores reported by the patient as follow; score 1 means improved , score 2 means worse and score 3 means no change
Change in sleep pattern
The change in the subjective scores reported by patient as follows, score 1 means improved, 2 means worse and 3 means the same as before
Change in medication use
1 means improved as in less use of medication, 2 means worse more use of medication and 3 means the same use of analgesic medication

Full Information

First Posted
February 9, 2018
Last Updated
November 6, 2019
Sponsor
The National Children's Hospital, Tallaght
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03460717
Brief Title
Thermal Micro-cautery for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis
Acronym
TMC-PKO
Official Title
Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-cautery for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Non Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The National Children's Hospital, Tallaght

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To trial a traditional pain management technique from Ayurveda in a modern way - the technique involves micro - cautery to painful areas in knee osteoarthritis for patients on a waiting list for knee replacement. The Investigators will include a waiting list control series.
Detailed Description
The Research and Ethics Committee at Tallaght University Hospital approved the recruitment of patient into the study by invitation. Patients who accepted the invitation were enrolled into the intervention group and patients who declined the invitation were enrolled into the control group and both groups were followed up for 8 week period. Agnikarma is a traditional surgical technique (thermal cautery) described in ancient surgical manuscripts for the treatment of severe persistent pain. It applies intense heat to points of maximum pain agreed with the patient pre procedure. The heat is applied by a metal rod (Shalaka) heated in an open naked flame. The rod is applied to the skin at the agreed pain point in an even manner and generates a micro second degree burn. A traditional herbal cream is then applied which cools the application as reported by the patient. It is usual to allow skin healing to occur before the application of further heat (1-2 weeks). The pain points can move within a painful area and the technique best works with precise application to the current pain point. So before each application the precise points are agreed with the patient in advance by demarcating the painful area with a pen and searching for the points of maximum tenderness within that field. The purpose of this study was simply to define if indeed this technique delivers pain relief as observed in practice. The investigators chose one group to study - painful knee arthritis. In this condition patients often wait many years for the definitive procedure and run some risks with current pain relief treatment. As these patients were not the normal attendees at a pain clinic the investigators decided in advance to limit the study to 4 applications over a 4- 8 week period, the latter to allow for different speeds at which the skin might heal. The investigators recruited both our interventional group and waiting list control group from the same orthopedic waiting list.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
intervention offered and those who decline are followed as a waiting list control
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
the person performing the intervention and the assessment are different
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention group: PNFS-TMC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Procedure- The patients in the intervention group were examined and the most painful points over the knee with the avoidance of the proposed site for skin incision for a future knee replacement operation were marked. The marked points received an intervention in the form of application of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery (PNFS-TMC), an intense heat by metal rod was applied to the painful points for 0.3 to 0.5 seconds. The patients to receive 4 sessions over a period of 8 weeks with 2 weeks rest after every session.
Arm Title
Control group: Stepladder analgesics
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients with painful knee osteoarthritis and on the waiting list for a total knee replacement surgery and declined to have PNFS-TMC were included in the control group. The control group received the stepladder analgesic protocol for pain management. The analgesic protocol was managed by the orthopaedic team without any interference by the investigators.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery
Intervention Description
The most painful points over the knee received an intense heat by a metal rod for 0.5 seconds.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in VAS score reduction after 4 sessions
Description
To measure the change in a visual analogue scale is a numerical ruler of 10 cm in length with each centimetre marked and the patient chooses a number between one and ten to score their pain where zero is no pain and 10 is the worst pain that the subject can imagine.
Time Frame
VAS score was recorded every two weeks, after each session with a total of 4 sessions over 8 weeks. 2 weeks interval between sessions
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in activity levels
Description
The change in the activity subjective scores reported by the patient as follow; score 1 means improved , score 2 means worse and score 3 means no change
Time Frame
The objective activity score was recorded every two weeks after each session with a total of 4 sessions over 8 weeks
Title
Change in sleep pattern
Description
The change in the subjective scores reported by patient as follows, score 1 means improved, 2 means worse and 3 means the same as before
Time Frame
The change in the sleep pattern was recorded every two weeks after each session with a total of 4 sessions over 8 weeks
Title
Change in medication use
Description
1 means improved as in less use of medication, 2 means worse more use of medication and 3 means the same use of analgesic medication
Time Frame
The change in the medication use was recorded every two weeks after each session with a total of 4 sessions over 8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: awaiting knee replacement surgery on an orthopaedic waiting list Exclusion Criteria: none
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
camillus power, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Tallaght University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tallaght University Hospital
City
Dublin
ZIP/Postal Code
D24NROA
Country
Ireland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Thermal Micro-cautery for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs