Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury (PREvsSPC)
Primary Purpose
Urethral Injury
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Primary realignment
Suprapubic cystostomy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Urethral Injury
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male children less than 18 years presenting with pelvic fracture urethral injury
Exclusion Criteria:
- Associated bladder neck injury.
- Associated rectal injury.
- Late presentation >2weeks since trauma.
- History of previous urethral intervention.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Primary realignment
Suprapubic cystostomy
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The success rate after initial intervention (realignment or suprapubic cystostomy).
The fulfillment of success criteria after initial intervention which includes good stream, no postvoid residual urine, normal Qmax for age and free retrograde urethrogram
Secondary Outcome Measures
The success rate of urethroplasty in both groups.
The surgical outcome of urethroplasty in cases of children with posterior urethral stricture after failed realignment or suprapubic cystostomy.
The need for urethroplasty in both groups.
Comparison of the need for urethroplasty in children with failed realignment or suprapubic cystostomy.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03468387
Brief Title
Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury
Acronym
PREvsSPC
Official Title
Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury in Children: Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 1, 2018 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Assiut University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
It is prospective randomized comparative clinical trial comparing primary urethral realignment vs. suprapubic cystostomy in initial management of pediatric pelvic fracture urethral injury regarding:
The success rate after initial intervention.
The need for urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.
The success rate of urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urethral Injury
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Primary realignment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Suprapubic cystostomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Primary realignment
Intervention Description
Endoscopic realignment of rupture urethra over a urethral catheter
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Suprapubic cystostomy
Intervention Description
Percutaneous cystostomy catheter will be inserted under sonographic guidance
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The success rate after initial intervention (realignment or suprapubic cystostomy).
Description
The fulfillment of success criteria after initial intervention which includes good stream, no postvoid residual urine, normal Qmax for age and free retrograde urethrogram
Time Frame
3 months after initial intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The success rate of urethroplasty in both groups.
Description
The surgical outcome of urethroplasty in cases of children with posterior urethral stricture after failed realignment or suprapubic cystostomy.
Time Frame
3 months after urethroplasty.
Title
The need for urethroplasty in both groups.
Description
Comparison of the need for urethroplasty in children with failed realignment or suprapubic cystostomy.
Time Frame
3 months after initial intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male children less than 18 years presenting with pelvic fracture urethral injury
Exclusion Criteria:
Associated bladder neck injury.
Associated rectal injury.
Late presentation >2weeks since trauma.
History of previous urethral intervention.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs