search
Back to results

Plantar Fasciopathy and the Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, Physical Training or Usual Care

Primary Purpose

Plantar Fascitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radial extracorporeal shock wave
Sham-radial extracorporeal shock wave
Standardized high-load exercise program
Usual care
Sponsored by
Oslo University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Plantar Fascitis focused on measuring plantar fasciopathy, plantar fasciitis, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, sham- radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, high-load strength training, foot orthosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain with duration > 3 months localized in the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia on the medial calcaneal tuberosity.

Only patients with reported pain NRS 3 or more at activity at baseline, will be included in the trial.

  • Tenderness to palpation corresponding to the painful area.
  • Be residents of Norway, understand oral and written Norwegian.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy the last 3 months.
  • Spondylarthropathy or rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Plantar fibromatosis.
  • Tarsal tunnel syndrome.
  • Polyneuropathy.
  • Previous surgery with remaining osteosynthesis material in the foot or ankle.
  • Contraindications for shock wave therapy ( use of anticoagulant drugs, pregnancy, bleeding disorders, epilepsy or pacemaker)

Sites / Locations

  • Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Radial extracorporeal shock wave

Sham-radial extracorporeal shock wave

Standardized high-load exercise program

Usual care

Arm Description

Active shock wave treatment. All patients will get standardized information and custom made foot orthosis.

Sham- shock wave treatment. All patients will get standardized information and custom made foot orthosis.

High-load exercise treatment. All patients will get standardized information and custom made foot orthosis.

Only standardized information and custom made foot orthosis

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Change in heel pain (during activity the last week ). Numeric rating scale is a patient reported pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Foot Functional Index, revised, short Version (FFI-RS)
Change in Foot Health status. Consists of 34 questions.
RAND- 12
Health related quality of life. 12 items.
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Change in heel pain (in rest the last week). Numeric rating scale is a patient reported pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Change in heel pain (in activity the last week).Numeric rating scale is a patient reported pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Patient Global Impression Of Change Scale (PGIC)
7-point scale ranging from "very much improved" to "very much worse"

Full Information

First Posted
March 14, 2018
Last Updated
March 14, 2023
Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03472989
Brief Title
Plantar Fasciopathy and the Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, Physical Training or Usual Care
Official Title
The Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT), Sham- rESWT, Standardised Exercise Program or Usual Care for Patients With Plantar Fasciopathy. Study Protocol for a Double-blind, Randomised Sham- Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 7, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 22, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT), sham- rESWT or standardised exercise program is more effective on change in heel pain than usual care in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy. The null hypothesis is: There is no difference between rESWT, sham- rESWT or standardised exercise program on change in heel pain (primary outcome) and functioning (secondary outcomes) compared to usual care in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy at 6 months follow-up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up). Alternative hypothesis is: H1: There is a difference between rESWT and usual care on change in heel pain (and secondary outcomes) at the 6 months follow-up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up). H2: There is a difference between sham-rESWT and usual care on change in heel pain (and secondary outcomes ) at 6 months follow-up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up). H3: There is a difference between standardized exercise program and usual care on change in heel pain (and secondary outcomes) at 6 months follow- up (and secondary outcomes at the 12 months follow-up).
Detailed Description
Plantar fasciopathy is a common cause of plantar heel pain, with reported lifetime prevalence up to 10%. The choice of best practice in these patients is debated. Two randomised studies reported that Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) is effective, but a meta-analysis concluded that due to methological limitations the evidence is questioned. There are few studies reporting the effect on exercise programs with high-load strength training, despite widespread use. The usual care at our outpatient clinic is information on the pathogenesis, etiology and prognosis. We give advice on using proper footwear, including foot orthosis and to accept pain to a certain level during activity. To our knowledge there are no other previous trials comparing rESWT, sham-rESWT and exercises to usual care. This trial is designed in order to provide results important for future clinical practice. The patients who give their informed consent will be randomised into one of the four Groups; rESWT, sham-rESWT, standardized exercise or usual care. A computer generation randomisation schedule with blocks of 8, in a 1:1 ratio, will be performed by an external statistician and electronically concealed. All the patients regardless of group allocation will receive standardized information (oral and written) on the condition and get custom made foot orthosis made by an orthopedic technician at Sophies Minde AS. The patients are blinded for rESWT/sham-rESWT, whereas blinding of the exercise group and usual care group is not possible. To evaluate the blinding of the rESWT, the patients are asked after the last treatment whether they believe that they have received real rESWT, sham-rESWT or if they do not know. The patients will have follow-up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The main outcome is change in heel pain (NRS) during activity at 6 months. Patient characteristics, anthropometric data and the duration of symptoms in the different groups will be registered at baseline, and presented as mean values (SD) for continuous variables or numbers (%) for categorical data. Pain and function scores will be presented as mean (SD). In addition to the two- group comparisons with t-tests, we will perform longitudinal data analysis and perform a mixed model analysis to compare differences between groups at follow- up with adjustment for scores at baseline and present mean differences (95% confidence intervals). We will perform analysis regarding secondary outcome as stated above. In addition we will apply multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis to identify predictive factors as demographics, clinical and ultrasound findings for primary and secondary outcomes. Model building will be done in a way that is appropriate for the given sample sizes, by restricting the number of potential predictive factors and considering shrinkage methods to stabilise predictions. Participants in the exercise group not attending 6 of 8 sessions with the physiotherapist or not completing 30 of 36 exercise sessions (3 sessions per week, 12 weeks) are regarded as non- adherence. In the rESWT and sham- rESWT group, participants not attending 2 of 3 sessions are regarded as non- adherence. They will be included in the intention- to- treat analysis. There will also be a separate intention-to- treat analysis with only adherent patients. There will be performed a study evaluating the validity, reliability and responsiveness on the Foot Functional Index Revised Short Form.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Plantar Fascitis
Keywords
plantar fasciopathy, plantar fasciitis, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, sham- radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, high-load strength training, foot orthosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the four intervention groups in parallell for the duration of the study.
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The patients who receive rESWT or sham-rESWT will be blinded.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Radial extracorporeal shock wave
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Active shock wave treatment. All patients will get standardized information and custom made foot orthosis.
Arm Title
Sham-radial extracorporeal shock wave
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham- shock wave treatment. All patients will get standardized information and custom made foot orthosis.
Arm Title
Standardized high-load exercise program
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
High-load exercise treatment. All patients will get standardized information and custom made foot orthosis.
Arm Title
Usual care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Only standardized information and custom made foot orthosis
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Radial extracorporeal shock wave
Intervention Description
Patients will receive treatment once a week for 3 weeks. Treatment will be administered by using the rESWT device named Swiss DolorClast (EMS). 2000 impulses are implied via the power hand piece to the area of max tenderness at the insertion of the plantar fascia, with a pressure of 1.5-3 bars depending on what the patient tolerates. The treatments will be given by a trained physiotherapist at our Department. Patients will also receive standardized information at baseline, and will get custom made foot orthosis.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham-radial extracorporeal shock wave
Intervention Description
Patients will receive the same treatment as the patients in the group receiving real shock waves, but no real shock waves are conducted. The probe is similar in design, sound and shape. Patients will also receive standardized information at baseline, and will get custom made foot orthosis.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Standardized high-load exercise program
Intervention Description
Patients will be instructed to do 2 exercises: "Unilateral heel raise" and "unilateral leg squat" three times a week for 12 weeks. The patients will have a total of 8 sessions supervised by a physiotherapist at our Department. Patients will also receive standardized information at baseline, and will get custom made foot orthosis.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Usual care
Intervention Description
Patients will get standardized information as in the other three intervention groups with information on pathogenesis, etiology and prognosis, and they will get custom made foot orthosis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Description
Change in heel pain (during activity the last week ). Numeric rating scale is a patient reported pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Foot Functional Index, revised, short Version (FFI-RS)
Description
Change in Foot Health status. Consists of 34 questions.
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
RAND- 12
Description
Health related quality of life. 12 items.
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Description
Change in heel pain (in rest the last week). Numeric rating scale is a patient reported pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Description
Change in heel pain (in activity the last week).Numeric rating scale is a patient reported pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Patient Global Impression Of Change Scale (PGIC)
Description
7-point scale ranging from "very much improved" to "very much worse"
Time Frame
6 and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Pain with duration > 3 months localized in the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia on the medial calcaneal tuberosity. Only patients with reported pain NRS 3 or more at activity at baseline, will be included in the trial. Tenderness to palpation corresponding to the painful area. Be residents of Norway, understand oral and written Norwegian. Exclusion Criteria: Treatment with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy the last 3 months. Spondylarthropathy or rheumatoid arthritis. Plantar fibromatosis. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Polyneuropathy. Previous surgery with remaining osteosynthesis material in the foot or ankle. Contraindications for shock wave therapy ( use of anticoagulant drugs, pregnancy, bleeding disorders, epilepsy or pacemaker)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aasne Fenne Hoksrud, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Oslo University hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0450
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19440137
Citation
Rompe JD. Plantar fasciopathy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Jun;17(2):100-4. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181a3d60e.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28403111
Citation
Sun J, Gao F, Wang Y, Sun W, Jiang B, Li Z. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis: A meta-analysis of RCTs. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(15):e6621. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006621.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25145882
Citation
Rathleff MS, Molgaard CM, Fredberg U, Kaalund S, Andersen KB, Jensen TT, Aaskov S, Olesen JL. High-load strength training improves outcome in patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Jun;25(3):e292-300. doi: 10.1111/sms.12313. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26609884
Citation
Landorf KB. Plantar heel pain and plantar fasciitis. BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Nov 25;2015:1111.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10797213
Citation
Gill LH. Plantar Fasciitis: Diagnosis and Conservative Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997 Mar;5(2):109-117. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199703000-00006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20460065
Citation
Ibrahim MI, Donatelli RA, Schmitz C, Hellman MA, Buxbaum F. Chronic plantar fasciitis treated with two sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 May;31(5):391-7. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0391.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18832341
Citation
Gerdesmeyer L, Frey C, Vester J, Maier M, Weil L Jr, Weil L Sr, Russlies M, Stienstra J, Scurran B, Fedder K, Diehl P, Lohrer H, Henne M, Gollwitzer H. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):2100-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324176. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31204294
Citation
Riel H, Jensen MB, Olesen JL, Vicenzino B, Rathleff MS. Self-dosed and pre-determined progressive heavy-slow resistance training have similar effects in people with plantar fasciopathy: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2019 Jul;65(3):144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29555795
Citation
Rasenberg N, Riel H, Rathleff MS, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Middelkoop M. Efficacy of foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(16):1040-1046. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097892. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28935689
Citation
Whittaker GA, Munteanu SE, Menz HB, Tan JM, Rabusin CL, Landorf KB. Foot orthoses for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;52(5):322-328. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097355. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28477082
Citation
Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F. Why We should Assess Patients' Expectations in Clinical Trials. Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):107-110. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0071-8. Epub 2017 May 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23369667
Citation
Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, Stuck RM. A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Feb 1;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15085917
Citation
Johnson JA, Maddigan SL. Performance of the RAND-12 and SF-12 summary scores in type 2 diabetes. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):449-56. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018494.72748.cf.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15621359
Citation
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32600386
Citation
Heide M, Mork M, Roe C, Brox JI, Fenne Hoksrud A. The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT, standardised exercise programme or usual care for patients with plantar fasciopathy: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04510-z.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Plantar Fasciopathy and the Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, Physical Training or Usual Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs