search
Back to results

RCT Comparing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab in MS (RAM-MS)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cyclophosphamide and ATG
Alemtuzumab
Cladribine Pill
Ocrelizumab
Sponsored by
Haukeland University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring multiple sclerosis,, HSCT, alemtuzumab, RCT

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between ≥18 to ≤50, both genders
  2. Women of childbearing potential* (WOCBP) and men in a sexual relation with WOCBP must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly.
  3. Diagnosis of RRMS using revised McDonald criteria of clinically definite MS1
  4. An EDSS score of 0 to 5.5
  5. Significant inflammatory disease activity in the last year despite treatment with standard disease modifying therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod, natalizumab)

    a. Significant inflammatory disease activity is defined by: i. One or more clinically reported multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse(s), ii. AND 1 or more T1 Gd-enhanced lesion(s), iii. OR three or more new or enlarging T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) The relapse(s) must have been treated with iv or oral high dose corticosteroids prescribed by a neurologist, and must have occurred 3 or more months after the onset of an immunomodulatory treatment, as MS immunomodulatory treatment may reach full effect after 3 months or more2.

  6. The patient is a RRMS-patient referred from neurological departments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden or possibly other European countries to an assigned study site.
  7. Signed informed consent and expected patient cooperation regarding the treatment schemes and procedures planned in the treatment and follow-up periods must be obtained and documented according to ICH GCP and national/local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known hypersensitivity or other known serious side effects for any of the study medications, including co-medications such as high-dose glucocorticosteroids
  2. Any illness or prior treatment that in the opinion of the investigators would jeopardize the ability of the patient to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy or high-dose glucocorticosteroids
  3. Any ongoing infection, including Tbc, CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, hepatitis virus, toxoplasmosis, HIV or syphilis infections, as well as heaptitis B surface antigen positivity and/or hepatitis C PCR positivity verified at Visit 1
  4. Patients without a history of chickenpox or without vaccination against varicella zoster virus (VZV), unless tested for antibodies to VZV. VZV negative patients can only be included if they receive vaccination against VZV at least 6 weeks prior to inclusion.
  5. Current or previous treatments with long-term effects that may influence the treatment effects or potential toxicities/side effects of the treatment arms. This includes, but is not restricted to previous treatment with rituximab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, cladribin and ocrelizumab
  6. Immunocompromised patients, or patients currently reveiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive therapy
  7. Treatment with glucocorticoids or ACTH within one month prior to start of study treatment
  8. Having experienced an MS relapse within one month prior to study inclusion
  9. Prior or current major depression
  10. Prior or current psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction influencing the patient ability to make an informed consent or comply with the treatment and follow-up phases of this protocol.
  11. Prior or current alcohol or drug dependencies
  12. Cardiac insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, significant cardiac dysrhytmia, unstable or advanced ischemic heart disease (NYHA III or IV)
  13. Significant hypertension: BP > 180/110
  14. Active malignancy, or prior history of malignancy except localized basal cell, squamous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
  15. Known untreated or unregulated thyroid disease
  16. Failure to willingly accept or comprehend risk of irreversible sterility as a side effect of therapy
  17. WBC < 1,5 x 109/L if not caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication. If WBC < 1,5 x 109/L is caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication the WBC count must be > 1,5 x 109/L before start of study treatment.
  18. Platelet (thrombocyte) count < 100 x 109/L
  19. ALAT and/or ASAT more than 2 times the upper normal reference limit (UNL)
  20. Serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L
  21. Serum bilirubin > ULN
  22. Moderate or severely impaired kidney function (creatinine-clearance below 60 ml/min)
  23. Presence of metallic objects implanted in the body that would preclude the ability of the patient to safely have MRI exams
  24. Diagnosis of primary progressive MS
  25. Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS
  26. Treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod within the last 2 months, and treatment with dimetylfumurat within the last month (washout must be performed as specified in section 5.1) prior to start of study medication.
  27. Use of teriflunomide (Aubagio®) within the previous 2 years unless cleared from the body (plasma concentration < 0.02 mcg/ml following elimination from the body with cholestyramine or activated powdered charcoal) as specified in section 5.1 prior to start of study medication.
  28. Any hereditary neurological disease such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or Spinocerebellar ataxia
  29. Any disease that can influence the patient safety and compliance, or the evaluation of disability
  30. History of hypersensitivity reaction to rabbit
  31. Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or who plan to become pregnant within the timeframe of this study
  32. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational treatment(s). Patients participating in a purely observational trial will not be excluded.

Sites / Locations

  • RigshospitaletRecruiting
  • VUmcRecruiting
  • Haukeland University HospitalRecruiting
  • Akershus University HospitalRecruiting
  • University Hospital of North NorwayRecruiting
  • St. Olav's University HospitalRecruiting
  • Sahlgrenska University HospitalRecruiting
  • Akademiska sjukhusetRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

HSCT (Cyclophosphamide and ATG)

Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab

Arm Description

Day 1: Cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 body surface area Days 5-10: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) 5 mcg/kg body weight/day sc. Day 11 and until apheresis is discontinued: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) 5 mcg/kg body weight x 2 sc/day. HSCT days -5 to -2: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day. HSCT days -5 to -1: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG-rabbit, Thymoglobuline®) 0.5 mg/kg body weight iv on day -5, 1.0 mg ATG-rabbit/kg will be given iv on day -4, and 1.5 mg ATG-rabbit /kg will be given iv on days -3,-2 and -1 over 10 hours. HSCT day 0: Reinfusion of a minimum of 3,0 x 106 CD 34+ cells/kg body weight.

Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab administered after the label of the study drug.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA, as defined per protocol).
A protocol-defined disease activity event is the occurrence of at least one of the following: A new T1 Gd-enhanced lesion on MRI of the brain and spinal cord A new T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI of brain and spinal cord A protocol-defined MS relapse (see below) 24 week confirmed disability progression based on increases in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

NEDA-4
Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %)
Pre-planned study extension:
Proportion of patients who have NEDA 4
Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event
Time to first sign of new disease activity, as measured as new relapses, EDSS-progression, MRI-activity or brain atrophy
Change in Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS) from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Weeks 96 and 240
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.
The proportion of patients who, at Week 96, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) , confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline
Disability progression, as measured with EDSS. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.
Annualized rate of protocol-defined relapses during 96 weeks
ARR
Time to onset of first protocol-defined relapse
Time to first relapse
Change in MRI T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume from baseline to weeks 96 (and 240)
Change in T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume
Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume from baseline to weeks 96 (and 240)
Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume
Change in brain volume from baseline to week 96 (and week 240)
Change in brain volume
Time to detection of a new MRI T2 lesion
Time to New MRI T2-lesion
Total number of MRI T1-weighted Gd-enhanced lesions
Number of Gd-lesions
Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions
Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions
Change in Nine-hole-peg test (9-HPT) score from baseline to week 96 (and 240)
The 9HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function. The participant picks up 9 pegs puts them in a block containing nine empty holes, and, once they are in the holes, removes them again as quickly as possible one at a time. The total time to complete the task is recorded. Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand are immediately followed by two consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The two trials for each hand are averaged
Change in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) score from baseline to week 48, 96 (and 240)
The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The participant is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time is calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the participant has reached the 25-foot mark. The task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. The score for the T25FW is the average of the 2 completed trials. The 95% CI of the percentage is based on normal approximation.
Change in The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) score from baseline to week 96 (and 240)
BICAMS is a composite cognitive assessment tool comprising of the three components : Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) , California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) and Brief visuospatial memory test- Revised (BVMT-R)

Full Information

First Posted
February 13, 2018
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Sponsor
Haukeland University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03477500
Brief Title
RCT Comparing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab in MS
Acronym
RAM-MS
Official Title
Randomized Autologous heMatopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab for Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 21, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 21, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Haukeland University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is a randomized multicentre, multinational, treatment interventional study of RRMS patients with breakthrough inflammatory disease activity in spite of ongoing standard immunomodulatory medication. The study has two treatment arms; arm A: HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and arm B: alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab. A pre-planned 3-year follow-up extension period will be performed depending on future funding. The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and side effects of a new treatment intervention in RRMS; HSCT, and, thereby, the value of HSCT in clinical practice. Data from recently published patient series indicate that HSCT may have a significantly higher treatment effect than currently registered RRMS immunomodulatory treatments. This study will determine the relative role of HSCT versus alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized study of autologous HSCT using a low intensity, non-ablative conditioning regimen with cyclophosphamide and ATG versus treatment with the currently presumed best available immunomodulatory medication (alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab) in RRMS patients with significant inflammatory disease activity in spite of ongoing immunomodulatory MS treatment. Significant disease activity is defined as having one or more clinically reported multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse(s), AND 1 or more T1 Gd-enhanced lesion(s), OR three or more new or enlarging T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over the last year while being treated on immunomodulatory medication by standard national guidelines. The relapse(s) must have occurred 3 or more months after the onset of an immunomodulatory treatment, as immunomodulatory treatment in MS may reach full effect after 3 months or more. Both the knowledge of the treatment effect of registered immunomodulatory therapies for RRMS, and the number of treatments approved for RRMS by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are rapidly increasing. During the study period, there may thus appear new supplementing information on other MS immunomodulatory treatments that favour the use of a new comparator (replacing or supplementing the comparators). This will be evaluated by the PMC if applicable during the study period and the planned extension period. If the treatment efficacy obtained by HSCT is better than the currently most efficacious standard, immunomodulatory treatment in randomized treatment trials, HSCT will likely be approved as a part of the standard treatment recommendations for a significant proportion of RRMS patients. A randomized study regarding with statistical power to evaluate the clinical outcome of autologous HSCT compared to a standard immunomodulatory treatment in MS has not yet been published. Except for Sweden, HSCT is currently not registered as a part of standard MS treatment in the public health services of Europe. The HSCT regimen for the study will be identical to the regimen used in similar patient populations in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab have been chosen as the primary comparators, because they are the immunomodulatory medication currently authorised by the EMA for treatment of RRMS with the most favourable therapeutic effects. In a meta-analysis of immunomodulatory treatment effects in RRMS, thse medications had the most eminent reduction of annualized relapse rate and 3 month confirmed disability progression. In this study, a health economic evaluation will be included. Accordingly, the proposed study should provide a robust basis for future official decisions regarding the role of HSCT in RRMS treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis,, HSCT, alemtuzumab, RCT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HSCT (Cyclophosphamide and ATG)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Day 1: Cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 body surface area Days 5-10: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) 5 mcg/kg body weight/day sc. Day 11 and until apheresis is discontinued: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) 5 mcg/kg body weight x 2 sc/day. HSCT days -5 to -2: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day. HSCT days -5 to -1: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG-rabbit, Thymoglobuline®) 0.5 mg/kg body weight iv on day -5, 1.0 mg ATG-rabbit/kg will be given iv on day -4, and 1.5 mg ATG-rabbit /kg will be given iv on days -3,-2 and -1 over 10 hours. HSCT day 0: Reinfusion of a minimum of 3,0 x 106 CD 34+ cells/kg body weight.
Arm Title
Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab administered after the label of the study drug.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cyclophosphamide and ATG
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sendoxan
Intervention Description
Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Alemtuzumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lemtrada
Intervention Description
Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cladribine Pill
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mavenclad
Intervention Description
Cladribine (Mavenclad)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ocrelizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ocrevus
Intervention Description
Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA, as defined per protocol).
Description
A protocol-defined disease activity event is the occurrence of at least one of the following: A new T1 Gd-enhanced lesion on MRI of the brain and spinal cord A new T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI of brain and spinal cord A protocol-defined MS relapse (see below) 24 week confirmed disability progression based on increases in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period with a 5 year (240 week) planned extension
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
NEDA-4
Description
Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %)
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period
Title
Pre-planned study extension:
Description
Proportion of patients who have NEDA 4
Time Frame
5 year (240 week) period.
Title
Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event
Description
Time to first sign of new disease activity, as measured as new relapses, EDSS-progression, MRI-activity or brain atrophy
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS) from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Weeks 96 and 240
Description
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
The proportion of patients who, at Week 96, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) , confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline
Description
Disability progression, as measured with EDSS. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Annualized rate of protocol-defined relapses during 96 weeks
Description
ARR
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Time to onset of first protocol-defined relapse
Description
Time to first relapse
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in MRI T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume from baseline to weeks 96 (and 240)
Description
Change in T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume from baseline to weeks 96 (and 240)
Description
Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in brain volume from baseline to week 96 (and week 240)
Description
Change in brain volume
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Time to detection of a new MRI T2 lesion
Description
Time to New MRI T2-lesion
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Total number of MRI T1-weighted Gd-enhanced lesions
Description
Number of Gd-lesions
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions
Description
Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in Nine-hole-peg test (9-HPT) score from baseline to week 96 (and 240)
Description
The 9HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function. The participant picks up 9 pegs puts them in a block containing nine empty holes, and, once they are in the holes, removes them again as quickly as possible one at a time. The total time to complete the task is recorded. Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand are immediately followed by two consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The two trials for each hand are averaged
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) score from baseline to week 48, 96 (and 240)
Description
The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The participant is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time is calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the participant has reached the 25-foot mark. The task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. The score for the T25FW is the average of the 2 completed trials. The 95% CI of the percentage is based on normal approximation.
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) score from baseline to week 96 (and 240)
Description
BICAMS is a composite cognitive assessment tool comprising of the three components : Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) , California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) and Brief visuospatial memory test- Revised (BVMT-R)
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Difference in patient reported quality of life based on the EuroQoL Health Related Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D 5L) scores
Description
EQ-5D 5L is a 5 item questionnaire (assessing - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and visual analogue scale (VAS) enables calculation of quality adjusted life years (QALY) to enable health economic analyses to be performed. Each dimension assessed has 5 response scales to select from: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Overall survival rate
Description
Survival
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Rate and nature of adverse events
Description
Rate and nature of adverse events
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Description
The FSS questionnaire contains nine statements that rate the severity of fatigue symptoms. A low value (e.g., 1); indicates strong disagreement with the statement, whereas a high value (e.g., 7); indicates strong agreement. A total score of 36 or more suggests presence of fatigue.
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS) - 29
Description
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Severity of relapses (residual disability (EDSS) after relapses)
Description
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period
Title
Frequency of serious adverse events
Description
Frequency of serious adverse events
Time Frame
2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age between ≥18 to ≤50, both genders Women of childbearing potential* (WOCBP) and men in a sexual relation with WOCBP must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Diagnosis of RRMS using revised McDonald criteria of clinically definite MS1 An EDSS score of 0 to 5.5 Significant inflammatory disease activity in the last year despite treatment with standard disease modifying therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod, natalizumab) a. Significant inflammatory disease activity is defined by: i. One or more clinically reported multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse(s), ii. AND 1 or more T1 Gd-enhanced lesion(s), iii. OR three or more new or enlarging T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) The relapse(s) must have been treated with iv or oral high dose corticosteroids prescribed by a neurologist, and must have occurred 3 or more months after the onset of an immunomodulatory treatment, as MS immunomodulatory treatment may reach full effect after 3 months or more2. The patient is a RRMS-patient referred from neurological departments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden or possibly other European countries to an assigned study site. Signed informed consent and expected patient cooperation regarding the treatment schemes and procedures planned in the treatment and follow-up periods must be obtained and documented according to ICH GCP and national/local regulations. Exclusion Criteria: Known hypersensitivity or other known serious side effects for any of the study medications, including co-medications such as high-dose glucocorticosteroids Any illness or prior treatment that in the opinion of the investigators would jeopardize the ability of the patient to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy or high-dose glucocorticosteroids Any ongoing infection, including Tbc, CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, hepatitis virus, toxoplasmosis, HIV or syphilis infections, as well as heaptitis B surface antigen positivity and/or hepatitis C PCR positivity verified at Visit 1 Patients without a history of chickenpox or without vaccination against varicella zoster virus (VZV), unless tested for antibodies to VZV. VZV negative patients can only be included if they receive vaccination against VZV at least 6 weeks prior to inclusion. Current or previous treatments with long-term effects that may influence the treatment effects or potential toxicities/side effects of the treatment arms. This includes, but is not restricted to previous treatment with rituximab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, cladribin and ocrelizumab Immunocompromised patients, or patients currently reveiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive therapy Treatment with glucocorticoids or ACTH within one month prior to start of study treatment Having experienced an MS relapse within one month prior to study inclusion Prior or current major depression Prior or current psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction influencing the patient ability to make an informed consent or comply with the treatment and follow-up phases of this protocol. Prior or current alcohol or drug dependencies Cardiac insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, significant cardiac dysrhytmia, unstable or advanced ischemic heart disease (NYHA III or IV) Significant hypertension: BP > 180/110 Active malignancy, or prior history of malignancy except localized basal cell, squamous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix. Known untreated or unregulated thyroid disease Failure to willingly accept or comprehend risk of irreversible sterility as a side effect of therapy WBC < 1,5 x 109/L if not caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication. If WBC < 1,5 x 109/L is caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication the WBC count must be > 1,5 x 109/L before start of study treatment. Platelet (thrombocyte) count < 100 x 109/L ALAT and/or ASAT more than 2 times the upper normal reference limit (UNL) Serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L Serum bilirubin > ULN Moderate or severely impaired kidney function (creatinine-clearance below 60 ml/min) Presence of metallic objects implanted in the body that would preclude the ability of the patient to safely have MRI exams Diagnosis of primary progressive MS Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS Treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod within the last 2 months, and treatment with dimetylfumurat within the last month (washout must be performed as specified in section 5.1) prior to start of study medication. Use of teriflunomide (Aubagio®) within the previous 2 years unless cleared from the body (plasma concentration < 0.02 mcg/ml following elimination from the body with cholestyramine or activated powdered charcoal) as specified in section 5.1 prior to start of study medication. Any hereditary neurological disease such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or Spinocerebellar ataxia Any disease that can influence the patient safety and compliance, or the evaluation of disability History of hypersensitivity reaction to rabbit Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or who plan to become pregnant within the timeframe of this study Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational treatment(s). Patients participating in a purely observational trial will not be excluded.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Øivind Torkildsen, MD, PhD
Phone
+4755976032
Email
ofto@helse-bergen.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lars Bø, MD, Phd
Phone
55977039
Email
labo@helse-bergen.no
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lars Bø, MD, Phd
Organizational Affiliation
Haukeland University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Kristine Lehmann, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Haukeland University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Astrid Kittang, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Haukeland University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Einar Kristoffersen, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Haukeland University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Øivind Torkildsen, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Haukeland University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Trygve Holmøy, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Akershus
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margitta Kampman, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Tromsø University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathrine K Liane, MD
Organizational Affiliation
St. Olavs Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joachim Burman, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Morten Blinkenberg, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Lycke, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Morten Blinkenberg, MD, PhD
Email
Morten.Blinkenberg@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Finn T Sellebjerg, MD, PhD
Email
finn.thorup.sellebjerg@regionh.dk
Facility Name
VUmc
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joep Killestein, PhD
Email
joep.killestein@vumc.nl
Facility Name
Haukeland University Hospital
City
Bergen
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Øivind Torkildsen, MD, PhD
Phone
4755976032
Email
ofto@helse-bergen.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lars Bø, MD, PhD
Phone
55977039
Email
labo@helse-bergen.no
Facility Name
Akershus University Hospital
City
Oslo
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Trygve Holmøy, MD, PhD
Email
trygve.holmoy@medisin.uio.no
Facility Name
University Hospital of North Norway
City
Tromsø
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margitta Kampman, MD, PhD
Email
Margitta.T.Kampman@unn.no
Facility Name
St. Olav's University Hospital
City
Trondheim
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathrine Lian, MD
Email
Kathrine.Krokenes.Lian@stolav.no
Facility Name
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
City
Gothenburg
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Lycke, MD, PhD
Email
jan.lycke@gu.se
Facility Name
Akademiska sjukhuset
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joachim Burman, MD, PhD
Email
joachim.burman@neuro.uu.se

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available within publication of the results.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data access requests will be reviewed by the RAM-MS steering committee. Requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement.
Links:
URL
http://www.ram-ms.no
Description
Study site (in Norwegian)

Learn more about this trial

RCT Comparing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab in MS

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs