Postoperative Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Management of Post-amputation Pain
Primary Purpose
Phantom Limb Pain, Postoperative Pain, Neuroma
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peripheral nerve stimulation
Standard Medical Therapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Phantom Limb Pain focused on measuring Neurostimulation, Peripheral nerve stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Nontraumatic transfemoral (above-the-knee) or transtibial (below-the-knee) amputation
- Presence of postamputation pain rated at least 4 or more
Exclusion Criteria:
- Beck Depression Inventory score greater than 20
- Systemic infection
- Immunocompromised or taking immunosuppressive medications
- Implanted electronic device
- Pregnancy
- Previous allergy to skin contact materials and/or anesthetic agent
- Altered mental status
- Inability to provide informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Group 1
Group 2
Arm Description
Standard medical therapy and 30 to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation starting within 7 days after surgery
Standard medical therapy only
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number Taking Opioids
The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)
Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores
FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from "1" = subject requires total assistance for the task to "7" = complete independence. A higher score is better.
Pain Interference
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0" = no interference to "10" = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as
1 = "very much improved," 2 = "much improved," 3 = "minimally improved," 4 = "no change," 5 = "minimally worse," 6 = "much worse," or 7 = "very much worse." A lower score is better.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of "0" = not at all to "4" = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better.
Pain Disability Index (PDI)
The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from "0" = no disability to "10" = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better.
30-day Readmission Rate
Percent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge.
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)
Hospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03484429
First Posted
February 7, 2018
Last Updated
June 30, 2021
Sponsor
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03484429
Brief Title
Postoperative Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Management of Post-amputation Pain
Official Title
Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Acute and Chronic Amputation Pain
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 17, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 17, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Limb loss is frequently associated with postamputation pain that can be challenging to treat and often involves opioids. Advances in the field of neuromodulation has led to development of an intentionally reversible percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system that has had promising results when treating chronic postamputation pain. PNS may offer sustained pain relief even after the treatment period has ended. Currently, there is no convincing evidence regarding the role of PNS in the acute postoperative period, which may be a critical time to control pain as those with higher pain appear to be at higher risk for developing persistent post-procedural pain. The investigators of this study aim to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PNS in the acute postoperative period and determine the feasibility of completing a randomized controlled treatment outcome study.
Detailed Description
16 patients with new nontraumatic transfemoral or transtibial amputation will be enrolled in the study
Having met inclusion criteria, the patients will be randomized to experimental or control groups
Patients in the experimental group undergo placement of PNS leads within 7 days of amputation surgery
Patients in both groups will be treated with standard pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain therapies and evaluated weekly for 8 weeks, then at 3, 6, and 12 months postamputation
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Phantom Limb Pain, Postoperative Pain, Neuroma, Acute Pain, Chronic Pain, Residual Limbs, Amputation
Keywords
Neurostimulation, Peripheral nerve stimulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
16 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Standard medical therapy and 30 to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation starting within 7 days after surgery
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard medical therapy only
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Peripheral nerve stimulation
Intervention Description
Up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard Medical Therapy
Intervention Description
Medications, physical therapy, or other pain treatments
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3.
Title
Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Title
Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3
Title
Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Title
Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Title
Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number Taking Opioids
Description
The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time Frame
Preop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12
Title
Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)
Description
Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects.
Time Frame
Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12
Title
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores
Description
FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from "1" = subject requires total assistance for the task to "7" = complete independence. A higher score is better.
Time Frame
Preoperative, Week 4, and Week 8
Title
Pain Interference
Description
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0" = no interference to "10" = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Description
Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as
1 = "very much improved," 2 = "much improved," 3 = "minimally improved," 4 = "no change," 5 = "minimally worse," 6 = "much worse," or 7 = "very much worse." A lower score is better.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Description
Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of "0" = not at all to "4" = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Title
Pain Disability Index (PDI)
Description
The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from "0" = no disability to "10" = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, Week 8, and Week 12
Title
30-day Readmission Rate
Description
Percent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge.
Time Frame
30 days from hospital discharge
Title
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)
Description
Hospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility.
Time Frame
Number of days from surgery to discharge
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Nontraumatic transfemoral (above-the-knee) or transtibial (below-the-knee) amputation
Presence of postamputation pain rated at least 4 or more
Exclusion Criteria:
Beck Depression Inventory score greater than 20
Systemic infection
Immunocompromised or taking immunosuppressive medications
Implanted electronic device
Pregnancy
Previous allergy to skin contact materials and/or anesthetic agent
Altered mental status
Inability to provide informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Denise Lester, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23249
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16949876
Citation
Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Smith DG, Ehde DM, Edwards WT, Robinson LR. Preamputation pain and acute pain predict chronic pain after lower extremity amputation. J Pain. 2007 Feb;8(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21368651
Citation
Karanikolas M, Aretha D, Tsolakis I, Monantera G, Kiekkas P, Papadoulas S, Swarm RA, Filos KS. Optimized perioperative analgesia reduces chronic phantom limb pain intensity, prevalence, and frequency: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 May;114(5):1144-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820fc7d2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27402960
Citation
Kent ML, Hsia HJ, Van de Ven TJ, Buchheit TE. Perioperative Pain Management Strategies for Amputation: A Topical Review. Pain Med. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):504-519. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw110.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19104185
Citation
Capdevila X, Bringuier S, Borgeat A. Infectious risk of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):182-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190bd5b. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12873949
Citation
Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20889937
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27685345
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Grant SA. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Postoperative Analgesia: Could Neurostimulation Replace Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):720-722. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000481. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27676323
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Saulino MF, Chae J, Peckham PH, Grant SA, Gilmore CA, Donohue MC, deBock MG, Wongsarnpigoon A, Boggs JW. Infection Rates of Electrical Leads Used for Percutaneous Neurostimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System. Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):753-762. doi: 10.1111/papr.12523. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30024078
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Ball ST, Gabriel RA, Sztain JF, Monahan AM, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Said ET, Parekh J, Grant SA, Wongsarnpigoon A, Boggs JW. A Feasibility Study of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Neuromodulation. 2019 Jul;22(5):653-660. doi: 10.1111/ner.12790. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29905630
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Monahan AM, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Finneran JJ 4th, Jaeger PT, Schwartz AK, Ahmed SS. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Sciatic Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Foot Surgery, a Proof-of-Concept Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):580-589. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000819.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30770421
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Nguyen PL, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Sztain JF, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Meunier MJ, Hentzen ER, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus for postoperative analgesia following ambulatory rotator cuff repair. A proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):310-318. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100121. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30954936
Citation
Gilmore C, Ilfeld B, Rosenow J, Li S, Desai M, Hunter C, Rauck R, Kapural L, Nader A, Mak J, Cohen S, Crosby N, Boggs J. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic postamputation pain: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;44(6):637-645. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100109. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31740443
Citation
Gilmore CA, Ilfeld BM, Rosenow JM, Li S, Desai MJ, Hunter CW, Rauck RL, Nader A, Mak J, Cohen SP, Crosby ND, Boggs JW. Percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation implant provides sustained relief of chronic pain following amputation: 12-month follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Nov 17:rapm-2019-100937. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100937. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8080219
Citation
Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18055266
Citation
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8311667
Citation
Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15480144
Citation
Anagnostis C, Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142221.88111.0f.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29617543
Citation
Massarweh NN, Kaji AH, Itani KMF. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP). JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):768-769. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0504. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25112889
Citation
Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, Levy RM, Abejon D, Buchser E, Burton A, Buvanendran A, Candido K, Caraway D, Cousins M, DeJongste M, Diwan S, Eldabe S, Gatzinsky K, Foreman RD, Hayek S, Kim P, Kinfe T, Kloth D, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Lad SP, Liem L, Linderoth B, Mackey S, McDowell G, McRoberts P, Poree L, Prager J, Raso L, Rauck R, Russo M, Simpson B, Slavin K, Staats P, Stanton-Hicks M, Verrills P, Wellington J, Williams K, North R; Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014 Aug;17(6):515-50; discussion 550. doi: 10.1111/ner.12208.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32346553
Citation
Deer TR, Naidu R, Strand N, Sparks D, Abd-Elsayed A, Kalia H, Hah JM, Mehta P, Sayed D, Gulati A. A review of the bioelectronic implications of stimulation of the peripheral nervous system for chronic pain conditions. Bioelectron Med. 2020 Apr 24;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s42234-020-00045-5. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23947830
Citation
Rauck RL, Cohen SP, Gilmore CA, North JM, Kapural L, Zang RH, Grill JH, Boggs JW. Treatment of post-amputation pain with peripheral nerve stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2014 Feb;17(2):188-97. doi: 10.1111/ner.12102. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26526062
Citation
Bruce J, Quinlan J. Chronic Post Surgical Pain. Rev Pain. 2011 Sep;5(3):23-9. doi: 10.1177/204946371100500306.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25729647
Citation
Imani F. Postoperative pain management. Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul;1(1):6-7. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.22287523.1810. Epub 2011 Jul 1. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20881281
Citation
Borghi B, D'Addabbo M, White PF, Gallerani P, Toccaceli L, Raffaeli W, Tognu A, Fabbri N, Mercuri M. The use of prolonged peripheral neural blockade after lower extremity amputation: the effect on symptoms associated with phantom limb syndrome. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1308-15. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f4e848. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29495957
Citation
Columbo JA, Davies L, Kang R, Barnes JA, Leinweber KA, Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Stone DH. Patient Experience of Recovery After Major Leg Amputation for Arterial Disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 May;52(4):262-268. doi: 10.1177/1538574418761984. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8117013
Citation
Houghton AD, Nicholls G, Houghton AL, Saadah E, McColl L. Phantom pain: natural history and association with rehabilitation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1):22-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11432649
Citation
Gallagher P, Allen D, Maclachlan M. Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following lower limb amputation: a descriptive analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2001 Aug 15;23(12):522-30. doi: 10.1080/09638280010029859.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19165686
Citation
Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, Kadel NJ, Campbell K, Phelps E, Ehde D, Smith DG. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(7):961-72. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0151.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25417827
Citation
Armaghani SJ, Lee DS, Bible JE, Archer KR, Shau DN, Kay H, Zhang C, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Preoperative opioid use and its association with perioperative opioid demand and postoperative opioid independence in patients undergoing spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):E1524-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000622.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28509820
Citation
Smith SR, Bido J, Collins JE, Yang H, Katz JN, Losina E. Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):803-808. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01200.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34761694
Citation
Albright-Trainer B, Phan T, Trainer RJ, Crosby ND, Murphy DP, Disalvo P, Amendola M, Lester DD. Peripheral nerve stimulation for the management of acute and subacute post-amputation pain: a randomized, controlled feasibility trial. Pain Manag. 2022 Apr;12(3):357-369. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0087. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Postoperative Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Management of Post-amputation Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs