The Effect of Vitamin E-coated Polysulfone Membrane on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Monocytes in Critically Ill Patients in CRRT (Vitabrane E)
Primary Purpose
Renal Failure, Renal Insufficiency, Acute
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ViE15-A
REXEED-15A
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Renal Failure focused on measuring Acute Kidney Injury, Oxidative Stress, Renal Replacement Therapy, Vitamine E-coated Polysulfone Membrane
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18 years
- Acute Kidney Injury
- ICU patients with clinical indication for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
- Clinical decision to begin CVVH for at least 24 hours with high flux filter (defined as membranes with an ultrafiltration coefficient KUF > 25ml/Kg/h)
- Obtain the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hemodialysis patients, peritoneal dialysis patients and transplant recipient;
- Hypothermia (T < 36°C)
- Regional Anticoagulation with Citrate
- Septic Shock;
- Neoplasm in Chemotherapy
- Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- Cardio Circulatory Arrest
- Autoimmune disease or immunosuppressed patients;
- Life expectancy < 24 hr
- Pregnancy;
- Informed Consent refused by the patient or surrogate decision-maker
Sites / Locations
- San Bortolo HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
ViE15-A
REXEED-15A
Arm Description
The patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers. The renal replacement therapy will be started using ViE15-A hemofilter
TThe patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers. The renal replacement therapy will be started using REXEED-15A
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Copper/Zinc
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Superoxide Dismutas
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Endogenous peroxidase activity
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Nitric Oxide
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Viability
Ex vivo comparison of relative decrease of monocytes cell line incubated in plasma
Apoptosis
Ex vivo comparison of relative decrease of monocytes cell line incubated in plasma
Necrosis
Ex vivo comparison of relative decrease of monocytes cell line incubated in plasma
Interleukine-6
In vivo comparison of relative reductions of inflammatory cytokines concentrations in two groups
Interleukine -10
In vivo comparison of relative reductions of inflammatory cytokines concentrations in two groups
Interleukine-18
In vivo comparison of relative reductions of inflammatory cytokines concentrations in two groups
Secondary Outcome Measures
Comparison of CRRT-free days from enrollment to ICU discharge in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of mechanical Ventilation-free days from enrollment to ICU discharge in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of vasopressor drugs-free days in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of ICU length of stay in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of renal recovery in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of CRRT-free days from enrollment to hospital discharge in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofiltes on long term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of need of (Intermittent Hemodialysis) IHD at hospital discarge in patients treated with vitamine E-coated membrane and non-vitamin E-coated membrane
The assessment of the effect of both hemofiltes on long term clinical renal outcomes
Comparison of renal recovery at hospital discharge in two groups
The assessment of the effect of both hemofiltes on long term clinical renal outcomes
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03489759
Brief Title
The Effect of Vitamin E-coated Polysulfone Membrane on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Monocytes in Critically Ill Patients in CRRT
Acronym
Vitabrane E
Official Title
The Effect of Vitamin E-coated Polysulfone Membrane on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Monocytes in Critically Ill Patients in CRRT: a Pilot, Randomized, Double-blinded, No-profit, Clinical Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 13, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 13, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 13, 2019 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
St. Bortolo Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study evaluate the effect of a membrane in polysulfone covered with vitamin E (ViE15-A, ASAHI Kasey, Tokyo, Japan) versus non-vitamin E polysulfone membrane (REXEED-15A, ASAHI Kasey, Tokyo, Japan) in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care undergoing continuous extracorporeal dialysis (CRRT).
The current randomized study is designed to assess the effect on the levels of oxidative stress, pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines and the mode and amount of death of monocytic cell lines using ViE 15-A in comparison withe REXEED-15A.
The investigators hypothezise that the ViE15-A versus REXEED-15A will have different effect on the levels of oxidative stress, pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines and the mode and amount of death of monocytic cell lines.
Detailed Description
The study evaluate the effect of a membrane in polysulfone covered with vitamin E (ViE15-A, ASAHI Kasey, Tokyo, Japan) on the levels of oxidative stress, pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines and the mode and amount of death of monocytic cell lines in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care undergoing continuous extracorporeal dialysis (CRRT).
This membrane will be compared with a non-vitamin E polysulfone membrane (REXEED-15A, ASAHI Kasey, Tokyo, Japan) and already intended for use in continuous renal support therapy.
The current randomized study is designed to assess the effect on the levels of oxidative stress, pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines and the mode and amount of death of monocytic cell lines using ViE 15-A in comparison withe REXEED-15A.
Precisely, will be evaluated
the effect of the filter on the reduction of the plasma levels of two pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6) and of two anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-8);
the analysis of the life modality of the monocytic cells: the patient's plasma will be used, incubated for 24 hours with U937 cells (monocyte precursor cells), necrosis cells and the percentage of apoptotic cells. The apoptotic cells will also evaluate the apoptotic pathway (evaluation of activated caspases) that led to cell death. The differences that are highlighted in the two different sampling moments become expressed Δ% with respect to the initial value Secondary outcomes will be to evaluate the clinical outcomes (haemodynamic and hematochemical parameters) in the short and long term deriving from the application of a membrane with vitamin E; for this reason, for the whole duration of the extracorporeal dialysis therapy, the same filter assigned to the patient at the time of enrollment will be used.
All the other parameters of the extracorporeal treatment that can influence the results will be standardized; in particular, the flows will be fixed according to the dialysis dose criteria and re-infusion methods according to the table in the paragraph "treatment characteristics".
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Renal Failure, Renal Insufficiency, Acute
Keywords
Acute Kidney Injury, Oxidative Stress, Renal Replacement Therapy, Vitamine E-coated Polysulfone Membrane
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The randomization list will be kept in a special lockable closet, not accessible to the other investigators involved in the study. The one who will create the list will not be involved in any other role in the present study.
The filter label, and hence the name, will be covered by a white covering label. Each kit of filters needed to perform a single treatment will be prepared in a closed box and the patient number will be written on it, so that the user who performs the treatment will not be able to understand which filter it is.
All the other investigators involved in the present study (nurses in the Nephrology department who will follow the treatment, the researchers who will collect the clinical data, the biologists who will analyze the samples and the statisticians who will analyze the data) will not know which filter has been applied in each treatment.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ViE15-A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers. The renal replacement therapy will be started using ViE15-A hemofilter
Arm Title
REXEED-15A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
TThe patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers. The renal replacement therapy will be started using REXEED-15A
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ViE15-A
Intervention Description
The type of dialytic treatment that will be used during the study will be continuous venous hemofiltration (CVVH-Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration). The filter will be ViE15-A.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
REXEED-15A
Intervention Description
The type of dialytic treatment that will be used during the study will be continuous venous hemofiltration (CVVH-Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration). The filter will be REXEED-15A.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Copper/Zinc
Description
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Superoxide Dismutas
Description
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Endogenous peroxidase activity
Description
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Nitric Oxide
Description
In vivo comparison of ROS concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Viability
Description
Ex vivo comparison of relative decrease of monocytes cell line incubated in plasma
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Apoptosis
Description
Ex vivo comparison of relative decrease of monocytes cell line incubated in plasma
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Necrosis
Description
Ex vivo comparison of relative decrease of monocytes cell line incubated in plasma
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Interleukine-6
Description
In vivo comparison of relative reductions of inflammatory cytokines concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Interleukine -10
Description
In vivo comparison of relative reductions of inflammatory cytokines concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Title
Interleukine-18
Description
In vivo comparison of relative reductions of inflammatory cytokines concentrations in two groups
Time Frame
change from 24 to 72 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of CRRT-free days from enrollment to ICU discharge in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Comparison of mechanical Ventilation-free days from enrollment to ICU discharge in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Comparison of vasopressor drugs-free days in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Comparison of ICU length of stay in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Comparison of renal recovery in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofilters on short term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Comparison of CRRT-free days from enrollment to hospital discharge in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofiltes on long term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Comparison of need of (Intermittent Hemodialysis) IHD at hospital discarge in patients treated with vitamine E-coated membrane and non-vitamin E-coated membrane
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofiltes on long term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Comparison of renal recovery at hospital discharge in two groups
Description
The assessment of the effect of both hemofiltes on long term clinical renal outcomes
Time Frame
90 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age > 18 years
Acute Kidney Injury
ICU patients with clinical indication for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Clinical decision to begin CVVH for at least 24 hours with high flux filter (defined as membranes with an ultrafiltration coefficient KUF > 25ml/Kg/h)
Obtain the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Hemodialysis patients, peritoneal dialysis patients and transplant recipient;
Hypothermia (T < 36°C)
Regional Anticoagulation with Citrate
Septic Shock;
Neoplasm in Chemotherapy
Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Cardio Circulatory Arrest
Autoimmune disease or immunosuppressed patients;
Life expectancy < 24 hr
Pregnancy;
Informed Consent refused by the patient or surrogate decision-maker
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Silvia De Rosa, MD
Phone
+393933098583
Email
derosa.silvia@ymail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudio Ronco, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
San Bortolo Hospital
City
Vicenza
ZIP/Postal Code
36100
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Silvia De Rosa, MD
Email
derosa.silvia@ymail.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
The Effect of Vitamin E-coated Polysulfone Membrane on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Monocytes in Critically Ill Patients in CRRT
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs