Subjective Evaluation of a Sound Processing Method for Hearing Aids on Auditory Distance Perception (EXTEND)
Hearing Disorders, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Hearing Disorders focused on measuring Hearing aids, Remote microphone systems, Roger technology, Sound externalization, Auditory distance estimation
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Willing and able to give written informed consent as documented by signature,
- French-native adult speakers,
- (Preferably) younger than 60 y.o.
For all normal-hearing participants:
- Hearing thresholds lower or equal to 20 dB on both ears, as ensured by a pure-tone audiometry (125 Hz to 8 kHz) conducted at the beginning of the session.
For all hearing-impaired patients:
- Patients of Mr. Philippe Estoppey, private audiologist settled in Lausanne,
- User of bilateral BTE Phonak hearing aids, commercialized after July 2012, with fittings that did not change over the last three months,
- Presenting a severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss,
- Presenting a symmetrical hearing loss (no bilateral hearing threshold that differ by more than 20 dB at any audiometric frequency (125 Hz - 4 kHz)).
For HI patients experienced with remote microphone systems:
- Past or present users of FM and/or Roger devices for more than six months.
For other HI patients:
- No past or present experience with FM and/or Roger devices for more than one month.
The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the participant:
- Collaborator of the laboratory (LTS2) or student attending the courses of audio and acoustics given by the laboratory staff (EE-348 Electroacoustics, EE-548 Audio Engineering),
- History of chronic or terminal illness, psychiatric disturbance, senile dementia, or cognitive impairment,
- History of strong tinnitus and/or hyperacusis,
- Strong visual impairment after correction with glasses or not,
- History of epilepsy or other reactions associated with the proximity to a screen,
- Motor disability that would disturb their presence at EPFL.
Sites / Locations
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Normal hearing
10 experienced hearing impaired
10 naive hearing impaired
A control group including ten normal-hearing participants. These participants are recruited because they can be considered as a reference when compared to hearing-impaired patients. They usually provide homogeneous results that are expected to be significantly different than those obtained with hearing-impaired patients. In this study, normal-hearing participants are expected to provide better and more consistent performance of auditory distance estimation.
A group of ten (expected sample size) severe-to-profound hearing-impaired patients who have a past and/or present experience of more than 6 months with remote microphone systems. These patients are expected to be aware of the drawbacks of the current remote microphone technology with respect to sound localization, auditory distance estimation, and audio-visual fusion.
A group of ten severe-to-profound hearing-impaired patients with no past or current experience with remote microphone systems. They are referred to as naïve patients. These patients must have similar profiles to the patients in the experienced group as regards the degree of hearing loss, origin of hearing loss (congenital, pre- or post-lingual disability), age, gender, and hearing aid technology. They will be selected and recruited on the basis of the patients included in experienced group