search
Back to results

Clinician Decision Support Algorithm for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Primary Purpose

Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm
Sponsored by
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Cancer focused on measuring Cancer Care, Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for Patients:

  • over 18 years of age,
  • completed one infusion of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer
  • has at least three more planned clinic visits associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy receipt after the day of consent
  • ambulatory,
  • signed informed consent,
  • willingness to participate in all study activities,
  • speaks/reads English,
  • receives care from one of the clinicians enrolled in the study.

Exclusion Criteria for Patients:

  • prognosis of ≤ two months or
  • documented peripheral neuropathy due to other causes (diabetes, alcohol abuse, central nervous system malignancy, vitamin B deficiency, hereditary, nerve compression injury).

Inclusion Criteria for Clinicians:

-if they are a Medical Doctor, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner and provide care to oncology patients at one of the study sites

Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Controls:

-if they are an adult (18+) who does not have cancer or symptoms of peripheral nerve injury from any cause and speak/read English

Sites / Locations

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Period I

Period II

Arm Description

-Consented patients will complete electronic versions of the PRO-CTCAE CIPN severity and interference items, 0 - 10 worst CIPN pain numerical rating scale, and QLQ-CIPN20 via tablet prior to their clinician visit at the outpatient oncology center at three consecutive clinic visits: baseline, visit 2, visit 3.

Consented patients will complete the same battery of assessments from the usual care period at the baseline, visit 2, and visit 3 time points. Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Clinician Medical Record Abstraction Form
Frequency of clinician CIPN assessment and management documentation for each period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale (QLQ-CIPN20): Sensory and Motor Subscales
Change in QLQ-CIPN20 scores between periods. Subscale total scores are scored from 0 - 100, higher scores represent worse neuropathy symptoms.
Patient-Reported Outcomes National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CIPN Severity and Interference Items
Reliability and validity testing of measure. The severity and interference items are scored from 0 - 4, with higher scores representing worse neuropathy.
0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale
Change in 0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale score between periods. Scored from 0 - 10, higher scores represent worse pain.
Adapted Acceptability E - Scale
Mean score will be calculated to determine clinician-related acceptability and satisfaction with intervention use. Each item is scored from 1 - 5, with higher scores representing greater acceptability and satisfaction.
Feasibility of Algorithm Implementation
Mean score to examine feasibility of intervention feasibility. Each item is scored from 1 - 5, with higher scores representing greater feasibility. Will be completed by clinicians only.

Full Information

First Posted
April 21, 2018
Last Updated
March 15, 2022
Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03514680
Brief Title
Clinician Decision Support Algorithm for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Official Title
Evaluating a Clinician Support Algorithm to Enhance Implementation of Evidence-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment and Management Recommendations
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 4, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 23, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This research study is evaluating how well a decision support tool works to improve clinicians' use of recommended chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment and management strategies in participants receiving chemotherapy.
Detailed Description
This research study will test a new clinician decision support tool for the assessment and management of CIPN. The algorithm is designed to help clinicians make decisions about which strategies to use for the assessment and/or management of CIPN. The investigators need to recruit participants receiving chemotherapy that is known to cause CIPN to determine how well the algorithm works to increase clinicians' use of recommended CIPN assessment and management strategies.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Keywords
Cancer Care, Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The study expect to enroll 162 patients, 60 clinicians, and 30 healthy controls for a total of 252. 81 patients will be recruited in Period 1 (usual care) and a separate 81 will be recruited in Period 2 (algorithm use). The 60 clinicians will be recruited and will participate in Periods I and II. We will use purposive sampling to recruit 30 health controls to match the age and demographic characteristics of the recruited patients. The healthy controls will receive no intervention.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
226 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Period I
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
-Consented patients will complete electronic versions of the PRO-CTCAE CIPN severity and interference items, 0 - 10 worst CIPN pain numerical rating scale, and QLQ-CIPN20 via tablet prior to their clinician visit at the outpatient oncology center at three consecutive clinic visits: baseline, visit 2, visit 3.
Arm Title
Period II
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Consented patients will complete the same battery of assessments from the usual care period at the baseline, visit 2, and visit 3 time points. Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm
Intervention Description
The revised algorithm incorporates evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies and standardized CIPN/pain patient-reported outcomes measures. In terms of processes, trained study staff will administer the screening questionnaires (e.g., PRO-CTCAE, 0 - 10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity) to consented patients before their clinician visit (e.g., in the waiting room). Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm. Clinicians may then use the algorithm at their discretion to guide the assessment and management of their patients' CIPN symptoms
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinician Medical Record Abstraction Form
Description
Frequency of clinician CIPN assessment and management documentation for each period.
Time Frame
From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale (QLQ-CIPN20): Sensory and Motor Subscales
Description
Change in QLQ-CIPN20 scores between periods. Subscale total scores are scored from 0 - 100, higher scores represent worse neuropathy symptoms.
Time Frame
From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CIPN Severity and Interference Items
Description
Reliability and validity testing of measure. The severity and interference items are scored from 0 - 4, with higher scores representing worse neuropathy.
Time Frame
From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Title
0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale
Description
Change in 0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale score between periods. Scored from 0 - 10, higher scores represent worse pain.
Time Frame
From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Title
Adapted Acceptability E - Scale
Description
Mean score will be calculated to determine clinician-related acceptability and satisfaction with intervention use. Each item is scored from 1 - 5, with higher scores representing greater acceptability and satisfaction.
Time Frame
From enrollment to until all patient participants complete both study periods, assessed up to approximately one year.
Title
Feasibility of Algorithm Implementation
Description
Mean score to examine feasibility of intervention feasibility. Each item is scored from 1 - 5, with higher scores representing greater feasibility. Will be completed by clinicians only.
Time Frame
From enrollment to until all patient participants complete both study periods, assessed up to approximately one year.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Patients: over 18 years of age, completed one infusion of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer has at least three more planned clinic visits associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy receipt after the day of consent ambulatory, signed informed consent, willingness to participate in all study activities, speaks/reads English, receives care from one of the clinicians enrolled in the study. Exclusion Criteria for Patients: prognosis of ≤ two months or documented peripheral neuropathy due to other causes (diabetes, alcohol abuse, central nervous system malignancy, vitamin B deficiency, hereditary, nerve compression injury). Inclusion Criteria for Clinicians: -if they are a Medical Doctor, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner and provide care to oncology patients at one of the study sites Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Controls: -if they are an adult (18+) who does not have cancer or symptoms of peripheral nerve injury from any cause and speak/read English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Knoerl, PhD, RN
Organizational Affiliation
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34568984
Citation
Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Mitchell SA, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel JA, Reyes K, Berry DL. Measurement properties of brief neuropathy screening items in cancer patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Sep 26;5(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00377-z.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33676431
Citation
Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel J, Reyes K, Berry DL. Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians' chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study. BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07965-8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Clinician Decision Support Algorithm for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs