search
Back to results

Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality

Primary Purpose

Muscle Spasticity

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Virtual Reality
Sponsored by
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Muscle Spasticity focused on measuring Botulinum Toxin Injections, Virtual Reality

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving botulinum toxin injections at Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are fully anesthetized during their medical procedure
  • Non-English speaking parents/patients
  • Patients with history of motion sickness
  • Patients with epilepsy
  • Patients with a ventricular shunt
  • Patients who have surgery during the study time period

Sites / Locations

  • GilletteChildren's Specialty Healthcare

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Virtual Reality for distraction

Standard of Care

Arm Description

The application of VR during the putative painful treatment (botulinum toxin injections) will provide a) active and engaging distraction during the procedure, and will b) block the view and auditory noise related to the procedure.

Patients will receive the standard of care for the putative painful treatment (botulinum toxin injections).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) to assess intensity of pain during injections.
The Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) will be used to assess pain intensity before, during, and after the treatment session. The FPS-R is a self-report measure of pain intensity developed for children. This scale shows a serious of six faces depicting increasing intensity of pain expression. The FPS-R instructions orient the child to the series of faces and then ask the child to point to the face that shows how much they hurt right now. Each face corresponds to a numerical rating between 0 and 10 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). This rating scale corresponds to the widely accepted 0-to-10 metric for pain. The "0" equals no pain and the "10" equals very much pain. The score is reported as a total score.

Secondary Outcome Measures

A series of visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess pain, anxiety, satisfaction with pain management, and perceived benefits of VR.
A visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to quantify multiple aspects of the treatment experience expected to be impacted by the use of VR. The VAS will be a 10 cm 0-100 scale and will assess the following: patient anxiety before, during and after the procedure; parent/caregiver anxiety before, during, and after the procedure; proportion of the treatment time spent thinking about pain; worst pain during treatment; satisfaction with pain management; and nausea during treatment. This will be done at both visits (VR and no-VR).
Information collected from the medical record (e.g., medication use during procedure).
Following the signing of a HIPPA release, the medical record will be accessed to obtain such information as: patient diagnosis, date of birth, ethnicity, number of botulinum toxin injections, muscles injected, patient weight, height, and temperature, heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during treatment, clinical description of the context of VR use; provider description of whether VR enhanced clinical care; reduction or avoidance of medication due to VR; total amounts of medications given (e.g., valium, nitrous oxide, opioids; mg/kg); and notation of patient side effects from VR. This will be done at both visits (VR and no-VR).
The Pain Opinion Questionnaire (POQ)
The Pain Opinion Questionnaire (POQ) requires caregivers to respond to 5 questions in 3 separate sections regarding children with mild, moderate, and severe/profound intellectual and developmental disabilities. A description of the abilities and limitations of a typical individual with each level of impairment is provided in each section. The questions address 5 facets of pain: (a) the ability of the children to sense painful stimuli (Sensation), (b) how upset or distressed the children feel while in pain (Emotional Reaction), (c) how strongly the children react behaviorally to pain (Behavioral Reaction), (d) how much the children communicate their pain to others (Communication), and (e) how much pain the children suffer (Frequency). We are modifying the scale to require parents or caregivers to estimate whether they believe their child (not a hypothetical child) would experience that aspect of pain the "same as", "less than", or "more than" children without impairment.
The Dalhousie Pain Interview (DPI)
The Dalhousie Pain Interview (DPI) will provide a measure of pain experience in the previous week, including pain frequency (number of pain episodes), intensity (rated 0-10) and duration (number of seconds or minutes in pain). The measure consists of 10 items and was designed explicitly as an interview/survey script.
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will provide a measure of pain interference in the previous week (i.e., the degree to which ongoing pain interferes with daily living). The BPI is a 10-item, 11-point scale (0 = does not interfere, 10 = completely interferes). The items include general activity, mood, mobility, normal work, relationships with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life, self-care, recreational activities, and social activities. Total score (sum of all 12 items combined; range 0-120) and average score (average item score; range 0-10) will be assessed.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2018
Last Updated
February 2, 2023
Sponsor
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03521076
Brief Title
Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management in a Specialty Rehabilitation Context
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Measure pain and anxiety during a putative painful medical procedure (i.e., botulinum toxin injections) when Virtual Reality is employed compared to standard of care only using a Randomized Controlled Trial study design.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Muscle Spasticity
Keywords
Botulinum Toxin Injections, Virtual Reality

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Participants who are having botulinum toxin injections will be enrolled in the study. We will use a crossover study design, such that participants will access VR in addition to standard of care in one session and then experience only standard of care in the other condition. Participants will be randomized following the consent process. The participants will experience the opposite condition at their 2nd visit.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Researcher #1 will break the blind and know which condition the participant is in. Researcher #1 will then be the one to video record the treatment session. Researcher #1 will leave the room immediately following the treatment intervention. Researcher #2 will enter the room and will support the patient, parent/caregiver, and provider in completing outcomes assessments.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
49 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Virtual Reality for distraction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The application of VR during the putative painful treatment (botulinum toxin injections) will provide a) active and engaging distraction during the procedure, and will b) block the view and auditory noise related to the procedure.
Arm Title
Standard of Care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients will receive the standard of care for the putative painful treatment (botulinum toxin injections).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Virtual Reality
Other Intervention Name(s)
AppliedVR
Intervention Description
Participants will have the opportunity to choose a game or relaxation experience to utilize during a botulinum toxin injection to distract from pain and anxiety during one visit. Virtual Reality will not be available during the other visit. AppliedVR has a number of games and relaxation experiences available for participants to chose from.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) to assess intensity of pain during injections.
Description
The Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) will be used to assess pain intensity before, during, and after the treatment session. The FPS-R is a self-report measure of pain intensity developed for children. This scale shows a serious of six faces depicting increasing intensity of pain expression. The FPS-R instructions orient the child to the series of faces and then ask the child to point to the face that shows how much they hurt right now. Each face corresponds to a numerical rating between 0 and 10 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). This rating scale corresponds to the widely accepted 0-to-10 metric for pain. The "0" equals no pain and the "10" equals very much pain. The score is reported as a total score.
Time Frame
2 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
A series of visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess pain, anxiety, satisfaction with pain management, and perceived benefits of VR.
Description
A visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to quantify multiple aspects of the treatment experience expected to be impacted by the use of VR. The VAS will be a 10 cm 0-100 scale and will assess the following: patient anxiety before, during and after the procedure; parent/caregiver anxiety before, during, and after the procedure; proportion of the treatment time spent thinking about pain; worst pain during treatment; satisfaction with pain management; and nausea during treatment. This will be done at both visits (VR and no-VR).
Time Frame
2 days
Title
Information collected from the medical record (e.g., medication use during procedure).
Description
Following the signing of a HIPPA release, the medical record will be accessed to obtain such information as: patient diagnosis, date of birth, ethnicity, number of botulinum toxin injections, muscles injected, patient weight, height, and temperature, heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during treatment, clinical description of the context of VR use; provider description of whether VR enhanced clinical care; reduction or avoidance of medication due to VR; total amounts of medications given (e.g., valium, nitrous oxide, opioids; mg/kg); and notation of patient side effects from VR. This will be done at both visits (VR and no-VR).
Time Frame
2 days
Title
The Pain Opinion Questionnaire (POQ)
Description
The Pain Opinion Questionnaire (POQ) requires caregivers to respond to 5 questions in 3 separate sections regarding children with mild, moderate, and severe/profound intellectual and developmental disabilities. A description of the abilities and limitations of a typical individual with each level of impairment is provided in each section. The questions address 5 facets of pain: (a) the ability of the children to sense painful stimuli (Sensation), (b) how upset or distressed the children feel while in pain (Emotional Reaction), (c) how strongly the children react behaviorally to pain (Behavioral Reaction), (d) how much the children communicate their pain to others (Communication), and (e) how much pain the children suffer (Frequency). We are modifying the scale to require parents or caregivers to estimate whether they believe their child (not a hypothetical child) would experience that aspect of pain the "same as", "less than", or "more than" children without impairment.
Time Frame
2 days
Title
The Dalhousie Pain Interview (DPI)
Description
The Dalhousie Pain Interview (DPI) will provide a measure of pain experience in the previous week, including pain frequency (number of pain episodes), intensity (rated 0-10) and duration (number of seconds or minutes in pain). The measure consists of 10 items and was designed explicitly as an interview/survey script.
Time Frame
2 days
Title
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will provide a measure of pain interference in the previous week (i.e., the degree to which ongoing pain interferes with daily living). The BPI is a 10-item, 11-point scale (0 = does not interfere, 10 = completely interferes). The items include general activity, mood, mobility, normal work, relationships with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life, self-care, recreational activities, and social activities. Total score (sum of all 12 items combined; range 0-120) and average score (average item score; range 0-10) will be assessed.
Time Frame
2 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients receiving botulinum toxin injections at Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are fully anesthetized during their medical procedure Non-English speaking parents/patients Patients with history of motion sickness Patients with epilepsy Patients with a ventricular shunt Patients who have surgery during the study time period
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chantel Burkitt, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GilletteChildren's Specialty Healthcare
City
Saint Paul
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55101
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19532853
Citation
Breau LM, Burkitt C. Assessing pain in children with intellectual disabilities. Pain Res Manag. 2009 Mar-Apr;14(2):116-20. doi: 10.1155/2009/642352.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22531549
Citation
Vega-Avelaira D, McKelvey R, Hathway G, Fitzgerald M. The emergence of adolescent onset pain hypersensitivity following neonatal nerve injury. Mol Pain. 2012 Apr 24;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-8-30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23838073
Citation
Victoria NC, Inoue K, Young LJ, Murphy AZ. A single neonatal injury induces life-long deficits in response to stress. Dev Neurosci. 2013;35(4):326-37. doi: 10.1159/000351121. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10421318
Citation
Santosh PJ, Baird G. Psychopharmacotherapy in children and adults with intellectual disability. Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):233-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07059-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10692634
Citation
Hoffman HG, Doctor JN, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ, Furness TA 3rd. Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during burn wound care in adolescent patients. Pain. 2000 Mar;85(1-2):305-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00275-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18036981
Citation
Sharar SR, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR. Factors influencing the efficacy of virtual reality distraction analgesia during postburn physical therapy: preliminary results from 3 ongoing studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12 Suppl 2):S43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20692769
Citation
Schmitt YS, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR, Jensen MP, Soltani M, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Sharar SR. A randomized, controlled trial of immersive virtual reality analgesia, during physical therapy for pediatric burns. Burns. 2011 Feb;37(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16640481
Citation
Gold JI, Kim SH, Kant AJ, Joseph MH, Rizzo AS. Effectiveness of virtual reality for pediatric pain distraction during i.v. placement. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Apr;9(2):207-12. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23277857
Citation
Asl Aminabadi N, Erfanparast L, Sohrabi A, Ghertasi Oskouei S, Naghili A. The Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety during Dental Treatment in 4-6 Year-Old Children: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Fall;6(4):117-24. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2012.025. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25972074
Citation
Hua Y, Qiu R, Yao WY, Zhang Q, Chen XL. The Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain Relief During Dressing Changes in Children with Chronic Wounds on Lower Limbs. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Oct;16(5):685-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 May 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23939326
Citation
Cacau Lde A, Oliveira GU, Maynard LG, Araujo Filho AA, Silva WM Jr, Cerqueria Neto ML, Antoniolli AR, Santana-Filho VJ. The use of the virtual reality as intervention tool in the postoperative of cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Jun;28(2):281-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130039.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27997539
Citation
Jones T, Moore T, Choo J. The Impact of Virtual Reality on Chronic Pain. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0167523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167523. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20691523
Citation
Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14756928
Citation
Steele E, Grimmer K, Thomas B, Mulley B, Fulton I, Hoffman H. Virtual reality as a pediatric pain modulation technique: a case study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003 Dec;6(6):633-8. doi: 10.1089/109493103322725405.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2367140
Citation
Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion DG, Addicoat L, Ziegler JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990 May;41(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22014321
Citation
Ramstad K, Jahnsen R, Skjeldal OH, Diseth TH. Characteristics of recurrent musculoskeletal pain in children with cerebral palsy aged 8 to 18 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Nov;53(11):1013-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04070.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11014398
Citation
Hoffman HG, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ. Use of virtual reality for adjunctive treatment of adult burn pain during physical therapy: a controlled study. Clin J Pain. 2000 Sep;16(3):244-50. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200009000-00010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18986237
Citation
Sharar SR, Miller W, Teeley A, Soltani M, Hoffman HG, Jensen MP, Patterson DR. Applications of virtual reality for pain management in burn-injured patients. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 Nov;8(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.11.1667.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17074626
Citation
Hoffman HG, Seibel EJ, Richards TL, Furness TA, Patterson DR, Sharar SR. Virtual reality helmet display quality influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. J Pain. 2006 Nov;7(11):843-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.04.006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15327820
Citation
Hoffman HG, Sharar SR, Coda B, Everett JJ, Ciol M, Richards T, Patterson DR. Manipulating presence influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. Pain. 2004 Sep;111(1-2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24135902
Citation
Shinde SK, Danov S, Chen CC, Clary J, Harper V, Bodfish JW, Symons FJ. Convergent validity evidence for the Pain and Discomfort Scale (PADS) for pain assessment among adults with intellectual disability. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):536-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12237214
Citation
Breau LM, McGrath PJ, Camfield CS, Finley GA. Psychometric properties of the non-communicating children's pain checklist-revised. Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):349-57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00179-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16039095
Citation
Phan A, Edwards CL, Robinson EL. The assessment of pain and discomfort in individuals with mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.10.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15167542
Citation
Hoffman HG, Richards TL, Coda B, Bills AR, Blough D, Richards AL, Sharar SR. Modulation of thermal pain-related brain activity with virtual reality: evidence from fMRI. Neuroreport. 2004 Jun 7;15(8):1245-8. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000127826.73576.91.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26764337
Citation
Wittwer A, Krummenacher P, La Marca R, Ehlert U, Folkers G. Salivary Alpha-Amylase Correlates with Subjective Heat Pain Perception. Pain Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):1131-6. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv085. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9194010
Citation
Norton M, Holm JE, McSherry WC 2nd. Behavioral assessment of relaxation: the validity of a Behavioral Rating Scale. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;28(2):129-37. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(97)00004-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24308022
Citation
Barney CC, Krach LE, Rivard PF, Belew JL, Symons FJ. Motor function predicts parent-reported musculoskeletal pain in children with cerebral palsy. Pain Res Manag. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):323-7. doi: 10.1155/2013/813867.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26425056
Citation
Barney CC, Feyma T, Beisang A, Symons FJ. Pain experience and expression in Rett syndrome: Subjective and objective measurement approaches. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2015 Aug 1;27(4):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s10882-015-9427-3. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24484757
Citation
Fernandez-Blazquez MA, Avila-Villanueva M, Lopez-Pina JA, Zea-Sevilla MA, Frades-Payo B. Psychometric properties of a new short version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for the assessment of anxiety in the elderly. Neurologia. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(6):352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Jan 28. English, Spanish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21876939
Citation
Perpina-Galvan J, Richart-Martinez M, Cabanero-Martinez MJ, Martinez-Dura I. Content validity of the short version of the subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Jul-Aug;19(4):882-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692011000400005. English, Portuguese, Spanish.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs