A Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Novomax in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Primary Purpose
Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Spacer
Titanium cage
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
[In Interventional Study]
- Subjects who required between L1 and S1 among those who required an extensive laminectomy or facetectomy to correct severe disc extrusion or severe spinal stenosis or those who required PLIF due to grade I or II spondylolisthesis
[In Long-term Follow-up Study]
- Subjects who are treated with bioactive glass ceramic intervertebral spacer or titanium cage in one-level PLIF surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
[In Interventional Study]
- Subjects with average T-scores of L1-L4 at <-3.0 in DEXA bone density tests
- Subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Subjects with a history of malignant tumor or malignant diseases (but the cases of cured disease with no relapse for the past 5 years were included in the present study)
- Subjects with abnormal blood potassium and phosphorus levels
- Subjects who are considered not suitable for the study by significant disease(liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory disease, metabolic disease, or psychological disease)
- Subjects who are not able to comply with the study requirements
- Subjects who are considered not suitable for the study by the investigator
[In Long-term Follow-up Study]
- Subjects who are not able to comply with the study requirements
- Subjects who are considered not suitable for the study by the investigator
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Spacer
Titanium cage
Arm Description
The one-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) surgery will be carried out with Novomax, which is the bioactive glass ceramic intervertebral spacer.
The one-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) surgery will be carried out with titanium cage.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Bone fusion with radiographs (X-ray)
Evaluation of bone fusion between bone substitutes and vertebral endplates with X-ray for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Bone fusion with 3-dimensional computed tomography(CT)
Evaluation of bone fusion between bone substitutes and vertebral endplates with 3-dimensional CT for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
The Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) assessment
Evaluation of the Oswestry disability index questionnaire survey for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
The SF(Short Form)-36 questionnaire assessment
Evaluation of the SF(Short Form)-36 questionnaire survey for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
VAS for target site
Evaluation of target site pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
1.Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Evaluation of AE
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03532945
Brief Title
A Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Novomax in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Official Title
A Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety for the Patients With Bioactive Glass-ceramic Intervertebral Spacer (Novomax) in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison With a Titanium Cage
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 28, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 13, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 7, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
BioAlpha Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a long-term follow-up study for more than 3 years to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bioactive glass-ceramic intervertebral spacer (Novomax) in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Detailed Description
During one-level PLIF, bioactive glass-ceramic intervertebral spacer (Novomax) and titanium cage were inserted in the experimental group and control group, respectively. Bone fusion by simple radiography had angular deformity of less than 3 degrees and a potential of less than 3 mm in flexion extension radiographs, and thin-section CT (<2 mm) was used to determine the combination between the vertebral endplate and the autogenous bone or bioactive glass-ceramic intervertebral spacer (Novomax) in the cage without any gaps or the part connected to bony trabecula as fusion, and both groups will be compared.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Spacer
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The one-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) surgery will be carried out with Novomax, which is the bioactive glass ceramic intervertebral spacer.
Arm Title
Titanium cage
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The one-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) surgery will be carried out with titanium cage.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Spacer
Other Intervention Name(s)
Novomax
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Titanium cage
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bone fusion with radiographs (X-ray)
Description
Evaluation of bone fusion between bone substitutes and vertebral endplates with X-ray for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
Time Frame
for 36 months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bone fusion with 3-dimensional computed tomography(CT)
Description
Evaluation of bone fusion between bone substitutes and vertebral endplates with 3-dimensional CT for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
Time Frame
for 36 months after surgery
Title
The Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) assessment
Description
Evaluation of the Oswestry disability index questionnaire survey for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
Time Frame
for 36 months after surgery
Title
The SF(Short Form)-36 questionnaire assessment
Description
Evaluation of the SF(Short Form)-36 questionnaire survey for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
Time Frame
for 36 months after surgery
Title
VAS for target site
Description
Evaluation of target site pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for 36 months(or more than 36 months) after PLIF surgery.
Time Frame
for 36 months after surgery
Title
1.Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Description
Evaluation of AE
Time Frame
for 36 months after surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
[In Interventional Study]
Subjects who required between L1 and S1 among those who required an extensive laminectomy or facetectomy to correct severe disc extrusion or severe spinal stenosis or those who required PLIF due to grade I or II spondylolisthesis
[In Long-term Follow-up Study]
Subjects who are treated with bioactive glass ceramic intervertebral spacer or titanium cage in one-level PLIF surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
[In Interventional Study]
Subjects with average T-scores of L1-L4 at <-3.0 in DEXA bone density tests
Subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding
Subjects with a history of malignant tumor or malignant diseases (but the cases of cured disease with no relapse for the past 5 years were included in the present study)
Subjects with abnormal blood potassium and phosphorus levels
Subjects who are considered not suitable for the study by significant disease(liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory disease, metabolic disease, or psychological disease)
Subjects who are not able to comply with the study requirements
Subjects who are considered not suitable for the study by the investigator
[In Long-term Follow-up Study]
Subjects who are not able to comply with the study requirements
Subjects who are considered not suitable for the study by the investigator
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bong-Soon Chang, MD. PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Seoul National University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ki Hyoung Koo, MD. PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
DongGuk University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ho-Joong Kim, MD. PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jae Hyup Lee, MD. PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
A Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Novomax in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs