Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers
Primary Purpose
Neck Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises
conventional exercises
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Neck Pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- experience of more than 5 years
- neck pain score of more than 5 on numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), mild to moderate disability score on neck disability index (NDI) and poor cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) test
Exclusion Criteria:
- any neurological sign or symptom, history of spinal surgery or if they were taking any treatment for their pain.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
experimental group
control group
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Pain at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS): NPRS. Subjects had to rate their pain on the 0-10 rating scale, where 0 means no pain while 10 is the worst possible pain.
Change in muscle endurance at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline
Craniocervical flexion test (CCF) test using pressure biofeedback instrument
Secondary Outcome Measures
disability
Functional disability was assessed using Neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Subjects had to answer the multiple choice questions and their score was interpreted on range from 0 to 50, 0 being no disability and 50 indicating complete disability.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03537300
Brief Title
Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers
Official Title
Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 21, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 1, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
King Saud University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Neck pain (NP) is a common work related disorder. Teaching is one profession in which its prevalence is high. The Daily job of a school teacher involves head down posture while reading, writing, etc., exposing them to risk of developing NP. Deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles have been shown to have lower endurance in patients with cervical impairment which has been associated with disability. There is limited evidence that reports efficacy of DCF muscles training in occupational NP. This study was done to see the effect of DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback on pain, muscle endurance and functional disability in school teachers with NP.
Detailed Description
Neck pain (NP) is a common work related disorder. Teaching is one profession in which its prevalence is high. The Daily job of a school teacher involves head down posture while reading, writing, etc., exposing them to risk of developing NP. Deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles have been shown to have lower endurance in patients with cervical impairment which has been associated with disability. There is limited evidence that reports efficacy of DCF muscles training in occupational NP. This study was done to see the effect of DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback on pain, muscle endurance and functional disability in school teachers with NP. 65 teachers, aged between 25 to 45 years with experience of more than 5 years were agreed to participate in this study. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, experimental (EG) and control group (CG). In EG, subjects received DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises for neck pain while in CG subjects received only conventional exercises. Pain, muscle endurance and disability measured at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment. Endurance of DCF muscles was measured by CCF test using pressure biofeedback instrument, Pain intensity was measured using NPRS and Functional disability was assessed using NDI questionnaire.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neck Pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
65 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
experimental group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises
Intervention Description
DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
conventional exercises
Intervention Description
conventional exercises
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline
Description
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS): NPRS. Subjects had to rate their pain on the 0-10 rating scale, where 0 means no pain while 10 is the worst possible pain.
Time Frame
at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment
Title
Change in muscle endurance at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline
Description
Craniocervical flexion test (CCF) test using pressure biofeedback instrument
Time Frame
at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
disability
Description
Functional disability was assessed using Neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Subjects had to answer the multiple choice questions and their score was interpreted on range from 0 to 50, 0 being no disability and 50 indicating complete disability.
Time Frame
at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
experience of more than 5 years
neck pain score of more than 5 on numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), mild to moderate disability score on neck disability index (NDI) and poor cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) test
Exclusion Criteria:
any neurological sign or symptom, history of spinal surgery or if they were taking any treatment for their pain.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33521131
Citation
Iqbal ZA, Alghadir AH, Anwer S. Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscle Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability, and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers: A Clinical Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 13;2021:7190808. doi: 10.1155/2021/7190808. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs