search
Back to results

Neurofeedback for Tinnitus - Does Frequency Specificity Matter?

Primary Purpose

Tinnitus, Subjective Tinnitus, Chronic Tinnitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
alpha/delta neurofeedback
beta/theta neurofeedback
Diary completion
Sponsored by
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tinnitus focused on measuring tinnitus distress, tinnitus intrusiveness, synchronization by loss of inhibition model (SLIM), neurofeedback, alpha/delta neurofeedback, beta/theta neurofeedback, electroencephalography (EEG), tinnitus intensity, tinnitus loudness

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic subjective tinnitus, i.e. tinnitus with a duration > 6 months
  • At least mild tinnitus distress, corresponding to a score of ≥ 18 on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderately severe or severe depression
  • Objective tinnitus, where causes are classified according to whether they are vascular or non-vascular in origin
  • Current use of psychotropic drugs for a mental health condition
  • Bipolar disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Psychosis
  • Substance abuse
  • Current psychotherapeutic treatment for tinnitus, previous biofeedback- or neurofeedback treatment
  • A history of seizures, strokes and/or brain hemorrhages

Sites / Locations

  • Philipps University Marburg, Dept. of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

ADR neurofeedback

BTR neurofeedback

Diary Control Group

Arm Description

Ten ADR neurofeedback training sessions. The first five sessions comprise four training blocks. The latter five sessions consists of five training blocks each. All training blocks are seven minutes in duration. Participants take between two to three sessions each week.

Ten BTR neurofeedback training sessions. The first five sessions comprise four training blocks. The latter five sessions each consists of five training blocks. All training blocks are seven minutes in duration. Participants take between two to three sessions each week.

Daily diary completion for two weeks in the period between baseline and end-point assessments (total period baseline to end-point = four weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI; Newman, Sandridge, & Jacobson, 1998)
Self-report measure of tinnitus handicap assessed pre-intervention, mid-treatment (five sessions), post-intervention and at three month follow-up. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory is a 25 item questionnaire. Each item is scored 0 - 4 (0 = No, 2 = Sometimes, 4 = Yes), yielding a total between 0 (no handicap) - 100 (catastrophic impact).
Tinnitus Magnitude Index (TMI; Schmidt, Kerns, Griest, Theodoroff, Pietrzak, & Henry, 2014).
TMI measures tinnitus intensity, three-item scale assessing self-reported severity, loudness and awareness. - Visual analogue scale ranges from 0-10 or 0-100, respectively: item 1 (loudness): Range 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud) item 2 (awareness): 0 to 100 in increments of 10, with verbal anchors of 0="never aware" and 100="always aware" item 3 (severity): 0-100 with verbal anchors of 0="no tinnitus present" to 100="the worst tinnitus you can imagine" for all items higher values indicate higher tinnitus magnitude values of the three items can be summed up to a total score. For standardisation, items are converted from 0-100 to 0-10.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI; Brüggemann, Szczepek, Kleinjung, Ojo, & Mazurek, 2017)
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a self-report measure of both perceived severity and negative impact of tinnitus. It covers multiple severity domains including but not exclusively quality of sleep, relaxation, sense of control. The TFI questionnaire consists of 25 items, predominantly scored between 0 - 10 bar item 1 and 3, which are expressed as percentages from 0 - 100%.
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ; Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006)
The B-IPQ is a nine item self-report measure of individual cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It includes the following domains: consequences of the illness; perception of duration of illness; control over illness; treatment control; symptoms; understanding of illness; emotional response and causes.
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Bastien, Vallières, & Morin, 2001)
A brief scanning measure of insomnia. It consists of 7 items assessing insomnia severity, interference in daily functioning, noticeability of impairment and distress/concern about sleep problems.
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
a quick and easy-to-administer scale for measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies
Sustained Attention Response Task (SART; Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, & Yiend, 1997)
measures the ability to sustain attention
Attention Network Test (ANT; Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, Raz, & Posner, 2002)
assesses orienting, alerting and executive attention processing respectively
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Gräfe, Zipfel, Herzog, & Löwe, 2004)
Assessment of depressive symptoms

Full Information

First Posted
May 27, 2018
Last Updated
March 8, 2021
Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Collaborators
Eriksholm Research Centre, Linkoeping University, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03550430
Brief Title
Neurofeedback for Tinnitus - Does Frequency Specificity Matter?
Official Title
Study Protocol for a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Assessing the Specificity of an Alpha/Delta Ratio Neurofeedback Training Protocol in Chronic Tinnitus.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Collaborators
Eriksholm Research Centre, Linkoeping University, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy of an alpha/delta ratio (ADR) neurofeedback training protocol on tinnitus distress. 1/3 of the participants in the study will undergo ADR neurofeedback training, 1/3 an active comparator, beta/theta ratio (BTR) neurofeedback training, whilst the final 1/3 of participants will fill in daily diaries of tinnitus complaints and symptoms for two weeks.
Detailed Description
Tinnitus is hypothesized to originate as a result of a disturbance in the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in central auditory structures. More specifically, inhibitory neurons hyperpolarize, by which their functional role is weakened . Consequently, this allows auditory neurons, deprived of input from a lesioned auditory system, to spontaneously synchronize their activity, resulting in the tinnitus percept. In the normal functioning auditory system, neurons firing synchronously in the alpha frequency region (8 - 12 Hz) have a gating function of inhibiting task-irrelevant regions in the brain. In people with chronic tinnitus, it has been observed, that alpha activity over temporal regions is weakened, thus leading to the spontaneous activity characterizing the condition. By upregulating alpha activity with neurofeedback training, it is hypothesized that the excitatory/inhibitory balance in temporal regions can be restored, thus minimizing the tinnitus percept. The coupling or exchange of information of distinct brain regions, leading to an integrated conscious perception, is assumed to be mediated by delta oscillations. In tinnitus, the distress associated with the condition arises as a consequence of coupling prefrontal areas, responsible for allocation of attentional resources with limbic (arousal) and temporal (auditory processing) regions. In neurofeedback, the downregulation of delta activity is hypothesized to lead to a de-coupling of the communication between the areas associated with the distress. No studies to date have tested the specific role of alpha and delta in the origin and perpetuation of tinnitus distress and intrusiveness. The present study seeks to compensate for this, by comparing an alpha and delta neurofeedback ratio training protocol with one assumed to have no direct association with the pathophysiology of tinnitus. In addition to the ten neurofeedback training sessions, all participants undergo diagnostic assessments at three time points throughout the trial (pre-neurofeedback training, post-neurofeedback training and at three months follow-up). For the first 40 participants, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is recorded and cognitive capacity assessed with two attention tests, the Attention Network Test and Sustained Attention Response Task, respectively at all three time points. For the remaining 80 participants, the EEG recording is abandoned, and only cognitive capacity assessed in the pre- post, and follow-up phase of the study. EEG recording and attention processes is similarly measured in a control group (n=40) at the pre-neurofeedback training stage. The group is comprised of healthy, age and gender matched participants. Their inclusion serve the purpose of comparing the brain activity, both at rest and during cognitive activity between people with- and people without tinnitus.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tinnitus, Subjective Tinnitus, Chronic Tinnitus
Keywords
tinnitus distress, tinnitus intrusiveness, synchronization by loss of inhibition model (SLIM), neurofeedback, alpha/delta neurofeedback, beta/theta neurofeedback, electroencephalography (EEG), tinnitus intensity, tinnitus loudness

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ADR neurofeedback
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ten ADR neurofeedback training sessions. The first five sessions comprise four training blocks. The latter five sessions consists of five training blocks each. All training blocks are seven minutes in duration. Participants take between two to three sessions each week.
Arm Title
BTR neurofeedback
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ten BTR neurofeedback training sessions. The first five sessions comprise four training blocks. The latter five sessions each consists of five training blocks. All training blocks are seven minutes in duration. Participants take between two to three sessions each week.
Arm Title
Diary Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Daily diary completion for two weeks in the period between baseline and end-point assessments (total period baseline to end-point = four weeks).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
alpha/delta neurofeedback
Intervention Description
neurofeedback training protocol seeking to decrease the alpha/delta ratio, by simultaneous rewarding alpha and inhibiting delta activity.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
beta/theta neurofeedback
Intervention Description
neurofeedback training protocol seeking to decrease the beta/theta ratio, by simultaneous rewarding beta and inhibiting theta activity.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Diary completion
Intervention Description
completion of diary relating to participants' experience of tinnitus intensity, interference, coping, harm and disability. Rated three times daily on numerical scale (0 - 10) for two weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI; Newman, Sandridge, & Jacobson, 1998)
Description
Self-report measure of tinnitus handicap assessed pre-intervention, mid-treatment (five sessions), post-intervention and at three month follow-up. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory is a 25 item questionnaire. Each item is scored 0 - 4 (0 = No, 2 = Sometimes, 4 = Yes), yielding a total between 0 (no handicap) - 100 (catastrophic impact).
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Tinnitus Magnitude Index (TMI; Schmidt, Kerns, Griest, Theodoroff, Pietrzak, & Henry, 2014).
Description
TMI measures tinnitus intensity, three-item scale assessing self-reported severity, loudness and awareness. - Visual analogue scale ranges from 0-10 or 0-100, respectively: item 1 (loudness): Range 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud) item 2 (awareness): 0 to 100 in increments of 10, with verbal anchors of 0="never aware" and 100="always aware" item 3 (severity): 0-100 with verbal anchors of 0="no tinnitus present" to 100="the worst tinnitus you can imagine" for all items higher values indicate higher tinnitus magnitude values of the three items can be summed up to a total score. For standardisation, items are converted from 0-100 to 0-10.
Time Frame
16 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI; Brüggemann, Szczepek, Kleinjung, Ojo, & Mazurek, 2017)
Description
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a self-report measure of both perceived severity and negative impact of tinnitus. It covers multiple severity domains including but not exclusively quality of sleep, relaxation, sense of control. The TFI questionnaire consists of 25 items, predominantly scored between 0 - 10 bar item 1 and 3, which are expressed as percentages from 0 - 100%.
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ; Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006)
Description
The B-IPQ is a nine item self-report measure of individual cognitive and emotional representations of illness. It includes the following domains: consequences of the illness; perception of duration of illness; control over illness; treatment control; symptoms; understanding of illness; emotional response and causes.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Bastien, Vallières, & Morin, 2001)
Description
A brief scanning measure of insomnia. It consists of 7 items assessing insomnia severity, interference in daily functioning, noticeability of impairment and distress/concern about sleep problems.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
Description
a quick and easy-to-administer scale for measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Sustained Attention Response Task (SART; Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, & Yiend, 1997)
Description
measures the ability to sustain attention
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Attention Network Test (ANT; Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, Raz, & Posner, 2002)
Description
assesses orienting, alerting and executive attention processing respectively
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Gräfe, Zipfel, Herzog, & Löwe, 2004)
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms
Time Frame
16 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Satisfaction with treatment
Description
self-developed scale to assess satisfaction with neurofeedback
Time Frame
3 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Chronic subjective tinnitus, i.e. tinnitus with a duration > 6 months At least mild tinnitus distress, corresponding to a score of ≥ 18 on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Exclusion Criteria: Moderately severe or severe depression Objective tinnitus, where causes are classified according to whether they are vascular or non-vascular in origin Current use of psychotropic drugs for a mental health condition Bipolar disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Psychosis Substance abuse Current psychotherapeutic treatment for tinnitus, previous biofeedback- or neurofeedback treatment A history of seizures, strokes and/or brain hemorrhages
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cornelia Weise, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Philipps Universität Marburg
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Philipps University Marburg, Dept. of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
City
Marburg
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
35037
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Anonymized individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data available within one year of study completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data access request will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator. Requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23326394
Citation
Balkenhol T, Wallhausser-Franke E, Delb W. Psychoacoustic tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress show different associations with oscillatory brain activity. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053180. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17956812
Citation
Dohrmann K, Weisz N, Schlee W, Hartmann T, Elbert T. Neurofeedback for treating tinnitus. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:473-85. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66046-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17956772
Citation
Weisz N, Dohrmann K, Elbert T. The relevance of spontaneous activity for the coding of the tinnitus sensation. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:61-70. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66006-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21687444
Citation
Weisz N, Hartmann T, Muller N, Lorenz I, Obleser J. Alpha rhythms in audition: cognitive and clinical perspectives. Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 26;2:73. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00073. eCollection 2011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9564679
Citation
Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP. Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Apr;9(2):153-60.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24603542
Citation
Schmidt CJ, Kerns RD, Griest S, Theodoroff SM, Pietrzak RH, Henry JA. Toward development of a tinnitus magnitude index. Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):476-84. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28499301
Citation
Bruggemann P, Szczepek AJ, Kleinjung T, Ojo M, Mazurek B. [Validation of the German Version of Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Sep;96(9):615-619. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122342. Epub 2017 May 12. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16731240
Citation
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11438246
Citation
Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001 Jul;2(4):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11132119
Citation
Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;31(2):73-86. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11970796
Citation
Fan J, McCandliss BD, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner MI. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):340-7. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361886.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9204482
Citation
Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J. 'Oops!': performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00015-8.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Gräfe, K., Zipfel, S., Herzog, W., & Löwe, B. (2004). Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem "Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)". Diagnostica, 50(4), 171-181.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32370767
Citation
Jensen M, Huttenrauch E, Schmidt J, Andersson G, Chavanon ML, Weise C. Neurofeedback for tinnitus: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing the specificity of an alpha/delta neurofeedback training protocol in alleviating both sound perception and psychological distress in a cohort of chronic tinnitus sufferers. Trials. 2020 May 5;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04309-y.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Neurofeedback for Tinnitus - Does Frequency Specificity Matter?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs