Monitored Home Exercise in Pregnancy
Primary Purpose
Exercise, Mobile Health, Pregnancy
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Monitored, At-Home Exercise Intervention
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Exercise focused on measuring Wearable technology, Pregnancy, Exercise, Mobile Health
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or greater
- Singleton gestation
- History of gestational diabetes
- OR
- BMI ≥30
- OR
- Significant family history of diabetes (two or more first degree relatives with DM)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-English or non-Spanish speaking patients
- Women unwilling to provide consent
- Patients with current diagnosis of diabetes
- Multiple gestation
- Medical or pregnancy complications and/or comorbidities that preclude exercise in pregnancy
- Unwillingness to commit to the prescribed exercise program
Sites / Locations
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Physical Activity Intervention
Control
Arm Description
Patients will be allocated to a physical activity intervention to be performed 3-5 days per week
Patients will receive standard counseling regarding activity recommendations in pregnancy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Adherence rate
Total number of performed exercise sessions divided by prescribed exercise sessions (3 per week at minimum)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Gestational Diabetes
Development of Gestational diabetes as determined by routine 1 hour and then subsequent 3 hour glucose testing results
Maternal Weight Gain
measured in kilograms
Gestational age at delivery
Infant's gestational age at delivery
Rate of Cesarean delivery
measured as the number of cesarean deliveries per total number of deliveries
Infant weight
Infant weight in grams measured post delivery
Neonatal Apgar scores
An assessment of neonatal wellbeing measured at 1, 5, and 10 minutes post-delivery, and is measured on a scale of 0-9, with 9 being the highest, and 0 being the lowest.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission Rate
Rate of admission of infants post-delivery to the NICU
Neonatal hypoglycemia rates
Number of infants with hypoglycemia divided by the total number of delivered infants
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03551535
First Posted
May 3, 2018
Last Updated
September 16, 2020
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03551535
Brief Title
Monitored Home Exercise in Pregnancy
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility and Adherence of a Prescribed, Monitored Home Exercise Program in High Risk Pregnant Women
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Study IRB approval expired
Study Start Date
November 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 8, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 8, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The Study Investigators intend to study the adherence to and effect of a prescribed, monitored at-home exercise regimen in a pregnant population at risk for gestational diabetes, with a specific goal of understanding factors relating to adoption and performance of regular, sustained physical activity.
Detailed Description
The obesity epidemic has affected the reproductive age population with a resultant increase in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). Two to 10% of pregnant women are now diagnosed with gestational diabetes, imposing significant increased risk of maternal and fetal/neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Diabetes and obesity can both be combated by participating in daily physical activity, and has been shown to be beneficial for women of all ages, including women that are pregnant. The health benefits of exercise in pregnancy have been extensively studied, demonstrating improved pregnancy outcomes [both maternal (decreased gestational weight gain, decreased rates of cesarean section, and reduced rates of pregnancy induced complications such as hypertension and pre-eclampsia) and neonatal (reduction in proportion of large for gestational age infants)] with no evidence of harm when not contraindicated. Research should now focus on determining the most feasible, constructive, and efficient methods to improve fitness in pregnant women.
Pregnancy provides an ideal opportunity to focus on physical health and fitness; however, physical activity recommendations are rarely met and physical activity consistently decreases in pregnancy. With the development of mobile, technology-based interventions, at-home fitness regimens are now more accessible, thus reducing logistical constraints and burdens posed by traditional physical activity interventions. Moreover, the sustainability of at-home fitness regimens may be more successful long-term/post-intervention due to ease of engagement and more personalized motivational tools. Finally, wearable technology provides real-time feedback of progress and compliance to the intervention team, allowing improved monitoring of goals and compliance. In this way, contemporaneous, mobile health technology can maximize patient care by providing a novel, efficient, low burden, and scalable method to pursue pregnancy fitness, the economic implications of which could be significant.
The objective of this study is to determine the adherence to and effect of a prescribed, monitored at-home exercise regimen in a pregnant population at risk for gestational diabetes, with a specific goal of understanding factors relating to adoption and performance of regular, sustained physical activity.
There will be two arms of the study: an intervention group that will be enrolled in the BurnAlong program as well as receive FitBit heart rate + activity monitors to track adherence rates to the prescribed exercise regimen on BurnAlong, with subsequent motivational interventions triggered if compliance varies from prescription, and a comparison group who will receive standard obstetric care, which will include counseling about diet and exercise utilizing American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines and literature, as well as a FitBit heart rate + activity monitor to track activity levels via step count. The project team will not interact with the comparison group regarding the patient's activity levels during the study duration.
A sample size of 25 women for each arm of the study (50 women total) will be recruited. Basic demographic data will be obtained for all enrolled subjects, including age, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, family history of diabetes, history of GDM (and number of previously affected pregnancies), preterm birth history, and baseline activity level (type of job, exercise, hours of standing). All participants will be asked to fill out a physical activity in pregnancy readiness survey as well as a baseline, previously validated international physical activity questionnaire, which will be utilized for comparison to activity level data collected during the study period. All enrolled patients will receive a FitBit heart rate + activity monitor, which will provide overall activity data in the form of steps per day through the duration of the trial. Those randomized to the intervention group will also utilize the FitBit during exercise sessions to provide data on duration, heart rate, and intensity, all of which will confirm that exercise is being accomplished as prescribed. This immediate exercise compliance feedback will enable automated motivational factors to engage the patient and optimize their continued exercise participation. Data regarding mode of delivery as well as infant details will be collected by chart review by the research team. Long term follow up may be obtained via email surveys, thus patient emails will be obtained at the time of enrollment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Exercise, Mobile Health, Pregnancy, Gestational Diabetes
Keywords
Wearable technology, Pregnancy, Exercise, Mobile Health
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Physical Activity Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be allocated to a physical activity intervention to be performed 3-5 days per week
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients will receive standard counseling regarding activity recommendations in pregnancy
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Monitored, At-Home Exercise Intervention
Intervention Description
Patients will be enrolled in the BurnAlong program as well as receive FitBit heart rate + activity monitors to track adherence rates to the prescribed exercise regimen on BurnAlong, with subsequent motivational interventions triggered if compliance varies from prescription
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adherence rate
Description
Total number of performed exercise sessions divided by prescribed exercise sessions (3 per week at minimum)
Time Frame
20 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gestational Diabetes
Description
Development of Gestational diabetes as determined by routine 1 hour and then subsequent 3 hour glucose testing results
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Maternal Weight Gain
Description
measured in kilograms
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Gestational age at delivery
Description
Infant's gestational age at delivery
Time Frame
One year
Title
Rate of Cesarean delivery
Description
measured as the number of cesarean deliveries per total number of deliveries
Time Frame
One year
Title
Infant weight
Description
Infant weight in grams measured post delivery
Time Frame
One year
Title
Neonatal Apgar scores
Description
An assessment of neonatal wellbeing measured at 1, 5, and 10 minutes post-delivery, and is measured on a scale of 0-9, with 9 being the highest, and 0 being the lowest.
Time Frame
1, 5, and 10 minutes of neonatal life
Title
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission Rate
Description
Rate of admission of infants post-delivery to the NICU
Time Frame
One year
Title
Neonatal hypoglycemia rates
Description
Number of infants with hypoglycemia divided by the total number of delivered infants
Time Frame
One year
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Pregnant female participants only
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years of age or greater
Singleton gestation
History of gestational diabetes
OR
BMI ≥30
OR
Significant family history of diabetes (two or more first degree relatives with DM)
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-English or non-Spanish speaking patients
Women unwilling to provide consent
Patients with current diagnosis of diabetes
Multiple gestation
Medical or pregnancy complications and/or comorbidities that preclude exercise in pregnancy
Unwillingness to commit to the prescribed exercise program
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeanne Sheffield, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21205
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
Citation
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16672855
Citation
Impact of physical activity during pregnancy and postpartum on chronic disease risk. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 May;38(5):989-1006. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000218147.51025.8a.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18845974
Citation
Borodulin KM, Evenson KR, Wen F, Herring AH, Benson AM. Physical activity patterns during pregnancy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Nov;40(11):1901-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817f1957.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21694556
Citation
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
Results Reference
background
Citation
World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. WHO (2010). Available at: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/9789241599979/en. (Accessed: 23rd March 2018)
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15165657
Citation
Oguma Y, Shinoda-Tagawa T. Physical activity decreases cardiovascular disease risk in women: review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jun;26(5):407-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26595585
Citation
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):e135-e142. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001214.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15033644
Citation
Dempsey JC, Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Lee IM, Miller RS, Dashow EE, Luthy DA. Prospective study of gestational diabetes mellitus risk in relation to maternal recreational physical activity before and during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):663-70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh091.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28161306
Citation
Wang C, Wei Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Sun Y, Su S, Zhang L, Liu C, Feng Y, Shou C, Guelfi KJ, Newnham JP, Yang H. A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27417680
Citation
Song C, Li J, Leng J, Ma RC, Yang X. Lifestyle intervention can reduce the risk of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2016 Oct;17(10):960-9. doi: 10.1111/obr.12442. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19683692
Citation
Phelan S. Pregnancy: a "teachable moment" for weight control and obesity prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):135.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15535815
Citation
Evenson KR, Savitz DA, Huston SL. Leisure-time physical activity among pregnant women in the US. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004 Nov;18(6):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00595.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21420359
Citation
Gaston A, Cramp A. Exercise during pregnancy: a review of patterns and determinants. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jul;14(4):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12962263
Citation
Ning Y, Williams MA, Dempsey JC, Sorensen TK, Frederick IO, Luthy DA. Correlates of recreational physical activity in early pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Jun;13(6):385-93. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.6.385.393.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16445309
Citation
Poudevigne MS, O'Connor PJ. A review of physical activity patterns in pregnant women and their relationship to psychological health. Sports Med. 2006;36(1):19-38. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636010-00003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22616913
Citation
Oostdam N, van Poppel MN, Wouters MG, Eekhoff EM, Bekedam DJ, Kuchenbecker WK, Quartero HW, Heres MH, van Mechelen W. No effect of the FitFor2 exercise programme on blood glucose, insulin sensitivity, and birthweight in pregnant women who were overweight and at risk for gestational diabetes: results of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2012 Aug;119(9):1098-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03366.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23763541
Citation
Olander EK, Atkinson L. Obese women's reasons for not attending a weight management service during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Oct;92(10):1227-30. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12195. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23263891
Citation
Sui Z, Turnbull DA, Dodd JM. Overweight and obese women's perceptions about making healthy change during pregnancy: a mixed method study. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Dec;17(10):1879-87. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1211-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28544551
Citation
Lau Y, Klainin-Yobas P, Htun TP, Wong SN, Tan KL, Ho-Lim ST, Chi C, Tsai C, Ong KW, Shorey S, Tam WSW. Electronic-based lifestyle interventions in overweight or obese perinatal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2017 Sep;18(9):1071-1087. doi: 10.1111/obr.12557. Epub 2017 May 22.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Monitored Home Exercise in Pregnancy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs