search
Back to results

Impact on Daily Life of Patients Using the Subretinal Implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS

Primary Purpose

Retinal Degeneration, Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Primarily Involving Sensory Retina

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Sponsored by
Retina Implant AG
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Retinal Degeneration focused on measuring Retinal Degeneration, Artificial Vision, Retinal Prosthesis, Subretinal Implant, Inherited Retinal Dystrophy, Vision Restoration, Bionic Eye, Bionic Vision, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Artificial Retina, Retina Implant, Cone-Rod Dystrophy, Choroideremia, Retinopathia Pigmentosa

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 78 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 78
  2. Willing and able to give written informed consent
  3. Hereditary retinal degeneration of the outer retinal layer i.e. photoreceptors (rods & cones)
  4. Pseudophakia or aphakia in the eye to be implanted
  5. Retinal vessels with remaining perfusion, despite pathological condition
  6. Layering of inner retina in the central region present, as shown by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
  7. Thickness of the retina sufficient for subretinal surgery as shown by OCT
  8. Inner retina still functional (proven e.g. by light perception or electrically evoked phosphenes (EEP))
  9. Blindness in both eyes, (no light perception or light perception only)
  10. Visual acuity sufficient for reading normal print in earlier life, optically corrected
  11. Period of appropriate visual functions at least 12 years / lifetime
  12. Willing and able to perform study assessments and training during the full time period of 12 months
  13. Motivation to get the best possible results through training and realistic expectations about these as assessed in screening interview

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. OCT shows significant retina edema and/or scar tissue within target region for implant
  2. Heavy clumped pigmentation at posterior pole or on the planned route of the implantation
  3. atrophy of optic nerve or ganglion cells degeneration
  4. Any other ophthalmologic disease with relevant effect upon visual function (e.g. glaucoma, optic neuropathies, trauma, diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment)
  5. Deep amblyopia reported earlier in life on eye to be implanted
  6. Systemic conditions that might imply considerable risks with regard to the surgical interventions and anesthesia (e.g. cardiovascular/pulmonary diseases, severe metabolic diseases)
  7. Acute and severe neurological and/or psychiatric diseases
  8. Hyperthyroidism or hypersensitivity to iodine
  9. Hypersensitivity to fluorescent dye
  10. Women who are pregnant or nursing, or women of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a medically acceptable means of birth control for the duration of the study or women unwilling to perform a pregnancy test before entering the study
  11. Participation in another interventional clinical study within the past 30 days

Sites / Locations

  • Clinique Saint Jean
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Milétrie de Poitiers

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS

Arm Description

All participants receive the subretinal device RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in functional vision
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessed at baseline (prior to implantation) versus one year after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Vision Related Quality of Life - Questionnaire
A validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, IVI-VLV, assessed at baseline versus one year after implantation
Visual Function - Questionnaire
A validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, ULV-VFQ, assessed at baseline versus one year after implantation
Adverse Events
Number, nature and severity of device-related and implantation-related adverse events
Measure of implant-mediated visual function
Computer test assessed with implant on versus off

Full Information

First Posted
May 17, 2018
Last Updated
April 17, 2019
Sponsor
Retina Implant AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03561922
Brief Title
Impact on Daily Life of Patients Using the Subretinal Implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Official Title
Impact on Daily Life of Patients Using the Subretinal Implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Manufacturer of the investigational device has ceased all business activities
Study Start Date
September 4, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 5, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 5, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Retina Implant AG

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the impact of the subretinal implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS on the patient's daily life, using validated activities of daily living and questionnaires.
Detailed Description
This study aims to assess the impact of the subretinal implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS on the patient's daily life. In addition, the study will provide additional information about the safety and efficacy of the CE-certified RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS. In several studies it has been shown that patients who received this subretinal implant regain visual function to a certain extent and that its use is safe. So far, all assessments of patients with the RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS have been done in a controlled environment within the scope of interventional studies where the benefit in daily life has been assessed anecdotally only. Currently, there is no standard method available for an objective assessment of the impact of such devices in daily life of these patients. Hence, the aim of this study is to further assess the impact in daily life with a combination of already validated and newly developed assessments and questionnaires. This study adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Retinal Degeneration, Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Primarily Involving Sensory Retina
Keywords
Retinal Degeneration, Artificial Vision, Retinal Prosthesis, Subretinal Implant, Inherited Retinal Dystrophy, Vision Restoration, Bionic Eye, Bionic Vision, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Artificial Retina, Retina Implant, Cone-Rod Dystrophy, Choroideremia, Retinopathia Pigmentosa

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
2 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All participants receive the subretinal device RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Intervention Description
Implantation of the subretinal RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in functional vision
Description
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessed at baseline (prior to implantation) versus one year after implantation
Time Frame
baseline vs. 12 months after implantation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Vision Related Quality of Life - Questionnaire
Description
A validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, IVI-VLV, assessed at baseline versus one year after implantation
Time Frame
at baseline and 1, 2.5, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months after implantation (and for longterm review after 18 and 24 months)
Title
Visual Function - Questionnaire
Description
A validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, ULV-VFQ, assessed at baseline versus one year after implantation
Time Frame
at baseline and 1, 2.5, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months after implantation (and for longterm review after 18 and 24 months)
Title
Adverse Events
Description
Number, nature and severity of device-related and implantation-related adverse events
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Measure of implant-mediated visual function
Description
Computer test assessed with implant on versus off
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
78 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 to 78 Willing and able to give written informed consent Hereditary retinal degeneration of the outer retinal layer i.e. photoreceptors (rods & cones) Pseudophakia or aphakia in the eye to be implanted Retinal vessels with remaining perfusion, despite pathological condition Layering of inner retina in the central region present, as shown by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Thickness of the retina sufficient for subretinal surgery as shown by OCT Inner retina still functional (proven e.g. by light perception or electrically evoked phosphenes (EEP)) Blindness in both eyes, (no light perception or light perception only) Visual acuity sufficient for reading normal print in earlier life, optically corrected Period of appropriate visual functions at least 12 years / lifetime Willing and able to perform study assessments and training during the full time period of 12 months Motivation to get the best possible results through training and realistic expectations about these as assessed in screening interview Exclusion Criteria: OCT shows significant retina edema and/or scar tissue within target region for implant Heavy clumped pigmentation at posterior pole or on the planned route of the implantation atrophy of optic nerve or ganglion cells degeneration Any other ophthalmologic disease with relevant effect upon visual function (e.g. glaucoma, optic neuropathies, trauma, diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment) Deep amblyopia reported earlier in life on eye to be implanted Systemic conditions that might imply considerable risks with regard to the surgical interventions and anesthesia (e.g. cardiovascular/pulmonary diseases, severe metabolic diseases) Acute and severe neurological and/or psychiatric diseases Hyperthyroidism or hypersensitivity to iodine Hypersensitivity to fluorescent dye Women who are pregnant or nursing, or women of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a medically acceptable means of birth control for the duration of the study or women unwilling to perform a pregnancy test before entering the study Participation in another interventional clinical study within the past 30 days
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas Leveziel, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, France
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre-André Duval, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Clinique Saint Jean, Montpellier, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinique Saint Jean
City
Montpellier
State/Province
Hérault
ZIP/Postal Code
34093
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Milétrie de Poitiers
City
Poitiers
State/Province
Vienne
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
If data are shared, this will only be done in a pseudonymized manner.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28878616
Citation
Stingl K, Schippert R, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Cottriall CL, Edwards TL, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Kiel K, Koitschev A, Kuhlewein L, MacLaren RE, Ramsden JD, Roider J, Rothermel A, Sachs H, Schroder GS, Tode J, Troelenberg N, Zrenner E. Interim Results of a Multicenter Trial with the New Electronic Subretinal Implant Alpha AMS in 15 Patients Blind from Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 23;11:445. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00445. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29110946
Citation
Edwards TL, Cottriall CL, Xue K, Simunovic MP, Ramsden JD, Zrenner E, MacLaren RE. Assessment of the Electronic Retinal Implant Alpha AMS in Restoring Vision to Blind Patients with End-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):432-443. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.retina-implant.de
Description
Retina Implant AG Sponsor homepage

Learn more about this trial

Impact on Daily Life of Patients Using the Subretinal Implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs