Toxicity of allogeneic MSC injection according to CTCAE Month 1
Tolerance according to side effects defined by CTCAE standards (Miller Results of cancer treatment Cancer 1981; 47 (1): 207 - 214). Treatment-related toxicity will be analyzed according to the international World Health Organization (WHO) (maximum degree of toxic attacks by the body). An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3.
Toxicity of allogeneic MSC injection according to CTCAE Month 3
Tolerance according to side effects defined by CTCAE standards (Miller Results of cancer treatment Cancer 1981; 47 (1): 207 - 214). Treatment-related toxicity will be analyzed according to the international World Health Organization (WHO) (maximum degree of toxic attacks by the body). An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3.
Toxicity of allogeneic MSC injection according to CTCAE Month 6
Tolerance according to side effects defined by CTCAE standards (Miller Results of cancer treatment Cancer 1981; 47 (1): 207 - 214). Treatment-related toxicity will be analyzed according to the international World Health Organization (WHO) (maximum degree of toxic attacks by the body). An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3.
Toxicity of allogeneic MSC injection according to CTCAE Month 12
Tolerance according to side effects defined by CTCAE standards (Miller Results of cancer treatment Cancer 1981; 47 (1): 207 - 214). Treatment-related toxicity will be analyzed according to the international World Health Organization (WHO) (maximum degree of toxic attacks by the body). An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3.
Proportion of subjects with Clinical Response Month 3
Proportion of subjects with Major Clinical Response (MCR) and the proportion of subjects with Partial Response Clinic (PCR)
Proportion of subjects with Clinical Response Month 6
Proportion of subjects with Major Clinical Response (MCR) and the proportion of subjects with Partial Response Clinic (PCR)
Proportion of subjects with Clinical Response Month 9
Proportion of subjects with Major Clinical Response (MCR) and the proportion of subjects with Partial Response Clinic (PCR)
Proportion of subjects with Clinical Response Month 12
Proportion of subjects with Major Clinical Response (MCR) and the proportion of subjects with Partial Response Clinic (PCR)
Disease activity measured by the BILAG index Month 3
Disease activity measured by the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (min=0 to max=72). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by SELENA-SLEDAI Month 3
Disease activity measured by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment study (SELENA) of the Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) (min=0 to max=105). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by SELENA-SLEDAI Month 6
Disease activity measured by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment study (SELENA) of the Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) (min=0 to max=105). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by the BILAG index Month 6
Disease activity measured by the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (min=0 to max=72). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by the BILAG index Month 9
Disease activity measured by the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (min=0 to max=72). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by SELENA-SLEDAI Month 9
Disease activity measured by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment study (SELENA) of the Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) (min=0 to max=105). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by the BILAG index Month 12
Disease activity measured by the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (min=0 to max=72). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
Disease activity measured by SELENA-SLEDAI Month 12
Disease activity measured by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment study (SELENA) of the Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) (min=0 to max=105). The higher value is the higher is the disease activity.
SRI Month 3
SRI (Systematic lupus erythematosus Responder Index) response rate during follow-up. A SRI response is defined as a binary outcome equal to 1 if all following conditions are validated:
4 points reduction of SELENA SLEDAI-score
no new BILAG A score for an organ
no more than one new BILAG B score
no worsening in the overall evaluation of the physician as compared to inclusion values
SRI Month 6
SRI (Systematic lupus erythematosus Responder Index) response rate during follow-up. A SRI response is defined as a binary outcome equal to 1 if all following conditions are validated:
4 points reduction of SELENA SLEDAI-score
no new BILAG A score for an organ
no more than one new BILAG B score
no worsening in the overall evaluation of the physician as compared to inclusion values
SRI Month 9
SRI (Systematic lupus erythematosus Responder Index) response rate during follow-up. A SRI response is defined as a binary outcome equal to 1 if all following conditions are validated:
4 points reduction of SELENA SLEDAI-score
no new BILAG A score for an organ
no more than one new BILAG B score
no worsening in the overall evaluation of the physician as compared to inclusion values
SRI Month 12
SRI (Systematic lupus erythematosus Responder Index) response rate during follow-up. A SRI response is defined as a binary outcome equal to 1 if all following conditions are validated:
4 points reduction of SELENA SLEDAI-score
no new BILAG A score for an organ
no more than one new BILAG B score
no worsening in the overall evaluation of the physician as compared to inclusion values
comorbidities Month 3
Presence of comorbidities
comorbidities Month 6
Presence of comorbidities
comorbidities Month 9
Presence of comorbidities
comorbidities Month 12
Presence of comorbidities
Quality of life Month SF-36 Month 3
Quality of life assessed by the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of life EQ-5D Month 3
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) : health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated from 0 to 5 and a single summary index is obtained by summing all the dimensions (min=0 to max=25).
Quality of life Month SF-36 Month 6
Quality of life assessed by the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of life EQ-5D Month 6
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) : health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated from 0 to 5 and a single summary index is obtained by summing all the dimensions (min=0 to max=25).
Quality of life Month SF-36 Month 9
Quality of life assessed by the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of life EQ-5D Month 9
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) : health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated from 0 to 5 and a single summary index is obtained by summing all the dimensions (min=0 to max=25).
Quality of life Month SF-36 Month 12
Quality of life assessed by the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of life EQ-5D Month 12
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) : health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated from 0 to 5 and a single summary index is obtained by summing all the dimensions (min=0 to max=25).
Steroids Month 3
Percentage of subjects with an average dose of prednisone reduced by 25% compared to M0
Steroids Month 6
Percentage of subjects with an average dose of prednisone reduced by 25% compared to M0
Steroids Month 9
Percentage of subjects with an average dose of prednisone reduced by 25% compared to M0
Steroids Month 12
Percentage of subjects with an average dose of prednisone reduced by 25% compared to M0