search
Back to results

Cryoneurolysis for Improvements in Pain, ADL and QOL in Patients With Ankle Osteoarthritis

Primary Purpose

Ankle Osteoarthritis

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
iovera
Sponsored by
University of Kansas Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ankle Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Cryoneurolysis, iovera, Superficial nerves treatment, Deep Fibular Nerve

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in an institutional review board-approved informed consent process, culminating in providing written consent.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures, visit schedules and ability to follow verbal and written instructions.
  • Male or female over 18 years of age.
  • Currently Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Grade 2, 3 or 4 in the ankle based on X-ray (weight-bearing mortise views with 20° internal rotation) or weight-bearing CT scan of the ankles.
  • Limited by unilateral ankle pain, rated on a Numerical Rating Scale for pain severity as ≥5 on most days over the last month.
  • Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) of < 75 in at least 1 category.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m2
  • Ambulatory
  • Willingness to abstain from the use of protocol-restricted medications during the study and also willing to abstain from use of analgesics other than acetaminophen 1 week prior to beginning of the study.
  • Has undergone at least one prior conservative osteoarthritis treatment (e.g. physical therapy, analgesics).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline knee, hip, spine or other limitations that affect walking ability to a greater extent than the ankle.
  • Cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, Raynaud's disease, cold urticaria.
  • Clinical signs or symptoms of active or recurrent infection in the index ankle joint or overlying skin.
  • IA, IV or IM corticosteroid (investigational or marketed) within 3 months of screening
  • Oral corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 2 weeks of screening (unless on a chronic stable dose for ≥3 months prior to enrollment).
  • Women who are pregnant (due to potential for the change in body mass and distribution to alter ankle symptoms over the period of follow-up).
  • Any condition other than OA of the ankle joint which, in the opinion of the investigators, affects their ability to ambulate to a sufficient degree to interfere with the assessment of the safety and treatment effects of the study injection.
  • Arthroscopy or open surgery of the ankle joint within 6 months of screening.
  • Planned/anticipated surgery of the index ankle joint during the 6-month study period.
  • Any clinically significant degree of cognitive impairment or other condition, finding, or psychiatric illness at screening which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise patient safety or interfere with the assessment of the safety and treatment effects of the study injection.
  • Skin breakdown at the ankle joint where the injection is planned to take place.
  • Participated in any investigational drug or device trial within 30 days prior to screening or concurrent participation in another research study that could complicate interpretation of the findings of either study.
  • Current consumption of more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week.
  • Patients with diffuse pain conditions (Complex pain - diffuse or confounding pain, fibromyalgia, etc.).
  • Known altered nerve anatomy or physiology (e.g. neuropathy) at the target, such as due to a congenital, traumatic or surgical cause.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Iovera

Arm Description

The iovera° device consists of a reusable, portable hand-piece, along with a single-patient use sterile smart Tip (cryoprobe) and disposable nitrous oxide (N2O) cartridges (cryogen). The smart tip is composed of closed-tip stainless steel needles, thereby fully enclosing the cryogen. There are 2 types of smart tips that will be utilized during this study, depending on the depth of the nerves being treated. The shorter smart tip comes in 2 variants - three X 6.9 mm or 8.9 mm, 27-gauge needles, with an attached skin warmer to prevent damage to the underlying skin. The longer smart tip also comes in 2 variants - 55 mm 22-gauge needle or a 90 mm 20G needle. The effect is by initiation of a cooling cycle, by fully inserting the smart tip into the procedure site and activating the cryogen flow. As the gas travels through the length of the needle, an ice ball develops around the needle freezing the surrounding tissue.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

FAOS - PAIN
FAOS-Pain is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living)
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - ADL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living)
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - ADL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living)
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - ADL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life)
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - QoL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life)
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - QoL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life)
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - QoL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS - PAIN
FAOS-Pain is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
FAOS - PAIN
FAOS-Pain is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
June 12, 2018
Last Updated
September 22, 2020
Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03567187
Brief Title
Cryoneurolysis for Improvements in Pain, ADL and QOL in Patients With Ankle Osteoarthritis
Official Title
Cryoneurolysis for Improvements in Pain, Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life in Patients With Ankle Osteoarthritis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 3, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This will be an open-label trial to describe the effects of cryoneurolysis with iovera° on symptom relief in patients with painful Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2-4 ankle osteoarthritis (OA). The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) subscales will be used to assess outcomes at 6, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment.
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to assess clinically significant long-term symptomatic relief with cryoneurolysis in people with unilateral ankle osteoarthritis (OA). The investigators will treat 1) the Superficial Fibular Nerve (SFN), Sural Nerve (SN) and Saphenous Nerve and/or 2) the Deep Fibular Nerve (DFN) with cryoneurolysis using the iovera° device. The primary study endpoint, clinically significant improvement in pain 12 weeks after each treatment, will be assessed using the FAOS pain subscale. If a participant is a non-responder (<20% improvement in pain within the 12 weeks following baseline), then the other treatment will be offered (e.g. if start with superficial group, then offer the DFN). The secondary outcomes will be improvement in quality of life (FAOS-QoL), activities of daily living (FAOS-ADL) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain. The tertiary outcome will be improvement in physical performance measures (40m fast-paced walking test, standing balance test).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ankle Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Cryoneurolysis, iovera, Superficial nerves treatment, Deep Fibular Nerve

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Iovera
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The iovera° device consists of a reusable, portable hand-piece, along with a single-patient use sterile smart Tip (cryoprobe) and disposable nitrous oxide (N2O) cartridges (cryogen). The smart tip is composed of closed-tip stainless steel needles, thereby fully enclosing the cryogen. There are 2 types of smart tips that will be utilized during this study, depending on the depth of the nerves being treated. The shorter smart tip comes in 2 variants - three X 6.9 mm or 8.9 mm, 27-gauge needles, with an attached skin warmer to prevent damage to the underlying skin. The longer smart tip also comes in 2 variants - 55 mm 22-gauge needle or a 90 mm 20G needle. The effect is by initiation of a cooling cycle, by fully inserting the smart tip into the procedure site and activating the cryogen flow. As the gas travels through the length of the needle, an ice ball develops around the needle freezing the surrounding tissue.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
iovera
Intervention Description
The iovera° device is 510(k)-cleared (K133453 and K161835) and is used to form a precisely controlled, sub-dermal cold zone of -20 to -88.5 degrees Celsius to temporarily disrupt peripheral nerve function, ultimately blocking pain. It is not indicated for the treatment of central nervous system tissue.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
FAOS - PAIN
Description
FAOS-Pain is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 12-weeks following treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living)
Description
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - ADL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 12-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living)
Description
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - ADL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 6-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living)
Description
FAOS - ADL(Activity of daily living) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - ADL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 24-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life)
Description
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - QoL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 12-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life)
Description
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - QoL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 6-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life)
Description
FAOS-QoL(Quality of life) is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score. It is similar to the KOOS - QoL components.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 24-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS - PAIN
Description
FAOS-Pain is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 6-weeks following treatment
Title
FAOS - PAIN
Description
FAOS-Pain is a subscale of the Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) which is a self-reported outcome score.The sub scale ranges from 0 to 100 where higher values represents a better outcome.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 24-weeks following treatment
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
40m fast paced walking test (40m FPWT)
Description
The 40-meter walk test is one of the three OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) recommended minimal core set of performance-based outcome measures in OA research and clinical practice.The 40m FPWT will take approximately 2 minutes for each subject to complete.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 6-weeks following treatment
Title
40m fast paced walking test (40m FPWT)
Description
The 40-meter walk test is one of the three OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) recommended minimal core set of performance-based outcome measures in OA research and clinical practice.The 40m FPWT will take approximately 2 minutes for each subject to complete.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 12-weeks following treatment
Title
40m fast paced walking test (40m FPWT)
Description
The 40-meter walk test is one of the three OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) recommended minimal core set of performance-based outcome measures in OA research and clinical practice.The 40m FPWT will take approximately 2 minutes for each subject to complete.
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 24-weeks following treatment
Title
Standing Balance Test
Description
The standing balance test outcome is measured with the feet side by side, then in semi-tandem stance (heel of one foot in front and beside the big toe of the other foot), and then in tandem stance (heel of one foot directly in front of the other foot); each stance was held for up to 10s. These test results are converted to scores (range 0-4).
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 6-weeks following treatment
Title
Standing Balance Test
Description
The standing balance test outcome is measured with the feet side by side, then in semi-tandem stance (heel of one foot in front and beside the big toe of the other foot), and then in tandem stance (heel of one foot directly in front of the other foot); each stance was held for up to 10s. These test results are converted to scores (range 0-4).
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 12-weeks following treatment
Title
Standing Balance Test
Description
The standing balance test outcome is measured with the feet side by side, then in semi-tandem stance (heel of one foot in front and beside the big toe of the other foot), and then in tandem stance (heel of one foot directly in front of the other foot); each stance was held for up to 10s. These test results are converted to scores (range 0-4).
Time Frame
change between baseline/screening and 24-weeks following treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participation in an institutional review board-approved informed consent process, culminating in providing written consent. Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures, visit schedules and ability to follow verbal and written instructions. Male or female over 18 years of age. Currently Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Grade 2, 3 or 4 in the ankle based on X-ray (weight-bearing mortise views with 20° internal rotation) or weight-bearing CT scan of the ankles. Limited by unilateral ankle pain, rated on a Numerical Rating Scale for pain severity as ≥5 on most days over the last month. Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) of < 75 in at least 1 category. Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m2 Ambulatory Willingness to abstain from the use of protocol-restricted medications during the study and also willing to abstain from use of analgesics other than acetaminophen 1 week prior to beginning of the study. Has undergone at least one prior conservative osteoarthritis treatment (e.g. physical therapy, analgesics). Exclusion Criteria: Baseline knee, hip, spine or other limitations that affect walking ability to a greater extent than the ankle. Cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, Raynaud's disease, cold urticaria. Clinical signs or symptoms of active or recurrent infection in the index ankle joint or overlying skin. IA, IV or IM corticosteroid (investigational or marketed) within 3 months of screening Oral corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 2 weeks of screening (unless on a chronic stable dose for ≥3 months prior to enrollment). Women who are pregnant (due to potential for the change in body mass and distribution to alter ankle symptoms over the period of follow-up). Any condition other than OA of the ankle joint which, in the opinion of the investigators, affects their ability to ambulate to a sufficient degree to interfere with the assessment of the safety and treatment effects of the study injection. Arthroscopy or open surgery of the ankle joint within 6 months of screening. Planned/anticipated surgery of the index ankle joint during the 6-month study period. Any clinically significant degree of cognitive impairment or other condition, finding, or psychiatric illness at screening which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise patient safety or interfere with the assessment of the safety and treatment effects of the study injection. Skin breakdown at the ankle joint where the injection is planned to take place. Participated in any investigational drug or device trial within 30 days prior to screening or concurrent participation in another research study that could complicate interpretation of the findings of either study. Current consumption of more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week. Patients with diffuse pain conditions (Complex pain - diffuse or confounding pain, fibromyalgia, etc.). Known altered nerve anatomy or physiology (e.g. neuropathy) at the target, such as due to a congenital, traumatic or surgical cause.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Neil A Segal, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Kansas Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18312921
Citation
Ward ST, Williams PL, Purkayastha S. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in the foot and ankle: a prospective 1-year follow-up investigation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;47(2):138-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.12.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18830791
Citation
Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jul;467(7):1800-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0543-6. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28231968
Citation
Repetto I, Biti B, Cerruti P, Trentini R, Felli L. Conservative Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis: Can Platelet-Rich Plasma Effectively Postpone Surgery? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Mar-Apr;56(2):362-365. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.11.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16880882
Citation
Trescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2003 Jul;6(3):345-60.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7326160
Citation
Evans PJ, Lloyd JW, Green CJ. Cryoanalgesia: the response to alterations in freeze cycle and temperature. Br J Anaesth. 1981 Nov;53(11):1121-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/53.11.1121.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24023029
Citation
Golightly YM, Devellis RF, Nelson AE, Hannan MT, Lohmander LS, Renner JB, Jordan JM. Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Mar;66(3):395-403. doi: 10.1002/acr.22162.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25922461
Citation
Mani SB, Do H, Vulcano E, Hogan MV, Lyman S, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle. Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):662-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.33940.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25463444
Citation
Holzer N, Salvo D, Marijnissen AC, Vincken KL, Ahmad AC, Serra E, Hoffmeyer P, Stern R, Lubbeke A, Assal M. Radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: the Kellgren-Lawrence scale is reliable and correlates with clinical symptoms. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Mar;23(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11642530
Citation
Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Oct;22(10):788-94. doi: 10.1177/107110070102201004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23965711
Citation
Hunt KJ, Hurwit D. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):e118(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01476.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23680877
Citation
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, Buchbinder R, Snyder-Mackler L, Henrotin Y, Thumboo J, Hansen P, Bennell KL. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21310252
Citation
McDaniel G, Renner JB, Sloane R, Kraus VB. Association of knee and ankle osteoarthritis with physical performance. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28336454
Citation
Radnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, Olson R, Dasa V, Segal N, Lane NE, Shrock K, Naranjo J, Darr K, Surowitz R, Choo J, Valadie A, Harrell R, Wei N, Metyas S. Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Aug;25(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Cryoneurolysis for Improvements in Pain, ADL and QOL in Patients With Ankle Osteoarthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs