Training Language and Literacy for Children Who Use CIs
Primary Purpose
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Phonological Awareness
Working Memory
Phonological Awareness + Working Memory
Active Control
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Prelingual hearing loss
- Use of amplification device (hearing aid and/or cochlear implant) for at least one year
- Able to visit the clinic 3x/week for 12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- No developmental delays (Down's syndrome, Autism spectrum disorder)
Sites / Locations
- Florida State University
- Northwestern University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Phonological Awareness
Working Memory
Phonological Awareness + Working Memory
Active Control
Arm Description
Children will play games to practice their rhyming, sound sequencing, and letter-sound knowledge. These games are all implemented in the Earobics program.
Children will play games designed to help them hold and manipulate objects in memory. These games are implemented in Cogmed.
Children will practice both their sound skills (Earobics) and their memory skills (Cogmed).
Children will play games to practice their addition and subtraction skills (Splashmath).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Phonological Awareness Test scores
Change in a standardized test of phonological awareness. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change inComprehensive Test of Phonological Awareness
Change in a standardized test of phonological awareness. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change in Children's Test of Nonword Repetition
Change in a standardized test of verbal working memory
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Oral Written Language Scales
Change in a standardized test of language and literacy skills. Measures performance on expressive and receptive language, and reading and writing abilities. Scores are age-adjusted.
Change in Receptive/Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test
Change in a standardized test of vocabulary knowledge. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change in Woodcock Johnson Reading Mastery Test
Change in a standardized test of early literacy skills. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03582566
First Posted
June 18, 2018
Last Updated
July 12, 2023
Sponsor
Florida State University
Collaborators
Northwestern University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03582566
Brief Title
Training Language and Literacy for Children Who Use CIs
Official Title
Training-Induced Language and Literacy Improvement in Children With Cochlear Implants
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Florida State University
Collaborators
Northwestern University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of computer games to improve language and literacy outcomes for children who have hearing loss. Children will be assigned to one of four conditions: phonological awareness training, working memory training, phonological awareness + working memory training, or active control.
Detailed Description
Both phonological awareness and working memory are known to be important for children's language and literacy learning. Though there are computer games that claim to improve phonological awareness and working memory, it is unknown if these games will improve language and literacy skills for children who have hearing loss.
The investigators will first determine if the games are effective for improving language and phonological awareness in children with hearing loss relative to an active control condition. Secondly, the investigators will determine if gains in phonological awareness and working memory translate into gains in language and literacy skills relative to active control.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Model Description
The efficacy of phonological awareness (Earobics) and working memory (Cogmed) training alone and in combination are compared to an active control (Splashmath).
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Assessors are blind to treatment condition. Intervention providers are blind to assessment outcomes.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
87 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Phonological Awareness
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Children will play games to practice their rhyming, sound sequencing, and letter-sound knowledge. These games are all implemented in the Earobics program.
Arm Title
Working Memory
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Children will play games designed to help them hold and manipulate objects in memory. These games are implemented in Cogmed.
Arm Title
Phonological Awareness + Working Memory
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Children will practice both their sound skills (Earobics) and their memory skills (Cogmed).
Arm Title
Active Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Children will play games to practice their addition and subtraction skills (Splashmath).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Phonological Awareness
Intervention Description
Earobics training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Working Memory
Intervention Description
Cogmed training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Phonological Awareness + Working Memory
Intervention Description
Earobics + Cogmed training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Active Control
Intervention Description
Spashmath
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Phonological Awareness Test scores
Description
Change in a standardized test of phonological awareness. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Title
Change inComprehensive Test of Phonological Awareness
Description
Change in a standardized test of phonological awareness. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Title
Change in Children's Test of Nonword Repetition
Description
Change in a standardized test of verbal working memory
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Oral Written Language Scales
Description
Change in a standardized test of language and literacy skills. Measures performance on expressive and receptive language, and reading and writing abilities. Scores are age-adjusted.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Title
Change in Receptive/Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test
Description
Change in a standardized test of vocabulary knowledge. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Title
Change in Woodcock Johnson Reading Mastery Test
Description
Change in a standardized test of early literacy skills. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
7 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Prelingual hearing loss
Use of amplification device (hearing aid and/or cochlear implant) for at least one year
Able to visit the clinic 3x/week for 12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
No developmental delays (Down's syndrome, Autism spectrum disorder)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erin Ingvalson, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Florida State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Florida State University
City
Tallahassee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60208
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Training Language and Literacy for Children Who Use CIs
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs