search
Back to results

Feasibility of Teleglaucoma Versus Conventional Clinical Evaluation for Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations in Patients With Glaucoma (Teleglaucoma)

Primary Purpose

Teleglaucoma, Teleophthalmology, Glaucoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Teleglaucoma
Sponsored by
Rutgers University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Teleglaucoma focused on measuring teleglaucoma, teleophthalmology

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with glaucoma or who are glaucoma suspects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical limitations precluding image acquisition like the inability to position for imaging or the inability to acquire images/testing

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Tele-Glaucoma arm

    Arm Description

    Subjects enrolled in tele-glaucoma arm for remote assessment

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Comparison of diagnosis and management in Teleglaucoma and conventional care
    Qualitative categorical outcome: Glaucoma Diagnosis, Management and follow up are clinical determinations by the investigator that are based on the overall clinical evaluation of the subject Diagnosis: A. no glaucoma B. confirmed glaucoma Management: A. maintain current therapy, B. advance therapy (additional glaucoma medication or surgical glaucoma intervention), C. no therapy needed Follow up: A. urgent (less than 4 weeks from time of evaluation) B. routine (more than 4 weeks from time of evaluation)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Visual acuity
    Quantitative outcome: Visual Acuity will be measured on the Snellen chart and then converted to a Log MAR scale (Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution scale= Log MAR scale). Log MAR scale: 0.0 to 2.0 units (in increments of 0.2) with 0.0 units representing 20/20 visual acuity (normal vision) and higher numbers representing worse visual acuity (2.0 units representing poor vision of 20/2000)
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Tonometry
    Quantitative outcome: Tonometry will be measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a puff tonometer. All measurements will be in mm Hg, range 0.0-60.0 mm Hg (in increments of 1 mm Hg). Normal range is 6-21 mm Hg. Measurements below 6 and above 21 mm Hg are considered outside the normal range.
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optic nerve
    Quantitative outcome: Vertical and Horizontal cup-to-disc rations 0.0-1.0 (in increments of 0.1) will be measured. Ratio>0.6 are considered higher risk for glaucoma. All measurements will be made by investigators on a high resolution monitor in a dark room. Investigators will be masked to one another assessments in instances were multiple readings are obtained. Images will be presented in a random order when multiple measures are obtained. Other Anterior and posterior segment pathology will be qualitatively noted (cataract, narrow angle, cornea pathology, diabetic retinopathy, age related macular degeneration, other).
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optical Coherence Tomography
    Quantitative outcome: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) will be used to obtain images of the anterior and posterior ocular segments. Quantitative measures in micron: 0-900 micron (+/- 5 micron) will be recorded for the cornea, optic nerve and retina. The range of normal is based on reference data that is age and racially determined.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 21, 2018
    Last Updated
    August 16, 2021
    Sponsor
    Rutgers University
    Collaborators
    New Jersey Health Foundation
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03587454
    Brief Title
    Feasibility of Teleglaucoma Versus Conventional Clinical Evaluation for Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations in Patients With Glaucoma
    Acronym
    Teleglaucoma
    Official Title
    TELEGLAUCOMA: THE NJ HEALTH FOUNDATION STUDY a Prospective, Single Site, Masked Study Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations of Teleglaucoma to Conventional Clinical Care in Patients With Glaucoma
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    August 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 1, 2019 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    September 1, 2019 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Rutgers University
    Collaborators
    New Jersey Health Foundation

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Telemedicine allows screening of subjects with limited access to eye care. Failure of screenees to come for full examination was identified as a serious problem. Teleglaucoma should allow a single physician access to screenees in real time. The investigators aim to test the technical feasibility of developing a system for teleglaucoma that will allow a physician real time access to patient information and images and compare it to traditional physical presence evaluation in glaucoma clinics. This system can be applied during telemedicine for glaucoma and other vision threatening diseases.
    Detailed Description
    Research Plan including Methods Investigators propose to develop a program for teleglaucoma and to validate it for patient care outcomes. The study will be conducted in two phases. The first phase will establish the technical foundation for the teleophthalmology system; the second phase will investigate the clinical impact of teleglaucoma. Phase I: Investigators will develop and test technical aspects of a teleophthalmology system for glaucoma. Phase II will evaluate the impact of teleglaucoma on patient care outcomes. Phase I. Development and Validation of a Teleophthalmology System in Glaucoma. By partnering with an ongoing telemedicine program at the Institute of Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), investigators will develop and test a system for telemedicine in glaucoma. In this phase, a wireless secure telemedicine system will be assembled that allows real-time access to participant subject screening data and images. The teleophthalmology system will be used and tested during telemedicine screening operations that are conducted by the investigators telemedicine team monthly in NJ. Telemedicine screenings occur all over the state of NJ at community centers, schools, places of worship, soup kitchens, other. Telemedicine system component assembly: Integration to imaging equipment, setup, installation, and training of personnel will be performed. In summary, this phase includes setup of imaging equipment (anterior segment and fundus camera) to the system, training of personnel, and post-installation quality checks by a communication technology expert. The server and specialized software will be customized for data entry, storage and display of selected patient health data in a secure configuration for internet access. Data obtained during routine IOVS telemedicine outreach program screening including demographic data, medical and ocular history, comprehensive ocular screening data (including imaging of the anterior and posterior ocular segments) will be configured for real time remote access by a physician. This phase also includes obtaining license to access a secure connection, and system configuration to allow data to be encrypted and securely transmitted using a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. Virtual storage of data will be configured, and monitors with visualization technology applications will be installed to communicate with the imaging devices used in telemedicine. During this phase quality measures will be tracked, recorded and analyzed. Those system quality checks will include 1. quality of acquired and transmitted ocular images (exposure, color, focus, etc.) 2. data security (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine encryption) 3. speed of data transmission (real-time network streamlining, interruptions and delays) obtained during each testing session. Phase II. Patient Outcomes: Teleglaucoma vs Conventional Care A population of patients seeking glaucoma care at IOVS glaucoma clinics will be included in this phase of the study. Subjects will be enrolled over a 6 month period. Subjects referred to or who are established patients at IOVS' glaucoma clinics will be enrolled on the same day in the teleglaucoma screening program and glaucoma clinic (physical presence). Two glaucoma fellowship-trained physician investigators will perform diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations during teleglaucoma and in glaucoma clinics. Participant patients will go through the consent process. All questions about the study will be explained by investigators. Upon consent process completion the participant will first undergo testing through the telemedicine protocol (see below). Data and images will then be transmitted. The investigator physician evaluating teleglaucoma data will assess the patient data and a diagnosis, management and follow-up recommendation will be made. The participant subject will then proceed to glaucoma clinic, where the participant will be examined by the investigator physician in the glaucoma clinic according to standard of care practices. The investigator physician physically present in the glaucoma clinics and the investigator physician in the teleglaucoma reading room will be masked to each other's recommendations regarding diagnostic tests and therapeutic recommendations. Data regarding the accuracy of diagnostic tests (e.g., visual acuity, tonometry, optic nerve assessment, and other routine glaucoma tests) from teleglaucoma and from physical presence will be compared. The accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis (no glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, confirmed Glaucoma) and management recommendations will also be compared. Parameters to be studied will include comparisons of LogMAR visual acuity, tonometry, ocular examination and particularly optic nerve evaluation (estimation of vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, presence of signs of glaucomatous neuropathy: disc hemorrhage, notching, localized pallor, and asymmetry in cup-to-disc ratio of the two eyes >0.2 disc diameters, among others). Limitations to an adequate ocular examination or imaging during teleglaucoma and physical presence will be tracked. Inter-observer agreement between the two arms (teleglaucoma and physical presence) will be determined. The accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis, i.e., confirmed glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, no glaucoma, as well as management recommendations, i.e., monitoring care, therapeutic interventions, obtained via teleglaucoma and physical presence will be compared. Statistical analyses will be performed on collected data. All data will be collected by subject codes. No protected health information will be gathered. Statistical analysis will be performed using statistical software through consultation with a statistician.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Teleglaucoma, Teleophthalmology, Glaucoma
    Keywords
    teleglaucoma, teleophthalmology

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Sequential Assignment
    Model Description
    Prospective sequential enrolment in teleglaucoma then conventional glaucoma clinical care
    Masking Description
    Investigators in teleglaucoma and conventional glaucoma clinics are masked to one another
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    107 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Tele-Glaucoma arm
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects enrolled in tele-glaucoma arm for remote assessment
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    Teleglaucoma
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    teleophthalmology
    Intervention Description
    Subjects are evaluated through a teleglaucoma protocol then by physical presence in a glaucoma clinic
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Comparison of diagnosis and management in Teleglaucoma and conventional care
    Description
    Qualitative categorical outcome: Glaucoma Diagnosis, Management and follow up are clinical determinations by the investigator that are based on the overall clinical evaluation of the subject Diagnosis: A. no glaucoma B. confirmed glaucoma Management: A. maintain current therapy, B. advance therapy (additional glaucoma medication or surgical glaucoma intervention), C. no therapy needed Follow up: A. urgent (less than 4 weeks from time of evaluation) B. routine (more than 4 weeks from time of evaluation)
    Time Frame
    24 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Visual acuity
    Description
    Quantitative outcome: Visual Acuity will be measured on the Snellen chart and then converted to a Log MAR scale (Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution scale= Log MAR scale). Log MAR scale: 0.0 to 2.0 units (in increments of 0.2) with 0.0 units representing 20/20 visual acuity (normal vision) and higher numbers representing worse visual acuity (2.0 units representing poor vision of 20/2000)
    Time Frame
    12 months
    Title
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Tonometry
    Description
    Quantitative outcome: Tonometry will be measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a puff tonometer. All measurements will be in mm Hg, range 0.0-60.0 mm Hg (in increments of 1 mm Hg). Normal range is 6-21 mm Hg. Measurements below 6 and above 21 mm Hg are considered outside the normal range.
    Time Frame
    12 months
    Title
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optic nerve
    Description
    Quantitative outcome: Vertical and Horizontal cup-to-disc rations 0.0-1.0 (in increments of 0.1) will be measured. Ratio>0.6 are considered higher risk for glaucoma. All measurements will be made by investigators on a high resolution monitor in a dark room. Investigators will be masked to one another assessments in instances were multiple readings are obtained. Images will be presented in a random order when multiple measures are obtained. Other Anterior and posterior segment pathology will be qualitatively noted (cataract, narrow angle, cornea pathology, diabetic retinopathy, age related macular degeneration, other).
    Time Frame
    12 months
    Title
    Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optical Coherence Tomography
    Description
    Quantitative outcome: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) will be used to obtain images of the anterior and posterior ocular segments. Quantitative measures in micron: 0-900 micron (+/- 5 micron) will be recorded for the cornea, optic nerve and retina. The range of normal is based on reference data that is age and racially determined.
    Time Frame
    12 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients with glaucoma or who are glaucoma suspects Exclusion Criteria: Physical limitations precluding image acquisition like the inability to position for imaging or the inability to acquire images/testing
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Albert S Khouri, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Rutgers University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    31138016
    Citation
    Chandrasekaran S, Kass W, Thangamathesvaran L, Mendez N, Khouri P, Szirth BC, Khouri AS. Tele-glaucoma versus clinical evaluation: The New Jersey Health Foundation Prospective Clinical Study. J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Oct;26(9):536-544. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19845273. Epub 2019 May 28.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Feasibility of Teleglaucoma Versus Conventional Clinical Evaluation for Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations in Patients With Glaucoma

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs