search
Back to results

Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility (DECISIF)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Online support decision tool
standard oral information
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast cancer, Preservation of fertility, Online support decision tool

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-40 years women
  • with breast cancer
  • cancer treatment not started, no antecedent of chemotherapy
  • speaking French
  • affiliated in Social Insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recurrence of breast cancer
  • metastatic breast cancer
  • pregnancy in progress
  • Adults protected (wardship, guardianship, protection of justice)

Sites / Locations

  • Reproduction medicine and fertility preservation ANTOINE BECLERE Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

DECISIF

IRIS

Arm Description

Exposed to an online support decision tool, in addition of the standard oral information

Exposed to a standard oral information

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC)
Measure of patient autonomy for making decision, according to the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC). A series of closed questions (based on the Osgoog's scale) on their feelings about this fertility preservation approach, describing attitudes in regards to "good / bad", "important / unimportant", "unhelpful" good thing / bad thing, "" pleasant / unpleasant "and" useful / useless ". Responses go from "very positive" (1) to "very negative" (7).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Decisional Conflict Scale Measure on
patient's decision-making discomfort, specific support needs for decision-making, the quality of decision making, the impact of supportive interventions on health decision-making.
Anxiety
: the 6 items of State and Trait Anxiety Inventory [55] [56], a reliable and sensitive measure of anxiety will be used to assess emotional disturbance. It consists of 6 items, indicating the lowest level of anxiety (1 = not at all) and 4 the highest (4 = very much), with a reverse rating items. The items are summated multiplied by 20 and divided by 6. Patients with scores> 50 are considered to have a high level of anxiety.

Full Information

First Posted
July 9, 2018
Last Updated
January 7, 2021
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03591848
Brief Title
Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility
Acronym
DECISIF
Official Title
Evaluation of an Online Decision Support Tool for Young Women With Breast Cancer During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 9, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 17, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 17, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Comparative study of two information modalities during the care course, aiming to propose the preservation of fertility to young women with breast cancer (but not yet under treatment): standard oral information during the PF consultation vs. an online decision support tool, consulted prior to the PF consultation, during which the standard oral information is provided.
Detailed Description
In recent decades, the incidence of breast cancer has increased significantly among young women. Between 1980 and 2012, there was an increase of 59% and 53% in the 30-39 age group and the 40-49 age group, respectively. However, both diagnostic and therapeutic advances made it possible to significantly reduce mortality, at the cost of potentially deleterious chemotherapeutic treatments for reproductive function. These treatments may therefore be the cause of a chronic pathology "infertility" that may negatively impact the quality of life of young breast cancer survivors. Since 2004, in France, the preservation of fertility (PF) is part of the different laws of bioethics. The latest cancer plans have highlighted the importance of quality of life in patients cured of cancer. For young women, this often involves the possibility of accessing maternity, using their own gametes. Thus, access to an onco fertility consultation should be systematically proposed, ideally before the initiation of any cancer treatment. While the importance of oncofertility consultations is now recognized, they raise a certain number of ethical questions, particularly as to the nature of the information to be transmitted, whether it is generalizable or not, and how it is delivered and supported. Very little data on the value of decision support tools in PF for women with breast cancer are available, while the concept of "shared medical decision" is becoming increasingly important in the doctor-patient relationship. The only available studies have shown that these tools can reduce the level of decisional conflict and regret over fertility-related treatment options, and improve knowledge about fertility and satisfaction among young women. This study aims to compare two modalities of delivery of information to breast cancer patients (not yet under treatment): standard oral information during the prevention of fertility (PF) consultation vs. an online decision support tool, consulted prior to the PF consultation, during which the standard oral information is provided.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast cancer, Preservation of fertility, Online support decision tool

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
186 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
DECISIF
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Exposed to an online support decision tool, in addition of the standard oral information
Arm Title
IRIS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Exposed to a standard oral information
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Online support decision tool
Intervention Description
Online support decision tool, in addition of the standard oral information
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
standard oral information
Intervention Description
standard oral information
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC)
Description
Measure of patient autonomy for making decision, according to the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC). A series of closed questions (based on the Osgoog's scale) on their feelings about this fertility preservation approach, describing attitudes in regards to "good / bad", "important / unimportant", "unhelpful" good thing / bad thing, "" pleasant / unpleasant "and" useful / useless ". Responses go from "very positive" (1) to "very negative" (7).
Time Frame
1 day (During the PF consultation)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decisional Conflict Scale Measure on
Description
patient's decision-making discomfort, specific support needs for decision-making, the quality of decision making, the impact of supportive interventions on health decision-making.
Time Frame
1 day (at the end of the PF consultation)
Title
Anxiety
Description
: the 6 items of State and Trait Anxiety Inventory [55] [56], a reliable and sensitive measure of anxiety will be used to assess emotional disturbance. It consists of 6 items, indicating the lowest level of anxiety (1 = not at all) and 4 the highest (4 = very much), with a reverse rating items. The items are summated multiplied by 20 and divided by 6. Patients with scores> 50 are considered to have a high level of anxiety.
Time Frame
1 day ( at the end of the PF consultation)

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18-40 years women with breast cancer cancer treatment not started, no antecedent of chemotherapy speaking French affiliated in Social Insurance Exclusion Criteria: recurrence of breast cancer metastatic breast cancer pregnancy in progress Adults protected (wardship, guardianship, protection of justice)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michaël GRYNBERG, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Reproduction medicine and fertility preservation ANTOINE BECLERE Hospital
City
Clamart
ZIP/Postal Code
92140
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32047010
Citation
Benoit A, Grynberg M, Morello R, Sermondade N, Grandazzi G, Moutel G. Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e031739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031739.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs