Strategy Training for People With Aphasia After Stroke
Primary Purpose
Strategy Training
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Strategy Training
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Strategy Training focused on measuring Stroke, Aphasia, Rehabilitation, Cognition, Disability
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- primary diagnosis of acute stroke
- admission to acute rehabilitation
- mild to moderate aphasia but able to understand and express communication with verbal, written, and/or augmentative communication (score of 1 or 2 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale item 9, or score 1 to 5 on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale)
Exclusion Criteria:
- pre-stroke diagnosis of dementia
- severe global aphasia (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale score of 0)
- dysarthria as the only communication impairment (score of 1 or 2 two on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale item 10, but score of 0 on item 9)
- current major depressive disorder (unless treated and in partial remission), bipolar disorder, or any other psychotic disorder (indicated by PRIME-MD)severe global aphasia (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale score of 0)
Sites / Locations
- University of Pittsburgh
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Strategy Training
Arm Description
Strategy training is a form of meta-cognitive instruction that trains individuals with stroke-related cognitive impairments to identify and prioritize problematic daily activities, identify the barriers impeding performance, generate and evaluate their own strategies to address barriers, and apply these skills through iterative practice.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean Patient-therapist Communication Score
Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC) Interaction score greater than or equal to 2. The scale assesses the degree of participation executed by the participant with communication impairment during supported conversation. Scores range from 0=no participation/comprehension to 4=full participation/comprehension.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Independence With Daily Activities
Change in independence measured with the Functional Independence Measure. The FIM assesses 18 tasks in 6 functional domains (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication and social cognition) using a scale of 1 (dependent) to 7 (independent). Scores range from 18 to 126. Higher values represent better outcomes. The a priori criterion for change was a medium effect size of change (Cohen's d≥0.5).
Change in Cognition
Change in cognition measured with the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test Executive Function Score. The severity score measures executive functions using 4 tasks (symbol trails, generative naming, mazes, and design generation). The score ranges from 40 (within normal limits) to 0 (severe impairment). Higher values represent better outcomes. The a priori criterion for change was a medium effect size of change (Cohen's d≥0.5).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03593876
First Posted
June 22, 2018
Last Updated
August 30, 2021
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03593876
Brief Title
Strategy Training for People With Aphasia After Stroke
Official Title
Strategy Training for People With Aphasia After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Given the design of the study, we reached saturation with a sample of 16
Study Start Date
July 23, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
One-third to one-half of acute strokes result in newly acquired cognitive impairments. Approximately 30 to 40% of people in the acute phase of stroke also sustain communication impairments. Stroke-related cognitive impairments are associated with significant functional disability, as indicated by the inability to regain independence in daily activities. The overall aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of an adapted form of strategy training for people with communication impairments who are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. These analyses will address a critical gap in current rehabilitation research, namely the exclusion of people with communication impairments in acute stroke rehabilitation clinical trials, and provide pilot data to inform the design of future inclusive clinical trials seeking to reduce disability after stroke.
Detailed Description
This pilot study will use a descriptive case series design with repeated measures to assess the feasibility of an adapted form of strategy training for people with communication impairments after acute stroke. The investigators will recruit people with aphasia due to stroke admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation units and administer the adapted form of strategy training one session per day 5 days per week for 10-15 sessions. The investigators will assess the feasibility of the intervention based on feedback from participants and therapists. These data will serve as pilot data to inform the design of a future clinical trials for people with cognitive impairments after stroke, including people with communication impairments. These efforts will allow the investigators to test new models to support optimal interventions for individuals with stroke-related cognitive impairments, including people with communication impairments who are among those most vulnerable for long-term disability.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Strategy Training
Keywords
Stroke, Aphasia, Rehabilitation, Cognition, Disability
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
16 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Strategy Training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Strategy training is a form of meta-cognitive instruction that trains individuals with stroke-related cognitive impairments to identify and prioritize problematic daily activities, identify the barriers impeding performance, generate and evaluate their own strategies to address barriers, and apply these skills through iterative practice.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Strategy Training
Intervention Description
This study will use an adapted form of strategy training for people with communication impairments.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Patient-therapist Communication Score
Description
Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC) Interaction score greater than or equal to 2. The scale assesses the degree of participation executed by the participant with communication impairment during supported conversation. Scores range from 0=no participation/comprehension to 4=full participation/comprehension.
Time Frame
Baseline to Post-Intervention (up to 3 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Independence With Daily Activities
Description
Change in independence measured with the Functional Independence Measure. The FIM assesses 18 tasks in 6 functional domains (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication and social cognition) using a scale of 1 (dependent) to 7 (independent). Scores range from 18 to 126. Higher values represent better outcomes. The a priori criterion for change was a medium effect size of change (Cohen's d≥0.5).
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Cognition
Description
Change in cognition measured with the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test Executive Function Score. The severity score measures executive functions using 4 tasks (symbol trails, generative naming, mazes, and design generation). The score ranges from 40 (within normal limits) to 0 (severe impairment). Higher values represent better outcomes. The a priori criterion for change was a medium effect size of change (Cohen's d≥0.5).
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
primary diagnosis of acute stroke
admission to acute rehabilitation
mild to moderate aphasia but able to understand and express communication with verbal, written, and/or augmentative communication (score of 1 or 2 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale item 9, or score 1 to 5 on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale)
Exclusion Criteria:
pre-stroke diagnosis of dementia
severe global aphasia (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale score of 0)
dysarthria as the only communication impairment (score of 1 or 2 two on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale item 10, but score of 0 on item 9)
current major depressive disorder (unless treated and in partial remission), bipolar disorder, or any other psychotic disorder (indicated by PRIME-MD)severe global aphasia (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Scale score of 0)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elizabeth R. Skidmore, PhD, OTR/L
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15260
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Strategy Training for People With Aphasia After Stroke
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs