search
Back to results

Long Term Comparative Effectiveness of Once Weekly Semaglutide Versus Standard of Care in a Real World Adult US Population With Type 2 Diabetes - a Randomized Pragmatic Trial

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Semaglutide
Standard of care
Sponsored by
Novo Nordisk A/S
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:- Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities. Study-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the study. - Male or female, age 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent. - Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis.- Treatment with either 1 or 2 oral antidiabetic medications.

- Current member of a commercial or Medicare health plan with pharmacy benefits.- Recorded HbAlc value within last 90 days prior to randomization. - Further intensification with an additional antidiabetic oral or injectable medication is indicated to achieve glycemic target at the discretion of the study physician according to approved labelling.

Exclusion Criteria: - Previous randomization in this study - Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes other than metformin in a period of 30 days before the day of eligibility assessment. Temporary/emergency use of any type of insulin is allowed, as is prior insulin treatment for gestational diabetes - Contraindications to semaglutide according to the Food and Drug Administration approved label - Female who is pregnant, breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant - Participation in another clinical trial

Sites / Locations

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Semaglutide

Standard of care

Arm Description

Participants will receive semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) in addition to metformin monotherapy as treatment intensification in the course of routine clinical practice. Participants will be followed for 2 years, regardless of changes in antidiabetic treatment over the course of the study.

Participants will receive standard of care in addition to metformin monotherapy as treatment intensification in the course of routine clinical practice. Participants will be followed for 2 years, regardless of changes in antidiabetic treatment over the course of the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7.0 Percentage (%) (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol]) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in HbA1c (Percentage-point [%-Point]) From Baseline to Year 1
Change in HbA1c from baseline to year 1 is presented in %-point.
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Change in HbA1c (%-Point) From Baseline to Year 2
Number of Participants With Individualized HbA1c Target Attained at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1 is presented. Study physicians set and documented an individualized HbA1c target for participants prior to randomization based on their clinical judgement and knowledge of the participant. Yes: number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria (less than 8.0% if age ≥ 65 years or with defined comorbidities, otherwise less than 7.0%) at year 1 is presented. Yes: Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1; No: Number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1
Change in Body Weight (in Pounds) From Baseline to Year 1
Change in body weight (in pounds) from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 1
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Year 1
Change in SBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Year 1
Change in DBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time to First Study Drug Discontinuation During 2 Years
Time to First Treatment Intensification (Add-on) or Change (Switch) After Randomization During 2 Years
Percentage of Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) for Study Drug Medication Adherence for the First Year of the Study
Percentage of MPR for study drug medication adherence for the first year of the study is presented. Medication adherence referred to a participant's conformance to the provider's recommendation with respect to timing, dosage, and frequency of medication taken during the prescribed length of time. The MPR was used to assess adherence. MPR was calculated as follows: MPR (%) = Sum of days supply for all prescription fills*100/Total number of days in time period. MPR was capped at 100%. MPR was calculated from pharmacy claims data and irrespective of adherence to randomized treatment or changes to antidiabetic treatment.
Number of Hypoglycemic Episodes Leading to an Inpatient Admission or Emergency Room (ER) Encounter From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Change Version (DTSQc), Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Measured at Year 1
DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score measured at year 1 is presented. The DTSQc provides a measure of how satisfied participants are with their current diabetes treatment compared with previous treatment. It consists of 8 questions, which are to be answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3 (-3 = much less satisfied now to +3 = much more satisfied now), with 0 (midpoint), representing no change. Six questions are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score. The remaining two questions concern perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia, respectively. The DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score ranges from -18 to +18, with higher scores associated with greater treatment satisfaction.
DTSQc, Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Measured at Year 2
Change From Baseline in Short Form 12-Item Version 2 Survey (SF-12 v2), Physical Summary Component (PCS-12) Score at Year 1
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: Physical summary component (PCS) Score and Mental summary component (MCS) Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 Score at Year 2
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, Mental Summary Component (MCS-12) Score at Year 1
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: PCS Score and MCS Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 Score at Year 2
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, General Health Questionnaire (WPAI-GH) Absenteeism (Work Time Missed) Score at Year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (work time missed) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (Work Time Missed) Score at Year 2
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) Score at Year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) Score at Year 2
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Work Productivity Loss (Overall Work Impairment/Absenteeism Plus Presenteeism) Score at Year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Work Productivity Loss (Overall Work Impairment/Absenteeism Plus Presenteeism) Score at Year 2
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Activity Impairment Score at Year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH activity impairment score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Activity Impairment Score at Year 2
All Cause Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Cumulative Length of Stay for Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Number of Emergency Room (ER) Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Number of Outpatient Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Number of Medications From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Occurrence of Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Occurrence of ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
All Cause HCRU: Occurrence of Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Cumulative Length of Stay for Diabetes Related Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related ER Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related Medications From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Occurrence of Diabetes Related Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Occurrence of Diabetes Related ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Diabetes Related HCRU: Occurrence of Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Number of Participants With Individualized HbA1c Target Attained at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1.
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1.
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline.
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Change in Body Weight (in Percentage) From Baseline to Year 2
Change in Body Weight (in Pounds) From Baseline to Year 2
Change in SBP From Baseline to Year 2
Change in DBP From Baseline to Year 2
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1; No: number of participants who did not report hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1.
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1.
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1.
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Percentage of Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) for Study Drug Medication Adherence For The Two Years of The Study

Full Information

First Posted
July 11, 2018
Last Updated
July 21, 2023
Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03596450
Brief Title
Long Term Comparative Effectiveness of Once Weekly Semaglutide Versus Standard of Care in a Real World Adult US Population With Type 2 Diabetes - a Randomized Pragmatic Trial
Official Title
Long Term Comparative Effectiveness of Once Weekly Semaglutide Versus Standard of Care in a Real World Adult US Population With Type 2 Diabetes - a Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 13, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 9, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 9, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to compare the effects of semaglutide (Ozempic®) with the effects of other treatments for type 2 diabetes in a normal practice setting. The participant will be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to one of the following treatment groups: Group 1: semaglutide (Ozempic®) (by injection into skin) Group 2: standard of care antidiabetic medication (oral or injectable). The participant has an equal chance of being in either of the treatment groups. Neither the participant nor the study doctor or study staff will be able to pick which group the participant is in, but the participant will know which study drug the participant has been assigned to. The study doctor will provide the participant with a prescription for the study diabetes medication based on the treatment group the participant is assigned. The participation will last about 2 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1278 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Semaglutide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) in addition to metformin monotherapy as treatment intensification in the course of routine clinical practice. Participants will be followed for 2 years, regardless of changes in antidiabetic treatment over the course of the study.
Arm Title
Standard of care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive standard of care in addition to metformin monotherapy as treatment intensification in the course of routine clinical practice. Participants will be followed for 2 years, regardless of changes in antidiabetic treatment over the course of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Semaglutide
Intervention Description
Participants will be prescribed commercially available semaglutide s.c. and will be instructed to initiate treatment with semaglutide s.c. according to the approved label. The study doctor will determine the intended maintenance dose of semaglutide, as well as changes to the maintenance dose thereafter.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of care
Intervention Description
Participants will receive standard of care, defined as commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication other than semaglutide. Participants will be prescribed and instructed to initiate commercially available antidiabetic medication according to the approved label and, if relevant for the specific antidiabetic medication, adjusted at the discretion of the study doctor.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7.0 Percentage (%) (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol]) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1.
Time Frame
At year 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in HbA1c (Percentage-point [%-Point]) From Baseline to Year 1
Description
Change in HbA1c from baseline to year 1 is presented in %-point.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 90 days prior to randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Change in HbA1c (%-Point) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 90 days prior to randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Number of Participants With Individualized HbA1c Target Attained at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1 is presented. Study physicians set and documented an individualized HbA1c target for participants prior to randomization based on their clinical judgement and knowledge of the participant. Yes: number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria (less than 8.0% if age ≥ 65 years or with defined comorbidities, otherwise less than 7.0%) at year 1 is presented. Yes: Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1; No: Number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Change in Body Weight (in Pounds) From Baseline to Year 1
Description
Change in body weight (in pounds) from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 1
Description
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Year 1
Description
Change in SBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Year 1
Description
Change in DBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Time to First Study Drug Discontinuation During 2 Years
Time Frame
Week 0 to year 2
Title
Time to First Treatment Intensification (Add-on) or Change (Switch) After Randomization During 2 Years
Time Frame
Week 0 to year 2
Title
Percentage of Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) for Study Drug Medication Adherence for the First Year of the Study
Description
Percentage of MPR for study drug medication adherence for the first year of the study is presented. Medication adherence referred to a participant's conformance to the provider's recommendation with respect to timing, dosage, and frequency of medication taken during the prescribed length of time. The MPR was used to assess adherence. MPR was calculated as follows: MPR (%) = Sum of days supply for all prescription fills*100/Total number of days in time period. MPR was capped at 100%. MPR was calculated from pharmacy claims data and irrespective of adherence to randomized treatment or changes to antidiabetic treatment.
Time Frame
Week 0 to year 1
Title
Number of Hypoglycemic Episodes Leading to an Inpatient Admission or Emergency Room (ER) Encounter From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Change Version (DTSQc), Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Measured at Year 1
Description
DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score measured at year 1 is presented. The DTSQc provides a measure of how satisfied participants are with their current diabetes treatment compared with previous treatment. It consists of 8 questions, which are to be answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3 (-3 = much less satisfied now to +3 = much more satisfied now), with 0 (midpoint), representing no change. Six questions are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score. The remaining two questions concern perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia, respectively. The DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score ranges from -18 to +18, with higher scores associated with greater treatment satisfaction.
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
DTSQc, Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Measured at Year 2
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form 12-Item Version 2 Survey (SF-12 v2), Physical Summary Component (PCS-12) Score at Year 1
Description
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: Physical summary component (PCS) Score and Mental summary component (MCS) Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 Score at Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, Mental Summary Component (MCS-12) Score at Year 1
Description
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: PCS Score and MCS Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 Score at Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, General Health Questionnaire (WPAI-GH) Absenteeism (Work Time Missed) Score at Year 1
Description
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (work time missed) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (Work Time Missed) Score at Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) Score at Year 1
Description
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) Score at Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Work Productivity Loss (Overall Work Impairment/Absenteeism Plus Presenteeism) Score at Year 1
Description
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Work Productivity Loss (Overall Work Impairment/Absenteeism Plus Presenteeism) Score at Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Activity Impairment Score at Year 1
Description
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH activity impairment score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Activity Impairment Score at Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
All Cause Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Cumulative Length of Stay for Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Number of Emergency Room (ER) Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Number of Outpatient Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Number of Medications From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Occurrence of Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Occurrence of ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
All Cause HCRU: Occurrence of Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Cumulative Length of Stay for Diabetes Related Inpatient Admissions From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related ER Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounters From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Diabetes Related Medications From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Occurrence of Diabetes Related Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Occurrence of Diabetes Related ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Diabetes Related HCRU: Occurrence of Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Title
Number of Participants With Individualized HbA1c Target Attained at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1.
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1.
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline.
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Change in Body Weight (in Percentage) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change in Body Weight (in Pounds) From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change in SBP From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Change in DBP From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame
Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Title
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1; No: number of participants who did not report hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1.
Time Frame
Week 0 to year 1
Title
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
Week 0 to year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1.
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Description
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1.
Time Frame
At year 1
Title
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Percentage of Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) for Study Drug Medication Adherence For The Two Years of The Study
Time Frame
Week 0 to year 2

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities. Study-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the study. Male or female, age 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent. Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis. Treatment with either 1 or 2 oral antidiabetic medications. Current member of a commercial or Medicare health plan with pharmacy benefits. Recorded HbAlc value within the last 90 days prior to randomization. Further intensification with an additional antidiabetic oral or injectable medication is indicated to achieve glycemic target at the discretion of the study physician according to approved labelling. Exclusion Criteria: Previous randomization in this study Treatment with more than 2 oral antidiabetic medications, oral semaglutide, or any injectable medication in a period of 30 days before the day of eligibility assessment. Temporary/emergency use of any type of insulin is allowed, as is prior insulin treatment for gestational diabetes. Contraindications to semaglutide according to the Food and Drug Administration approved label. Female who is pregnant, breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant Participation in another clinical trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure (1452)
Organizational Affiliation
Novo Nordisk A/S
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Buena Park
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90620
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92835
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Garden Grove
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92844
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Lancaster
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93534
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Los Alamitos
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Milpitas
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95035
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Mission Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91345
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Monterey
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93940
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Napa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94558
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Oxnard
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Pomona
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91766-2007
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
San Jose
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95148
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Toluca Lake
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91602
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90505
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Tulare
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93274
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Visalia
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93291
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94598
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80220
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Bristol
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Danbury
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06810
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Hamden
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06517
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Milford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06460
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30312
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
04915
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Blue Ridge
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30513
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Buford
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30519
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31904
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
LaGrange
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30240
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Lilburn
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30047
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Locust Grove
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30248
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30067
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Roswell
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30075
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Sandersville
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31082
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Statesboro
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30461
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Stockbridge
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30281
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Suwanee
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30024
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Swainsboro
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Waycross
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Anderson
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Avon
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Berne
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46711
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47725
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Fort Wayne
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46825
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Franklin
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46131
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Greenfield
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46140
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Michigan City
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Mishawaka
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46544
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Muncie
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47304
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Richmond
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47374
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Ashland
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Covington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41011
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Owensboro
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Paris
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40361
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Richmond
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40475
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Belfast
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04915
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Sterling Heights
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48310-3503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Chesterfield
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Jefferson City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Springfield
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89148
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Great Neck
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Great Neck
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11023
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Yonkers
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28277
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Fargo
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Blanchester
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Canton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Carlisle
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45005
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Franklin
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45005
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Mason
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45040
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Wadsworth
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44281
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Harleysville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19438
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Lansdale
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19446-1002
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
McMurray
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15317
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15236
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Athens
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Bristol
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
24201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Humboldt
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38343
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
McMinnville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
New Braunfels
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Sugar Land
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77478
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Saint George
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84790
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Chatham
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24531
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Colonial Heights
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23834
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Daleville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23083
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Danville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24541
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22044
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Hampton
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23666
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Lynchburg
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Newport News
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Portsmouth
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Radford
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
South Boston
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24592
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Suffolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23454
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23462
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Warrenton
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
20186
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Williamsburg
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
49820
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Green Bay
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
54303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
IPD Sharing URL
http://novonordisk-trials.com

Learn more about this trial

Long Term Comparative Effectiveness of Once Weekly Semaglutide Versus Standard of Care in a Real World Adult US Population With Type 2 Diabetes - a Randomized Pragmatic Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs