search
Back to results

Timing for Rectal Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy (ST812)

Primary Purpose

Rectal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Lithuania
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Surgery after 12 weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy.
Sponsored by
National Cancer Institute, Lithuania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring Rectal cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) score I-III
  • Histological confirmation of adenocarcinoma of rectum
  • T3 or T4 N0, T any N positive cancer on MRI, without metastasis on CT scan
  • Undergoing preoperative radiotherapy/ chemotherapy
  • Curative total mesorectal excision intended
  • Written informed consent
  • Patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy should not be excluded

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with distant metastasis
  • T1 or T2, N0 cancer on MRI
  • Rectal cancer 12 cm above the dentate line
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Patients previously treated of pelvic organ cancer
  • Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patients ability to give informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • National Cancer InstituteRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1

Group 2

Arm Description

The cancer surgery is practice 8 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

The cancer surgery will be performed in 12 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complete pathologic response assessed by pathologist Dworak scale
Dworak scale assesses the response: 0. No regression; 1. Predominantly tumor with significant fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; 2. Predominantly fibrosis with scattered tumor cells (slightly recognizable histologically); 3. Only scattered tumor cells in the space of fibrosis with/without acellular mucin; 4. No vital tumor cells detectable

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical response assessed using MRi
Rates of clinical response to chemoradiotherapy before surgery, comparison between the two groups
Pathological response assessed by pathologist using Dworak scale
Dworak scale assesses the response: 0. No regression; 1. Predominantly tumor with significant fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; 2. Predominantly fibrosis with scattered tumor cells (slightly recognizable histologically); 3. Only scattered tumor cells in the space of fibrosis with/without acellular mucin; 4. No vital tumor cells detectable
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale
Rates of operative morbidity at 30 days, comparison between the two groups. Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics and electrolytes and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusionsand total parenteral nutritionare also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention IIIa Intervention not under general anesthesia IIIb Intervention under general anesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications)* requiring IC/ICU-management IVa single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) IVb multiorgan dysfunction
Incidence of Mortality assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale
Rates of operative mortality at 30 days, comparison between the two groups. Grade V Death of a patient
Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality assessed by TME completeness scale (by P.Quircke)
Quality of mesorectum resection assessed by TME completeness scale: Mesorectal resection (MRR)/good/complete: intact mesorectum and smooth mesorectal surface with only minor irregularities; no defects deeper than 5 mm; no coning of the specimen towards the distal margin; and smooth macro-circular resection margin (CRM) on slicing. Intramesorectal resection (IMR)/intermediate/nearly complete: intermediate bulk of the mesorectum with an irregular surface; a defect deeper than 5 mm, and no visible muscularis propria other than inserted levator; intermediate coning; intermediate irregularity of macro-CRM on slicing. Muscularis propria resection (MPR)/poor/incomplete: small bulk of the mesorectum with a very irregular surface; defect down to the muscularis propria; severe coning; severe irregularity of macro-CRM on slicing.
Distant recurrence assessed by CT scan
Distant recurrence rates, comparison between the two groups
Local recurrence assessed by CT scan/MRI/endoscopy
Local recurrence rates, comparison between the two groups
Oncological outcome - overall survival
Overall survival rates, comparison between the two groups
Oncological outcome - disease-free survival
Disease-free survival rates, comparison between the two groups
Radiotherapy skin toxicity assessed by EORTC scale
Radiotherapy related toxicity rates: skin reactions will be assessed using EORTC radiotherapy toxicity scale: Skin Grade 1 follicular, faint or dull erythema / epilation / dry desquamation / decreased sweating; Grade 2 tender or bright erythema, patchy moist desquamation / moderate edema; Grade 3 confluent, moist desquamation other than skin folds, pitting edema; Grade 4 - ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis
Radiotherapy toxicity assessed by EORTC scale
Radiotherapy related toxicity rates: gastrointestinal reactions will be assessed using EORTC radiotherapy toxicity scale: Grade 1 increased frequency or change in quality of bowel habits not requiring medication / rectal discomfort not requiring analgesics; Grade 2 diarrhea requiring parasympatholytic drugs (e.g. Lomotil) / mucous discharge not necessitating sanitary pads / rectal or abdominal pain requiring analgesics; Grade 3 diarrhea requiring parenteral support / severe mucous or blood discharge necessitating sanitary pads / abdominal distention (flat plate radiograph demonstrates distended bowel loops); Grade 4 acute or subacute obstruction, fistula or perforation; GI bleeding requiring transfusion; abdominal pain or tenesmus requiring tube decompression or bowel diversion
Quality of Life assessed by Low anterior resection syndrome score
The Low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS) score consists of five items concerning the following: incontinence for flatus, incontinence for liquid stool, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of stools, and urgency. Each symptom of bowel dysfunction is weighed according to its impact on the quality of life. The calculated score ranges from 0 to 42, with a score of 0-20 representing no ARS, a score of 21-29 representing minor ARS, and a score of 30-42 representing major ARS.
Immune response assessed
We have assessed the immune response before chemoradiotherapy and 8 weeks following the treatment. IL1B, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL2R, TNF alfa are assessed and will be correlated with the response to treatment.
Urinary catheter removal timing
All the patients will have there urinary catheters removed on day 1. Some patients will get Urorec (adrenomimetic for prevention of urinary retention). The patients will be randomized 2:1

Full Information

First Posted
June 20, 2018
Last Updated
February 4, 2022
Sponsor
National Cancer Institute, Lithuania
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03607370
Brief Title
Timing for Rectal Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy
Acronym
ST812
Official Title
Timing for Rectal Surgery After ChST
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National Cancer Institute, Lithuania

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine whether greater rectal cancer downstaging and regression occurs when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy compared to 8 weeks. Hypothesis: Greater down-staging and tumor regression is observed when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy compared to 8 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
Keywords
Rectal cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The cancer surgery is practice 8 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The cancer surgery will be performed in 12 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgery after 12 weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy.
Intervention Description
Surgery consists oncologic resection of the rectal cancer with total excision of the mesorectum after 12 weeks of delay after the end of chemoradiotherapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete pathologic response assessed by pathologist Dworak scale
Description
Dworak scale assesses the response: 0. No regression; 1. Predominantly tumor with significant fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; 2. Predominantly fibrosis with scattered tumor cells (slightly recognizable histologically); 3. Only scattered tumor cells in the space of fibrosis with/without acellular mucin; 4. No vital tumor cells detectable
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical response assessed using MRi
Description
Rates of clinical response to chemoradiotherapy before surgery, comparison between the two groups
Time Frame
8 weeks (2 months)
Title
Pathological response assessed by pathologist using Dworak scale
Description
Dworak scale assesses the response: 0. No regression; 1. Predominantly tumor with significant fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; 2. Predominantly fibrosis with scattered tumor cells (slightly recognizable histologically); 3. Only scattered tumor cells in the space of fibrosis with/without acellular mucin; 4. No vital tumor cells detectable
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale
Description
Rates of operative morbidity at 30 days, comparison between the two groups. Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics and electrolytes and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusionsand total parenteral nutritionare also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention IIIa Intervention not under general anesthesia IIIb Intervention under general anesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications)* requiring IC/ICU-management IVa single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) IVb multiorgan dysfunction
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Incidence of Mortality assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale
Description
Rates of operative mortality at 30 days, comparison between the two groups. Grade V Death of a patient
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality assessed by TME completeness scale (by P.Quircke)
Description
Quality of mesorectum resection assessed by TME completeness scale: Mesorectal resection (MRR)/good/complete: intact mesorectum and smooth mesorectal surface with only minor irregularities; no defects deeper than 5 mm; no coning of the specimen towards the distal margin; and smooth macro-circular resection margin (CRM) on slicing. Intramesorectal resection (IMR)/intermediate/nearly complete: intermediate bulk of the mesorectum with an irregular surface; a defect deeper than 5 mm, and no visible muscularis propria other than inserted levator; intermediate coning; intermediate irregularity of macro-CRM on slicing. Muscularis propria resection (MPR)/poor/incomplete: small bulk of the mesorectum with a very irregular surface; defect down to the muscularis propria; severe coning; severe irregularity of macro-CRM on slicing.
Time Frame
8-12 weeks
Title
Distant recurrence assessed by CT scan
Description
Distant recurrence rates, comparison between the two groups
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Local recurrence assessed by CT scan/MRI/endoscopy
Description
Local recurrence rates, comparison between the two groups
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Oncological outcome - overall survival
Description
Overall survival rates, comparison between the two groups
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Oncological outcome - disease-free survival
Description
Disease-free survival rates, comparison between the two groups
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Radiotherapy skin toxicity assessed by EORTC scale
Description
Radiotherapy related toxicity rates: skin reactions will be assessed using EORTC radiotherapy toxicity scale: Skin Grade 1 follicular, faint or dull erythema / epilation / dry desquamation / decreased sweating; Grade 2 tender or bright erythema, patchy moist desquamation / moderate edema; Grade 3 confluent, moist desquamation other than skin folds, pitting edema; Grade 4 - ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Radiotherapy toxicity assessed by EORTC scale
Description
Radiotherapy related toxicity rates: gastrointestinal reactions will be assessed using EORTC radiotherapy toxicity scale: Grade 1 increased frequency or change in quality of bowel habits not requiring medication / rectal discomfort not requiring analgesics; Grade 2 diarrhea requiring parasympatholytic drugs (e.g. Lomotil) / mucous discharge not necessitating sanitary pads / rectal or abdominal pain requiring analgesics; Grade 3 diarrhea requiring parenteral support / severe mucous or blood discharge necessitating sanitary pads / abdominal distention (flat plate radiograph demonstrates distended bowel loops); Grade 4 acute or subacute obstruction, fistula or perforation; GI bleeding requiring transfusion; abdominal pain or tenesmus requiring tube decompression or bowel diversion
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Quality of Life assessed by Low anterior resection syndrome score
Description
The Low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS) score consists of five items concerning the following: incontinence for flatus, incontinence for liquid stool, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of stools, and urgency. Each symptom of bowel dysfunction is weighed according to its impact on the quality of life. The calculated score ranges from 0 to 42, with a score of 0-20 representing no ARS, a score of 21-29 representing minor ARS, and a score of 30-42 representing major ARS.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Immune response assessed
Description
We have assessed the immune response before chemoradiotherapy and 8 weeks following the treatment. IL1B, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL2R, TNF alfa are assessed and will be correlated with the response to treatment.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Urinary catheter removal timing
Description
All the patients will have there urinary catheters removed on day 1. Some patients will get Urorec (adrenomimetic for prevention of urinary retention). The patients will be randomized 2:1
Time Frame
3 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Over 18 years old Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1, American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) score I-III Histological confirmation of adenocarcinoma of rectum T3 or T4 N0, T any N positive cancer on MRI, without metastasis on CT scan Undergoing preoperative radiotherapy/ chemotherapy Curative total mesorectal excision intended Written informed consent Patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy should not be excluded Exclusion Criteria: Patients with distant metastasis T1 or T2, N0 cancer on MRI Rectal cancer 12 cm above the dentate line Contraindications to MRI Patients previously treated of pelvic organ cancer Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patients ability to give informed consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Audrius Dulskas, MD, PhD
Phone
+37067520094
Email
audrius.dulskas@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audrius Dulskas, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Cancer Institute
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
08406
Country
Lithuania
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audrius Dulskas, MD, PhD
Phone
852786812
Email
audrius.dulskas@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Timing for Rectal Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs