search
Back to results

PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds

Primary Purpose

Partial-thickness Burn

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PermeaDerm
Mepilex Ag
Sponsored by
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Partial-thickness Burn focused on measuring PermeaDerm, Mepilex Ag, partial thickness burn wounds

Eligibility Criteria

6 Months - 99 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Superficial partial thickness burn injury due to flame burn, scald injury or contact burn that does not require excision and grafting
  • Total Body Surface Area burned (TBSA) total ≤30 %
  • Admission within 72 hours of burn injury
  • Non-infected wound as diagnosed by the attending physician upon admission
  • Treated as an outpatient or in an observational setting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient younger than 6 months
  • Causes other than contact burn, flame or scald injuries (i.e., electrical, chemical or frostbite)
  • Admission time greater than 72 hours after the injury
  • Wounds noted to be infected at admission
  • Previous treatment efforts such as previous debridement, silver sulfadiazine ointment or other pseudo eschar-forming topical agents
  • Pregnancy/lactation

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    PermeaDerm

    Mepilex Ag

    Arm Description

    Participants receive PermeaDerm dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely

    Participants receive Mepilex Ag dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Time to heal
    Time until wound is complete healed in days. A wound is considered as completely healed, when either PermeaDerm detaches on its own or no more dressings need to be applied in the Mepilex group. This time point is defined when approximately 95% of the wound shows epithelialization as determined by an experienced burn surgeon.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Pain assessment using Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scales (age dependent)
    Pain assessment using Visual Analog Scale rating Pain scores ranging from 0-10 (8 years and older) OR Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (3-7 years old). FACES stands for faces, since this rating scale shows faces from very happy to very unhappy. It ranges also from 0-10. Higher values indicating greater pain. The 0-10 scores for each scale are equivalent.
    Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
    Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
    Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
    Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
    Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
    Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
    Measured based on skin conductance.
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
    Measured based on skin conductance.
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
    Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
    Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
    Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
    Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
    Rate of Infection
    Defined as bacterial growth of >10 to power of 5 in swab. Only taken when infection suspected.
    Cost-effectiveness
    Number of dressing changes required until healing versus respective product costs (costs per cm square)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    July 19, 2018
    Last Updated
    June 15, 2023
    Sponsor
    The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03613870
    Brief Title
    PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
    Official Title
    A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® and Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    Administratively closed prior enrollment of participants.
    Study Start Date
    July 19, 2018 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 1, 2018 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    July 11, 2019 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds: PermeaDerm® (PermeaDerm, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA) and silver impregnated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®, Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden)
    Detailed Description
    In this prospective, randomized parallel study, the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds will be compared: PermeaDerm®, and silver coated foam dressing Mepilex Ag®.This study is therefore considered a minimal risk study. Procedures related to research apart from randomization to one of the dressings, will include review of medical records, non-invasive wound and scar assessments and additional photographs. 60 patients with partial thickness burns meeting the inclusion criteria of the study will be enrolled to receive either PermeaDerm® (n=30) or silver coated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®; n=30) in an outpatient or observational setting. Prior to placement of wound dressings, baseline assessments of wound size and burn depth will be performed by the experienced physician and documented using photography and when indicated laser Doppler (Moor Laser Speckle®, Moor Instruments, Devon, UK) measurements. Time to heal will be defined as the time after which complete re-epithelialization is reached and PermeaDerm® detaches or there are no more changes of Mepilex Ag® needed. Secondary goals of the study are to assess pain, and scarring associated with the use of the different dressings in our burn patients, as well as to assess cost-effectiveness of the therapy. Pain will be assessed at every patient visit using visual analog scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES respectively; mid and long-term scar development is assessed at approximately 1 and 6 months after enrollment in the study using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and DermaLab Combo® (Cortex Technology, Denmark).

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Partial-thickness Burn
    Keywords
    PermeaDerm, Mepilex Ag, partial thickness burn wounds

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    PermeaDerm
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Participants receive PermeaDerm dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely
    Arm Title
    Mepilex Ag
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Participants receive Mepilex Ag dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    PermeaDerm
    Intervention Description
    Wound treatment with PermeaDerm
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Mepilex Ag
    Intervention Description
    Wound treatment with Mepilex Ag
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Time to heal
    Description
    Time until wound is complete healed in days. A wound is considered as completely healed, when either PermeaDerm detaches on its own or no more dressings need to be applied in the Mepilex group. This time point is defined when approximately 95% of the wound shows epithelialization as determined by an experienced burn surgeon.
    Time Frame
    up to 3 weeks after injury
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain assessment using Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scales (age dependent)
    Description
    Pain assessment using Visual Analog Scale rating Pain scores ranging from 0-10 (8 years and older) OR Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (3-7 years old). FACES stands for faces, since this rating scale shows faces from very happy to very unhappy. It ranges also from 0-10. Higher values indicating greater pain. The 0-10 scores for each scale are equivalent.
    Time Frame
    Changes over first 30 days post injury, using regression modeling for analysis.
    Title
    Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
    Description
    Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post injury
    Title
    Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
    Description
    Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
    Time Frame
    at 6 months post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
    Description
    Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
    Description
    Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
    Time Frame
    at 6 months post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
    Description
    Measured based on skin conductance.
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
    Description
    Measured based on skin conductance.
    Time Frame
    at 6 months post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
    Description
    Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
    Description
    Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
    Time Frame
    at 6 months post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
    Description
    Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post injury
    Title
    Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
    Description
    Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
    Time Frame
    at 6 months post injury
    Title
    Rate of Infection
    Description
    Defined as bacterial growth of >10 to power of 5 in swab. Only taken when infection suspected.
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post burn
    Title
    Cost-effectiveness
    Description
    Number of dressing changes required until healing versus respective product costs (costs per cm square)
    Time Frame
    at 1 month post burn

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    6 Months
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    99 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Superficial partial thickness burn injury due to flame burn, scald injury or contact burn that does not require excision and grafting Total Body Surface Area burned (TBSA) total ≤30 % Admission within 72 hours of burn injury Non-infected wound as diagnosed by the attending physician upon admission Treated as an outpatient or in an observational setting Exclusion Criteria: Patient younger than 6 months Causes other than contact burn, flame or scald injuries (i.e., electrical, chemical or frostbite) Admission time greater than 72 hours after the injury Wounds noted to be infected at admission Previous treatment efforts such as previous debridement, silver sulfadiazine ointment or other pseudo eschar-forming topical agents Pregnancy/lactation
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Ludwik K Branski, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    data won't be shared

    Learn more about this trial

    PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs