PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
Primary Purpose
Partial-thickness Burn
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PermeaDerm
Mepilex Ag
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Partial-thickness Burn focused on measuring PermeaDerm, Mepilex Ag, partial thickness burn wounds
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Superficial partial thickness burn injury due to flame burn, scald injury or contact burn that does not require excision and grafting
- Total Body Surface Area burned (TBSA) total ≤30 %
- Admission within 72 hours of burn injury
- Non-infected wound as diagnosed by the attending physician upon admission
- Treated as an outpatient or in an observational setting
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient younger than 6 months
- Causes other than contact burn, flame or scald injuries (i.e., electrical, chemical or frostbite)
- Admission time greater than 72 hours after the injury
- Wounds noted to be infected at admission
- Previous treatment efforts such as previous debridement, silver sulfadiazine ointment or other pseudo eschar-forming topical agents
- Pregnancy/lactation
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
PermeaDerm
Mepilex Ag
Arm Description
Participants receive PermeaDerm dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely
Participants receive Mepilex Ag dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time to heal
Time until wound is complete healed in days. A wound is considered as completely healed, when either PermeaDerm detaches on its own or no more dressings need to be applied in the Mepilex group. This time point is defined when approximately 95% of the wound shows epithelialization as determined by an experienced burn surgeon.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain assessment using Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scales (age dependent)
Pain assessment using Visual Analog Scale rating Pain scores ranging from 0-10 (8 years and older) OR Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (3-7 years old). FACES stands for faces, since this rating scale shows faces from very happy to very unhappy. It ranges also from 0-10. Higher values indicating greater pain. The 0-10 scores for each scale are equivalent.
Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
Measured based on skin conductance.
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
Measured based on skin conductance.
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
Rate of Infection
Defined as bacterial growth of >10 to power of 5 in swab. Only taken when infection suspected.
Cost-effectiveness
Number of dressing changes required until healing versus respective product costs (costs per cm square)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03613870
First Posted
July 19, 2018
Last Updated
June 15, 2023
Sponsor
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03613870
Brief Title
PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® and Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Administratively closed prior enrollment of participants.
Study Start Date
July 19, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 11, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds: PermeaDerm® (PermeaDerm, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA) and silver impregnated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®, Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden)
Detailed Description
In this prospective, randomized parallel study, the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds will be compared: PermeaDerm®, and silver coated foam dressing Mepilex Ag®.This study is therefore considered a minimal risk study. Procedures related to research apart from randomization to one of the dressings, will include review of medical records, non-invasive wound and scar assessments and additional photographs.
60 patients with partial thickness burns meeting the inclusion criteria of the study will be enrolled to receive either PermeaDerm® (n=30) or silver coated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®; n=30) in an outpatient or observational setting.
Prior to placement of wound dressings, baseline assessments of wound size and burn depth will be performed by the experienced physician and documented using photography and when indicated laser Doppler (Moor Laser Speckle®, Moor Instruments, Devon, UK) measurements. Time to heal will be defined as the time after which complete re-epithelialization is reached and PermeaDerm® detaches or there are no more changes of Mepilex Ag® needed. Secondary goals of the study are to assess pain, and scarring associated with the use of the different dressings in our burn patients, as well as to assess cost-effectiveness of the therapy.
Pain will be assessed at every patient visit using visual analog scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES respectively; mid and long-term scar development is assessed at approximately 1 and 6 months after enrollment in the study using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and DermaLab Combo® (Cortex Technology, Denmark).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Partial-thickness Burn
Keywords
PermeaDerm, Mepilex Ag, partial thickness burn wounds
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PermeaDerm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants receive PermeaDerm dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely
Arm Title
Mepilex Ag
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants receive Mepilex Ag dressing for wound treatment until wounds have healed completely
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PermeaDerm
Intervention Description
Wound treatment with PermeaDerm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Mepilex Ag
Intervention Description
Wound treatment with Mepilex Ag
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to heal
Description
Time until wound is complete healed in days. A wound is considered as completely healed, when either PermeaDerm detaches on its own or no more dressings need to be applied in the Mepilex group. This time point is defined when approximately 95% of the wound shows epithelialization as determined by an experienced burn surgeon.
Time Frame
up to 3 weeks after injury
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain assessment using Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scales (age dependent)
Description
Pain assessment using Visual Analog Scale rating Pain scores ranging from 0-10 (8 years and older) OR Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (3-7 years old). FACES stands for faces, since this rating scale shows faces from very happy to very unhappy. It ranges also from 0-10. Higher values indicating greater pain. The 0-10 scores for each scale are equivalent.
Time Frame
Changes over first 30 days post injury, using regression modeling for analysis.
Title
Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Description
Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
Time Frame
at 1 month post injury
Title
Scar assessment with Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Description
Using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale POSAS, what is a composite score that is rating the overall appearance of the scar, based on each single score for rating vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface. Every subscore ranges from 1-10. The composite score is calculated as an average of the subscores. Higher numbers mean worse scarring.
Time Frame
at 6 months post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
Description
Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
Time Frame
at 1 month post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Viscoelasticity
Description
Measured through negative suction and retraction time.
Time Frame
at 6 months post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
Description
Measured based on skin conductance.
Time Frame
at 1 month post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Hydration
Description
Measured based on skin conductance.
Time Frame
at 6 months post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
Description
Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
Time Frame
at 1 month post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Pigmentation
Description
Measured based on light absorption of melanin and erythema
Time Frame
at 6 months post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
Description
Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
Time Frame
at 1 month post injury
Title
Scarring with DermaLab Combo device: Trans epithermal water loss
Description
Measuring evaporation in g/meter square/hour
Time Frame
at 6 months post injury
Title
Rate of Infection
Description
Defined as bacterial growth of >10 to power of 5 in swab. Only taken when infection suspected.
Time Frame
at 1 month post burn
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Description
Number of dressing changes required until healing versus respective product costs (costs per cm square)
Time Frame
at 1 month post burn
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Superficial partial thickness burn injury due to flame burn, scald injury or contact burn that does not require excision and grafting
Total Body Surface Area burned (TBSA) total ≤30 %
Admission within 72 hours of burn injury
Non-infected wound as diagnosed by the attending physician upon admission
Treated as an outpatient or in an observational setting
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient younger than 6 months
Causes other than contact burn, flame or scald injuries (i.e., electrical, chemical or frostbite)
Admission time greater than 72 hours after the injury
Wounds noted to be infected at admission
Previous treatment efforts such as previous debridement, silver sulfadiazine ointment or other pseudo eschar-forming topical agents
Pregnancy/lactation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ludwik K Branski, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
data won't be shared
Learn more about this trial
PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs