search
Back to results

Acceptance of the CP950 Sound Processor

Primary Purpose

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CP950 OTE Sound processor
Sponsored by
Cochlear
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Eighteen years of age or older
  2. At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear
  3. At least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor
  4. Native speaker in the language used to assess speech perception performance
  5. Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol
  6. Able to score 30% or more at +15 SNR with CI alone

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device
  2. Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations
  3. Nucleus 22 Implant

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    All participants

    Arm Description

    At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear and at least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Acceptability Ratings for the CP950 Sound Processor Compared to Subjects' Own Processors, Summarized by the Overall Hearing Performance Score.
    Each subject used the Investigational device (CP950) for take home use to obtain subjective ratings. During the take home use, A subjective questionnaire was asked them to recall and rate how their hearing performance with the Investigational device CP950 OTE processor compared to their hearing performance with their own CP810, CP910 or CP920 BTE processor. Likert scale was used for each rating in the questionnaire for at home usage ( with the values ranging from) : 1 = much worse; 2 = somewhat worse; 3 = No difference; 4 = somewhat better; 5 = much better.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Speech Reception Threshold (SNR50) for Sentence Testing in Noise With CP950 Sound Processor .
    Signal to noise ratio (measured in decibels) providing 50% speech intelligibility for sentences presented in noise to evaluate the benefit from microphone directionality with the CP950 OTE (Off the ear) sound processor.
    Percentage of Correct Words Scored With Sentences in Noise With the CP950 Sound Processor
    Two lists of twenty sentences presented from front speaker with 4 Talker babble noise presented from rear-half speakers. Higher the percentage of correct words means better outcome.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 31, 2016
    Last Updated
    September 1, 2023
    Sponsor
    Cochlear
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03613909
    Brief Title
    Acceptance of the CP950 Sound Processor
    Official Title
    Acceptance of the CP950 Sound Processor With Experienced CP810/CP910/CP920 BTE Sound Processor Users
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    November 2015 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Cochlear

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Acceptance of CP950 sound processor with experienced CP810/CP910/CP920 BTE sound processor users.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Model Description
    Repeated measures, single-subject experiment. Each subject received the same treatment.
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    23 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    All participants
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear and at least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    CP950 OTE Sound processor
    Intervention Description
    CP950 is Off The Ear (OTE) Cochlear Implant Sound Processor
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Acceptability Ratings for the CP950 Sound Processor Compared to Subjects' Own Processors, Summarized by the Overall Hearing Performance Score.
    Description
    Each subject used the Investigational device (CP950) for take home use to obtain subjective ratings. During the take home use, A subjective questionnaire was asked them to recall and rate how their hearing performance with the Investigational device CP950 OTE processor compared to their hearing performance with their own CP810, CP910 or CP920 BTE processor. Likert scale was used for each rating in the questionnaire for at home usage ( with the values ranging from) : 1 = much worse; 2 = somewhat worse; 3 = No difference; 4 = somewhat better; 5 = much better.
    Time Frame
    14 days
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Speech Reception Threshold (SNR50) for Sentence Testing in Noise With CP950 Sound Processor .
    Description
    Signal to noise ratio (measured in decibels) providing 50% speech intelligibility for sentences presented in noise to evaluate the benefit from microphone directionality with the CP950 OTE (Off the ear) sound processor.
    Time Frame
    in booth testing 1 day.
    Title
    Percentage of Correct Words Scored With Sentences in Noise With the CP950 Sound Processor
    Description
    Two lists of twenty sentences presented from front speaker with 4 Talker babble noise presented from rear-half speakers. Higher the percentage of correct words means better outcome.
    Time Frame
    In booth testing 1 day

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Eighteen years of age or older At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear At least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor Native speaker in the language used to assess speech perception performance Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol Able to score 30% or more at +15 SNR with CI alone Exclusion Criteria: Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations Nucleus 22 Implant

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Acceptance of the CP950 Sound Processor

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs