search
Back to results

Effect of Ticagrelor vs. Placebo in the Reduction of Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (HESTIA3)

Primary Purpose

Sickle Cell Disease

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ticagrelor
Placebo
Sponsored by
AstraZeneca
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sickle Cell Disease focused on measuring Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia, SCD, Platelet aggregation, Ticagrelor, Brilinta, VOC, Vaso-Occlusive Crises, ACS, painful crisis

Eligibility Criteria

2 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study specific procedures not part of standard medical care (local regulations and international guidelines are to be followed in determining the assent/consent requirements for children).
  2. Male or female paediatric patients aged ≥2 to <18 years and body weight of ≥12 kg (at Visit 1), diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 as confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis.

    Note: Diagnosis of SCD (if not confirmed prior to screening and records available on the medical file) should be confirmed for HbSS or HbS/β0 by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis, performed at the site's local lab, in order to confirm the type of mutation.

  3. Have experienced at least 2 VOCs (painful crisis and/or ACS) as judged by the Investigator in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1. These VOCs need to be documented in the patient's medical records or in other documents that can be reconciled.
  4. If ≤16 years old, must have had transcranial Doppler (TCD) within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, a TCD examination must be done before proceeding in the study.
  5. If ≥10 years old, must have had an ophthalmological examination within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, the patient must be examined by an ophthalmologist before proceeding in the study. If local guidelines dictate ophthalmological examination at younger ages, those local guidelines should be followed.
  6. If treated with hydroxyurea, the weight-adjusted dose must be stable for 3 months before screening.
  7. Suitable venous access for the study-related blood sampling
  8. Prior to dosing on day of randomisation (Visit 2), a negative urine (dipstick) pregnancy test performed at Screening (Visit 1) and at Visit 2 must be available for female patients of childbearing potential.
  9. Females of childbearing potential (after menarche) must not become pregnant during study. Sexually active females must use a highly effective method of contraception which results in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1% per year). If use of effective contraception cannot be secured in sexually active females, the patient cannot be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), severe head trauma, intracranial haemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm, or proliferative retinopathy.
  2. Findings on TCD: Current or previous values for time averaged mean of the maximum velocity (TAMMV) that are Conditional or Abnormal. Patients with Conditional TAMMV values or higher (≥153 cm/sec using TCD imaging technique [TCDi] which is corresponding to ≥170 cm/sec by the non-imaging technique). Both the middle cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery should be considered.

    Any other criteria that would locally be considered as TCD indications for chronic transfusion would also exclude the patient.

  3. Active pathological bleeding or increased risk of bleeding complications according to Investigator
  4. Haemoglobin <6 g/dL from test performed at Screening (Visit 1)
  5. Platelets <100 x 10^9/L from test performed at Screening (Visit 1) Undergoing treatment with chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy.
  6. Undergoing treatment with chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy.
  7. Chronic use of NSAIDs defined as continuous intake >3 days per week that cannot be discontinued
  8. Receiving chronic treatment with anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs that cannot be discontinued
  9. Moderate or severe hepatic impairment defined as laboratory values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 × upper limits of normal (ULN), total bilirubin >2 × ULN (unless judged by the Investigator to be caused by haemolysis), albumin <35 g/L (3.5 g/dL) and International normalised ratio (INR) >1.4, or symptoms of liver disease (eg, ascites) from test performed at Screening (Visit 1).
  10. Renal failure requiring dialysis
  11. Patient considered to be at risk of bradycardic events (eg, known sick sinus syndrome or second or third degree atrioventricular block) unless already treated with a permanent pacemaker.
  12. Concomitant oral or intravenous therapy with strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors, CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices, or strong CYP3A inducers, which cannot be stopped at least 5 half-lives before randomisation.
  13. Active untreated malaria. Patients with suspected malaria at Screening (Visit 1) will be tested.
  14. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to ticagrelor
  15. Patients who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study or have given birth less than 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1)
  16. Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make it unsafe or unsuitable for the patient to participate in this study
  17. Concern for the inability of the patient or caregiver (defined as legally authorized representative) to comply with study procedures and/or follow-up
  18. Previous randomisation in the present study.
  19. Participation in another clinical study with an IP or device during the last 30 days preceding screening.
  20. Involvement of member of patient's family, or patient self, in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff and/or staff at the study site).

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Ticagrelor

Placebo

Arm Description

The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.

The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
A VOC is the composite of a painful crisis and/or an acute chest syndrome (ACS) event. The number of VOC events is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant throughout the treatment period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Painful Crisis Events
A painful crisis is an onset or worsening of pain that lasts at least 2 hours, for which there is no explanation other than vaso-occlusion and which requires therapy with oral or parenteral opioids, parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or other analgesics prescribed by a healthcare provider in a medical setting (such as a hospital, clinic or emergency room visit) or at home. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Number of Acute Chest Syndrome Events
The ACS is an acute illness characterized by fever and/or respiratory symptoms, accompanied by a new pulmonary infiltrate on a chest X-ray. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Duration of Painful Crises
The duration of painful crises is defined as the sum of the duration of painful crises experienced by a participant over the defined treatment period. If two or more events have overlapping durations, the overlapping days were counted only once.
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events Requiring Hospitalization or Emergency Department Visits
The number of VOC events requiring hospitalization or emergency department visits is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant over the treatment period, for which the primary setting for VOC treatment was in-patient hospitalization or emergency department. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Number of Days Hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
The number of days hospitalized for all individual VOC events experienced by a participant during the treatment period is defined as the sum of the duration of all individual hospitalizations (taking into account potential overlapping hospitalization days of VOC components) during VOC events experienced by a participant over the treatment period for which the primary setting for VOC treatment was in-patient hospitalization.
Number of Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
The number of acute SCD complications is defined as the count of all individual acute SCD complications experienced by a participant over the treatment period. Acute SCD complications are defined as any one or more of the following individual complications: Transient ischaemic attack/ischaemic stroke, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, priapism, and dactylitis.
Number of Days Hospitalized for Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
The number of days hospitalized for acute SCD complications is defined as the sum of the duration of all individual hospitalizations (taking into account potential overlapping hospitalization days) due to acute SCD complications experienced by a participant over the treatment period, for which hospitalization was reported.
Number of Sickle Cell-Related Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions
The number of participants with at least one sickle cell-related RBC transfusion reported. Adverse events resulting in the need for RBC transfusions were captured prior to database lock to determine if the transfusion was sickle cell-related or not.
Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score Using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Sickle Cell Disease Module
The PedsQL SCD module instrument developed using a 5-point Likert scale (where 0= never and 4= almost always) for the participant self-report forms for ages ≥5 to <8 years, ≥8 to <13 years, and ≥13 to ≤18 years and the caregiver proxy-report form specific for ≥2 to <5 years was used. The PedsQL SCD module measures problems in the following categories: Pain: 3 sub-scales Worry: 2 sub-scales Emotions: 1 sub-scale Treatment: 1 sub-scale Communication: 2 sub-scales Total score PedsQL SCD module items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (0= 100, 1= 75, 2= 50, 3= 25, 4= 0) so that higher scores indicate better quality of life. To create the PedsQL SCD module total score (43/42/40 items - depending on version completed) the arithmetic mean of the transformed scores was computed as the sum of the items transformed scores divided by the number of items answered. Baseline values are the closest observation prior to and including the randomization visit.
Fatigue Total Score Using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale instrument developed using a 5-point Likert scale (where 0= never and 4= almost always) for the participant self-report forms for ages ≥5 to <8 years, ≥8 to <13 years, and ≥13 to ≤18 years and the caregiver proxy-report form specific for ≥2 to <5 years was used. The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale measures problems in the following categories: General (6 items) Sleep/rest (6 items) Cognitive fatigue (6 items) Total score (18 items) PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (0= 100, 1= 75, 2= 50, 3= 25, 4= 0) so that higher scores indicate better quality of life. To create the PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale total score (18 items), the arithmetic mean of the transformed scores was computed as the sum of the items transformed scores divided by the number of items answered. Baseline values are closest observation prior to and including randomization visit.
Percentage of Days of Absence From School or Work Due to Sickle Cell Disease
For participants attending school/work at randomization, absence from school/work due to SCD was recorded weekly by the participant in the eDevice with the help of the caregiver if needed. The percentage of days absent from school/work due to SCD in the defined treatment period was calculated as follows: Percentage of absent days = (total number of days reported)/(total number of questionnaires answered ×7).
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants <5 Years of Age
The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale is caregiver-reported and used to assess pain daily during the VOC event for those participants <5 years of age as determined at randomization. Each of the 5 behaviours observed are assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2. The total FLACC score ranges between 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "very much pain". Lower score indicate better outcome. Worst pain ratings were collected once daily throughout the duration of the VOC event using an eDevice.
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
The Faces Pain Scale-revised (FPS-R) was administered to assess pain daily during the VOC event by those participants aged ≥5 years as determined at randomization. The FPS-R consists of 6 faces and scoring ranges between 0 and 10 (with an increase in numeric value by 2), where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "very much pain". Lower score indicate better outcome. Worst pain ratings were collected once daily throughout the duration of the VOC event using an eDevice.
Type of Analgesics Used by Participants During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Analgesics use (opioid and non-opioid) during VOC events.
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment (SMPA) in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
Response to palatability was assessed through the SMPA question "Was any behaviour observed when the study medication was given to this participant that would be indicative of a negative response to the palatability of the study medication?". This was presented as a binary outcome (that is, where "No" is no negative response and "Yes" is negative response). No negative response was considered as a positive outcome.
Swallowability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
An observer's assessment of the participant's behaviour using the SMPA was performed for all participants taking the study treatment who are 2 to 4 years of age. Willingness to swallow was assessed and categorized as follows: Swallowed without a problem Some resistance but did swallow Spit out some/all of the medication Vomited up the medication. The category "swallowed without a problem" was considered as positive outcome.
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Facial Hedonic Scale (FHS) in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
The FHS method was used for all participants taking the study treatment who are ≥5 years of age. The FHS consists of 5 faces with descriptions ranging from "Dislike very much" to "Like very much". The face with description "Like very much" was considered as positive outcome. The way in which the study treatment was taken, that is, whether the tablet is whole or dispersed, was captured.

Full Information

First Posted
June 22, 2018
Last Updated
March 15, 2021
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03615924
Brief Title
Effect of Ticagrelor vs. Placebo in the Reduction of Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
Acronym
HESTIA3
Official Title
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (HESTIA3)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Recommendation from an independent data monitoring committee (DMC) and accepted by AstraZeneca.
Study Start Date
September 26, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 13, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 13, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Detailed Description
Hestia3 will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ticagrelor versus placebo in children with SCD during treatment for at least 12 months and up to approximately 24 months. The target population are children aged ≥2 to <18 years of age and body weight of ≥12 kg diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or hemoglobin electrophoresis. At least 50 evaluable patients should be recruited in each of the age groups, ≥2 years to <12 years and ≥12 years to <18 years. To be eligible for the study, patients must have experienced at least 2 VOCs (defined as painful crisis and/or ACS) events in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1, indicating that the severity of the patient's disease justifies preventive chronic long-term treatment. The intent is to enroll only children aged 2 years or above, since VOCs become more frequent with age. Study participants should receive standard of care for SCD, adjusted to the individual patient at the discretion of the investigator, including routine health care screening examinations and immunizations according to local guidelines and health care programmers. Study drug will be given on the background of standard treatments for SCD. Study participants are not withheld from any other treatments that may be used in SCD (eg., hydroxyurea) during the trial, which is important considering the use of a placebo control group. However, restrictions apply to some medications and interventions that may be necessary for the patient's health and well-being during the study. Patients are to be followed up to 24 months or until a common study end date is reached defined as 12 months after the last patient is randomised. The expected average follow-up is 18 months. Considering inclusion of patients with at least 2 VOC events in the past year, this treatment duration is considered long enough to evaluate effects on VOC events as well as to capture safety and tolerability data supporting a potential future long term use of ticagrelor. Due to ticagrelor mechanism of action and the potential to reduce symptoms caused by ischemia during a vaso-occlusion, a composite endpoint with painful crises and/or ACS has been selected for the primary endpoint. Painful crisis is the most common reason for emergency department visits for patients with SCD with a significant impact on young patients' lives, affecting them physically and emotionally. Secondary endpoints are included to broaden the understanding of effects in patients with SCD and to also assess potential benefits on symptomatic disease burden and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Patients will be treated with 15, 30 and 45 mg bd or matching placebo, depending on body weight.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sickle Cell Disease
Keywords
Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia, SCD, Platelet aggregation, Ticagrelor, Brilinta, VOC, Vaso-Occlusive Crises, ACS, painful crisis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
193 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ticagrelor
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ticagrelor
Intervention Description
The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Description
A VOC is the composite of a painful crisis and/or an acute chest syndrome (ACS) event. The number of VOC events is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant throughout the treatment period.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to end of study (EOS) visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Painful Crisis Events
Description
A painful crisis is an onset or worsening of pain that lasts at least 2 hours, for which there is no explanation other than vaso-occlusion and which requires therapy with oral or parenteral opioids, parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or other analgesics prescribed by a healthcare provider in a medical setting (such as a hospital, clinic or emergency room visit) or at home. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Number of Acute Chest Syndrome Events
Description
The ACS is an acute illness characterized by fever and/or respiratory symptoms, accompanied by a new pulmonary infiltrate on a chest X-ray. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Duration of Painful Crises
Description
The duration of painful crises is defined as the sum of the duration of painful crises experienced by a participant over the defined treatment period. If two or more events have overlapping durations, the overlapping days were counted only once.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events Requiring Hospitalization or Emergency Department Visits
Description
The number of VOC events requiring hospitalization or emergency department visits is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant over the treatment period, for which the primary setting for VOC treatment was in-patient hospitalization or emergency department. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Description
The number of days hospitalized for all individual VOC events experienced by a participant during the treatment period is defined as the sum of the duration of all individual hospitalizations (taking into account potential overlapping hospitalization days of VOC components) during VOC events experienced by a participant over the treatment period for which the primary setting for VOC treatment was in-patient hospitalization.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Number of Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
Description
The number of acute SCD complications is defined as the count of all individual acute SCD complications experienced by a participant over the treatment period. Acute SCD complications are defined as any one or more of the following individual complications: Transient ischaemic attack/ischaemic stroke, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, priapism, and dactylitis.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized for Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
Description
The number of days hospitalized for acute SCD complications is defined as the sum of the duration of all individual hospitalizations (taking into account potential overlapping hospitalization days) due to acute SCD complications experienced by a participant over the treatment period, for which hospitalization was reported.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Number of Sickle Cell-Related Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions
Description
The number of participants with at least one sickle cell-related RBC transfusion reported. Adverse events resulting in the need for RBC transfusions were captured prior to database lock to determine if the transfusion was sickle cell-related or not.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score Using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Sickle Cell Disease Module
Description
The PedsQL SCD module instrument developed using a 5-point Likert scale (where 0= never and 4= almost always) for the participant self-report forms for ages ≥5 to <8 years, ≥8 to <13 years, and ≥13 to ≤18 years and the caregiver proxy-report form specific for ≥2 to <5 years was used. The PedsQL SCD module measures problems in the following categories: Pain: 3 sub-scales Worry: 2 sub-scales Emotions: 1 sub-scale Treatment: 1 sub-scale Communication: 2 sub-scales Total score PedsQL SCD module items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (0= 100, 1= 75, 2= 50, 3= 25, 4= 0) so that higher scores indicate better quality of life. To create the PedsQL SCD module total score (43/42/40 items - depending on version completed) the arithmetic mean of the transformed scores was computed as the sum of the items transformed scores divided by the number of items answered. Baseline values are the closest observation prior to and including the randomization visit.
Time Frame
For ages ≥2 to <5 years and ≥5 to <8 years: Baseline (observation prior to and including the randomization visit) and Months 6, and 12; For ages ≥8 to <13 years and ≥13 to ≤18 years: Baseline and Months 6, 12, and 18
Title
Fatigue Total Score Using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Description
The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale instrument developed using a 5-point Likert scale (where 0= never and 4= almost always) for the participant self-report forms for ages ≥5 to <8 years, ≥8 to <13 years, and ≥13 to ≤18 years and the caregiver proxy-report form specific for ≥2 to <5 years was used. The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale measures problems in the following categories: General (6 items) Sleep/rest (6 items) Cognitive fatigue (6 items) Total score (18 items) PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (0= 100, 1= 75, 2= 50, 3= 25, 4= 0) so that higher scores indicate better quality of life. To create the PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale total score (18 items), the arithmetic mean of the transformed scores was computed as the sum of the items transformed scores divided by the number of items answered. Baseline values are closest observation prior to and including randomization visit.
Time Frame
For ages ≥2 to <5 years and ≥5 to <8 years: Baseline (observation prior to and including the randomization visit) and Months 6, and 12; For ages ≥8 to <13 years and ≥13 to ≤18 years: Baseline and Months 6, 12, and 18
Title
Percentage of Days of Absence From School or Work Due to Sickle Cell Disease
Description
For participants attending school/work at randomization, absence from school/work due to SCD was recorded weekly by the participant in the eDevice with the help of the caregiver if needed. The percentage of days absent from school/work due to SCD in the defined treatment period was calculated as follows: Percentage of absent days = (total number of days reported)/(total number of questionnaires answered ×7).
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants <5 Years of Age
Description
The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale is caregiver-reported and used to assess pain daily during the VOC event for those participants <5 years of age as determined at randomization. Each of the 5 behaviours observed are assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2. The total FLACC score ranges between 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "very much pain". Lower score indicate better outcome. Worst pain ratings were collected once daily throughout the duration of the VOC event using an eDevice.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
Description
The Faces Pain Scale-revised (FPS-R) was administered to assess pain daily during the VOC event by those participants aged ≥5 years as determined at randomization. The FPS-R consists of 6 faces and scoring ranges between 0 and 10 (with an increase in numeric value by 2), where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "very much pain". Lower score indicate better outcome. Worst pain ratings were collected once daily throughout the duration of the VOC event using an eDevice.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Type of Analgesics Used by Participants During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Description
Analgesics use (opioid and non-opioid) during VOC events.
Time Frame
From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Title
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment (SMPA) in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
Description
Response to palatability was assessed through the SMPA question "Was any behaviour observed when the study medication was given to this participant that would be indicative of a negative response to the palatability of the study medication?". This was presented as a binary outcome (that is, where "No" is no negative response and "Yes" is negative response). No negative response was considered as a positive outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Title
Swallowability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
Description
An observer's assessment of the participant's behaviour using the SMPA was performed for all participants taking the study treatment who are 2 to 4 years of age. Willingness to swallow was assessed and categorized as follows: Swallowed without a problem Some resistance but did swallow Spit out some/all of the medication Vomited up the medication. The category "swallowed without a problem" was considered as positive outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Title
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Facial Hedonic Scale (FHS) in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
Description
The FHS method was used for all participants taking the study treatment who are ≥5 years of age. The FHS consists of 5 faces with descriptions ranging from "Dislike very much" to "Like very much". The face with description "Like very much" was considered as positive outcome. The way in which the study treatment was taken, that is, whether the tablet is whole or dispersed, was captured.
Time Frame
Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study specific procedures not part of standard medical care (local regulations and international guidelines are to be followed in determining the assent/consent requirements for children). Male or female paediatric patients aged ≥2 to <18 years and body weight of ≥12 kg (at Visit 1), diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 as confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis. Note: Diagnosis of SCD (if not confirmed prior to screening and records available on the medical file) should be confirmed for HbSS or HbS/β0 by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis, performed at the site's local lab, in order to confirm the type of mutation. Have experienced at least 2 VOCs (painful crisis and/or ACS) as judged by the Investigator in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1. These VOCs need to be documented in the patient's medical records or in other documents that can be reconciled. If ≤16 years old, must have had transcranial Doppler (TCD) within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, a TCD examination must be done before proceeding in the study. If ≥10 years old, must have had an ophthalmological examination within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, the patient must be examined by an ophthalmologist before proceeding in the study. If local guidelines dictate ophthalmological examination at younger ages, those local guidelines should be followed. If treated with hydroxyurea, the weight-adjusted dose must be stable for 3 months before screening. Suitable venous access for the study-related blood sampling Prior to dosing on day of randomisation (Visit 2), a negative urine (dipstick) pregnancy test performed at Screening (Visit 1) and at Visit 2 must be available for female patients of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential (after menarche) must not become pregnant during study. Sexually active females must use a highly effective method of contraception which results in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1% per year). If use of effective contraception cannot be secured in sexually active females, the patient cannot be included in this study. Exclusion Criteria: History of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), severe head trauma, intracranial haemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm, or proliferative retinopathy. Findings on TCD: Current or previous values for time averaged mean of the maximum velocity (TAMMV) that are Conditional or Abnormal. Patients with Conditional TAMMV values or higher (≥153 cm/sec using TCD imaging technique [TCDi] which is corresponding to ≥170 cm/sec by the non-imaging technique). Both the middle cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery should be considered. Any other criteria that would locally be considered as TCD indications for chronic transfusion would also exclude the patient. Active pathological bleeding or increased risk of bleeding complications according to Investigator Haemoglobin <6 g/dL from test performed at Screening (Visit 1) Platelets <100 x 10^9/L from test performed at Screening (Visit 1) Undergoing treatment with chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy. Undergoing treatment with chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy. Chronic use of NSAIDs defined as continuous intake >3 days per week that cannot be discontinued Receiving chronic treatment with anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs that cannot be discontinued Moderate or severe hepatic impairment defined as laboratory values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 × upper limits of normal (ULN), total bilirubin >2 × ULN (unless judged by the Investigator to be caused by haemolysis), albumin <35 g/L (3.5 g/dL) and International normalised ratio (INR) >1.4, or symptoms of liver disease (eg, ascites) from test performed at Screening (Visit 1). Renal failure requiring dialysis Patient considered to be at risk of bradycardic events (eg, known sick sinus syndrome or second or third degree atrioventricular block) unless already treated with a permanent pacemaker. Concomitant oral or intravenous therapy with strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors, CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices, or strong CYP3A inducers, which cannot be stopped at least 5 half-lives before randomisation. Active untreated malaria. Patients with suspected malaria at Screening (Visit 1) will be tested. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to ticagrelor Patients who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study or have given birth less than 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1) Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make it unsafe or unsuitable for the patient to participate in this study Concern for the inability of the patient or caregiver (defined as legally authorized representative) to comply with study procedures and/or follow-up Previous randomisation in the present study. Participation in another clinical study with an IP or device during the last 30 days preceding screening. Involvement of member of patient's family, or patient self, in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff and/or staff at the study site).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anders Berggren, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
AstraZeneca
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Heeney, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33316
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Oak Lawn
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60453
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brussel
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Porto Alegre
ZIP/Postal Code
90035-903
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
20211-080
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Salvador
ZIP/Postal Code
41253-190
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
01221010
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
08270-070
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Al Sharkeya
ZIP/Postal Code
44519
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Alexandria
ZIP/Postal Code
21131
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cairo
ZIP/Postal Code
11521
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cairo
ZIP/Postal Code
11566
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cairo
ZIP/Postal Code
12655
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dakahlia
ZIP/Postal Code
35516
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Accra
ZIP/Postal Code
233
Country
Ghana
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ho
ZIP/Postal Code
0
Country
Ghana
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kumasi
ZIP/Postal Code
1934
Country
Ghana
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11521
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400053
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nagpur
ZIP/Postal Code
440003
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nagpur
ZIP/Postal Code
440012
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pune
ZIP/Postal Code
411001
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pune
ZIP/Postal Code
411004
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wardha
ZIP/Postal Code
442004
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Catania
ZIP/Postal Code
95123
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Naples
ZIP/Postal Code
80138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Padova
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kisumu
ZIP/Postal Code
40100
Country
Kenya
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nairobi
ZIP/Postal Code
00200
Country
Kenya
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Siaya
ZIP/Postal Code
40600
Country
Kenya
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Beirut
ZIP/Postal Code
11-0236
Country
Lebanon
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tripoli
ZIP/Postal Code
961
Country
Lebanon
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7700
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Soweto
ZIP/Postal Code
2013
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Barakaldo
ZIP/Postal Code
48903
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mbeya
ZIP/Postal Code
2410
Country
Tanzania
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Antalya
ZIP/Postal Code
7070
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mersin
ZIP/Postal Code
33343
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seyhan
ZIP/Postal Code
01130
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kampala
ZIP/Postal Code
10005
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Masaka
ZIP/Postal Code
0000
Country
Uganda
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cardiff
ZIP/Postal Code
CF14 4XW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G51 4TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
E1 1BB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 7EH
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please refer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
IPD Sharing URL
https://astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com/DT/Home
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35849650
Citation
Heeney MM, Abboud MR, Githanga J, Inusa BPD, Kanter J, Michelson AD, Nduba V, Musiime V, Apte M, Inati A, Taksande AM, Andersson M, Astrand M, Maklad N, Niazi M, Himmelmann A, Berggren AR. Ticagrelor vs placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: the HESTIA3 study. Blood. 2022 Sep 29;140(13):1470-1481. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014095.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31446143
Citation
Heeney MM, Abboud MR, Amilon C, Andersson M, Githanga J, Inusa B, Kanter J, Leonsson-Zachrisson M, Michelson AD, Berggren AR; HESTIA3 study investigators. Ticagrelor versus placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study (HESTIA3). Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;85:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105835. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://filehosting-v2.pharmacm.com/api/Attachment/Download?tenantId=80217111&parentIdentifier=D5136C00009&attachmentIdentifier=d032cbc0-d37d-4ecc-991e-c656722cee5a&fileName=D5136C00009(HESTIA)_Statistical_Analysis_Plan_Redacted.pdf&versionIdentifier=
Description
Statistical Analysis Plan redacted
URL
https://filehosting-v2.pharmacm.com/api/Attachment/Download?tenantId=80217111&parentIdentifier=D5136C00009&attachmentIdentifier=1b352613-fe0a-427a-ab9f-b25f9922ac9c&fileName=D5136C00009(HESTIA)_Clinical_Study_Protocol_Redacted.pdf&versionIdentifier=
Description
Clinical Study Protocol redacted

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Ticagrelor vs. Placebo in the Reduction of Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs