search
Back to results

Assessment of Multi-Modality Quantitative Imaging for Evaluation of Response of Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Therapy

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SPECT CT
18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
18F-NaF PET/CT
WB-MRI
Sponsored by
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring J1835, SPECT CT, PSMA, 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, WB-MRI, NaF

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Males ≥18 years of age. Subjects provide signed informed consent and confirm that they are able and willing to comply with all protocol requirements.

Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with Bone metastases as manifested by one or more lesions on bone scan.

Documented castrate level of serum testosterone (≤50 ng/dl).

Documented progressive mCRPC based on at least one of the following criteria:

  1. PSA progression defined as 25% increase over baseline value or nadir.
  2. Radiographic progression for soft tissue lesions as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), and/ or radiographic progression for bone lesions as determined by radionuclide bone scan using the consensus guidelines of the PCWG3 criteria.

Planning to receive first line novel hormonal therapy with Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for the first time for mCRPC within 4 weeks of documented progression. Baseline scans will be obtained prior to starting new therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who are unable to give valid informed consent Subjects who are unwilling or unable to undergo an SPECT, PET or MR exam, including subjects with contra-indications to MR exams.

Subjects with prior Enzalutamide and Abiraterone for mCRPC Subjects with prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC Subjects administered any radioisotope within five physical half-lives or any IV X-ray contrast medium within 24 hours or any high density oral contrast medium (oral water contrast is acceptable) within 5 days prior to study drug injection.

Subjects with any medical condition or other circumstances that, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completion.

Patients with a history reaction to gadolinium contrast agent. For cohort C, patients with renal failure (eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2) or patients on dialysis.

Sites / Locations

  • Johns Hopkins University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

"Cohort A" - SPECT CT and NaF PET

"Cohort B" - SPECT CT and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT

"Cohort C" - SPECT CT and WB-MRI

Arm Description

Intervention 1: SPECT CT Intervention 2: NaF PET

Intervention 1: SPECT CT Intervention 2: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT

Intervention 1: SPECT CT Intervention 2: WB-MRI

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Accuracy for Prediction of Progression Free Survival as determined by Quantitative bone SPECT indices (QBSIs)
QBSI will be measured on SPECT scans at pre-defined intervals. A lower QBSI would mean likelier progression free survival.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Reproducibility of the QBSIs using test-retest studies in 12 patients
Reproducibility measured by difference in QBSI between test-retest in 12 patients, as defined by the protocol. A smaller difference in QBSI reflects greater reproducibility.
Ability of QBSPECT to detect recurrence of metastatic disease as determined by QBSI in 60 patients.
QBSI will be measured on QBSPECT images obtained at the same time as standard-of-care bone scans. A higher QBSI would predict earlier recurrence of metastasis.
Accuracy of NaF PET/CT as determined by difference in QBSI from SPECT versus QBSI from NaF PET/CT in 20 patients
Difference in QBSI from SPECT versus NaF PET/CT. A smaller difference in the measured QBSI would reflect a higher accuracy of Na18F PET/CT. These images will be acquired within 32 hours of the bone scintigraphy scans at the pre-defined time points, per protocol.
Accuracy of PSMA PET/CT as determined by difference in QBSI from SPECT versus QBSI from PSMA PET/CT in 20 patients
Difference in QBSI from SPECT versus PSMA PET/CT. A smaller difference in the measured QBSI would reflect a higher accuracy of PSMA PET/CT. These images will be acquired within 32 hours of the bone scintigraphy scans at the pre-defined time points, per protocol.
Correlation of QBSI from SPECT/CT to restricted diffusion obtained from whole body MRI
Ratio of QBSI obtained from SPECT imaging to quantitative biomarkers of restricted diffusion (diffusion-weighted imaging) obtained from a WB-MRI protocol.

Full Information

First Posted
August 3, 2018
Last Updated
January 9, 2023
Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03619655
Brief Title
Assessment of Multi-Modality Quantitative Imaging for Evaluation of Response of Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Therapy
Official Title
Assessment of Multi-Modality Quantitative Imaging for Evaluation of Response of Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Due to changing prostate cancer standard of care, the research question became obsolete as the target population for the study no longer existed. The study is deemed not clinically relevant.
Study Start Date
November 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 14, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 14, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is an open label, non-randomized study designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SPECT CT.
Detailed Description
The study is an open label, non-randomized study designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SPECT CT. The study will consist of 3 cohorts, and a subset of the patients in cohort C will participate in a test-retest study, where the baseline SPECT/CT will be repeated. SPECT CT will be performed in all cohorts. Cohort A will evaluate SPECT CT by comparison to a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan using NaF. Cohort B will evaluate SPECT CT by comparison to 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Cohort C will evaluate SPECT CT by comparison to Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI). Eligible subjects will be enrolled in a non-randomized manner per the treating physician discretion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
J1835, SPECT CT, PSMA, 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, WB-MRI, NaF

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
3 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
"Cohort A" - SPECT CT and NaF PET
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention 1: SPECT CT Intervention 2: NaF PET
Arm Title
"Cohort B" - SPECT CT and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention 1: SPECT CT Intervention 2: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
Arm Title
"Cohort C" - SPECT CT and WB-MRI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention 1: SPECT CT Intervention 2: WB-MRI
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
SPECT CT
Intervention Description
MDP (99mTc-MDP) administration, about 180 min post-injection: whole body scan followed by a SPECT CT of regions designated by a board certified Nuclear Medicine physician after review of the whole body scan.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
Other Intervention Name(s)
18F-DCFPyL
Intervention Description
A bolus of ~9 mCi (333 MBq) of 18F-DCFPyL will be injected by slow IV push.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
18F-NaF PET/CT
Other Intervention Name(s)
18F-NaF, NaF PET
Intervention Description
A dose of 5 mCi 18F-NaF is injected through the IV and followed by at least 10 ml of saline to flush the IV line of the remaining dose. At the 1 hour post injection time, total Whole Body Images take approximately 40 - 60 minutes depending on the height of the patient.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
WB-MRI
Other Intervention Name(s)
Whole body MRI
Intervention Description
Whole body MRI exam (total examination time < 50 minutes)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Accuracy for Prediction of Progression Free Survival as determined by Quantitative bone SPECT indices (QBSIs)
Description
QBSI will be measured on SPECT scans at pre-defined intervals. A lower QBSI would mean likelier progression free survival.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment, at time of disease progression assessed up to 5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reproducibility of the QBSIs using test-retest studies in 12 patients
Description
Reproducibility measured by difference in QBSI between test-retest in 12 patients, as defined by the protocol. A smaller difference in QBSI reflects greater reproducibility.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Ability of QBSPECT to detect recurrence of metastatic disease as determined by QBSI in 60 patients.
Description
QBSI will be measured on QBSPECT images obtained at the same time as standard-of-care bone scans. A higher QBSI would predict earlier recurrence of metastasis.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment, at time of disease progression assessed up to 5 years
Title
Accuracy of NaF PET/CT as determined by difference in QBSI from SPECT versus QBSI from NaF PET/CT in 20 patients
Description
Difference in QBSI from SPECT versus NaF PET/CT. A smaller difference in the measured QBSI would reflect a higher accuracy of Na18F PET/CT. These images will be acquired within 32 hours of the bone scintigraphy scans at the pre-defined time points, per protocol.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment, at time of disease progression assessed up to 5 years
Title
Accuracy of PSMA PET/CT as determined by difference in QBSI from SPECT versus QBSI from PSMA PET/CT in 20 patients
Description
Difference in QBSI from SPECT versus PSMA PET/CT. A smaller difference in the measured QBSI would reflect a higher accuracy of PSMA PET/CT. These images will be acquired within 32 hours of the bone scintigraphy scans at the pre-defined time points, per protocol.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months post-treatment, assessed up to 5 years
Title
Correlation of QBSI from SPECT/CT to restricted diffusion obtained from whole body MRI
Description
Ratio of QBSI obtained from SPECT imaging to quantitative biomarkers of restricted diffusion (diffusion-weighted imaging) obtained from a WB-MRI protocol.
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Males ≥18 years of age. Subjects provide signed informed consent and confirm that they are able and willing to comply with all protocol requirements. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with Bone metastases as manifested by one or more lesions on bone scan. Documented castrate level of serum testosterone (≤50 ng/dl). Documented progressive mCRPC based on at least one of the following criteria: PSA progression defined as 25% increase over baseline value or nadir. Radiographic progression for soft tissue lesions as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), and/ or radiographic progression for bone lesions as determined by radionuclide bone scan using the consensus guidelines of the PCWG3 criteria. Planning to receive first line novel hormonal therapy with Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for the first time for mCRPC within 4 weeks of documented progression. Baseline scans will be obtained prior to starting new therapy. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who are unable to give valid informed consent Subjects who are unwilling or unable to undergo an SPECT, PET or MR exam, including subjects with contra-indications to MR exams. Subjects with prior Enzalutamide and Abiraterone for mCRPC Subjects with prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC Subjects administered any radioisotope within five physical half-lives or any IV X-ray contrast medium within 24 hours or any high density oral contrast medium (oral water contrast is acceptable) within 5 days prior to study drug injection. Subjects with any medical condition or other circumstances that, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completion. Patients with a history reaction to gadolinium contrast agent. For cohort C, patients with renal failure (eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2) or patients on dialysis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lilja Solnes, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Assessment of Multi-Modality Quantitative Imaging for Evaluation of Response of Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs