A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Office-based MR-guided Prostate Biopsy Approaches
Primary Purpose
Prostate Cancer, Elevated PSA
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
prostate biopsy
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Prostate Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men 18 years or older with suspicion for prostate cancer based upon an elevated PSA, abnormal digital rectal examination, abnormal MRI
- Men on active surveillance with indication for biopsy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Men with active urinary tract infection, metastatic prostate cancer, history of colorectal surgery limiting insertion of transrectal probe, evidence of acute or chronic prostatitis, or concern for perineal cellulitis or fistula
- Men unfit to undergo prostate biopsy under local anesthesia
- Men with prior definitive therapy for prostate cancer, such as radiation therapy or partial gland ablation
- Men with contraindication to prostate MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, chronic kidney disease)
Sites / Locations
- Weill Cornell Medicine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy (TRUS)
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
Arm Description
Patients will receive a transrectal guided prostate biopsy
Patients will receive a transperineal prostate biopsy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Gleason Grade
Detection of clinically significant disease
Typical Gleason Scores range from 6-10. The higher the Gleason Score, the more likely that the cancer will grow and spread quickly.
Scores of 6 or less describe cancer cells that look similar to normal cells and suggest that the cancer is likely to grow slowly.
A score of 7 suggests and intermediate risk for aggressive cancer. Scoring a 7 means that the primary score (largest section of the tumor) scored a 3 or 4. Tumors with a primary score of 3 and a secondary score of 4 have a fairly good outlook, whereas cancers with a primary Gleason Score of 4 and a secondary score of 3, are more likely to grow and spread.
Scores of 8 or higher describe cancers that are likely to spread more rapidly, these cancers are often referred to as poorly differentiated or high grade.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patient-reported Pain, as Measured on a 0-10 Likert Scale
Pain will be scored on a 0-10 Likert scale. 0 indicates no pain and high scores indicate greater pain.
Patient-reported Symptoms, as Measured by International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) Questionnaire
IPSS scores range from 1 to 35, with 1-7 indicating mild symptoms, 8-19 indicating moderate symptoms, 20-35 indicating severe symptoms.
Patient-reported Erectile Function, as Measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire
IIEF-5 scores range from 1 to 25, with 1-7 indicating severe erectile dysfunction, 8-11 indicating moderate erectile dysfunction, 12-16 indicating mild-moderate erectile dysfunction, 17-21 indicating mild erectile dysfunction, and 22-25 indicating no erectile dysfunction.
Patient-reported Quality of Life, as Measured by EPIC-CP Questionnaire
EPIC-CP comprises of 10 questions about the patient within the last four weeks.
Questions 1,7,8,9 are each graded on a scale from 0-4 for a total of 12 points. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life with regards to urinary and sexual function.
Questions 2-4 grade Urinary Incontinence Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse urinary incontinence symptoms.
Questions 5a-c grade Urinary Irritation/Obstructive Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 poitns). Higher scores indicate worse urinary irritation/obstructive symptoms.
Questions 6a-c grade Bowel Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse bowel symptoms.
Questions 10a-c grade Vitality/Hormonal Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse vitality/hormonal symptoms.
All scores are summed (max 60 points) to calculate the Overall Prostate Cancer QOL score. Higher score indicates worse patient-reported QOL.
Adverse Events
Adverse events that have occurred, such as hospital re-admissions, aborted procedures due to discomfort, hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, hematochezia, and/or infection.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03632655
First Posted
August 9, 2018
Last Updated
June 21, 2021
Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03632655
Brief Title
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Office-based MR-guided Prostate Biopsy Approaches
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Office-based MR-guided Prostate Biopsy Approaches: Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Compared With a Transperineal Approach
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
The study was terminated due to procurement of new funding sources.
Study Start Date
December 23, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 8, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 8, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized trial will compare the safety and efficacy of TPM versus TRUS biopsies performed in the outpatient setting. Primary endpoints will be pain as well as detection of clinically significant disease (defined as Gleason Score >=7 or cancer core length >=6 mm). Secondary endpoints will be detection of any prostate cancer, hospital re-admissions within 30 days, aborted procedures due to discomfort, procedure time, adverse events including hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, hematochezia, and infection, and patient-reported outcomes as measured on validated instruments such as International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). In men who subsequently elect to undergo radical prostatectomy for definitive treatment of their prostate cancer, Gleason scores at final pathology will be correlated to the Gleason scores obtained at time of biopsy.
Detailed Description
The feasibility of outpatient TPM has been well demonstrated.(Bianco & Martínez-Salamanca, 2016; Merrick et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2014) New technology now allows for fusion of MRI images with TPM devices, allowing for targeting of cancerous-appearing lesions on MRI. Such technology that fuses MRI-imaging with TRUS biopsy has become routine in U.S. clinical practice, with improved cancer detection rates as compared with standard TRUS.(Ahmed et al., 2017; Robertson, Emberton, & Moore, 2013)
This randomized trial will compare the safety and efficacy of TPM versus TRUS biopsies performed in the outpatient setting. Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy. All men will receive a urine culture within 2 weeks of biopsy and will be started on antibiotic prophylaxis prior to biopsy in accordance with AUA antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines. Men with a positive urine culture will be treated with culture-specific antibiotics and must have a documented negative urine culture prior to biopsy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer, Elevated PSA
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy (TRUS)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will receive a transrectal guided prostate biopsy
Arm Title
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will receive a transperineal prostate biopsy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
prostate biopsy
Intervention Description
Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gleason Grade
Description
Detection of clinically significant disease
Typical Gleason Scores range from 6-10. The higher the Gleason Score, the more likely that the cancer will grow and spread quickly.
Scores of 6 or less describe cancer cells that look similar to normal cells and suggest that the cancer is likely to grow slowly.
A score of 7 suggests and intermediate risk for aggressive cancer. Scoring a 7 means that the primary score (largest section of the tumor) scored a 3 or 4. Tumors with a primary score of 3 and a secondary score of 4 have a fairly good outlook, whereas cancers with a primary Gleason Score of 4 and a secondary score of 3, are more likely to grow and spread.
Scores of 8 or higher describe cancers that are likely to spread more rapidly, these cancers are often referred to as poorly differentiated or high grade.
Time Frame
7 days post-biopsy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient-reported Pain, as Measured on a 0-10 Likert Scale
Description
Pain will be scored on a 0-10 Likert scale. 0 indicates no pain and high scores indicate greater pain.
Time Frame
At time of local anesthesia administration, initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy, 3 months post-biopsy
Title
Patient-reported Symptoms, as Measured by International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) Questionnaire
Description
IPSS scores range from 1 to 35, with 1-7 indicating mild symptoms, 8-19 indicating moderate symptoms, 20-35 indicating severe symptoms.
Time Frame
baseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy
Title
Patient-reported Erectile Function, as Measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire
Description
IIEF-5 scores range from 1 to 25, with 1-7 indicating severe erectile dysfunction, 8-11 indicating moderate erectile dysfunction, 12-16 indicating mild-moderate erectile dysfunction, 17-21 indicating mild erectile dysfunction, and 22-25 indicating no erectile dysfunction.
Time Frame
baseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy
Title
Patient-reported Quality of Life, as Measured by EPIC-CP Questionnaire
Description
EPIC-CP comprises of 10 questions about the patient within the last four weeks.
Questions 1,7,8,9 are each graded on a scale from 0-4 for a total of 12 points. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life with regards to urinary and sexual function.
Questions 2-4 grade Urinary Incontinence Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse urinary incontinence symptoms.
Questions 5a-c grade Urinary Irritation/Obstructive Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 poitns). Higher scores indicate worse urinary irritation/obstructive symptoms.
Questions 6a-c grade Bowel Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse bowel symptoms.
Questions 10a-c grade Vitality/Hormonal Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse vitality/hormonal symptoms.
All scores are summed (max 60 points) to calculate the Overall Prostate Cancer QOL score. Higher score indicates worse patient-reported QOL.
Time Frame
baseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy
Title
Adverse Events
Description
Adverse events that have occurred, such as hospital re-admissions, aborted procedures due to discomfort, hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, hematochezia, and/or infection.
Time Frame
initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Must have clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men 18 years or older with suspicion for prostate cancer based upon an elevated PSA, abnormal digital rectal examination, abnormal MRI
Men on active surveillance with indication for biopsy
Exclusion Criteria:
Men with active urinary tract infection, metastatic prostate cancer, history of colorectal surgery limiting insertion of transrectal probe, evidence of acute or chronic prostatitis, or concern for perineal cellulitis or fistula
Men unfit to undergo prostate biopsy under local anesthesia
Men with prior definitive therapy for prostate cancer, such as radiation therapy or partial gland ablation
Men with contraindication to prostate MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, chronic kidney disease)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jim Hu, M.D., M.P.H.
Organizational Affiliation
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Weill Cornell Medicine
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Office-based MR-guided Prostate Biopsy Approaches
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs