search
Back to results

Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Dyads (PEP-LC)

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer, Depression, Physical Activity

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exercise Intervention
Survey Administration
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Sponsored by
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Lung Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild depression symptoms
  • Able to participate in exercise program per physician approval
  • Available partner/spouse to participate with patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent severe depression symptoms
  • Inability to participate in exercise
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year

Sites / Locations

  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • VA Portland Health Care System

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Supportive care (exercise)

Arm Description

Participants attend supervised group exercises classes twice per week during weeks 1-6 and once per week during weeks 7-12. Participants also attend home-based unsupervised exercise sessions via an instructional DVD once per weeks over for 30 minutes during weeks 1-6 and twice per week during weeks 7-12.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Study Feasibility: Proportion enrolled
Will be measured as the number of couples who enroll out of those approached. Will evaluate using descriptive statistics.
Study Acceptability: Average attendance
Will be measured by the average attendance at sessions over the course of the intervention. This will be calculated as the total number of classes attended divided by the total possible they could have attended over the course of the study. Attendance will be categorized by sessions couples attended together and those where only one partner attends. Will evaluate using descriptive statistics.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of Depression
Will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8). Total sum scores range from 0-24 with 0 indicating no symptoms to higher scores (>=10) indicating major depressive symptoms.
Change in physical function over time: 6-minute walk
We will monitor the change in physical function over time of the participants with lung cancer in our study. Physical functioning will be measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of the exercise program. For this test, the participants ability to walk for 6 minutes, and the distance (meters) walked within that 6 minutes will be recorded and compared at each time point.
Change in physical function over time: Hand grip test
We will monitor the change in physical function over time of the participants with lung cancer in our study. Physical functioning will be measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of the exercise program. For the hand grip test, participants will grip a dynamometer that measures force in kg. The force of the grip will be measured and compared at each time point.
Change in physical function over time: Short Physical Performance Battery
We will monitor the change in physical function over time of the participants with lung cancer in our study. Physical functioning will be measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of the exercise program. The Short Physical Performance Battery test includes height/weight measurements, standing balance tests (semi-tandem, side-by-side, full tandem), walking speed (at 4 meters), and chair stands. Participants are assigned scores based on their ability to complete each exercise. For the Balance test, 0=incomplete, 1=complete. For the time it takes to walk 4 meters, point values of 1 to 4 are assigned. (1=8.7 sec, 2=6.21 to 8.70 sec, 3=4.82 to 6.20 sec, 4=less than 4.82 sec). For the chair stands, 1=between 16.7 sec and 60 sec, 2=13.7 sec to 16.69 sec, 3=11.2 sec to 13.69 sec, 4=11.19 sec or less. Each of these scores are then summed. The sum scores will be compared at each time point to measure change in physical function over time.
Quality of Life for participants with lung cancer assessed by FACT-L
Quality of life for participants with lung cancer will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L). The 36-item questionnaire uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very Much). We will measure the sum of all responses as well as look at sub-scales: physical, social/family, emotional, functional, and additional concerns.
Quality of Life for exercise partners assessed by CQOLC
Quality of life for exercise partners will be measured using the Caregiver Quality of Life Index - Cancer (CQOLC), a 35-item questionnaire about caring for loved ones with lung cancer. It uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much)
Fatigue assessed by PROMIS Short-Form
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Short-Form - Fatigue questionnaires measure the fatigue experienced in the past 7 days and its level of interference with daily activities. All participants will answer the 7-item questionnaire using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always).
Pain assessed by PROMIS Short-Form
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Short-From - Pain questionnaires measure both pain intensity, quality, and impact on daily function experienced in the past 7 days. All participants will answer the 16 questions using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0, "no pain" to 4, "very severe"; and 0, "not at all" to 4, "very much."
Sleep assessed by PROMIS Short-Form
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Short-Form - Sleep questionnaire measures the sleep quality using an 8-item questionnaire on a 5-point scale, with responses ranging from 0 (Very Poor/Not at all) to 4 (Very Good/Not at all).
Relationship Distress assessed by DAS-SF
Measured using the DAS-SF (Dyadic Adjustment Scale - Short Form) a 7-item scale asking about relationship satisfaction and scored using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
Social Support assessed by PSSS
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (PSSS) is a 12-item questionnaire that uses a 7 point Likert scale that measures the support one receives from friends, family, and significant others.
Level of exercise outside the exercise intervention assessed by GLTEQ
The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) is a self-report questionnaire asking the patient-participant how often they engaged in mild effort, moderate exercise, strenuous exercise, and resistance (weight bearing exercise). This will be measured in three different ways: 1) total activity = vigorous + moderate + mild + resistance, 2) physical activity guidelines = moderate + (vigorous x 2), 3) moderate + vigorous.
Incidence of Malnutrition
Measured using a Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST). Patients with lung cancer with a score of 2 or more are considered at risk for malnutrition.
Subjective evaluation of PEP-LC participant experience from phone interviews
Dyads participating in the exercise intervention will complete a follow up phone interview regarding their experience in the program. They will be ask to describe their overall experience as well as indicate if they have any suggestions on making the program better
Incidence of Relationship Strain
Partner participants will complete the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI), an 18-item questionnaire about strain caused by caretaking for a person with cancer. Uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (A great deal)

Full Information

First Posted
July 27, 2018
Last Updated
December 7, 2020
Sponsor
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Portland VA Medical Center, Oregon Health and Science University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03649737
Brief Title
Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Dyads
Acronym
PEP-LC
Official Title
Pilot Study of a Progressive Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Patient-Partner Dyads
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 16, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 22, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 22, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Portland VA Medical Center, Oregon Health and Science University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Pilot study of an exercise program among patients with all stages of lung cancer examining feasibility and acceptability. Preliminary outcomes include objective measures of physical function, depression, adherence to lung cancer treatments, Quality of Life (QOL), and social support.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Determine the feasibility and acceptability of a progressive exercise program initiated after lung cancer diagnosis among patient partner dyads. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. Examine the preliminary effects of partnered exercise on physical function, depression, adherence to lung cancer treatments, QOL and social support . OUTLINE: Participants attend supervised group exercises classes twice per week during weeks 1-6 and once per week during weeks 7-12. Participants also attend home-based unsupervised exercise sessions via an instructional DVD once per weeks over for 30 minutes during weeks 1-6 and twice per week during weeks 7-12.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer, Depression, Physical Activity, Quality of Life, Pain, Lung Cancer Symptoms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
46 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Supportive care (exercise)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants attend supervised group exercises classes twice per week during weeks 1-6 and once per week during weeks 7-12. Participants also attend home-based unsupervised exercise sessions via an instructional DVD once per weeks over for 30 minutes during weeks 1-6 and twice per week during weeks 7-12.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise Intervention
Intervention Description
Attend supervised and unsupervised exercise sessions
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Survey Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Study Feasibility: Proportion enrolled
Description
Will be measured as the number of couples who enroll out of those approached. Will evaluate using descriptive statistics.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Study Acceptability: Average attendance
Description
Will be measured by the average attendance at sessions over the course of the intervention. This will be calculated as the total number of classes attended divided by the total possible they could have attended over the course of the study. Attendance will be categorized by sessions couples attended together and those where only one partner attends. Will evaluate using descriptive statistics.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of Depression
Description
Will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8). Total sum scores range from 0-24 with 0 indicating no symptoms to higher scores (>=10) indicating major depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Change in physical function over time: 6-minute walk
Description
We will monitor the change in physical function over time of the participants with lung cancer in our study. Physical functioning will be measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of the exercise program. For this test, the participants ability to walk for 6 minutes, and the distance (meters) walked within that 6 minutes will be recorded and compared at each time point.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Change in physical function over time: Hand grip test
Description
We will monitor the change in physical function over time of the participants with lung cancer in our study. Physical functioning will be measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of the exercise program. For the hand grip test, participants will grip a dynamometer that measures force in kg. The force of the grip will be measured and compared at each time point.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Change in physical function over time: Short Physical Performance Battery
Description
We will monitor the change in physical function over time of the participants with lung cancer in our study. Physical functioning will be measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12 of the exercise program. The Short Physical Performance Battery test includes height/weight measurements, standing balance tests (semi-tandem, side-by-side, full tandem), walking speed (at 4 meters), and chair stands. Participants are assigned scores based on their ability to complete each exercise. For the Balance test, 0=incomplete, 1=complete. For the time it takes to walk 4 meters, point values of 1 to 4 are assigned. (1=8.7 sec, 2=6.21 to 8.70 sec, 3=4.82 to 6.20 sec, 4=less than 4.82 sec). For the chair stands, 1=between 16.7 sec and 60 sec, 2=13.7 sec to 16.69 sec, 3=11.2 sec to 13.69 sec, 4=11.19 sec or less. Each of these scores are then summed. The sum scores will be compared at each time point to measure change in physical function over time.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Quality of Life for participants with lung cancer assessed by FACT-L
Description
Quality of life for participants with lung cancer will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L). The 36-item questionnaire uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very Much). We will measure the sum of all responses as well as look at sub-scales: physical, social/family, emotional, functional, and additional concerns.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Quality of Life for exercise partners assessed by CQOLC
Description
Quality of life for exercise partners will be measured using the Caregiver Quality of Life Index - Cancer (CQOLC), a 35-item questionnaire about caring for loved ones with lung cancer. It uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much)
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Fatigue assessed by PROMIS Short-Form
Description
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Short-Form - Fatigue questionnaires measure the fatigue experienced in the past 7 days and its level of interference with daily activities. All participants will answer the 7-item questionnaire using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Pain assessed by PROMIS Short-Form
Description
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Short-From - Pain questionnaires measure both pain intensity, quality, and impact on daily function experienced in the past 7 days. All participants will answer the 16 questions using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0, "no pain" to 4, "very severe"; and 0, "not at all" to 4, "very much."
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Sleep assessed by PROMIS Short-Form
Description
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Short-Form - Sleep questionnaire measures the sleep quality using an 8-item questionnaire on a 5-point scale, with responses ranging from 0 (Very Poor/Not at all) to 4 (Very Good/Not at all).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Relationship Distress assessed by DAS-SF
Description
Measured using the DAS-SF (Dyadic Adjustment Scale - Short Form) a 7-item scale asking about relationship satisfaction and scored using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Social Support assessed by PSSS
Description
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (PSSS) is a 12-item questionnaire that uses a 7 point Likert scale that measures the support one receives from friends, family, and significant others.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Level of exercise outside the exercise intervention assessed by GLTEQ
Description
The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) is a self-report questionnaire asking the patient-participant how often they engaged in mild effort, moderate exercise, strenuous exercise, and resistance (weight bearing exercise). This will be measured in three different ways: 1) total activity = vigorous + moderate + mild + resistance, 2) physical activity guidelines = moderate + (vigorous x 2), 3) moderate + vigorous.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Incidence of Malnutrition
Description
Measured using a Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST). Patients with lung cancer with a score of 2 or more are considered at risk for malnutrition.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Subjective evaluation of PEP-LC participant experience from phone interviews
Description
Dyads participating in the exercise intervention will complete a follow up phone interview regarding their experience in the program. They will be ask to describe their overall experience as well as indicate if they have any suggestions on making the program better
Time Frame
1-2 months follow completion of program (up to 4 months)
Title
Incidence of Relationship Strain
Description
Partner participants will complete the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI), an 18-item questionnaire about strain caused by caretaking for a person with cancer. Uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (A great deal)
Time Frame
12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Mild depression symptoms Able to participate in exercise program per physician approval Available partner/spouse to participate with patient Exclusion Criteria: Persistent severe depression symptoms Inability to participate in exercise Life expectancy less than 1 year
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donald R Sullivan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Portland Health Care System
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23175625
Citation
Walker J, Holm Hansen C, Martin P, Sawhney A, Thekkumpurath P, Beale C, Symeonides S, Wall L, Murray G, Sharpe M. Prevalence of depression in adults with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr;24(4):895-900. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds575. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24080122
Citation
Sullivan DR, Ganzini L, Duckart JP, Lopez-Chavez A, Deffebach ME, Thielke SM, Slatore CG. Treatment receipt and outcomes among lung cancer patients with depression. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Jan;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27996350
Citation
Sullivan DR, Forsberg CW, Ganzini L, Au DH, Gould MK, Provenzale D, Slatore CG. Longitudinal Changes in Depression Symptoms and Survival Among Patients With Lung Cancer: A National Cohort Assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):3984-3991. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.8459. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15263042
Citation
Massie MJ. Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004;(32):57-71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27803239
Citation
Lyons KS, Miller LM, McCarthy MJ. The Roles of Dyadic Appraisal and Coping in Couples With Lung Cancer. J Fam Nurs. 2016 Nov;22(4):493-514. doi: 10.1177/1074840716675976. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24428251
Citation
Brown Johnson CG, Brodsky JL, Cataldo JK. Lung cancer stigma, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(1):59-73. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2013.855963.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21803653
Citation
Cataldo JK, Jahan TM, Pongquan VL. Lung cancer stigma, depression, and quality of life among ever and never smokers. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012 Jul;16(3):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26463853
Citation
Piderman KM, Sytsma TT, Frost MH, Novotny PJ, Rausch Osian SM, Solberg Nes L, Patten CA, Sloan JA, Rummans TA, Bronars CA, Yang P, Clark MM. Improving Spiritual Well-Being in Patients with Lung Cancers. J Pastoral Care Counsel. 2015 Sep;69(3):156-62. doi: 10.1177/1542305015602711.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27991611
Citation
Miller LM, Sullivan DR, Lyons KS. Dyadic Perceptions of the Decision Process in Families Living With Lung Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jan 1;44(1):108-115. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.108-115.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25090253
Citation
Lyons KS, Bennett JA, Nail LM, Fromme EK, Dieckmann N, Sayer AG. The role of patient pain and physical function on depressive symptoms in couples with lung cancer: a longitudinal dyadic analysis. J Fam Psychol. 2014 Oct;28(5):692-700. doi: 10.1037/fam0000017. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20878868
Citation
Kim Y, Carver CS, Spillers RL, Crammer C, Zhou ES. Individual and dyadic relations between spiritual well-being and quality of life among cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Psychooncology. 2011 Jul;20(7):762-70. doi: 10.1002/pon.1778. Epub 2010 May 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17967089
Citation
Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;133(6):920-54. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19777535
Citation
Brown LF, Kroenke K, Theobald DE, Wu J, Tu W. The association of depression and anxiety with health-related quality of life in cancer patients with depression and/or pain. Psychooncology. 2010 Jul;19(7):734-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1627.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25758447
Citation
Lazenby M, Ercolano E, Grant M, Holland JC, Jacobsen PB, McCorkle R. Supporting commission on cancer-mandated psychosocial distress screening with implementation strategies. J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e413-20. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002816. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23778105
Citation
Walker J, Sawhney A, Hansen CH, Ahmed S, Martin P, Symeonides S, Murray G, Sharpe M. Treatment of depression in adults with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(5):897-907. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001372. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24026850
Citation
Cooney GM, Dwan K, Greig CA, Lawlor DA, Rimer J, Waugh FR, McMurdo M, Mead GE. Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9973590
Citation
DiLorenzo TM, Bargman EP, Stucky-Ropp R, Brassington GS, Frensch PA, LaFontaine T. Long-term effects of aerobic exercise on psychological outcomes. Prev Med. 1999 Jan;28(1):75-85. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0385.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28006694
Citation
Buffart LM, Kalter J, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, May AM, Galvao DA, Chinapaw MJ, Steindorf K, Irwin ML, Stuiver MM, Hayes S, Griffith KA, Lucia A, Mesters I, van Weert E, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Mutrie N, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schulz KH, Short CE, James EL, Plotnikoff RC, Arbane G, Schmidt ME, Potthoff K, van Beurden M, Oldenburg HS, Sonke GS, van Harten WH, Garrod R, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J. Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Jan;52:91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20052559
Citation
Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jun;4(2):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0110-5. Epub 2010 Jan 6. Erratum In: J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Mar;5(1):112.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28442076
Citation
Cavalheri V, Jenkins S, Cecins N, Gain K, Phillips MJ, Sanders LH, Hill K. Exercise training for people following curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23904353
Citation
Cavalheri V, Tahirah F, Nonoyama M, Jenkins S, Hill K. Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;(7):CD009955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009955.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28965138
Citation
Winters-Stone KM, Moe EL, Perry CK, Medysky M, Pommier R, Vetto J, Naik A. Enhancing an oncologist's recommendation to exercise to manage fatigue levels in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Mar;26(3):905-912. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3909-z. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23217054
Citation
Winters-Stone KM, Li F, Horak F, Luoh SW, Bennett JA, Nail L, Dieckmann N. Comparison of tai chi vs. strength training for fall prevention among female cancer survivors: study protocol for the GET FIT trial. BMC Cancer. 2012 Dec 5;12:577. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-577.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26715587
Citation
Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Dobek J, Dieckmann NF, Bennett JA, Nail L, Beer TM. Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses: results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26652029
Citation
Kamen C, Heckler C, Janelsins MC, Peppone LJ, McMahon JM, Morrow GR, Bowen D, Mustian K. A Dyadic Exercise Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Among Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Cancer Survivors. LGBT Health. 2016 Feb;3(1):57-64. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2015.0101. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19732197
Citation
Rasekaba T, Lee AL, Naughton MT, Williams TJ, Holland AE. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Intern Med J. 2009 Aug;39(8):495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01880.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11556941
Citation
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25515721
Citation
Andersen BL, Rowland JH, Somerfield MR. Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an american society of clinical oncology guideline adaptation. J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):133-4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002311. Epub 2014 Dec 16. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2280326
Citation
Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28052867
Citation
Wright SP, Hall Brown TS, Collier SR, Sandberg K. How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;312(3):R358-R367. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00349.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28635971
Citation
Zhang X, McClean D, Ko E, Morgan MA, Schmitz K. Exercise Among Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Feasibility and Pre-/Post-Test Exploratory Pilot Study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 May 1;44(3):366-374. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.366-374.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7838189
Citation
Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):556-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503023320902.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16670410
Citation
Newman AB, Simonsick EM, Naydeck BL, Boudreau RM, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt MC, Pahor M, Satterfield S, Brach JS, Studenski SA, Harris TB. Association of long-distance corridor walk performance with mortality, cardiovascular disease, mobility limitation, and disability. JAMA. 2006 May 3;295(17):2018-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24880060
Citation
Eickmeyer SM, Walczak CK, Myers KB, Lindstrom DR, Layde P, Campbell BH. Quality of life, shoulder range of motion, and spinal accessory nerve status in 5-year survivors of head and neck cancer. PM R. 2014 Dec;6(12):1073-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21570036
Citation
Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, Fejer R, Beck R. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM R. 2011 May;3(5):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.025.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27362514
Citation
Ameringer S, Elswick RK Jr, Menzies V, Robins JL, Starkweather A, Walter J, Gentry AE, Jallo N. Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue-Short Form Across Diverse Populations. Nurs Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;65(4):279-89. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000162.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Dyads

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs