search
Back to results

UAS-RBS: a Safety Study

Primary Purpose

Refractory Benign Strictures

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Esophageal stent implantation
Stent removal
Sponsored by
Erasme University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Refractory Benign Strictures

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Benign Esophageal Refractory Stricture no more than 40 mm in length.
  • More than two dilations to at least 16 mm in diameter with symptoms relapse within 6 months.
  • Last dilation to 16 mm no more than 6 months before study procedure.
  • Dysphagia score of 2 (ability to swallow semi-solid foods), 3 (ability to swallow liquids only) or 4 (unable to swallow liquids) at the time of measurement.
  • Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stricture within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter.
  • Dysphagia related to motility disorder.
  • Planned adjuvant radiation therapy post esophagectomy.
  • Esophageal stent in place.
  • Active erosive esophagitis.
  • Sensitivity to any components of the stent or delivery system.
  • Concurrent medical condition that would affect the investigator's ability to evaluate the patient's condition or could compromise patient safety.
  • Currently enrolled in another clinical trial.

Sites / Locations

  • CUB Hopital erasme

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation)

Arm Description

Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation) at J0, removal after 6 months and follow-up for 6 months

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of all Adverse Device Effects
Serious adverse event (SAE) during the period of stent implantation
Technical stent placement success
Ability to deploy the UAS-RBS in satisfactory position across the stricture
Full deployment of stent
Endoscopic visualization
Technical stent removal success
Ability to remove the stent without complications

Secondary Outcome Measures

SAE during the period after stent removal
Number of re-interventions
Change of dysphagia score (Dakkak and Bennett score of Dysphagia)
Patient's satisfaction with the therapy
scored by a visual analog scale (0 worse - 10 best)
Patient's report of pain
scored by a visual analog scale (0 worse - 10 best)
Quality Of Life SF36 questionnaire
SF36

Full Information

First Posted
July 10, 2018
Last Updated
February 8, 2022
Sponsor
Erasme University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03652285
Brief Title
UAS-RBS: a Safety Study
Official Title
Universal Partially Covered Removable Self-Expanding Stent and Anchoring System for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures (UAS-RBS): a Safety Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 27, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Erasme University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A novel stent, called Universal Partially Covered Removable Self-expanding Stent and Anchoring System for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures (UAS-RBS) was designed to improve the treatment of benign esophageal refractory strictures with a novel stent. This study aims at evaluating the safety of this new device.
Detailed Description
Refractory strictures are defined as benign esophageal strictures who do not achieve acceptable symptom relief despite an intensive dilation schedule. Considering the failure of balloon or mechanical dilation other techniques such as intralesional injection of corticosteroids or stents placement were developed. Self-expandable metal stents, plastic stents and biodegradable stents are also used in that indication. In a meta-analysis of 18 studies with 444 patients, clinical success was achieved in 41 percent of patients. Stent migration occurred in 29 percent of patients, and adverse events occurred in 21 percent. A self-expending nitinol stent has been design to reduce the migration risk. The stent is partially covered on both extremities, allowing the formation of small hyperplasia in the middle part of the stent. This design with the inner sheet (usually, when using fully covered stents, the sheet is outside) allows formation of hyperplasia (therefore reducing the risk of migration) but partly controlled by the inner sheet to reduce the risk of lumen occlusion. By this design, the balance between hyperplasia formation to avoid the risk of migration and reducing the risk of lumen occlusion could be entailed stable esophageal calibration. The UAS-RBS system is a reversible procedure to treat Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures through stent implantation. Above standard of care monitoring, safety assessment of the procedure and device performance decreases the risk and unforeseen events.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Refractory Benign Strictures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
As a proof of concept, feasibility study - First In Man Study (FIM). The study will enroll 10 patients and an additional 10% of patients to compensate for potential attrition during follow-up, resulting in a sample size of 11 patients.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
11 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation) at J0, removal after 6 months and follow-up for 6 months
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Esophageal stent implantation
Intervention Description
An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy. Depending on the size of the stricture a dilation can be performed prior to the stent deployment. Otherwise, the stent will be deployed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy. After, the gastroscopy will go through the esophagus to check for the stent deployment, or any complications. An injection of contrast agent will be done to be sure of the correct positioning and that no complications was happened. The patient will be kept overnight, with liquid food for 3 days and under PPI until one month after the stent placement.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Stent removal
Intervention Description
Six months after implantation, the removal of the stent will be performed. Patient will undergo a first endoscopy under general anesthesia for the placement of a FCSEMS. Then, depending on the importance of the hyperplasia, removal of both stents, under general anesthesia, will be done after 7 to 10 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of all Adverse Device Effects
Description
Serious adverse event (SAE) during the period of stent implantation
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Technical stent placement success
Description
Ability to deploy the UAS-RBS in satisfactory position across the stricture
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Full deployment of stent
Description
Endoscopic visualization
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Technical stent removal success
Description
Ability to remove the stent without complications
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
SAE during the period after stent removal
Time Frame
6 months post retrieval
Title
Number of re-interventions
Time Frame
within 12 months following stent placement
Title
Change of dysphagia score (Dakkak and Bennett score of Dysphagia)
Time Frame
Baseline and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation
Title
Patient's satisfaction with the therapy
Description
scored by a visual analog scale (0 worse - 10 best)
Time Frame
week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation
Title
Patient's report of pain
Description
scored by a visual analog scale (0 worse - 10 best)
Time Frame
before treatment, and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation
Title
Quality Of Life SF36 questionnaire
Description
SF36
Time Frame
before treatment, and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Benign Esophageal Refractory Stricture no more than 40 mm in length. More than two dilations to at least 16 mm in diameter with symptoms relapse within 6 months. Last dilation to 16 mm no more than 6 months before study procedure. Dysphagia score of 2 (ability to swallow semi-solid foods), 3 (ability to swallow liquids only) or 4 (unable to swallow liquids) at the time of measurement. Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Stricture within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter. Dysphagia related to motility disorder. Planned adjuvant radiation therapy post esophagectomy. Esophageal stent in place. Active erosive esophagitis. Sensitivity to any components of the stent or delivery system. Concurrent medical condition that would affect the investigator's ability to evaluate the patient's condition or could compromise patient safety. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CUB Hopital erasme
City
Anderlecht
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

UAS-RBS: a Safety Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs