search
Back to results

Patient-centred Home-based Management of Heart Failure (PACEMAN-HF)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Home-based tool
Sponsored by
CareLigo AB
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring patient centred, m-health, e-health, home-based, self-care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • admitted due to acute heart failure
  • diagnosed heart failure according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines 2012
  • prescribed loop-diuretics
  • Signed letter of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • more than mild cognitive impairment
  • pregnancy
  • having attended nurse-led heart failure clinic the past 12 months, or referred to one following this current hospitalization
  • life-expectancy of less than 6 months

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    No Intervention

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Control group

    Intervention group

    Arm Description

    Subject to standard care.

    Exposed to the home-based tool.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Self-care behaviour
    Assessed by the validated instrument European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. It measures how well the patient adheres to advice provided from the health care professional. It si made up of nine questions to which the patient answers between "completely agree" and "completely disagree", corresponding to a score of 1 or 5 respectively. The possible scores on the questionnaire range from 9 to 45, where 9 corresponds to the most desireable self-care behaviour and 45 to the least favourable.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    In-hospital days due to heart failure
    Data retrieved from the medical records after the intervention period is completed. All hospitalizations analyzed and adjudicated as either heart failure related or not.
    Quality of life (general)
    Assessed by the 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36). The instrument includes 8 multi-item scales plus a single-item scale to compare the patient's current health with that 1 year ago. The 8 domains are physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health vitality, social functioning, role of emotional health and role of mental health. SF-36 also consists of two summary scores: mental and physical. The scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    Quality of life (disease-specific)
    Assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is a 23-item (15 questions), self-administrating,disease-specifi c instrument that quantifi es 6 domains (scales) and 2 summary scores of patients' health status. The 6 domains are physical limitations, symptom score, symptom change, self-effi cacy, social interference and QoL. The 2 summary scores are labelled: clinical summary scores and overall summary scores. All scale scores are transformed to 0 - 100 scale, in which a higher score indicates better health related quality of life (HRQoL).
    Knowledge about heart failure
    Assessed by the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale (DHFKS), which consists of 15 multiple-choice items (0 - 15). It measures knowledge in HF in general, symptom recognition and treatment. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 30, 2018
    Last Updated
    August 31, 2018
    Sponsor
    CareLigo AB
    Collaborators
    Karolinska University Hospital, Danderyd's hospital, Stockholm South General Hospital
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03655496
    Brief Title
    Patient-centred Home-based Management of Heart Failure
    Acronym
    PACEMAN-HF
    Official Title
    Patient-centred Home-based Management of Heart Failure
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 22, 2013 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 18, 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 18, 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    CareLigo AB
    Collaborators
    Karolinska University Hospital, Danderyd's hospital, Stockholm South General Hospital

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    A novel home-based tool for self-management is to be evaluated for heart failure patients. The tool assists the patient with symptom monitoring, education and titration of diuretics. Patients who were recently hospitalized for heart failure will be randomized to receiving the tool or standard care for six months. The primary end-point will be self-care behaviour, as measured with the validated instrument the European Heart failure self-care behaviour Scale 9-item questionnaire (Jaarsma et al). Secondary end-points are in-hospital days due to heart failure, quality of life (general and disease-specific) as measured by the SF-36 and KCCQ questionnaires, and finally knowledge about heart failure, assessed by the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale.
    Detailed Description
    Patients who are admitted to the emergency unit for decompensated heart failure at the three largest clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, are screened for recruitment. For patients to be eligible for study participation, they shall be discharged from the hospital to the general practitioner without being referred to a nurse led heart failure clinic, which is considered the gold standard in terms of improving patients' self-care behaviour. At the point of discharge, patients are approached about study participation and those who accept will be provided study information and forced to provide a written consent to participate. Continuous sampling is employed. Baseline characteristics are noted, as well as baseline data collected for the following end-points: Self-care, using the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale (EHFScB), general quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire, disease-specific quality of life using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and knowledge about heart failure using the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale (DHFKS). After this data is collected patients will be randomized, using sealed envelopes, to either receive standard care or receive the home-based tool that constitutes the intervention investigated. Within one week after discharge, the patients randomized to the intervention group will have he tool installed in their home. The tool consists of a tablet computer locked to a specialized software, and a Bluetooth connected weight scale. Every day the patient is encouraged by the tablet computer to step up on the weight scale. The weight is wirelessly transferred to the tablet computer and today's dose of diuretics is shown on screen together with a short tip about how to improve living with heart failure. Every five days the patient assess their self-perceived symptoms, as prompted on the tablet computer. For every patient equipped with the tool, a patient-specific normal dose of diuretics, as well as a high dose is input in the tool at the point of randomization. If the weight increases by 2kg or more in 3 days or less, the high dose is recommended for two days, after which the effect on the weight is assessed. If the weight was decreased back to where it was prior to the rapid weight gain, the dose is returned to normal and if it is still elevated, the patient will be encouraged to call his/her health care provider at the number presented on the table computer. If the self-assessed symptoms deteriorate, the same type of warning will appear on screen, urging the patient to contact the health care provider. Both the intervention patients and the control patients will be given the same discharge information in writing, describing the most important parts of self-management for heart failure patients. The data collected at baseline will be collected again after 3 months and 6 months after randomization. After 6 months data about hospitalizations will be retrieved from the medical records and adjudicated as either heart failure-hospitalization or not. The adjudication will be done by the cardiologists participating in the study and as the focus of the study is in estimating the net/marginal incidence rate ratio of in-patient hospitalization, absorbing competing events (e.g. death) will be handled by censoring.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Heart Failure
    Keywords
    patient centred, m-health, e-health, home-based, self-care

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Supportive Care
    Study Phase
    Phase 1
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Randomized controlled parallel trial
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    82 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Subject to standard care.
    Arm Title
    Intervention group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Exposed to the home-based tool.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Home-based tool
    Intervention Description
    The tool consists of a tablet computer and a Bluetooth connected weight scale. The patient is encouraged to use the tool daily. The weight is titrates the dose of diuretics and a short tip about how to improve living with heart failure, this is presented on the screen. Every five days the patient assess their self-perceived symptoms on the tablet computer. If the weight increases by 2kg or more in 3 days or less, the high dose is recommended for two days, after which the effect on the weight is assessed. If the weight increased was reverted, the dose is returned to normal and if it is still elevated, an alert on the table computer. If the self-assessed symptoms deteriorate, the same type of alert will appear on screen, urging the patient to contact the health care provider.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Self-care behaviour
    Description
    Assessed by the validated instrument European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. It measures how well the patient adheres to advice provided from the health care professional. It si made up of nine questions to which the patient answers between "completely agree" and "completely disagree", corresponding to a score of 1 or 5 respectively. The possible scores on the questionnaire range from 9 to 45, where 9 corresponds to the most desireable self-care behaviour and 45 to the least favourable.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    In-hospital days due to heart failure
    Description
    Data retrieved from the medical records after the intervention period is completed. All hospitalizations analyzed and adjudicated as either heart failure related or not.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Quality of life (general)
    Description
    Assessed by the 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36). The instrument includes 8 multi-item scales plus a single-item scale to compare the patient's current health with that 1 year ago. The 8 domains are physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health vitality, social functioning, role of emotional health and role of mental health. SF-36 also consists of two summary scores: mental and physical. The scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Quality of life (disease-specific)
    Description
    Assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is a 23-item (15 questions), self-administrating,disease-specifi c instrument that quantifi es 6 domains (scales) and 2 summary scores of patients' health status. The 6 domains are physical limitations, symptom score, symptom change, self-effi cacy, social interference and QoL. The 2 summary scores are labelled: clinical summary scores and overall summary scores. All scale scores are transformed to 0 - 100 scale, in which a higher score indicates better health related quality of life (HRQoL).
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Knowledge about heart failure
    Description
    Assessed by the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale (DHFKS), which consists of 15 multiple-choice items (0 - 15). It measures knowledge in HF in general, symptom recognition and treatment. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.
    Time Frame
    6 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: admitted due to acute heart failure diagnosed heart failure according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines 2012 prescribed loop-diuretics Signed letter of consent Exclusion Criteria: more than mild cognitive impairment pregnancy having attended nurse-led heart failure clinic the past 12 months, or referred to one following this current hospitalization life-expectancy of less than 6 months
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Inger Hagerman, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Karolinska University Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    25968968
    Citation
    Hagglund E, Lynga P, Frie F, Ullman B, Persson H, Melin M, Hagerman I. Patient-centred home-based management of heart failure. Findings from a randomised clinical trial evaluating a tablet computer for self-care, quality of life and effects on knowledge. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015 Aug;49(4):193-9. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2015.1035319. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29369123
    Citation
    Melin M, Hagglund E, Ullman B, Persson H, Hagerman I. Effects of a Tablet Computer on Self-care, Quality of Life, and Knowledge: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):336-343. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000462.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31217992
    Citation
    Hovland-Tanneryd A, Melin M, Hagglund E, Hagerman I, Persson HE. From randomised controlled trial to real world implementation of a novel home-based heart failure tool: pooled and comparative analyses of two clinical controlled trials. Open Heart. 2019 May 28;6(1):e000954. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000954. eCollection 2019.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Patient-centred Home-based Management of Heart Failure

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs