search
Back to results

Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department

Primary Purpose

Hunger, Child Nutrition Disorders

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Food Insecurity Screening Tablet
Food Insecurity Screening Verbal
Sponsored by
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Hunger focused on measuring social determinants of health, food insecurity, screening, pediatrics

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient (child) in critical condition
  • Patient (child) >18 years of age
  • Previously enrolled in study

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tablet Screening

Verbal Screening

Arm Description

Food insecurity screening conducted via electronic tablet

Food insecurity screening conducted via verbal face-to-face interview

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Presence of Food Insecurity
Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."

Secondary Outcome Measures

Preferred Screening Modality
Report of screening modality preference: verbal, tablet, or no preference
Comfort level with screening location
Report of comfort with screening in the emergency department and in the primary care setting

Full Information

First Posted
August 28, 2018
Last Updated
March 14, 2023
Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03656146
Brief Title
Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department
Official Title
Food for Thought: A Randomized Trial of Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 15, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 28, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 18, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study compares food insecurity disclosure rates in face-to-face interviews versus electronic formats, and explores caregiver preferences regarding screening modality and location, in a large, urban pediatric emergency department. Half of the participants were screened for food insecurity verbally, face-to-face by a research assistant, and half of the participants were screened electronically by a tablet.
Detailed Description
Children are disproportionately affected by the rise in poverty rates in the United States, and economic hardships can compromise their development, negatively affect their overall health, and adversely affect their abilities to succeed in school and in life. Food insecurity (FI)-the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate or safe foods- while strongly associated with poverty, is an independent predictor of poor health outcomes for children. The Emergency Department (ED) of academic medical centers often serves as a point of care entry for impoverished and high-risk families. Although there is a growing interest in the healthcare system's ability to address Social Determinants of Health (SDH), little is known about food insecurity in the pediatric ED. Additionally, there are limited data on how to implement FI screening into practice in a way that maximizes elicitation of social need, while assuring patient and family comfort.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hunger, Child Nutrition Disorders
Keywords
social determinants of health, food insecurity, screening, pediatrics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1818 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tablet Screening
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Food insecurity screening conducted via electronic tablet
Arm Title
Verbal Screening
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Food insecurity screening conducted via verbal face-to-face interview
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Food Insecurity Screening Tablet
Intervention Description
The intervention is the type of screening modality used to identify food insecurity: verbal face-to-face, or tablet-based screening
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Food Insecurity Screening Verbal
Intervention Description
The intervention is the type of screening modality used to identify food insecurity: verbal face-to-face, or tablet-based screening
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Presence of Food Insecurity
Description
Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Preferred Screening Modality
Description
Report of screening modality preference: verbal, tablet, or no preference
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Comfort level with screening location
Description
Report of comfort with screening in the emergency department and in the primary care setting
Time Frame
4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: English speaking Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department Exclusion Criteria: Patient (child) in critical condition Patient (child) >18 years of age Previously enrolled in study
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs