search
Back to results

Efficacy and Dose Ranging Study of Seroguard

Primary Purpose

Adhesion

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Russian Federation
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Seroguard
Placebo
Sponsored by
Pharmasyntez
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Adhesion focused on measuring Adhesion, Efficacy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 45 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients aged from 18 to 45 years with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesions having indications for surgery (laparoscopic adhesiolysis).
  2. Voluntarily and personally signed and dated Form of Informed Consent.
  3. Female patients with pelvic adhesions confirmed by gynecological and ultrasound examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients having contraindications to surgical treatment (including acute or exacerbated chronical adnexal inflammation);
  2. Body mass index of 30.0 kg/m2 and more;
  3. Known hypersensitivity to the test drug components (Seroguard);
  4. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy during the clinical trial;
  5. Refusal to use effective contraception methods throughout the study;
  6. Positive HIV, RW, HBV or HCV test result;
  7. Alcohol abuse, drug addiction, and toxicomania (except smoking);
  8. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category III and more (ASA);
  9. Purulent process in the abdominal cavity;
  10. Disseminated endometriosis;
  11. WBC count more than 10*109/L at the complete blood count;
  12. Need of using any drugs during the surgery other than 0.02% chlorhexidine aqueous solution throughout the surgery, as well as the test drug or the placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) administered intraperitoneally in the end of surgery.
  13. Concomitant diseases that may require conversion of the surgical intervention by other indications;
  14. Type I or II diabetes mellitus;
  15. Deep vein thrombosis and/or PATE at the screening or in the medical history;
  16. Renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 assessed by the CKD-EPI equation);
  17. Liver disorders defined as more than 2-fold rise of the upper limit of normal of one of the following enzymes: ALT, AST, GGTP, AP, or more than 2-fold total bilirubin increase;
  18. Myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening;
  19. Any concomitant diseases accompanied by heart failure;
  20. Clinically significant ECG changes (as to the investigator's opinion);
  21. Any concomitant diseases accompanied by respiratory failure;
  22. Any oncological disease within 3 years before enrollment into the study;
  23. Systemic inflammatory diseases;
  24. Diseases associated with chronic hemorrhages;
  25. Blood diseases (anemias of any origin, hemoglobinopathies, inherited and acquired coagulopathies, hemostasis disorders, thrombocytopenias, and thrombocytopathias, any hemoblastoses);
  26. Any other disease that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect study results or present an additional threat to well-being of a patient after administration of the study drug;
  27. Use of anticoagulants, antiaggregants (except for acetylsalicylic acid at the dose of less than 325 mg/day) at the moment of inclusion into the study or planning to do so during the study;
  28. Use of drugs with pronounced hemato-, hepato-, or nephrotoxic action, drugs of biological origin;
  29. Need to administer cytostatics, systemic glucocorticosteroids, and other immunosuppressive agents during the patient's participation in the study.
  30. Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days before screening;
  31. Contraindications to MRI (presence of implants or implanted electronic devices);
  32. Impossibility or inability to comply with the requirements of the protocol, including for physical, psychic or social reasons, in the investigator's opinion.

Sites / Locations

  • Krai Government-Owned State Funded Healthcare Institution "Krai Clinical Hospital"
  • State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site Publicly Funded
  • State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "V.M. Buyanov Municipal Clinical Hospital"
  • Federal State Institution "V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology" of the Ministry of Healthcare and Social Development of the Russian Federation.
  • State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Kazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian at the clinical site of Kazan Maternity Hospital No. 3 named after V.S. Gruzdev
  • State Funded Health Care Institution "Bryansk Municipal Hospital No 1
  • Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "Kemerovo State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Kemerovo Oblast Publicly Funded Healthcare Institution "L.A.
  • Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "L.G. Sokolov Federal Biomedical Agency Clinical Hospital No 122".
  • Federal State Funded Scientific Institution "Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
  • Moscow Oblast State Funded Healthcare Institution "Moscow Oblast Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology"
  • State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "Moscow Municipal Clinical Hospital No 31"
  • State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Rostov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute
  • Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of State Funded Healthcare Institution "Municipal Clin
  • Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg

Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg

Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg

Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg

Arm Description

each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight;

each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight;

each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight;

each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More
The number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions
The change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved.
Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility
The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery
The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility
Absolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline
Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions
Frequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more)
Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery
No limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown

Full Information

First Posted
August 31, 2018
Last Updated
June 17, 2019
Sponsor
Pharmasyntez
Collaborators
Cromos Pharma LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03660787
Brief Title
Efficacy and Dose Ranging Study of Seroguard
Official Title
Phase II Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Efficacy and Dose Ranging Trial of the Drug Product Seroguard, Solution (JSC Pharmasyntez, Russia) Used for the Prevention of Pelvic Adhesions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 4, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 23, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 23, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pharmasyntez
Collaborators
Cromos Pharma LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This trial was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II study in adult hospitalized female patients with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesive disease in Study centres in Russia.
Detailed Description
In order to evaluate efficacy and safety of Seroguard, solution for IP administration, a study design meeting the set objectives was selected: prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study. Given the fact that comparison with placebo is considered the best way to prove efficacy and safety of a drug and that currently there are no drugs with a similar mechanism of action at the pharmaceutical product market, a placebo-controlled, parallel group study design was selected. A randomized, parallel group study design was chosen in order to ensure minimization of a selection bias. Subjects were randomized into four groups (two groups of the test drug and two placebo groups corresponding to the two doses) to enable a comparison of Seroguard administration at two doses. A double-blind study design was selected in order to ensure minimization of an outcome evaluation bias.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Adhesion
Keywords
Adhesion, Efficacy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
The present study was conducted as a double blind trial. Neither a medical investigator, nor patients had access to the treatment assignment code in order to ensure the maximum objective evaluation of the primary endpoint. Blinding was performed in such a way that disclosing a randomization code of a certain subject excluded a disclosure of the code in general (i.e. the randomization code had no indication to the treatment group). However, there were no cases of the randomization code disclosure in the study
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
114 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight;
Arm Title
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight;
Arm Title
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight;
Arm Title
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Seroguard
Intervention Description
Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Saline
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More
Description
The number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgical intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions
Description
The change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved.
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgery
Title
Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility
Description
The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgery
Title
Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery
Description
The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgery
Title
Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility
Description
Absolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgery
Title
Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions
Description
Frequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more)
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgery
Title
Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery
Description
No limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown
Time Frame
30±4 days after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Female patients aged from 18 to 45 years with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesions having indications for surgery (laparoscopic adhesiolysis). Voluntarily and personally signed and dated Form of Informed Consent. Female patients with pelvic adhesions confirmed by gynecological and ultrasound examination. Exclusion Criteria: Female patients having contraindications to surgical treatment (including acute or exacerbated chronical adnexal inflammation); Body mass index of 30.0 kg/m2 and more; Known hypersensitivity to the test drug components (Seroguard); Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy during the clinical trial; Refusal to use effective contraception methods throughout the study; Positive HIV, RW, HBV or HCV test result; Alcohol abuse, drug addiction, and toxicomania (except smoking); American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category III and more (ASA); Purulent process in the abdominal cavity; Disseminated endometriosis; WBC count more than 10*109/L at the complete blood count; Need of using any drugs during the surgery other than 0.02% chlorhexidine aqueous solution throughout the surgery, as well as the test drug or the placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) administered intraperitoneally in the end of surgery. Concomitant diseases that may require conversion of the surgical intervention by other indications; Type I or II diabetes mellitus; Deep vein thrombosis and/or PATE at the screening or in the medical history; Renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 assessed by the CKD-EPI equation); Liver disorders defined as more than 2-fold rise of the upper limit of normal of one of the following enzymes: ALT, AST, GGTP, AP, or more than 2-fold total bilirubin increase; Myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening; Any concomitant diseases accompanied by heart failure; Clinically significant ECG changes (as to the investigator's opinion); Any concomitant diseases accompanied by respiratory failure; Any oncological disease within 3 years before enrollment into the study; Systemic inflammatory diseases; Diseases associated with chronic hemorrhages; Blood diseases (anemias of any origin, hemoglobinopathies, inherited and acquired coagulopathies, hemostasis disorders, thrombocytopenias, and thrombocytopathias, any hemoblastoses); Any other disease that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect study results or present an additional threat to well-being of a patient after administration of the study drug; Use of anticoagulants, antiaggregants (except for acetylsalicylic acid at the dose of less than 325 mg/day) at the moment of inclusion into the study or planning to do so during the study; Use of drugs with pronounced hemato-, hepato-, or nephrotoxic action, drugs of biological origin; Need to administer cytostatics, systemic glucocorticosteroids, and other immunosuppressive agents during the patient's participation in the study. Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days before screening; Contraindications to MRI (presence of implants or implanted electronic devices); Impossibility or inability to comply with the requirements of the protocol, including for physical, psychic or social reasons, in the investigator's opinion.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mikhail Shurygin, PhD,D.M.Sc.
Organizational Affiliation
Pharmasyntez
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Krai Government-Owned State Funded Healthcare Institution "Krai Clinical Hospital"
City
Krasnoyarsk
State/Province
Krasnoyarsk Krai
ZIP/Postal Code
660022
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site Publicly Funded
City
Krasnoyarsk
State/Province
Krasnoyarsk Krai
ZIP/Postal Code
660074
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "V.M. Buyanov Municipal Clinical Hospital"
City
Moscow
State/Province
Moscow Region
ZIP/Postal Code
115516
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Institution "V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology" of the Ministry of Healthcare and Social Development of the Russian Federation.
City
Moscow
State/Province
Moscow Region
ZIP/Postal Code
117997
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Kazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian at the clinical site of Kazan Maternity Hospital No. 3 named after V.S. Gruzdev
City
Kazan
State/Province
Republic Of Tatarstan
ZIP/Postal Code
420012
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Funded Health Care Institution "Bryansk Municipal Hospital No 1
City
Bryansk
State/Province
The Bryansk Region
ZIP/Postal Code
241035
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "Kemerovo State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Kemerovo Oblast Publicly Funded Healthcare Institution "L.A.
City
Kemerovo
State/Province
The Kemerovo Region
ZIP/Postal Code
650000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "L.G. Sokolov Federal Biomedical Agency Clinical Hospital No 122".
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
The Leningrad Region
ZIP/Postal Code
194291
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Funded Scientific Institution "Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
The Leningrad Region
ZIP/Postal Code
199034
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Moscow Oblast State Funded Healthcare Institution "Moscow Oblast Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology"
City
Moscow
State/Province
The Moscow Region
ZIP/Postal Code
101000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "Moscow Municipal Clinical Hospital No 31"
City
Moscow
State/Province
The Moscow Region
ZIP/Postal Code
119415
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Rostov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute
City
Rostov-on-Don
State/Province
The Rostov Region
ZIP/Postal Code
344013
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of State Funded Healthcare Institution "Municipal Clin
City
Ryazan'
State/Province
The Ryazan Region
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
City
Yekaterinburg
State/Province
The Sverdlovsk Region
ZIP/Postal Code
620028
Country
Russian Federation

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10521760
Citation
Miller JH, Weinberg RK, Canino NL, Klein NA, Soules MR. The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):952-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70331-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23182560
Citation
Dun EC, Nezhat CH. Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;39(4):551-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.09.006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
123123
Citation
Westrom L. Effect of acute pelvic inflammatory disease on fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Mar 1;121(5):707-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90477-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8042113
Citation
Westrom LV. Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Mar-Apr;21(2 Suppl):S32-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19562067
Citation
Patil M. Assessing tubal damage. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009 Jan;2(1):2-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.51335.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6667046
Citation
Sutherland AM. The changing pattern of tuberculosis of the female genital tract. A thirty year survey. Arch Gynecol. 1983;234(2):95-101. doi: 10.1007/BF00207681.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3785307
Citation
Mueller BA, Daling JR, Moore DE, Weiss NS, Spadoni LR, Stadel BV, Soules MR. Appendectomy and the risk of tubal infertility. N Engl J Med. 1986 Dec 11;315(24):1506-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612113152402.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Schwartz L, Diamond M. Formation, Reduction, and Treatment of Adhesive Disease. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 1991; 9(02): p. 89-99.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24701493
Citation
Vaid K, Mehra S, Verma M, Jain S, Sharma A, Bhaskaran S. Pan endoscopic approach "hysterolaparoscopy" as an initial procedure in selected infertile women. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):95-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7271.4018. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25935960
Citation
Neerja, Jain K. Role of laporoscopy-hysteroscopy in cases of infertility with pregnancy outcome. J Indian Med Assoc. 2014 Feb;112(2):85-6, 88.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2952528
Citation
Diamond MP, Daniell JF, Feste J, Surrey MW, McLaughlin DS, Friedman S, Vaughn WK, Martin DC. Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril. 1987 May;47(5):864-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59181-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6231195
Citation
DeCherney AH, Mezer HC. The nature of posttuboplasty pelvic adhesions as determined by early and late laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 1984 Apr;41(4):643-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47793-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21437827
Citation
Al-Jabri S, Tulandi T. Management and prevention of pelvic adhesions. Semin Reprod Med. 2011 Mar;29(2):130-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272475. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22297658
Citation
Brochhausen C, Schmitt VH, Planck CN, Rajab TK, Hollemann D, Tapprich C, Kramer B, Wallwiener C, Hierlemann H, Zehbe R, Planck H, Kirkpatrick CJ. Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1256-74. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19665431
Citation
Coulthard LR, White DE, Jones DL, McDermott MF, Burchill SA. p38(MAPK): stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Trends Mol Med. 2009 Aug;15(8):369-79. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21492875
Citation
Ward BC, Kavalukas S, Brugnano J, Barbul A, Panitch A. Peptide inhibitors of MK2 show promise for inhibition of abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2011 Jul;169(1):e27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.01.043. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15576468
Citation
Katada J, Saito H, Ohashi A. Significance of cyclooxygenase-2 induced via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in mechanical stimulus-induced peritoneal adhesion in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Apr;313(1):286-92. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.078717. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
Results Reference
background
Citation
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Online]. Northborough; 2006 [cited 2015 Dec 22. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4217b1_01_Executive%20Summary.pdf.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25024524
Citation
Ghonge NP, Ghonge SD. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pelvic peritoneal adhesions: What radiologists need to know? Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014 Apr;24(2):149-55. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.134400.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2217485
Citation
diZerega GS. The peritoneum and its response to surgical injury. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;358:1-11. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11727863
Citation
diZerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):547-55. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.6.547.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10702313
Citation
Lali FV, Hunt AE, Turner SJ, Foxwell BM. The pyridinyl imidazole inhibitor SB203580 blocks phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase activity, protein kinase B phosphorylation, and retinoblastoma hyperphosphorylation in interleukin-2-stimulated T cells independently of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 10;275(10):7395-402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7395.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20068172
Citation
Kumar B, Koul S, Petersen J, Khandrika L, Hwa JS, Meacham RB, Wilson S, Koul HK. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-driven MAPKAPK2 regulates invasion of bladder cancer by modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity. Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):832-41. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2918. Epub 2010 Jan 12. Erratum In: Cancer Res. 2022 Dec 16;82(24):4696.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16328673
Citation
Louizos AA, Hadzilia SJ, Leandros E, Kouroukli IK, Georgiou LG, Bramis JP. Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of preincisional infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Surg Endosc. 2005 Nov;19(11):1503-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-3002-4. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7970121
Citation
Innes A, Burden RP, Finch RG, Morgan AG. Treatment of resistant peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with intraperitoneal urokinase: a double-blind clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(7):797-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8711605
Citation
Szem JW, Hydo L, Barie PS. A double-blinded evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine vs saline for the reduction of postoperative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1996 Jan;10(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649910011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11772809
Citation
Labaille T, Mazoit JX, Paqueron X, Franco D, Benhamou D. The clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):100-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200201000-00019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25005450
Citation
Ahmad G, Mackie FL, Iles DA, O'Flynn H, Dias S, Metwally M, Watson A. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;(7):CD001298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001298.pub4.
Results Reference
background
Citation
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials.; 2010 [cited 2015 Dec. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/./Guidances/UCM202140.pdf.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 2nd ed.: Chapman&Hall / CRC Biostatistics Series; 2008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9455829
Citation
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec;12(12):2649-53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2649.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19368917
Citation
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Alcazar JL, Mais V, Melis GB. Diagnosis of pelvic adhesions in patients with endometrioma: the role of transvaginal ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):742-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.035. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Julious SA. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15802321
Citation
Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1144-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh870. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12923157
Citation
Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1959-66. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg366.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Dose Ranging Study of Seroguard

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs