Dissemination and Implementation Field Trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder
Primary Purpose
Bipolar Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dialectical behavioral therapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring dialectical behavior therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- English-speaking
- Age 13 years, 0 months to 19 years, 11 months
- Meet diagnostic criteria for BD by KSADS-PL
- Engaged in, or willing to proceed with, a pharmacotherapy regimen
- At least one parent/guardian with whom the patient lives or regularly interacts (>5 hours per week) is willing to participate in skills training
- Able and willing to give informed consent/assent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of mental retardation, moderate to severe pervasive developmental disorder, or organic central nervous system disorder by the K-SADS-PL, parent report, medical history, or school records
- A life-threatening medical condition requiring immediate treatment
- Current victim of sexual or physical abuse.
Sites / Locations
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Adolescents with bipolar disorder
Arm Description
40 adolescents aged 13 to 19 with bipolar disorder (type I, type II, not otherwise specified/nos) will be enrolled in the dialectical behavioral therapy intervention.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 6 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 6 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
therapists will adhere to the DBT Adherence Rating Scale
Tapes will be rated for adherence using the DBT Adherence Rating scale. The scale generates a Global Score of DBT adherence and subscale scores for the 12 DBT strategy domains. To examine sustained adherence, each therapist will submit 3 consecutive sessions for adherence coding. The rating scale is not available to the public and is utilized by the DBT-Linehan Board of Certification (copyright). Please see http://www.dbt-lbc.org/downloads/Applicant_Handbook_final_with_RW_review_2018.pdf for more information.
Therapists will obtain a passing grade of the DBT Certification Exam
Clinicians will attain knowledge and fidelity required to pass the DBT certification examination (exam total score ≥ 80%; passing score on case conceptualization; two of three consecutive tapes coded at or above adherence). Please see the certification manual http://www.dbt-lbc.org/downloads/Applicant_Handbook_final_with_RW_review_2018.pdf for more information.
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 12 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 24 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE)
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) will provide a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal picture of the symptomatic and psychosocial course and outcome of all participants in this study. Scores range from 0-3 on certain disorders and 0-6 for other disorders. High scores indicate high level of symptom impairment.
Change in symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE)
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) will provide a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal picture of the symptomatic and psychosocial course and outcome of all participants in this study. Scores range from 0-3 on certain disorders and 0-6 for other disorders. High scores indicate high level of symptom impairment.
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children, Present and Life Version (K-SADS-PL)
The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured interview designed to ascertain present episode and lifetime history of psychiatric illness, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria for children and adolescents.
K-SADS Mania Rating Scale (MRS)
The K-SADS MRS is a 13-item rating scale with scores ranging from 0 to 6. In addition to assessing common manic symptoms, it includes the K-SADS-PL items that assess the presence and severity of hallucinations and delusions.
Depression section of the K-SADS-Present Episode Version (K-SADS-Dep)
The K-SADS-Dep will be used to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. It is a 21-item semi-structured interview that allows depression symptom severity to be rated on a 6-point scale, from none to severe.
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Change in suicidality using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
We will assess suicidal events (past and over follow-up) with the Pediatric Version of the C-SSRS. The C-SSRS has sound psychometric properties, yields ratings of widely accepted definitions of youth suicidal events, and was used in other pediatric treatment trials yielding standardized outcomes to compare across studies. This is a semi-structured interview that includes yes/no questions as well as narrative. It captures number of suicidal events as well as type and severity.
Change in suicidality using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
We will assess suicidal events (past and over follow-up) with the Pediatric Version of the C-SSRS. The C-SSRS has sound psychometric properties, yields ratings of widely accepted definitions of youth suicidal events, and was used in other pediatric treatment trials yielding standardized outcomes to compare across studies. This is a semi-structured interview that includes yes/no questions as well as narrative. It captures number of suicidal events as well as type and severity.
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
Change in symptoms using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV): Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline and antisocial personality symptoms will be assessed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. The SID-P uses a semi structured interview format to assess for symptoms of personality disorders.
Change in symptoms using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV): Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline and antisocial personality symptoms will be assessed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. The SID-P uses a semi structured interview format to assess for symptoms of personality disorders.
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems. It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation. To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems. It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation. To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems. It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation. To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument. It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored. High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument. It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored. High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument. It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored. High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
Implementation Climate Scale
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies. This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
Implementation Climate Scale
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies. This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
Implementation Climate Scale
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies. This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
Change in therapist self-assessment
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Therapist Self-Assessment will allow for DBT therapists to provide subjective appraisals of their own level of comfort and confidence in applying the treatment. It also assesses the need for additional supervision from the study supervisor, consultant, and/or peer. Scores range from 1 to 7 on a Likert scale and high scores indicate high therapist level of comfort in implementing the treatment.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03661333
First Posted
August 31, 2018
Last Updated
November 29, 2021
Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03661333
Brief Title
Dissemination and Implementation Field Trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder
Official Title
Dissemination and Implementation Field Trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 31, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 8, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 8, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The overarching goal of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing dialectical behavior therapy DBT for adolescents with bipolar disorder in an outpatient mental health clinic. In collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh, this study will measure study therapists' knowledge of the DBT model, adherence to the treatment model, and satisfaction with the treatment model.
Detailed Description
This study proposes to implement dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD) in an outpatient mental health clinic serving youth with bipolar spectrum disorders. In collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh, this study will systemically operationalize, implement, and examine the specific training, supervision, and programmatic systems needed to successfully implement and sustain the intervention in an adherent manner to achieve positive patient outcomes. This study therefore presents a unique opportunity to enhance understanding of the necessary procedures for implementing the treatment in the community, while allowing us to examine effectiveness of the intervention at the community level.
Aim 1: To examine the short- and longer-term feasibility and acceptability of a training program in DBT for adolescents with BD through clinician satisfaction ratings.
Aim 2: To examine the short- and longer-term effects of the training on practitioner knowledge and performance, and patient outcomes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bipolar Disorder
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
21 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Adolescents with bipolar disorder
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
40 adolescents aged 13 to 19 with bipolar disorder (type I, type II, not otherwise specified/nos) will be enrolled in the dialectical behavioral therapy intervention.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Dialectical behavioral therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
DBT
Intervention Description
DBT will be conducted over 1 year, and divided into two modalities: skills training, conducted in 60 minute biweekly family meetings and individual therapy conducted in 60 minute biweekly sessions. Family skills training proceeds as follows: psychoeducation about DBT and bipolar disorder, mindfulness skills, emotion regulation skills, distress tolerance skills, interpersonal skills, and walking the middle path skills. Individual therapy sessions aim to aid the adolescent in applying skills in their daily lives. We adopt the standard DBT hierarchy of treatment targets, whereby the individual therapist selects behaviors to focus on based on the following priorities: 1) decreasing life-threatening behaviors, 2) decreasing therapy-interfering behaviors, 3) decreasing quality-of-life interfering behaviors, and 4) increasing behavioral skills. Therapists will be available to participants and their participating family members by cell phone for in-vivo skills coaching between sessions.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Description
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 6 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Description
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 6 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Time Frame
6 months
Title
therapists will adhere to the DBT Adherence Rating Scale
Description
Tapes will be rated for adherence using the DBT Adherence Rating scale. The scale generates a Global Score of DBT adherence and subscale scores for the 12 DBT strategy domains. To examine sustained adherence, each therapist will submit 3 consecutive sessions for adherence coding. The rating scale is not available to the public and is utilized by the DBT-Linehan Board of Certification (copyright). Please see http://www.dbt-lbc.org/downloads/Applicant_Handbook_final_with_RW_review_2018.pdf for more information.
Time Frame
End of study year 2
Title
Therapists will obtain a passing grade of the DBT Certification Exam
Description
Clinicians will attain knowledge and fidelity required to pass the DBT certification examination (exam total score ≥ 80%; passing score on case conceptualization; two of three consecutive tapes coded at or above adherence). Please see the certification manual http://www.dbt-lbc.org/downloads/Applicant_Handbook_final_with_RW_review_2018.pdf for more information.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Description
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 12 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Description
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 24 months. Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE)
Description
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) will provide a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal picture of the symptomatic and psychosocial course and outcome of all participants in this study. Scores range from 0-3 on certain disorders and 0-6 for other disorders. High scores indicate high level of symptom impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE)
Description
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) will provide a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal picture of the symptomatic and psychosocial course and outcome of all participants in this study. Scores range from 0-3 on certain disorders and 0-6 for other disorders. High scores indicate high level of symptom impairment.
Time Frame
6 months to 12 months
Title
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children, Present and Life Version (K-SADS-PL)
Description
The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured interview designed to ascertain present episode and lifetime history of psychiatric illness, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria for children and adolescents.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
K-SADS Mania Rating Scale (MRS)
Description
The K-SADS MRS is a 13-item rating scale with scores ranging from 0 to 6. In addition to assessing common manic symptoms, it includes the K-SADS-PL items that assess the presence and severity of hallucinations and delusions.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Depression section of the K-SADS-Present Episode Version (K-SADS-Dep)
Description
The K-SADS-Dep will be used to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. It is a 21-item semi-structured interview that allows depression symptom severity to be rated on a 6-point scale, from none to severe.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Description
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 months
Title
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Description
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Time Frame
3 months to 6 months
Title
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Description
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Time Frame
6 months to 9 months
Title
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Description
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the CMRS. The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale.
Time Frame
9 months to 12 months
Title
Change in suicidality using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Description
We will assess suicidal events (past and over follow-up) with the Pediatric Version of the C-SSRS. The C-SSRS has sound psychometric properties, yields ratings of widely accepted definitions of youth suicidal events, and was used in other pediatric treatment trials yielding standardized outcomes to compare across studies. This is a semi-structured interview that includes yes/no questions as well as narrative. It captures number of suicidal events as well as type and severity.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in suicidality using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Description
We will assess suicidal events (past and over follow-up) with the Pediatric Version of the C-SSRS. The C-SSRS has sound psychometric properties, yields ratings of widely accepted definitions of youth suicidal events, and was used in other pediatric treatment trials yielding standardized outcomes to compare across studies. This is a semi-structured interview that includes yes/no questions as well as narrative. It captures number of suicidal events as well as type and severity.
Time Frame
6 months to 12 months
Title
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Description
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 months,
Title
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Description
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Time Frame
3 months to 6 months
Title
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Description
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Time Frame
6 months to 9 months
Title
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Description
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the MFQ. Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
Time Frame
9 months to 12 months
Title
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 months
Title
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Time Frame
3 months to 6 months
Title
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Time Frame
6 months to 9 months
Title
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the self-report SIQ, which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
Time Frame
9 months to 12 months
Title
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 months
Title
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Time Frame
3 months to 6 months
Title
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Time Frame
6 months to 9 months
Title
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Description
Adolescents will also complete the DERS, a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation. Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10%" to 5= "almost always; 91-100%".
Time Frame
9 months to 12 months
Title
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Description
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Description
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Description
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in symptoms using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV): Borderline Personality Disorder
Description
Borderline and antisocial personality symptoms will be assessed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. The SID-P uses a semi structured interview format to assess for symptoms of personality disorders.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in symptoms using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV): Borderline Personality Disorder
Description
Borderline and antisocial personality symptoms will be assessed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. The SID-P uses a semi structured interview format to assess for symptoms of personality disorders.
Time Frame
6 months to 12 months
Title
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Description
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 months
Title
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Description
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Time Frame
3 months to 6 months
Title
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Description
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Time Frame
6 months to 9 months
Title
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Description
The CALS is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD. It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Time Frame
9 months to 12 months
Title
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
Description
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems. It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation. To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
Description
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems. It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation. To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
Time Frame
6 months to 12 months
Title
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
Description
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems. It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation. To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
Time Frame
12 months to 24 months
Title
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Description
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument. It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored. High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Description
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument. It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored. High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
Time Frame
6 months to 12 months
Title
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Description
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument. It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored. High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
Time Frame
12 months to 24 months
Title
Implementation Climate Scale
Description
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies. This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Implementation Climate Scale
Description
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies. This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
Time Frame
6 months to 12 months
Title
Implementation Climate Scale
Description
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies. This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
Time Frame
12 months to 24 months
Title
Change in therapist self-assessment
Description
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Therapist Self-Assessment will allow for DBT therapists to provide subjective appraisals of their own level of comfort and confidence in applying the treatment. It also assesses the need for additional supervision from the study supervisor, consultant, and/or peer. Scores range from 1 to 7 on a Likert scale and high scores indicate high therapist level of comfort in implementing the treatment.
Time Frame
Every month for two years through study completion, an average 24 months.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
English-speaking
Age 13 years, 0 months to 19 years, 11 months
Meet diagnostic criteria for BD by KSADS-PL
Engaged in, or willing to proceed with, a pharmacotherapy regimen
At least one parent/guardian with whom the patient lives or regularly interacts (>5 hours per week) is willing to participate in skills training
Able and willing to give informed consent/assent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence of mental retardation, moderate to severe pervasive developmental disorder, or organic central nervous system disorder by the K-SADS-PL, parent report, medical history, or school records
A life-threatening medical condition requiring immediate treatment
Current victim of sexual or physical abuse.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin I Goldstein, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Sunnybrook Research Insitute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N3M5
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Dissemination and Implementation Field Trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs